Thread Starter
Printable View
Thread Starter
After Loki PK suggested the idea in the Backpage thread, I took a look at the Cincinnati forum to see what this Rant and Raves thread was that he was talking about. Basically a member created a thread in their forum dedicated to allowing people to sound off on anything and everything. I don't necessarily think we need a special place to tear people down and argue. I have a feeling if that's what this turns into the admins are still going to hand out the requisite smack downs and perhaps even kill the thread. That being said it would be nice to have a place to talk about items not directly related to finding pussy without jamming up the threads that are there for specifically that purpose. So here we go.
[QUOTE=Rdavis1972;1801168]. That being said it would be nice to have a place to talk about items not directly related to finding pussy without jamming up the threads that are there for specifically that purpose. So here we go.[/QUOTE]Right On!
'So, did ya ever notice". The number of used condoms or wrappers in the basket on your way out of an appointment? I noticed today, more than I care to admit I counted! Thats fucked up! Just sayin.
Peace.
PK
How fucking awesome is this? I will now become a much more active member. Love it!
Speaking of condoms, I once saw a young girl that emptied purse on bed, and about 87 rubbers came out. All different brand, sizes, colors, and flavors!
Not at all for me but to each his own I guess. Dude that's some wicked shit! Enjoy and let the good times roll. Like a snowball headed down hill!
Quail. Your shit amazes me!
L10.
BTW. Love the new R & R forum thread!
[QUOTE=Loki Pk; 1801273]Right On!
'So, did ya ever notice". The number of used condoms or wrappers in the basket on your way out of an appointment? I noticed today, more than I care to admit I counted! Thats fucked up! Just sayin.
Peace.
PK[/QUOTE]And worse the amount of condoms, was size of the one hanging over the side. I thought it was pantyhose. Damn! I'm so white.
[blue]this is how the octagon works in cincy. in this thread [b]and only this thread[/b] i'll relax some of the rules regarding argumentative behavior. you can't out somebody, you can't, as always, post about **** stuff, you can't threaten people, what you can do is call somebody a douchebag or asshole and i'll let it go. hell i'll even let the girls speak freely in here if you want.
the price for a thread like that is you can't do [b]any[/b] of that stuff in the review threads anymore. none, nada, zip. no complaining about what people post, no calling guys liars, no white knighting, all that stuff would happen here.
talk among yourselves, if you just want this to be a place you can sound off about shit that pisses you off while retaining the "no calling other members out" sort of rules, that's fine with me as well. if you do choose to make this a free fire zone then i will moderate all the other review threads with a much heavier hand.
a2[/blue]
I have a few questions. Normally I would ask via PM. But for the benefit of ALL forum members I shall do so here.
1. What if somebody posts in the General thread, a totally inaccurate or off the wall statement about a provider or a situation. Do we respond here? Or simply say 'lets move this discussion to R&R' and take it up here?
What would be an acceptable way to 'jump' the topic to this thread?
2. Regarding responses to posts in the other threads, how far can we go, or what is allowed, regarding bad information. That is to say, there is a difference in calling or inferring somebody is a douche as opposed to saying 'no that is incorrect'. Opinion vs. Facts.
3."Talk among yourselves, if you just want this to be a place you can sound off about shit that pisses you off while retaining the "no calling other members out" sort of rules, that's fine with me as well. If you do choose to make this a free fire zone then I will moderate all the other review threads with a much heavier hand." ----.how do we make that choice? a Poll? Or short probationary period untill we work through the details?
Finally, as you know I am TRYING to stay on Jacksons good side and not piss you guys off ;) so with that in mind, where do we draw the line between intelligent reponse with solid info and being overly abrasive?
Thanks.
Peace.
PK
[blue]Why do you feel the need to "correct" other peoples "bad" information. This is a crowd sourced model. 10 guys say,"everything covered," 1 guy says "she gave me BB Anal." What do you think happened? Guys that come on here that are douchebags and post bad information should be [b]ignored[/b] Not [b]engaged[/b]. Engaging a troll is giving them EXACTLY what they are looking for. What they hate is to be ignored. Each and every time you pound your keyboard it's like you are jerking them off. Click their name and put them on your ignore list and you will never see them again. If somebody is STUPID enough to read one report and make a decision based on that, well that's a painful lesson we all had to learn.
If you just HAVE to give them the BBBJ they are so desperately looking for by engaging them then click on "Reply With Quote" then when the dialog box comes up copy everything INCLUDING the Quote=XXXX; 12345678 then back out, come here, and start with a new post and copy that in. I haven't checked that but it should work. Of course it probably won't result in the argument that you are looking for (I'm being nice but truth is truth) because they won't know to check here for your cutting remarks.
As far as what this thread should be, I'm checking it, as guys express their wishes I'll figure it out.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Loki Pk; 1802177]I have a few questions. Normally I would ask via PM. But for the benefit of ALL forum members I shall do so here.
1. What if somebody posts in the General thread, a totally inaccurate or off the wall statement about a provider or a situation. Do we respond here? Or simply say 'lets move this discussion to R&R' and take it up here?
What would be an acceptable way to 'jump' the topic to this thread?
2. Regarding responses to posts in the other threads, how far can we go, or what is allowed, regarding bad information. That is to say, there is a difference in calling or inferring somebody is a douche as opposed to saying 'no that is incorrect'. Opinion vs. Facts.
3."Talk among yourselves, if you just want this to be a place you can sound off about shit that pisses you off while retaining the "no calling other members out" sort of rules, that's fine with me as well. If you do choose to make this a free fire zone then I will moderate all the other review threads with a much heavier hand.". How do we make that choice? A Poll? Or short probationary period untill we work through the details?
Finally, as you know I am TRYING to stay on Jacksons good side and not piss you guys off. So with that in mind, where do we draw the line between intelligent reponse with solid info and being overly abrasive?
Thanks.
Peace.
PK[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Admin2; 1802595][blue]Why do you feel the need to "correct" other peoples "bad" information. This is a crowd sourced model. 10 guys say,"everything covered," 1 guy says "she gave me BB Anal." What do you think happened? Guys that come on here that are douchebags and post bad information should be [b]ignored[/b] Not [b]engaged[/b]. Engaging a troll is giving them EXACTLY what they are looking for. What they hate is to be ignored. Each and every time you pound your keyboard it's like you are jerking them off. Click their name and put them on your ignore list and you will never see them again. If somebody is STUPID enough to read one report and make a decision based on that, well that's a painful lesson we all had to learn.
If you just HAVE to give them the BBBJ they are so desperately looking for by engaging them then click on "Reply With Quote" then when the dialog box comes up copy everything INCLUDING the Quote=XXXX; 12345678 then back out, come here, and start with a new post and copy that in. I haven't checked that but it should work. Of course it probably won't result in the argument that you are looking for (I'm being nice but truth is truth) because they won't know to check here for your cutting remarks.
As far as what this thread should be, I'm checking it, as guys express their wishes I'll figure it out.
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]The only reason I (not speaking for others) feel the need to engage certain individuals is to protect MY sources of outlet. If some douchebag trashes a decent provider that I see, or others here see and know, it effects their business. Which, in turn, effects my ability to see them. Over the years I have seen many issues arise with or about a girl that then turns into a big shit storm and eventually she leaves the business or our area. Now, I have to go and find a relaible provider to replace her. Not as easy to do in upstate NY as other places. Such as BA.
Also, since it is a crowdsourced forum there should be a balance between input and critical review of that input. Without that degree of scrutiny anybody can say anything they want and it may be taken as true or accurate. This means anyone with a vendetta or an axe to grind could come to the forum and throw wild accusations around and ruin a girl's reputation as a good provider. When the other 'tenured' or senior members step up and say ' no thats not true, or has NEVER been my experience', the ability to form your own opinon on who to see is enhanced.
I'm no white knight, but I feel a degree of critcal review or banter is necessary for good, lively discussion. That doesn't mean we get to slam each and every statement by every poster. But it does allow for more information to be revealed over the course of the discussion. Just recently it went down like that regarding a girl in Troy named Ryan. Everyone had seen her posts, yet nobody ever reported seeing her. I busted a newb's balls over asking for her info in his first and only post. 2 days and 15 posts later somebody came forward and reported he HAD seen her and she WAS reliable and worth seeing. If that didn't fly that way, we never would have known about her.
Look at it from a member standpoint. How many members were posting here in 2007? In 2010? In the last 12 months the traffic and new members has more than tripled! I know you have been her longer than me, but I have been here in the Albany forum since 2003/2004 and I lasted through some dark days. Back when it was me and maybe 3 others posting and even then it may have been only once or twice a month. Over the last 9-10 years we have developed a strong community and are getting more and more good information. Much more so in the recent years. That is a good thing, isn't it? Point is, DRAMA sells. People don't come back for boring, robotic, slow interaction. Guys come back to read exciting reports and grab good information, so they can live vicariously. So they can learn how the vets do it, so they can do it to. Learning what NOT to do is just as important as what TO do. By calling bullshit when I see it, I feel it can benefit everybody so we can be safe and have a good time. Unfortunately, every now and then the trolls turn up and shit in the bathwater. That sucks, but can have some entertainment value as well. It is MORE than obvious that I enjoy conflict and spirited debate, I can't deny that. But I try to present an intelligent and fair response. I don't call people names(usually ;) ) and engage in personal attacks, I typically only question motives and facts and if I am proven wrong I say 'I'm wrong' and apologize.
Sorry for the long response, but you asked. While I'm on it, a perfect example of a post I would normally go after is this "Alison I see her every day."
My normal response would be " Gee thanks for that!" " Now could you tell us 'when' or 'how' you see her and what she charges? And what her service and appearance is like since she jumped from SW to BP beauty?"
Why would I do that? Because I used to see her for 30-70 a pop and now she is on BP for 150-200. I am genuinely interested in more info on her, now it has been going on 2- 3 days and that is going to 'die in committee'. So I believe a certain amount of banter helps drive traffic and interest in the forums. I'm not saying let the trolls have at it. I'm just sayin sometimes its not a bad thing to 'let the boys be boys'. ;)
Have a great fucking week everybody! I may be out of communication for a few days so wishing why'all a happy 4th of July.
Peace.
PK
[QUOTE=Loki Pk;1802979]The only reason I (not speaking for others) feel the need to engage certain individuals is to protect MY sources of outlet. If some douchebag trashes a decent provider that I see, or others here see and know, it effects their business. Which, in turn, effects my ability to see them. Over the years I have seen many issues arise with or about a girl that then turns into a big shit storm and eventually she leaves the business or our area. Now, I have to go and find a relaible provider to replace her. Not as easy to do in upstate NY as other places. Such as BA.[/QUOTE][blue]Good point I hadn't thought about that. Living in a place where the hobby is legal does tend to make one blind to the problems of the brothers elsewhere. [/blue]
[QUOTE=Loki Pk; 1802979]Also, since it is a crowdsourced forum there should be a balance between input and critical review of that input. Without that degree of scrutiny anybody can say anything they want and it may be taken as true or accurate. This means anyone with a vendetta or an axe to grind could come to the forum and throw wild accusations around and ruin a girl's reputation as a good provider. When the other 'tenured' or senior members step up and say ' no thats not true, or has NEVER been my experience', the ability to form your own opinon on who to see is enhanced.
I'm no white knight, but I feel a degree of critcal review or banter is necessary for good, lively discussion. That doesn't mean we get to slam each and every statement by every poster. But it does allow for more information to be revealed over the course of the discussion.[/QUOTE][blue]Exactly, A2 has never and will never throw a flag for critical review or good, lively discussion. You don't even need a "Rants and Raves" section for that. Flags start flying at the "What they hell are you saying" or "you're a fucking liar" point. It's like Jax says in the FAQ "It's hard to define but I know it when I see it."[/blue]
[QUOTE=Loki Pk;1802979]Look at it from a member standpoint. How many members were posting here in 2007? In 2010? In the last 12 months the traffic and new members has more than tripled! I know you have been her longer than me, but I have been here in the Albany forum since 2003/2004 and I lasted through some dark days. Back when it was me and maybe 3 others posting and even then it may have been only once or twice a month.[/QUOTE][blue]We thank all of you for keeping this forum alive then. [/blue]
[QUOTE=Loki Pk;1802979]Have a great fucking week everybody! Wishing y'all a happy 4th of July.[/QUOTE][blue]Our sentiments from here at USASG as well,
A2[/blue]
The things some of you like and perform with all willing providers, such as lfk / dfk, DATY, BBBJ, greek, etc. BLOWS MY MIND. I can't get beyond the VERY REAL std risk of this hobby. Providers have ZERO incentive to tell us if they have an std. (And vice-versa, so these girls who have no rules are always at risk to become a "sexual zombie" from a random john and then spread it to us regular johns.)
I wish I could delude myself to enjoy DATY / dfk, but I long ago gave those activities except for the very rare provider. I just can never get beyond that what-the-fuck-did-I-just-do feeling afterwards if I play it risky.
[blue]You guys are about to find out why we have rules prohibiting discussing this issue. I let this post go because it's in R&R's.
Flame on,
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=Spitz; 1803181]The things some of you like and perform with all willing providers, such as lfk / dfk, DATY, BBBJ, greek, etc. BLOWS MY MIND. I can't get beyond the VERY REAL std risk of this hobby. Providers have ZERO incentive to tell us if they have an std. (And vice-versa, so these girls who have no rules are always at risk to become a "sexual zombie" from a random john and then spread it to us regular johns.)
I wish I could delude myself to enjoy DATY / dfk, but I long ago gave those activities except for the very rare provider. I just can never get beyond that what-the-fuck-did-I-just-do feeling afterwards if I play it risky.
[blue]You guys are about to find out why we have rules prohibiting discussing this issue. I let this post go because it's in R&R's.
Flame on,
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]I agree with everything you said, except the preaching part. It's not for me, but to each their own. I just hope I never have a condom blowout. If that happens you're right I the mix with all the risk takers. It's a risky business, we should all know that by now.
Are fucking up my PayDar!
After decades of NYC hunting, my eye is nigh-hawk trained to hone in on the slow-moving, the loitering, the poor, the huddles masses. You get the point.
So now, there's all these pseudo-loitering "figures" messing with my echo-location pings (to flagrantly mix my wildlife metaphor)!
Luckily, I've not yet been arrested for jerking off on on of 'them!
[QUOTE=Spitz; 1803181]The things some of you like and perform with all willing providers, such as lfk / dfk, DATY, BBBJ, greek, etc. BLOWS MY MIND. I can't get beyond the VERY REAL std risk of this hobby. Providers have ZERO incentive to tell us if they have an std. (And vice-versa, so these girls who have no rules are always at risk to become a "sexual zombie" from a random john and then spread it to us regular johns.)
I wish I could delude myself to enjoy DATY / dfk, but I long ago gave those activities except for the very rare provider. I just can never get beyond that what-the-fuck-did-I-just-do feeling afterwards if I play it risky[/QUOTE]Been Away on vacation so I have been out of the loop.
I am not attacking your position. Merely stating my own opinion and that of some others, I'm sure.
Risk? Yes of course there is risk associated with each and every one of those activities. The only thing is, you risk that each and every day with a girl you pick up in a bar or at the beach or at school. Seriously, you play Russian roulette with anyone you have relations with unless you are in a REAL monogamous relationship. You may be, but is your S. O. ? How do you know she isn't blowing her favorite bartender BB? We all HOPE thats not the case, but can you REALLY be sure?
I find that kissing is very much not a 'high' level activity regarding disease, but DATY certainly can be. But for me I never dine the first time. I usually see a girl 2-3 times before I stick my tongue in for a taste. I have never contracted an STD in the years I have been active in this hobby. I consider myself quite lucky to be sure. But BBBJ? Unless she has open sores in her mouth or on her lips the risk of transmission to you / me is as low as kissing. Much more risky for her if you are infected and pop in her mouth. But the F to M risk is relatively low.
As for BBFS or BB Greek? No way! I find that to be a serious risk that I would never take. Especially the Anal. Too mush risk of blood exposure and that is just insane. But to each his own. If I discover a girl I see has been BBFS or BB anal, chances are I won't see her for any service. Which puts the whole idea of transparency in jeopardy. If a girl knows she will lose biz she has more incentive NOT to tell.
So risk is a relative term to each individual. You could be at risk if a girl is blowing you and tongues your balls and shaft below the cover. So how does that cover help you sleep at night when you look at the dirty details of service. The best way to stay that safe is to find another hobby. OR learn to internalize the guilt, shame and worry associated with these activites. AND see trusted providers instead of traveling BP beauties. Also, develop a good relationship with your Doctor and get checked often.
Like the NYS lottery,"HEY, you never know!"
Peace.
PK
So we had this review posted for Nuru Goddess Dominique earlier this afternoon.
Originally Posted by TableToy [View Original Post]
[url]http://albany.backpage.com/BodyRubs/.ont-25/8303335[/url]
Called early set up appointment for noon. She said call when you get close,
I called at 11:50 no answer and message box was full. Tried about 15 times.
And gave up. I did read of this happening another a while back. A waste of gas and time.
I thought it was a bit odd and so did some others as Dom's service has been nothing short of spectacular. I'm not a guy that normally goes back for seconds, I like variety but I have seen Dom more times than I can count, which is not enough. I saw her today at 4:00 and asked her if she had missed an appointment at noon today, I did not tell her about the bad review. Dom told me that someone had called for a noon appointment but they didn't have or would not provide references. She no longer sees new clients that don't have references. She had no reason to defend herself as I had not mentioned the review at that time.
So I can only guess that the bad review is sour grapes for not being seen. I have seen it before and I'm sure I will see it again. The reason I believe Dom's side of the story is because of how well I know her and how much I trust her. She has become a friend that I look forward to seeing for reasons other than the Nuru activities. The other reason I believe Dom is the review itself. 15 times dude? Really? No one tries 15 times before they give up. 5 maybe, not 15.
Sorry, got to raise the BS flag on this one.
Gentlemen, it is VITAL that the integrity of these reviews be maintained. Using the reviews as retaliation when a provider won't see you or won't do what you want them to do ruins that integrity. The BS from a lot of the providers is bad enough, let's take the high road on our end.
[QUOTE=TableToy; 1811590]Based on the fact that several providers read our comments, in particular in the Massage Parlor Reports.
Perhaps at least in that area we should refrain from any specifics of a good nature, and just.
Give a rating of C, B, B+, A, A+. I saw a report where 1 girl "Judy" was given outstanding.
Reviews and a lot of description. Well she changed her name and service stopped.
On the other hand far more beneficial would be negative reviews so we can save our money and.
Maybe even encourage better service. As always YMMV but at least we'd know the.
Rip offs and wouldn't jeopardize the good spots. Just an idea.[/QUOTE]On the surface this sounds like a great idea, it would address the concern that you bring up. That being said, if all you give is a letter grade with no detail, all that tells us is that [b]you[/b] Had a certain level of good time with a provider. You may have an experience that you consider an A+ because the provider happened to offer exactly what you were looking for. Somebody else may have the exact same experience with this provider and only consider it a D- because she didn't offer what he was looking for. Does this D- mean this is a bad provider? Of course not. It just means that we all have different likes and dislikes. We're not here just to avoid getting ripped off, another big part of this is to find a good provider that offers what we're looking for. Read back through the threads. What is the most commonly asked follow up question to reports? What is on the menu (or some variation). Without session detail this forum turns into just a complaint board where people come to complain about bad sessions, because basically all you've got to say is a detailed complaint about a bad session, or a vague letter grade for a good one that tells nothing about that session.
Good to see we are finally making coming sense out of something that is very easy to figure out. We should never be going against fellow board members just respect their opinion and use what suits us. I used to want to post commentary and always did but that put me on the defensive and alienated me with a lot of board members. I sit back and let people express themselves because after all its their opinion and they are entitled to it. I may not always agree but I know people have the same thoughts likes and dislikes etc also. My methods are unique because they work for me and I don't expect people to follow what I do. I hit fellow board members via PM so that they have a one one chance to answer my critiques if they choose to.
[QUOTE=Msanders; 1811781]So we had this review posted for Nuru Goddess Dominique earlier this afternoon.
Originally Posted by TableToy [View Original Post]
[url]http://albany.backpage.com/BodyRubs/.ont-25/8303335[/url]
Called early set up appointment for noon. She said call when you get close,
I called at 11:50 no answer and message box was full. Tried about 15 times.
And gave up. I did read of this happening another a while back. A waste of gas and time.
I thought it was a bit odd and so did some others as Dom's service has been nothing short of spectacular. I'm not a guy that normally goes back for seconds, I like variety but I have seen Dom more times than I can count, which is not enough. I saw her today at 4:00 and asked her if she had missed an appointment at noon today, I did not tell her about the bad review. Dom told me that someone had called for a noon appointment but they didn't have or would not provide references. She no longer sees new clients that don't have references. She had no reason to defend herself as I had not mentioned the review at that time.
So I can only guess that the bad review is sour grapes for not being seen. I have seen it before and I'm sure I will see it again. The reason I believe Dom's side of the story is because of how well I know her and how much I trust her. She has become a friend that I look forward to seeing for reasons other than the Nuru activities. The other reason I believe Dom is the review itself. 15 times dude? Really? No one tries 15 times before they give up. 5 maybe, not 15.
Sorry, got to raise the BS flag on this one.
Gentlemen, it is VITAL that the integrity of these reviews be maintained. Using the reviews as retaliation when a provider won't see you or won't do what you want them to do ruins that integrity. The BS from a lot of the providers is bad enough, let's take the high road on our end.[/QUOTE]I agree with you 100000% reviews should NEVER be used for retribution. If it didn't work out or you had no chemistry there are decent ways to say that. Writing a Bullshit review is not one of them!
[QUOTE=Rdavis1972;1812387]On the surface this sounds like a great idea, it would address the concern that you bring up. That being said, if all you give is a letter grade with no detail, all that tells us is that [b]you[/b] Had a certain level of good time with a provider. You may have an experience that you consider an A+ because the provider happened to offer exactly what you were looking for. Somebody else may have the exact same experience with this provider and only consider it a D- because she didn't offer what he was looking for. Does this D- mean this is a bad provider? Of course not. It just means that we all have different likes and dislikes. We're not here just to avoid getting ripped off, another big part of this is to find a good provider that offers what we're looking for. Read back through the threads. What is the most commonly asked follow up question to reports? What is on the menu (or some variation). Without session detail this forum turns into just a complaint board where people come to complain about bad sessions, because basically all you've got to say is a detailed complaint about a bad session, or a vague letter grade for a good one that tells nothing about that session.[/QUOTE]Again, I agree completely. Who is to say that one man's 'D' isn't another man's 'A+++'? Writing descriptive reviews and detailed accounts of the session gives guys the BEST information to make better decisions! Some fucktards will never understand no matter how many times or ways you try to lay it out for them. Their motives and lack of good 'mongering' sense shows through every time.
Just because one or two girls drop off the radar because they don't like being reviewed is no reason (not a good one, IMHO) to stop providing fellow hobbyists with reliable info. It could save any one of us a great deal of time and aggro simply by stating she is not a GFE or does NOT do BBBJ. For every one that drops out 10 more take her place. Then it is the review system or community that helps keep the ball rolling.
Sorry if some of my posts seem out of context but Tabletoy is on my admin-blocked list so I don't see those posts. Only if somebody quotes will I see that info. Which is probably best for all involved, 'cause y'all know how I am! And I'm not going to change anytime soon! In the lyrics of Sammy Davis jr " I gotta be ME, I just gotta be ME!"
Peace.
PK
Rdavis1972 wrote. On the surface this sounds like a great idea, it would address the concern that you bring up. That being said, if all you give is a letter grade with no detail, all that tells us is that you Had a certain level of good time with a provider. You may have an experience that you consider an A+ because the provider happened to offer exactly what you were looking for. Somebody else may have the exact same experience with this provider and only consider it a D- because she didn't offer what he was looking for. Does this D- mean this is a bad provider? Of course not. It just means that we all have different likes and dislikes. We're not here just to avoid getting ripped off, another big part of this is to find a good provider that offers what we're looking for. Read back through the threads. What is the most commonly asked follow up question to reports? What is on the menu (or some variation). Without session detail this forum turns into just a complaint board where people come to complain about bad sessions, because basically all you've got to say is a detailed complaint about a bad session, or a vague letter grade for a good one that tells nothing about that session.
Point well taken. I guess that ratings wouldn't provide the info needed. It did sound good on the surface though.
[QUOTE=GTrac;1812486]Good to see we are finally making coming sense out of something that is very easy to figure out. We should never be going against fellow board members just respect their opinion and use what suits us. I used to want to post commentary and always did but that put me on the defensive and alienated me with a lot of board members. I sit back and let people express themselves because after all its their opinion and they are entitled to it. I may not always agree but I know people have the same thoughts likes and dislikes etc also. My methods are unique because they work for me and I don't expect people to follow what I do. I hit fellow board members via PM so that they have a one one chance to answer my critiques if they choose to.[/QUOTE]I understand the desire to let sleeping dogs lie. BUT, I think that there are times and situations that call for 'discussion'. We are not talking about whether or not one member likes CBJ and another likes BBBJ. We often are discussing 'good ettiquette' or proper tcb skills. Some guys come on the board, shit in the cereal bowl and are never heard from again. Those of us who have been around the block a few times (I know you have been here a long time under a similar handle) don't always take well to 'bad information' or purposeful misleading of newbies. Or Vindictive bullshit posts with an agenda.
I get that you seem to dislike or disagree with the drama associated with these forums. Thats fine. And I don't want to be offensive to other members. But to each his own bro. Just like YMMV with providers, so too does the 'online experience'. If you don't like the banter and the playful ribbing, don't engage. For what its worth, it's not like you are here for the 'Albany market info' it appears you primarily monger in the downstate area-so if you don't like the scene, why participate?
Peace.
PK
[QUOTE=Msanders; 1811781]So we had this review posted for Nuru Goddess Dominique earlier this afternoon.
Originally Posted by TableToy [View Original Post]
[url]http://albany.backpage.com/BodyRubs/.ont-25/8303335[/url]
Called early set up appointment for noon. She said call when you get close,
I called at 11:50 no answer and message box was full. Tried about 15 times.
And gave up. I did read of this happening another a while back. A waste of gas and time.
I thought it was a bit odd and so did some others as Dom's service has been nothing short of spectacular. I'm not a guy that normally goes back for seconds, I like variety but I have seen Dom more times than I can count, which is not enough. I saw her today at 4:00 and asked her if she had missed an appointment at noon today, I did not tell her about the bad review. Dom told me that someone had called for a noon appointment but they didn't have or would not provide references. She no longer sees new clients that don't have references. She had no reason to defend herself as I had not mentioned the review at that time.
So I can only guess that the bad review is sour grapes for not being seen. I have seen it before and I'm sure I will see it again. The reason I believe Dom's side of the story is because of how well I know her and how much I trust her. She has become a friend that I look forward to seeing for reasons other than the Nuru activities. The other reason I believe Dom is the review itself. 15 times dude? Really? No one tries 15 times before they give up. 5 maybe, not 15.
Sorry, got to raise the BS flag on this one.
Gentlemen, it is VITAL that the integrity of these reviews be maintained. Using the reviews as retaliation when a provider won't see you or won't do what you want them to do ruins that integrity. The BS from a lot of the providers is bad enough, let's take the high road on our end.[/QUOTE]I did call 15 times since I really wanted the NURU and she had great reviews. She agreed to the appointment and never asked once for any reference at all just a first name. It's very disappointing, fortunately I was able to get into the CP massage and had a wonderful time though not NURU. I may try Dom. Again 1 more time and explain what she said happened. If what she said is true, then why didn't she answer the phone at noon and ask for references?
[QUOTE=Hobbyist10; 1812648]Rdavis1972 wrote. On the surface this sounds like a great idea, it would address the concern that you bring up. That being said, if all you give is a letter grade with no detail, all that tells us is that you Had a certain level of good time with a provider. You may have an experience that you consider an A+ because the provider happened to offer exactly what you were looking for. Somebody else may have the exact same experience with this provider and only consider it a D- because she didn't offer what he was looking for. Does this D- mean this is a bad provider? Of course not. It just means that we all have different likes and dislikes. We're not here just to avoid getting ripped off, another big part of this is to find a good provider that offers what we're looking for. Read back through the threads. What is the most commonly asked follow up question to reports? What is on the menu (or some variation). Without session detail this forum turns into just a complaint board where people come to complain about bad sessions, because basically all you've got to say is a detailed complaint about a bad session, or a vague letter grade for a good one that tells nothing about that session.
Point well taken. I guess that ratings wouldn't provide the info needed. It did sound good on the surface though.[/QUOTE]I think it's easy enough for members to understand a simple system. FS or BJ gets between A- to A+, Nude or topless B- to B+, great HJ B- to B+, if no HJ just say it's a legit place, if it's a lackluster HJ then give it a C what I'm saying is that a lot of these places try and stay off the radar, and when a lot of detailed reviews show up they tend to pull back on service or change girls. A sample review might be something like, went to Schenectady Spa was pleasantly surprised by clean place, lockable doors, good looking masseuse that enjoyed her work. Massage was very thorough and overall service was a B+.
A few of you self absorbed writers say my comments on Dominique were only for retaliation. That's total B. S. I merely reported a fact, I'd really like to get a NURU from this provider. She asked for no references as I said and then after I drove to the designated spot some 30 minutes away she didn't answer the phone. I did not make any of this up because of a bad experience with Dom. Just couldn't complete the appointment because of her end. If you know of any better way to get an actual meet up please elaborate.
[QUOTE=TableToy;1813187]I think it's easy enough for members to understand a simple system. FS or BJ gets between A- to A+, Nude or topless B- to B+, great HJ B- to B+, if no HJ just say it's a legit place, if it's a lackluster HJ then give it a C what I'm saying is that a lot of these places try and stay off the radar, and when a lot of detailed reviews show up they tend to pull back on service or change girls. A sample review might be something like, went to Schenectady Spa was pleasantly surprised by clean place, lockable doors, good looking masseuse that enjoyed her work. Massage was very thorough and overall service was a B+.[/QUOTE]Using a rating system that implies quality will be extraordinarily confusing if you mean it simply as a code.
[QUOTE=TableToy;1813187]I think it's easy enough for members to understand a simple system. FS or BJ gets between A- to A+, Nude or topless B- to B+, great HJ B- to B+, if no HJ just say it's a legit place, if it's a lackluster HJ then give it a C what I'm saying is that a lot of these places try and stay off the radar, and when a lot of detailed reviews show up they tend to pull back on service or change girls. A sample review might be something like, went to Schenectady Spa was pleasantly surprised by clean place, lockable doors, good looking masseuse that enjoyed her work. Massage was very thorough and overall service was a B+.[/QUOTE]The problem with a system like this is that in order for it to mean anything to anybody, they need to know how to decode the rating. If everybody knows the code, what's the point? It's just another unnecessary layer of confusion.
[QUOTE=TableToy;1813187]I think it's easy enough for members to understand a simple system. FS or BJ gets between A- to A+, Nude or topless B- to B+, great HJ B- to B+, if no HJ just say it's a legit place, if it's a lackluster HJ then give it a C what I'm saying is that a lot of these places try and stay off the radar, and when a lot of detailed reviews show up they tend to pull back on service or change girls. A sample review might be something like, went to Schenectady Spa was pleasantly surprised by clean place, lockable doors, good looking masseuse that enjoyed her work. Massage was very thorough and overall service was a B+.[/QUOTE]Why? What purpose would this serve? All of your ratings are at best subjective. Lets just stick to giving a girl a review with an explanation of why you are saying the things you are about her. I for one will not participate in an unnecessary layer of ratings. It's kinda like the "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" deal. I have had some pretty good pussy from girls who never got undressed. They just pulled up their skirt and I plowed away.
This suggestion kinda reminds me of the bureaucracy that epitomizes all of our state programs and employees. Notice I refrained from using the term "state worker" as this is a fictitious oxy-moron.
Just write your review and justify it with details.
L10
[QUOTE=TableToy;1813403]A few of you self absorbed writers say my comments on Dominique were only for retaliation. That's total B. S. I merely reported a fact, I'd really like to get a NURU from this provider. She asked for no references as I said and then after I drove to the designated spot some 30 minutes away she didn't answer the phone. I did not make any of this up because of a bad experience with Dom. Just couldn't complete the appointment because of her end. If you know of any better way to get an actual meet up please elaborate.[/QUOTE]Self absorbed? Go f%k yourself. I heard your side of the story and I heard Dom's side. I believe her side. The way I presented it to her she had no reason to defend herself whatsoever. No one else here has had the "problem" you had so your "problem" lacks credibility. The fact that you have been blocked by several members of this board, add me to that list, also costs you credibility.
Have a nice life.
[QUOTE=Rdavis1972;1813848]The problem with a system like this is that in order for it to mean anything to anybody, they need to know how to decode the rating. If everybody knows the code, what's the point? It's just another unnecessary layer of confusion.[/QUOTE]I only suggest some system and only relating to massage places, that protects the girls from specifics that could cause management to remove them, thus in the long run hurting ourselves. This apparently happened at the spa on Central Ave, where Judy was giving "great" service but after a detailed review it stopped. I refer anyone interested to the type of reviews at Spahunters as an example [url]http://www.spahunters.com/spa/8807/Good-Life-Spa?rtn=[/url]%2Fspas%2FNew-York%2Fother%2F%3Fstatus%3D%26sort%3DREVIEWED%26page%3D1
To add my depreciated sixpence on the issues recently discussed:
A letter-grade-rating system is good in theory, but will be awful in practice. I get the idea. If we advertise a provider is doing extras in a place where maybe she doesn't want that known, right, we could jeopardize a good thing. I have a perfect solution for that: DON'T REVIEW HER THEN. Yes, mongers will lose out, but at least the original poster will have kept his good thing going. Nothing wrong with being selfish every now-and-then. If the provider feels she wants more clients because she does extra activities, then she has to get the word out. No way around it. I have debated this too, and so if I feel my review will jeopardize a good thing, I just don't give every darn DDarkness-mandated detail.
As for fellow mongers getting on Table Toy's case, I don't get it. He didn't actually give the provider a bad review. He simply said she was a no-show / no-answer. Any monger who has been in the hobby long enough has experienced the extreme frustration when this happens. It sucks. It's a total loss. Time, gas, opportunity cost, and still no pussy. Back to square one or give up for the night. I don't review every provider who does a no-show, because I get it, shit happens. There are infinite reasons why a provider will do this: kid issues, SO issues, handler issues, over-booking, etc. Escorts aren't known to be paragons of accountability. To castigate Table Toy because he called out the provider for bad TCB skills isn't fair to the forum. That's info we need. And if asked directly, of course a provider will justify any of her actions. After all, we're not paying cash to fuck Mother Theresa.
[QUOTE=Spitz; 1818360]As for fellow mongers getting on Table Toy's case, I don't get it. /QUOTE]I believe it wasn't so much this post, but his prior post (in which he essentially called another member a liar) , that lent itself to lingering ill-will.
Here's a portion of that post (of note. What Mr Mojo reported was very similar to services others have reported as well) :
[quote]04-18-13 19:03.
Albany-Schenectady-Troy: Massage Parlor Reports.
TableToy.
I think this is embellished?
No name of attendant? Is Mr MoJo that "Studley" that he gets services no one else reports? I think perhaps a fantasy has been reported here.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Spitz; 1818360]To add my depreciated sixpence on the issues recently discussed:
A letter-grade-rating system is good in theory, but will be awful in practice. I get the idea. If we advertise a provider is doing extras in a place where maybe she doesn't want that known, right, we could jeopardize a good thing. I have a perfect solution for that: DON'T REVIEW HER THEN. Yes, mongers will lose out, but at least the original poster will have kept his good thing going. Nothing wrong with being selfish every now-and-then. If the provider feels she wants more clients because she does extra activities, then she has to get the word out. No way around it. I have debated this too, and so if I feel my review will jeopardize a good thing, I just don't give every darn DDarkness-mandated detail.
As for fellow mongers getting on Table Toy's case, I don't get it. He didn't actually give the provider a bad review. He simply said she was a no-show / no-answer. Any monger who has been in the hobby long enough has experienced the extreme frustration when this happens. It sucks. It's a total loss. Time, gas, opportunity cost, and still no pussy. Back to square one or give up for the night. I don't review every provider who does a no-show, because I get it, shit happens. There are infinite reasons why a provider will do this: kid issues, SO issues, handler issues, over-booking, etc. Escorts aren't known to be paragons of accountability. To castigate Table Toy because he called out the provider for bad TCB skills isn't fair to the forum. That's info we need. And if asked directly, of course a provider will justify any of her actions. After all, we're not paying cash to fuck Mother Theresa.[/QUOTE]First- DDarkness is a MOD in a different forum. Try to keep them straight, not everybody is fully aware of that reference.
Second- in that forum certain things are required for premium access. If you don't like the rules, don't play. Those same set of rules don't apply here or in the 10 other forums some of us use as well.
Third- a letter grade is just not a workable system in this type of situation. YMMV far too much from provider to provider or even the same one day to day. Not everybody has the same needs or fantasies. If you only like to jerk off in front of a girl, how does your A+ rating help the guy who digs FS or BBBJ or greek or any other kink or fetish? It just doesn't fly.
THUS the NEED for good reports and some quality of detail. These forums are to HELP OTHER MONGERS! How can you help if you say ' good massage plus extras'. 'or 'I left happy'. Guys need to understand that the powers that be KNOW what goes on. They know WHERE it goes on. And they don't NEED THESE BOARDS to figure it out. So please, guys, don't get all "afraid it will stop happening' cause you wrote a report about it.
Some chick didn't get fired because some dude reported she was giving extra service. She got fired because she GOT CAUGHT! Let us not be too over the top when it comes to stuff like this.
Write the report you want to write! Don't let anyone change the way you do what you do. Spitzer-you have gone to the mat several times on eccie because of not meeting PA requirements-and have said you don't want or need PA- totally cool bro. That is your choice, nobody should bust your balls about it.
BUT, some guys are going to want or ask for more detail, to better decide if they want to see a girl or not. Our money is hard earned we wish tos spend wisely, no more or less. If you want to help, cool. If not, then don't.
As for the 'other' members review or no-show report, that is his right to speak. It's a free country. Other members disagreed with his assessment of that girl because of their own experience with her. In a crowdsourced forum, you need to read and make your own choices from the 'volume' of information provided. I think others were more offended by the nature of the report and the 'history' or lack there of, of that particular member. People are more apt to believe a senior member with lots of 'solid' reports, as opposed to a new member with mostly argumentative posts and few comprehensive reports with usable info.
Just my 2. 5cents (adjusted for inflation);)
Peace.
PK
I don't think a rating systems works. If you want a quality provider, you have to read the reviews and find ones that fit your style. I have received provider recommendations from senior members, only to be dissapointed from time to time. Just because a woman clicks with one type of client and he has a really great time, doesn't mean she'll click with a friend of his. This ends up with one glowing review and one negative review. Just because she gets an A+ rating once doesn't mean she always will be that. I'd rather have the usual details we offer here vs a simplistic number / letter grading. This allows me to read up before making a call. SBA is classic case, she would have rave reviews, only to get dragged down by her problems and flame out, then 6 months later come back strong as ever for a little while, until she flamed out again. (no offense to SBA, she's a sweet as pie heartbreaker when she wants to be)
[QUOTE=CJ Albany;1820997]I don't know why, but I am ALWAYS surprised by how much preaching is done on this site. I never said I was "special." I was getting what I paid for on a regular basis. Skip the lecture and provide some helpful information. For example, I'll provide you with some helpful information, it is not "your special" it is "you're special." I'm happy to help you out.[/QUOTE]I'm going to cut you a little slack here since I did reply to "your" (did I get it right this time?) post and therefore it's not hard to imagine why you'd think that I was singling you out, but that is not at all the case. I replied to "your" (I think I'm getting the hang of this.) post because it was the latest in the discussion and I didn't want my input to appear to be coming out of left field. It was meant as a reminder to all, as it is easy to start getting comfortable with these ladies. My point was, take the reviews for what they are, useful information, but never let "your" (eh, eh) guard down regardless of how many glowing reviews a provider has or from whom (yeah, I thought you'd be proud of that one) those review might have come from. Believe it or not I was actually trying to support "your" (sorry, I ran out of funnies) post.
I normally write with excellent grammar. As a well educated professional I take pride in proper use of the English language. That being said, I like to relax a little bit when posting to a web forum dedicated to the pursuit of good pussy for hire. I guess this reinforces my point, even here you can't let your guard down for a second. Next time I'm updating my resume I'll be sure to run it by you first. You just can't take any chances when "you're" (WOW, that one almost got by me) trying to land that dream job.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist10;1821148]I have noticed that what is a "Great" experience to one guy, might be just an "okay" experience to another guy. I am starting to recognize that some members on here have the same expectations as me, and some members have other expectations. So I will try to pay closer attention to those posts that are more reflective of my views. Just an observation.[/QUOTE]
Your powers of observation serve you well young jedi!
I am not busting balls but I think we can all agree this should be obvious. And that is the reason I would be so against a letter grade system for any type of provider report. Massage, escort, SW, any kind of experience is really in the eye of the beholder. And one man's trash is another man's treasure, it REALLY is as simple as that.
I, for one, don't usually engage in FS with many providers. It is just my thing, I get plenty of straight sex at home but NEVER, EVER get any head! So, I see escorts almost exclusively for BBBJ, which means I can't rate a girl according to a letter system that would have solid meaning to others.
Some guys almost exclusively like FS, Some like to have a girl in the room while they just jerk-off, some are greek aficionados. Some guys LOVE fat BBW, some like ONLY spinners, black, white, blonde, redhead, big tits, small tits, big ass, small ass. The spectrum is so broad nobody could hope to pin it down.
For me, somedays I like thick, most days I like spinners, I LOVE redheads of all shapes and sizes (although BBW do nada for me). So depending on the day or the mood I'm in can directly relate to my overall experience and effect my final review. I have had awesome CBJs from ugly or less attractive girls and horrible BBBJs from some model material providers. Some girls are just great at riding rodeo style, others are dead fish. Some are both, depending on the dude or the day. This is almost as ethereal a question as the chicken or the egg.
WHICH, is why it is so important to provide some detail regarding your encounter. That will help everyone here make better choices and read between the lines. If a guy says it took 'all day and countless calls' to finally meet and then says he had a bad time. Got to take it with a grain of salt because anyone would be annoyed to all fucking hell by the time the meeting took place... and then just 1 word out of place could make you pull your pants up and walk out. Many of us have been there, many of you WILL be there someday, count on it!
So in closing, I only want to say please take the time to try to write a decent, cohesive report. It doesn't have to be long winded prose.... But being 'thorough' is very helpful and you don't have to be 'Thoreau' to do that.... Lets try to have some standards men! And GET FUCKED! Then tell us about it ;)
Peace.
PK
[QUOTE=Rdavis1972; 1821026]I'm going to cut you a little slack here since I did reply to "your" (did I get it right this time?) post and therefore it's not hard to imagine why you'd think that I was singling you out, but that is not at all the case. I replied to "your" (I think I'm getting the hang of this.) post because it was the latest in the discussion and I didn't want my input to appear to be coming out of left field. It was meant as a reminder to all, as it is easy to start getting comfortable with these ladies. My point was, take the reviews for what they are, useful information, but never let "your" (eh, eh) guard down regardless of how many glowing reviews a provider has or from whom (yeah, I thought you'd be proud of that one) those review might have come from. Believe it or not I was actually trying to support "your" (sorry, I ran out of funnies) post.
I normally write with excellent grammar. As a well educated professional I take pride in proper use of the English language. That being said, I like to relax a little bit when posting to a web forum dedicated to the pursuit of good pussy for hire. I guess this reinforces my point, even here you can't let your guard down for a second. Next time I'm updating my resume I'll be sure to run it by you first. You just can't take any chances when "you're" (WOW, that one almost got by me) trying to land that dream job.[/QUOTE]Well done RDavis. I enjoyed you're entertaining response. Your a funny dude! Whom does that other member think he is, correcting you're english. We mostly all right good. Afterall, this is'nt middle-school grammar class.
[QUOTE=Nmale1962; 1821581]Hey Mister I'm glad you had a change of heart.
I'm glad your had a great time with Lexy. Because I didn't think you would ever call again after your what wrote in post # 686 under in the Streetwalker thread. You said 'If I call her and she tells me 150 for 30 mins, guess what? NOT GON DO IT! Read my lips, na gan the! ', But I'm glad fun was had by all! Because I needed I mean she needed the money.
I'm glad she was able to help you with your fetish!
No hard feelings dude. I just call 'them like I see them. And I have seen A LOT of you guys!
RM122[/QUOTE]What the fuck is this?
I don't like the idea of the ladies (or their handlers, who are guys playing for the opposing team) scrutinizing our reviews and calling us out if we change an opinion. These forums serve as a "locker room" for dudes to talk about pussy. It ain't going to read well to feminine eyes. Fuck, I'd hate to read "Monger Reviews" posted by providers. I know it's impossible to prevent the ladies / handlers from reading, but at least maybe the mods can prevent them from posting?
And what's up with that creepy, cryptic last line? It's like: "I AM THE GREAT ORACLE OF DELPHI! I SEE ALL. I KNOW ALL OF YOU. WHAT YOU DO. WHY. WHEN. WHERE. WITH WHOM. AND ALL YOUR DARK, DIRTY FETISHES." Ahhhh, good for you. Now go suck a dick.
[QUOTE=Loki Pk; 1823311]"I' meaning YOU are Lexy? Is that correct?
Peace.
PK[/QUOTE]I don't know if this is Alison / Lexi. It's certainly implied in the plate of crow presented to Loki, though something's off. Almost all of the posts from Nmale1962 are in support of Alison / Lexi. Either a +1 of somebody else's positive report, or an original glowing reviewer, or a cut her some slack type thing. All seems to lend weight to this being Alison / Lexi. All that is except for the one post where Nmale1962 implies the Alison stole "his" debit card (below). Why would Alison post this about herself? She wouldn't. Perhaps this is a close friend of Alison / Lexi that had an axe to grind back on January 24th when this post was made.
In any case, it is definitely VERY shady to say the least and does not paint a very pretty picture for Lexy in my eyes.
01/24/2013. This report from Nmale1962 implies that Alison stole "his" debit card.
[QUOTE=Nmale1962; 1660033]I'm sorry I didn't post this sooner. I have been to Alison's place at least four times in the past three weeks. I have been drawn there just like everybody else on this board. All of my visits have been during the day. Never later than 1 pm. I also was thinking she was a good person in a bad situation. Here is where it all comes to an end for me. Last Friday we agreeded to go to lunch. Get her out of that area for a while. We have been talking just about every day. I know what she does and don't have a problem with it. I am not looking for wife I have one. And I'm not looking to become a sugar daddy. I believed she is a good kid in a bad situation. Friday morning we texted back and forth and I told her if something comes up we can do it another time. She texted me back saying we can have lunch at her place and asked if we could date after because she really needed the money. I said sure. There is should be no debate about her skills.
Here is where it all went downhill. I left work and picked up lunch. I paid with my debit card and for some reason in a rush I put in my debit card in my pocket instead of my wallet. When I pulled up to her place I locked my wallet in my glove compartment forgetting that my debt card still in my pocket. She lets me in. I notice she seemed a little different. I think she's was strung-out. So I go with it. As soon as we sit to eat lunch there's a pounding on the door. She tells to me to stay seated. Everything is ok. She answers the door and has a conversation with a man. I could not hear what was said but it seemed heated. Like someone is owed money and they knew I was there. She comes back and we continue with our lunch. A few minutes later pounding on the door again. She gets up lets someone in the house. I ask who that was. She tells me she had to let someone in the basement. But it sounded like they went upstairs. A few minutes later is pounding on the door again. This goes on a least 3 more times. Now by my count there is at least 5 other people in the house with us. We do finish lunch and she asks if I want to go to the back part of the house. I said she sure. I'm thinking with the wrong head. We sit on the bed for a while and pounding on the door again. She answers' it and comes back. I then give her a donation. She put it in her purse and says she will be right back. She comes back. We talk for a while and eventually my pants do come off. The same pants that have my debit card it. I don't need to go into detail. It's now time to go back to work and she walks me to the door.
Here is where it really goes downhill. I get back to work and one of my friends at work asks to see me. I go into his office and he closes the door. He point blank asks me what I was doing in that house. My reply was what you are talking about. He then tells me that he knows that I was there Wednesday and even knows I was there on a Sunday morning. He then tells me someone was looking out for me. And this is my only warning! He also tells me that the APD will have no pity on me if I become a victim in that neighborhood. His first concern is I went there to smoke crack. So I come clean with him and tell him there is a great girl that lives there. He assures me that there are no great girls in the neighborhood. Only working girls and crack heads. (I learn that he grew up in that neighborhood and his brother still lives there) I still don't know how who tipped him off on my actives. I assured him that I was not going back there. Now I'm feeling lucky that nothing happened to me and he will keep his mouth shut.
Not it's Friday night and I has promised my son I'll take him out to eat. We go to a local dinner to eat. Now it's time to pay and guess what no debit card. I pay with cash and fly home. Check my on-line banking and I was lucky no extra charges. I called the 800 number on the web site and disabled the card. Total damages $5 for a replacement card.
Earlier I sent two text messages to Alison after I left her place and before I knew the card was missing and got no response from her. I looked in my car at work and still can't find my debit card. I not am going to accuse her of taking anything from me. It may still turn up. I still have not heard from her (I have not texted her since Friday). At this point I feel lucky just to walk away.
I was not going to post this message but after reading the most recent post I don't want anyone to get hurt. Again I'm sorry I didn't post this sooner. Needless to say I will not be returning there.[/QUOTE]
There are more than a few reports from Nmale1962 about Allison / Lexy. If you read them closely it almost seems as if there ia a pattern of some 'freudian slips' in each and every post that points to actually 'being' Allison / Lexy.
It certainly would be easier if the truth came to light. I, for one, have no issue with girls posting in threads. It actually can be a very helpful dynamic. Although, I absolutely advise against them responding to bad reports. Unless there is a real issue of accuracy (like she wasn't IN TOWN and somebody posts a fake review to smear her good name) providers should remain mute unless its to say thanks.
BUT the shill posts by the sock puppet are really a bad bad bad idea. Nothing good will ever come of that behavior, especially when they get exposed for doing it. Then everyone seems to resent that situation. Better to cum clean sooner than later so less people feel deceived and slighted.
Just my 2 cents.
Peace.
PK
The truth is. I am NOT Alison. Yes it's spelled Alison not Allison. Loki Pk ripped me pretty good in a previous post. I waited a long time to get him back. Now it's over and I have no hard feelings. I will tell you that a popular senior member gave me Alison number on 12/31/2012. What is my relationship with Alison / Lexy? Like many mongers on this board I have seen her a lot. Anyone who has ever seen Alison / Lexy knows what you're going to get. Now let's all move on get fucked and report on it! If anyone has any problems or questions they can PM me.
Stay Safe
[QUOTE=Loki Pk; 1823601]There are more than a few reports from Nmale1962 about Allison / Lexy. If you read them closely it almost seems as if there ia a pattern of some 'freudian slips' in each and every post that points to actually 'being' Allison / Lexy.
It certainly would be easier if the truth came to light. I, for one, have no issue with girls posting in threads. It actually can be a very helpful dynamic. Although, I absolutely advise against them responding to bad reports. Unless there is a real issue of accuracy (like she wasn't IN TOWN and somebody posts a fake review to smear her good name) providers should remain mute unless its to say thanks.
BUT the shill posts by the sock puppet are really a bad bad bad idea. Nothing good will ever come of that behavior, especially when they get exposed for doing it. Then everyone seems to resent that situation. Better to cum clean sooner than later so less people feel deceived and slighted.
Just my 2 cents.
Peace.
PK[/QUOTE]