General Reports

[QUOTE=Kygolfer77;1395054]Talked to one of the girls that work at one of our local body rub locations and she told me that the owner 1099's the girls and keeps most of the door fee. How do they get away with this? She also said she gets fined for being late, if a session runs over and a few other things. I run a small business and don t see how their not breaking a few tax laws. She said they sign contracts. Anyone know how they get away with this?[/QUOTE]I was told pretty much the same thing by a girl from the east end several weeks ago. She also stated that they were fined if the session was over sooner than the scheduled time and that they had to pay so much per week to launder the sheets. In the past, I've been told several different different versions of stories by different girls at three same location about pay percentages and none of the stories matched up.

[QUOTE=Coloice;1395413]Does anyone know if the girls that worked at the clarksville location that just got shutdown are going solo? There are a couple I wouldn't mind seeing[/QUOTE]Yes, there are some solo opportunities, feel free to PM me

[QUOTE=Legal Eagle;1385136]I wonder if I should contact Troy and ask for my $5K? I have the feeling, as I stated much earlier, that he is going to need that money far more than I. There is truth, there is bull and finally there is justice.[/QUOTE]I am a former provider that worked at various places. I can promise that T never worked for or with other owners. I know he had lunch with other owners a lot and world send them workers if the stadium was full but not own it or work there. When I was there he had the most fair price and was clear that we could not do things other than standard. Why would he work with them and allow that when it was not allowed in his own office? I know several of them called to work at the stadium because he was fair and did not let us do things that arent allowed. The other providers were jealous of our place and a couple mentioned how they wanted to date T. If I ever go back to the business the stadium is where I will go. We never had trouble there. I think someone was trying to get out of trouble so they brought up other names and since he was at that office sometimes he was an easy target but I know for fact that he did not work there or own anything other than the stadium and the office it was before he moved to the stadium I can't remember the name though.

Hope to see some of you if I go back in the business.

Going out of town for a few days. I am going to find a date. I thought I would like to do dinner with her as well. My question is twofold. Is this a good idea and am I going to buy the dinner time as well even if we go to a nice place for dinner? Sorry, I'm cheap.

[QUOTE=MissFancy; 1398508]I am a former provider that worked at various places. I can promise that T never worked for or with other owners. I know he had lunch with other owners a lot and world send them workers if the stadium was full but not own it or work there. When I was there he had the most fair price and was clear that we could not do things other than standard. Why would he work with them and allow that when it was not allowed in his own office? I know several of them called to work at the stadium because he was fair and did not let us do things that arent allowed. The other providers were jealous of our place and a couple mentioned how they wanted to date T. If I ever go back to the business the stadium is where I will go. We never had trouble there. I think someone was trying to get out of trouble so they brought up other names and since he was at that office sometimes he was an easy target but I know for fact that he did not work there or own anything other than the stadium and the office it was before he moved to the stadium I can't remember the name though.

Hope to see some of you if I go back in the business.[/QUOTE]Since you "promised," I guess we can simply chalk up the contradictory information possessed by law enforcement to pure conjecture. I, for one, am persuaded by the honesty, candor and depth of feeling apparent in your soliloquy. The very idea, nay the unfounded insinuation, that a man of Sweet T's caliber would instruct women who do not work for him on the fine art of doing things that they are prohibited from doing at the locations he leases but does not own is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of law enforcement. That Deleon's providers would, in a fit of apparent jealousy, accuse Sweet T of handdebugging them through basic provider training is something we universally condemn. Shame on them, the horny, envious lot. Thank goodness there was former stadium provider to clarify the situation.

*Cue Celine Dion: My Heart Will Go On*

I was all wrong about Sweet T; he is as manly, virulent and fair-minded as all the "girls who do not work for him" portray him. Extend to him my heartfelt apology, and tell him that I writhe naked in shame for all I have said and, ironically, admire him for his determination and integrity. For my part, I thank him for preventing, through simple suggestion I am sure, the "girls who do not work for him" from doing anything they might otherwise be inclined to do as part of the activities he does not control. He clearly does not work with Deleon (the cad!) How anyone could have compared Sweet T and Deleon is, much like who murdered Dr. Black in the study with a candlestick, a sweet mystery of life.

You are quite literally a pearl among oysters, Miss Fancy. Yours truly,

Santa Claus.

PS, It was Colonel Mustard. Expect coal in your stocking this year.

[QUOTE=LuvMyAsians;1398753]Going out of town for a few days. I am going to find a date. I thought I would like to do dinner with her as well. My question is twofold. Is this a good idea and am I going to buy the dinner time as well even if we go to a nice place for dinner? Sorry, I'm cheap.[/QUOTE]My assumption is that you would be expected to pay for that hour also. I'm sure there are exceptions but I would think that would be the norm.

[QUOTE=LuvMyAsians;1398753]Going out of town for a few days. I am going to find a date. I thought I would like to do dinner with her as well. My question is twofold. Is this a good idea and am I going to buy the dinner time as well even if we go to a nice place for dinner? Sorry, I'm cheap.[/QUOTE]I would expect to pay for the hour especially if I did not know the girl but at a reduced rate.

[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1398830]Since you "promised," I guess we can simply chalk up the contradictory information possessed by law enforcement to pure conjecture. I, for one, am persuaded by the honesty, candor and depth of feeling apparent in your soliloquy. The very idea, nay the unfounded insinuation, that a man of Sweet T's caliber would instruct women who do not work for him on the fine art of doing things that they are prohibited from doing at the locations he leases but does not own is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of law enforcement. That Deleon's providers would, in a fit of apparent jealousy, accuse Sweet T of handdebugging them through basic provider training is something we universally condemn. Shame on them, the horny, envious lot. Thank goodness there was former stadium provider to clarify the situation.

*Cue Celine Dion: My Heart Will Go On*

I was all wrong about Sweet T; he is as manly, virulent and fair-minded as all the "girls who do not work for him" portray him. Extend to him my heartfelt apology, and tell him that I writhe naked in shame for all I have said and, ironically, admire him for his determination and integrity. For my part, I thank him for preventing, through simple suggestion I am sure, the "girls who do not work for him" from doing anything they might otherwise be inclined to do as part of the activities he does not control. He clearly does not work with Deleon (the cad!) How anyone could have compared Sweet T and Deleon is, much like who murdered Dr. Black in the study with a candlestick, a sweet mystery of life.

You are quite literally a pearl among oysters, Miss Fancy. Yours truly,

Santa Claus.

PS, It was Colonel Mustard. Expect coal in your stocking this year.[/QUOTE]I haven't talked to him in awhile so I don't know but have not seen anything saying the stadium owner was charged. If law enforcement has all this on him why not charge him? The article you posted only has a first name and a common one. Your speculation and spewing of the mouth amazes me. Don't know about T's personal life but he was a good person to work for and wanted us all to make money. I think you have an agenda on here. Leo visited sometimes as they do every other place and when I was there we had no issues. I know some Leo who came to visit me outside of their job and our office was never a concern for them. Still isn't from the mouths of some I still talk to. If T is a bad man he never showed it around us. You have accused him of owning another place I worked at and I know 100% he didn't own that.

So men take what he says with a grain of salt. I know what did and didn't go on at all the places I worked.

Have a wonderful day

[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1398830]Since you "promised," I guess we can simply chalk up the contradictory information possessed by law enforcement to pure conjecture. I, for one, am persuaded by the honesty, candor and depth of feeling apparent in your soliloquy. The very idea, nay the unfounded insinuation, that a man of Sweet T's caliber would instruct women who do not work for him on the fine art of doing things that they are prohibited from doing at the locations he leases but does not own is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of law enforcement. That Deleon's providers would, in a fit of apparent jealousy, accuse Sweet T of handdebugging them through basic provider training is something we universally condemn. Shame on them, the horny, envious lot. Thank goodness there was former stadium provider to clarify the situation.

*Cue Celine Dion: My Heart Will Go On*

I was all wrong about Sweet T; he is as manly, virulent and fair-minded as all the "girls who do not work for him" portray him. Extend to him my heartfelt apology, and tell him that I writhe naked in shame for all I have said and, ironically, admire him for his determination and integrity. For my part, I thank him for preventing, through simple suggestion I am sure, the "girls who do not work for him" from doing anything they might otherwise be inclined to do as part of the activities he does not control. He clearly does not work with Deleon (the cad!) How anyone could have compared Sweet T and Deleon is, much like who murdered Dr. Black in the study with a candlestick, a sweet mystery of life.

You are quite literally a pearl among oysters, Miss Fancy. Yours truly,

Santa Claus.

PS, It was Colonel Mustard. Expect coal in your stocking this year.[/QUOTE]After having given Lawdoc a standing ovation for authoring a masterpiece, I am thinking I may have been a bit premature (hate when that happens. I mean I have heard that it happens to others. I have no problems. Honest. I don't. No, really.)

Sorry. Lost my focus. I am thankful for yet another very entertaining submission by Legal. The time and effort you put into you work does not go unnoticed.

If I may add my 3 cents. (I am a big spender compared to most.) I have heard from more than one provider that T is a dog that never gives up the chase. I have had dreams where I was lying naked in an oh so comfy bed with a true beauty worshipping my existence only to be woken up by not one, not two, but three calls from T. When I asked my companion why he would be calling her, she said that he had been chasing her for years and trying to make his dreams a reality with her. She swore on the bedside bible (Thanks Gideon) that he does this with a lot of the talent.

Don't know him. Don't want to.

Sport,

[QUOTE=TheSportScout;1399501]She swore on the bedside bible (Thanks Gideon)[/QUOTE]Brilliant, all I can say, have not posted much lately, but just been dreaming with regulars, but Zone Jane was a very nice dream, but the BP post has been chaotic, don't know what is going on.

Be smart and stay safe

[QUOTE=MissFancy;1399158]I haven't talked to him in awhile so I don't know but have not seen anything saying the stadium owner was charged.[/QUOTE]Sweet T has not been charged. Yet.

[QUOTE]If law enforcement has all this on him why not charge him?[/QUOTE]Because law enforcement has this terrible habit of gathering evidence first and then charging people.

[QUOTE]The article you posted only has a first name and a common one.[/QUOTE]I did not post the article; that was a contribution of another board member. Credit where credit is due."Troy" is surely a common name. If you have read other information on this board about Troy recruiting on Deleon's behalf and combine that with Troy's acknowledgement of his personal relationship with Deleon, it is not difficult to identify the "Troy" to which the article refers. The world, particularly this world, is smaller than you think.

[QUOTE]Your speculation and spewing of the mouth amazes me.[/QUOTE]No doubt the Earth being round and rainfall in Spring amazes you as well. Those things, much like The Troy's negative contributions to our local game, are undeniable facts.

[QUOTE]Don't know about T's personal life but he was a good person to work for and wanted us all to make money.[/QUOTE]No, you clearly do not know about his personal life and definitely know even less about his business acumen. As for his eagerness to see you earn money, most landlords want their tenants gainfully employed. Do not take it as a personal endorsement. It is not.

[QUOTE]I think you have an agenda on here.[/QUOTE]It only took you one visit to the board to start parroting your benefactor. I am certain this is coincidental.

[QUOTE]Leo visited sometimes as they do every other place and when I was there we had no issues. I know some Leo who came to visit me outside of their job and our office was never a concern for them. Still isn't from the mouths of some I still talk to.[/QUOTE]This subject just casually arose during your completely unrelated conversations with random law enforcement officers, did it? Kind of them to exonerate someone who had yet to be publicly accused. If it helps you any, Miss Guided (I mean, Miss Fancy,) The Troy used the same relativistic argument about "other" locations during his earlier defense. A pros_ute calling other women wh_res does not transform her into a princess. Nice try, though.

[QUOTE]If T is a bad man he never showed it around us.[/QUOTE]I did not quantify The Troy one way or the other, Miss Fancy; I simply pointed out a personal and business relationship which he (through other board guises) first denied and then later limited to strictly personal. The proof of what he is may be established through a review of his conduct on this board since that time. Your opinion about The Troy is your own, as is mine.

[QUOTE]You have accused him of owning another place I worked at and I know 100% he didn't own that.[/QUOTE]Because he told you so, right? He told StoptheBS the same thing. Have you considered that he might not be sharing his private business information with the girls who "do not work for him," much less girls who work at "places he for sure 100% does not own?" As you pause to consider this, Miss Fancy, ask yourself a simple question: Why would he?

[QUOTE]So men take what he says with a grain of salt. I know what did and didn't go on at all the places I worked.[/QUOTE]Time is the best indicator of what is true and untrue, Miss Fancy. I offered information, and you and others may judge for yourselves whether that information proved accurate. I would offer the same cautionary language about relying on the assertions of a first-time poster coming to the defense of a man who has manipulated this board, lied about his associations and clearly misrepresented the risk posed to his locations and his providers owing to his conduct.

Troy will need alibi witnesses as the law enforcement investigation proceeds, Miss Fancy. If you are as certain of your information as you suggest, then testify on his behalf. Let the courtroom test the accuracy of your assertions. I stand on the accuracy of the information coming out in the investigation.

[QUOTE]Have a wonderful day[/QUOTE]You do the same, Miss Fancy.

If you have no objection, Miss Fancy, might we relocate this debate to the LEGAL DISCUSSION thread? The membership has previously voiced their concern about muddying up the waters with this issue outside that location. I'll be happy to debate with you there if you like.

[QUOTE=LuvMyAsians;1398753]Going out of town for a few days. I am going to find a date. I thought I would like to do dinner with her as well. My question is twofold. Is this a good idea and am I going to buy the dinner time as well even if we go to a nice place for dinner? Sorry, I'm cheap.[/QUOTE]I always pay for that time as well. Good investment with class providers in my opinion.

[QUOTE=Legal Eagle;1399585]If you have no objection, Miss Fancy, might we relocate this debate to the LEGAL DISCUSSION thread? The membership has previously voiced their concern about muddying up the waters with this issue outside that location. I'll be happy to debate with you there if you like.[/QUOTE]Well Said Legal.

[QUOTE=GreatCatHunter; 1399534]Brilliant, all I can say, have not posted much lately, but just been dreaming with regulars, but Zone Jane was a very nice dream, but the BP post has been chaotic, don't know what is going on.

Be smart and stay safe[/QUOTE]Who owned the places because I worked there. I know my employers. I took the time last night to read your posts and it's obvious why you are on here. I got on here to put the truth out. Since I was in the business I know from first hand experience. While I was working several law enforcement guys were customers believe or not I have continued that relationship with some and know what I am talking about and not frivolously spewing inaccurate information. I had a personal interest in knowing whether what you were saying was true. It's not.

T sat in the office most days with us and other than the one he dated he never had relations with any of us. He would regularly get calls from other providers wanting to work at the stadium.

Put up or shut up. Show some proof. The other owners and workers have been arrested, if there was proof as you say, he would be too. You argue that you are not involved with the case so how do you know what proof they have? Being a excellent provider as I was we have ways of getting to the real information and I know that they are not concerned about him.

As the other guy said on here about T calling so what? He might be a monger just like you. I guarantee providers aren't turning him away. They will see anyone with a pocket full of money.

Again mongers it is clear there is an agenda with these guys. Legal even threatened T's kids on here. What kind of person does that? They are little kids. Do I have an agenda? Yes. I'm thinking of getting back in the business and want to set the record straight. I have no reason to move to another site because I won't continue to argue with this "man".

[QUOTE=MissFancy; 1399158]I haven't talked to him in awhile so I don't know but have not seen anything saying the stadium owner was charged. If law enforcement has all this on him why not charge him? The article you posted only has a first name and a common one. Your speculation and spewing of the mouth amazes me. Don't know about T's personal life but he was a good person to work for and wanted us all to make money. I think you have an agenda on here. Leo visited sometimes as they do every other place and when I was there we had no issues. I know some Leo who came to visit me outside of their job and our office was never a concern for them. Still isn't from the mouths of some I still talk to. If T is a bad man he never showed it around us. You have accused him of owning another place I worked at and I know 100% he didn't own that.

So men take what he says with a grain of salt. I know what did and didn't go on at all the places I worked.

Have a wonderful day[/QUOTE]It is almost worth getting my account deleted to just post his full name up here so we can get all of that out of the way. 'T', who the hell wants to be called 'T'. Anyway, I think I've already posted it in a way and will completely end any further discussion. You should post your ad up here so we know how we can set an appointment with you, you sound fiesty.

Seems like a while back I saw some discussion on here about the New Albany spa girls moonlighting at the boat. I have looked every time since and only once did I see a group of girls that may have been them.

Any info on how / where to arrange a meeting?

PM is fine.

Thanks,

T2P

BustyGirl posted on here. Has anyone here seen her? Legit? I'm in town for awhile and looking for some fun.

[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1398830]Since you "promised," I guess we can simply chalk up the contradictory information possessed by law enforcement to pure conjecture. I, for one, am persuaded by the honesty, candor and depth of feeling apparent in your soliloquy. The very idea, nay the unfounded insinuation, that a man of Sweet T's caliber would instruct women who do not work for him on the fine art of doing things that they are prohibited from doing at the locations he leases but does not own is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of law enforcement. That Deleon's providers would, in a fit of apparent jealousy, accuse Sweet T of handdebugging them through basic provider training is something we universally condemn. Shame on them, the horny, envious lot. Thank goodness there was former stadium provider to clarify the situation.

*Cue Celine Dion: My Heart Will Go On*

I was all wrong about Sweet T; he is as manly, virulent and fair-minded as all the "girls who do not work for him" portray him. Extend to him my heartfelt apology, and tell him that I writhe naked in shame for all I have said and, ironically, admire him for his determination and integrity. For my part, I thank him for preventing, through simple suggestion I am sure, the "girls who do not work for him" from doing anything they might otherwise be inclined to do as part of the activities he does not control. He clearly does not work with Deleon (the cad!) How anyone could have compared Sweet T and Deleon is, much like who murdered Dr. Black in the study with a candlestick, a sweet mystery of life.

You are quite literally a pearl among oysters, Miss Fancy. Yours truly,

Santa Claus.

PS, It was Colonel Mustard. Expect coal in your stocking this year.[/QUOTE]Not taking anyone's side here, but what is your issue with Troy? I'm a fairly regular hobbiest and have to say that his place is one of my favorites. I have never had any problems there and have talked to several girls that work there and they all seem pretty happy. It would seem that if you are a hobbiest this constant back and forth is not helping the activity in town. I get warning folks, and we have been duely warned, but you seem to be takinging it to a more personal level. IMHO, personal vendettas have no place on this board, they are just static that the rest of us have to wade through.

[QUOTE=Bigtlvr;1401596]Not taking anyone's side here, but what is your issue with Troy? I'm a fairly regular hobbiest and have to say that his place is one of my favorites. I have never had any problems there and have talked to several girls that work there and they all seem pretty happy. It would seem that if you are a hobbiest this constant back and forth is not helping the activity in town. I get warning folks, and we have been duely warned, but you seem to be takinging it to a more personal level. IMHO, personal vendettas have no place on this board, they are just static that the rest of us have to wade through.[/QUOTE]In total agreement. For whatever reason, Legal has an axe to grind with Troy, and it seems personal. From my perspective, the back and forth adds nothing to this board. On a side note, both Legal and now Kylawdoc seem bent on trying to impress us all with their keen with and legal knowledge. I have learned that when someone feels a need to stand on a rooftop and shout "look at how smart I am", there is usually a reason that the listening audiance needs to be convinced.

[QUOTE=Bigtlvr;1401596]Not taking anyone's side here, but what is your issue with Troy? I'm a fairly regular hobbiest and have to say that his place is one of my favorites. I have never had any problems there and have talked to several girls that work there and they all seem pretty happy. It would seem that if you are a hobbiest this constant back and forth is not helping the activity in town. I get warning folks, and we have been duely warned, but you seem to be takinging it to a more personal level. IMHO, personal vendettas have no place on this board, they are just static that the rest of us have to wade through.[/QUOTE]I honestly think it is not a personal vendetta but that Legal is probably just trying to stand his ground and it looks like an attack since they keep coming back. But I think here it is the old saying "Never argue with a fool, people won't be able to tell you apart". Legal has been fair in my opinion, but it does take away from the board. He did ask in a previous post that the discussion be moved from this forum into the legal area out of respect for others on the board.

I am not a white knight for Legal, but he has been around for a while and hasn't steered me wrong yet.

[QUOTE=BoneDaddy;1401681]In total agreement. For whatever reason, Legal has an axe to grind with Troy, and it seems personal. From my perspective, the back and forth adds nothing to this board. On a side note, both Legal and now Kylawdoc seem bent on trying to impress us all with their keen with and legal knowledge. I have learned that when someone feels a need to stand on a rooftop and shout "look at how smart I am", there is usually a reason that the listening audiance needs to be convinced.[/QUOTE]Keep your side notes in that very location, on the side. I have had nothing to do with the discussion that you now bring me into and speak negatively about. I note that you and your three posts have had nothing to do with the purpose or intent of this board. Rather, they have been to continue to churn sh! T. Do us all a favor and either post on topic or just stay on the sidelines, kid.

[QUOTE=Ky Lawdoc;1401742]Keep your side notes in that very location, on the side. I have had nothing to do with the discussion that you now bring me into and speak negatively about. I note that you and your three posts have had nothing to do with the purpose or intent of this board. Rather, they have been to continue to churn sh! T. Do us all a favor and either post on topic or just stay on the sidelines, kid.[/QUOTE] (1) I will keep my side notes where ever I want; (2) you are correct, I should not have brought you into this (I was thinking of another thread). I apologize; (3) I just re-read my previous posts, and personally, I think that I had a very good point and would guess that many felt the way I did on that particular topic. Which actually WAS helpful; and (4) thanks for the advice.

I realize that with this response, I too am guilty of cluttering the board with "static". So with that, I am out.

The board consensus was to let this matter rest and, up until the recent post regarding the news article addressing developments in Deleon's arrest, the matter lay dormant. You have asked a relevant question, Bigtlvr, and new poster BoneDaddy has echoed your sentiments. Since you asked the question in this thread, I will respond in this thread.

[QUOTE=BoneDaddy;1401681]In total agreement. For whatever reason, Legal has an axe to grind with Troy, and it seems personal. From my perspective, the back and forth adds nothing to this board. On a side note, both Legal and now Kylawdoc seem bent on trying to impress us all with their keen with and legal knowledge. I have learned that when someone feels a need to stand on a rooftop and shout "look at how smart I am", there is usually a reason that the listening audiance needs to be convinced.[/QUOTE]For your part, BoneDaddy, you have described yourself in one of your three (as of this comment) posts on this board as "a longtime reader." That suggests you recall how this matter began and how it developed during the dialogue between myself and the various identities used by The Troy. A previous post of yours explains the matter succinctly:

[QUOTE=BoneDaddy; 1356327]Ok. I have been a longtime reader of this forum, and I do not post. However, I cannot keep silent about this. Why not post this name on here to protect everybody? There is absolutely no reason to only share with "SR members who have made quality posts."

If anyone knows who this is and only shares with a select few, they are a complete douchebag. There is no risk whatsoever to you or anyone else on this board by making this information public. The only risks are: (1) If the info is true, then the risk is that LEO will no longer be effective with respect to this operation; or (2) risk that the provider will see a decline in business (regardless as to if the info is correct or not).

So. You choose to not protect other readers of this board from substantial risk so that you can be a bigshot and only help those who have helped you, or you actually know nothing, but you want for people on here to think you know something and have power. That spells "douchebag".[/QUOTE]While your comment addressed the identity of an allegedly risky provider, the same logic holds true of an owner who creates risk through conduct and deception. Discussing and thereby reducing the risk surrounding a particular studio is the contribution provided by sharing this information. Not discussing the risk or, alternatively, circulating information among select members gives rise to the very "douchebaggery" of which you complained. We either share or we do not, BoneDaddy. If you believe sharing information about the risk surrounding the stadium is not important to this board, please explain your position.

Recall that I did not start this conflict with The Troy. He chose to characterize information that I shared about the My1501 investigation and how it directed law enforcement toward the stadium as "false." I thereafter explained why I believed my information to be accurate, and his disagreement became more pointed and personal; up to and including offering a bounty and posting information he incorrectly believed personally identified me. Those are facts which are undeniable. I have no personal agenda towards The Troy and stated as much during this discussion. I simply stated and reiterated that my information about My1501 and the stadium was true and that law enforcement was focusing upon both organizations due to an interaction of their businesses. This information has been validated contemporaneously vis a vis information recently released by law enforcement upon Deleon's arrest. If you mistakenly attribute sharing this information to an effort to appear "intelligent," then I attribute that to a matter of your personal perception. Opinion, by its very nature, is dependent upon perspective. Consider the language of your quoted post, BoneDaddy, and then ask yourself whether sharing information of this nature publicly was fair or unfair.

As to your observation, Bigtlvr, let me state first of all that while I respect your status and history on this board, I respectfully reject the notion that you are neutral on this issue. You candidly acknowledge your fondness for the stadium, but should add to this your predilection towards both My1501 and HR. You advocated patronage of these establishments in multiple posts irrespective of the clear risk involved to mongers posed by the ongoing investigation; information about which had been shared and discussed by multiple board members for the last several months. To begin your comment with language suggesting that you "are not taking sides" is, respectfully, not something that can be easily or logically accepted. You have taken a side and chose that side some time ago, Bigtlvr. I can respect anyone who disagrees with commentary on this board, whether it be posted by myself or anyone else, as long as the basis for the disagreement is clear and unequivocal. Stating that you enjoy particular locations, have not perceived risk while attending and simultaneously offering that you are "neutral" gives one pause to consider your offered neutrality.

Having said this, both you and BoneDaddy are, respectfully, confusing accuracy with motivation. This entire discussion between The Troy, his supporters and I began with my post about the My1501 investigation. I shared information indicating that the stadium operation was identified and discussed during the My1501 investigation, and that law enforcement was shifting their focus to include both operations. I later shared information which connected the two operations. During each phase of this discussion, The Troy, in various guises, condemned the information as false and became increasingly hostile toward me. As I read his denials and attempts to attack the accuracy of the information about both My1501 and the stadium, I began to notice a similarity in many older posts advocating the providers at both locations. It became clear that The Troy was using multiple board identities to promote both he and Deleon's businesses in the form of fake reviews. When I pointed this out, his attacks became still more hostile.

Troy proceeded to successively and inaccurately accuse me of being several different people during the course of this discussion, Bigtlvr. I was initially polite and professional towards The Troy, and he responded with insult. I returned the gesture in successive posts, of course. Finally several board members requested that the debate end or at least be moved to a single thread. The debate continued there for a short time and eventually ended with an agreement to disagree. That is where the matter stood until the publication of the news article. Recall that I did not post any link to that article initially. I did of course comment on the content of the news story in as much as it echoed what I had been stating for some time. I have no agenda other than confirming that what I have stated is the truth despite successive assertions by The Troy that the information was untrue. My information has been borne out by a neutral third party media source.

If there was an agenda being followed, Bigtlvr, it was in Troy's attempt to distract board members from the information which was coming out about the risk surrounding the stadium operation. Recall that I never advocated mongers avoiding either My1501 / HR or the stadium. What I stated was that these locations pose increased risk and that additional caution should be exercised. You can review the succession of posts and see that my characterization of how this discussion developed is accurate. The diatribe began when The Troy began a game of "shoot the messenger." When someone begins questioning "why" information is shared despite its accuracy, particularly on this board, you truly do have to begin to wonder about motivations and agendas.

Sorry, but I have to take this opportunity whenever HR is mentioned. If anyone finds where the HR girls wind up, especially Jackie, a PM would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

[QUOTE=ReadyForDay; 1401725]I honestly think it is not a personal vendetta but that Legal is probably just trying to stand his ground and it looks like an attack since they keep coming back. But I think here it is the old saying "Never argue with a fool, people won't be able to tell you apart". Legal has been fair in my opinion, but it does take away from the board. He did ask in a previous post that the discussion be moved from this forum into the legal area out of respect for others on the board.

I am not a white knight for Legal, but he has been around for a while and hasn't steered me wrong yet.[/QUOTE]You say it way better than I can. I see it as Legal answering all the shit that Troy was saying about his info and dealing with the personal stuff that Troy cat was saying about Legal. Funny thing is that none of the cats jumping on Legal for this are saying his info was wrong. The only cat that needs his balls busted for this shit is Troy for real.

Thanks to all for their input on my etiquette questions! I would have so many STUPID questions for providers without the feedback. You made my trip to Lex much more enjoyable! Met sweet girls and enjoying then.

[QUOTE=BoneDaddy;1401764]I realize that with this response, I too am guilty of cluttering the board with "static". So with that, I am out.[/QUOTE]I'll risk being a hypocrite here, but that's really one of the hardest things to deal with on a board focused on specific subjects.

I've seen a few things here that made my eyes roll so far back in my head I could see my tonsils, but bit my tongue and let it slide because it had squat to do with the board.

Though I'd bet the majority of the time reprimanding people for going off topic causes more off topic chatter than if the responders would've ignored it. (See any company blast email where people start responding with "take me off this list" causing a cluster for hours afterwards.)

To go back on topic, Chelsey from the body rubs section continues to be cute and have *great* technique, but apparently I suck at negotiations because she'll only do the standard finish with me. (Actually, I'm now feeling so awkward I probably won't go back, but that's just my personal issues.)

Again, I have personally spoke with law enforcement members both in Indiana and Louisville in trying to determine whether I want to come back to work. Neither T or the stadium are of anymore interest to them than any other body rub or massage establishment. In fact even less than some because none of the stadiums neighbors complain.

Have a great day, Mongers.

Please don't quote a big ass message, especially if you're not responding to something specific in it. In fact, if you are responding to something specific trim down the message to what you want to respond to.

[QUOTE=MissFancy;1402519]Again, I have personally spoke with law enforcement members both in Indiana and Louisville in trying to determine whether I want to come back to work.[/QUOTE]All I could think after reading that was this:

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENlJB9gDs4g]Balls of Steel[/url]

[QUOTE=Doctor Z;1402139]You say it way better than I can. I see it as Legal answering all the shit that Troy was saying about his info and dealing with the personal stuff that Troy cat was saying about Legal. Funny thing is that none of the cats jumping on Legal for this are saying his info was wrong. The only cat that needs his balls busted for this shit is Troy for real.[/QUOTE]I am saying Legal cat is wrong. Leo is not after him or the stadium straight from Leo's mouth. At least T cat was willing to identify himself on here to set people straight.

[QUOTE=MissFancy;1402519]Again, I have personally spoke with law enforcement members both in Indiana and Louisville in trying to determine whether I want to come back to work.[/QUOTE]A guy walks into a bar. There's a counter and a sign: "Cheese Sandwiches. $2. Handjobs. $10"

He goes up to the lady at the counter and says "'Scuze me, Miss. Are YOU the lady that gives the handjobs?"

"Yes I am!" she says.

"Well wash those hands and fix me a cheese sandwich!"

Right.

[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1403255]A guy walks into a bar. There's a counter and a sign: "Cheese Sandwiches. $2. Handjobs. $10"

He goes up to the lady at the counter and says "'Scuze me, Miss. Are YOU the lady that gives the handjobs?"

"Yes I am!" she says.

"Well wash those hands and fix me a cheese sandwich!"

Right.[/QUOTE]That's exactly how it went. You're so smart.

Hey did anyone read the crime times this week? On page 9 there was a chick named Michele Carlise lottering for prostitution. She's kinda cute LOL. Has anyone ever picked this girl up?

[blue][Forum Complaint deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]The general posting sections of the Forum are not the place to voice your personal complaints about the Forum's rules or operating procedures. In the future, please send any complaints about the Forum to me personally by email or PM, or post them in the Comment on Forum Rules section. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=James Doe69;1404339]Hey did anyone read the crime times this week? On page 9 there was a chick named Michele Carlise lottering for prostitution. She's kinda cute LOL. Has anyone ever picked this girl up?[/QUOTE]Man are you for real dude? Hook up with the chick that got busted for some shit? You do that bru. I'm going to go with the chick that don't even know what Crime Times is LOL.

Hey, page 4 top right corner photo in the March 26th 2012 issue of Crime Times. Name that whhore. Winner gets a gold star!

[QUOTE=James Doe69;1413149]Hey, page 4 top right corner photo in the March 26th 2012 issue of Crime Times. Name that whhore. Winner gets a gold star![/QUOTE]Are these mags online?

[QUOTE=Boner889;1413174]Are these mags online?[/QUOTE]No I checked

Buy them at Thorton's ETC. Probably not the best place to go hunting!

[QUOTE=GreatCatHunter;1413255]No I checked[/QUOTE]