Have You Never Seen This Ad Before?
This ad gets run on a weekly if not almost daily basis. I thank the boys in blue for reminding me not to get too lazy. If you want to avoid a sting operation, just read my post that has yet to go up. Thanks admin guy, I wrote it 4 hours ago! LOL
MW
[QUOTE=Masonm;1725636]This is bad news. They are ramping up![/QUOTE]
Wanted more info on Lexi!
Was wondering if anyone Give me digits on Lexi and her incall in pm. thanks.
It's a good thing they don't get it
[QUOTE=Marcus Weiner;1728103]I love google image search. Over 5 pages of pics for Carmen a web cam girl! Why don't these girls get it?[/QUOTE]Or else they'd take the time to find obscure pix that don't show up in Google. As long as they're sloppy, those of us who do 30 seconds of research will know who to avoid.
Definitely her or her manager posting BS
[QUOTE=Polotic360; 1728729]Meet with this provider and all I can say is Wow! Izzy. Is a great companion, very professional, and you get the service that you are expecting. The pics are 100% accurate, but they don't even come close to her great personality. This provider is a must see in any area. Izzy feels as soft as silk, and she knows how to keep all the attention on her, by keeping her attention on you. Her dangerous curves will have you wanting more. Can't wait to see her again.
[url]http://baltimore.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/80-special-sexy-red-hair-white-girl-small-waist-fat-azz-25/6961353[/url][/QUOTE]This reads like ad copy."Soft as silk?" If she has "dangerous curves" and a "fat azz," why do her ads from February say she's skinny?
[url]http://eroticmugshots.com/boston-escorts/917-657-0649/?pid=22164900[/url]
Pix are "100% accurate," but as Laxman pointed out, anoThER review says they're old, and she's flabby.
As for girls who say they'll leave me "wanting more," I want them to leave me satisfied.
Sugar Tits and Sasha research
[QUOTE=JustPlayingMD; 1729990]Not at a computer that I can do normal info gathering, so any info on these two:
[url]http://baltimore.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hot-suger-tits-young-fun-and-flirty-xoxo-24/7063370[/url]
Or.
[url]http://baltimore.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/gorgeous-sexy-blonde-_-22/7068934[/url][/QUOTE]On "Sugar Tits," 443-453-6758, just 5-6 ads going back a few months with the same girl's pic, and 1-2 with another girl. No reviews, or hits on Google image. It's a roll of the dice if you want to TOFTT.
On Sasha. 808-599-0286, Google brings up nothing on her phone older than last week. On Google image search, most of her pix are new, but found pix leading to prior number of 808-445-3534, which has dozens of ads for Sasha going back 6 months. No reviews or other info about her.
Sasha is posting many ads.
[QUOTE=AoxoMoxoa; 1730333]On the oThER site someone asked the same question about Sasha.
According to what I read she seems to be a flake, and that was coming from someone who knows his stuff.
But YMMV with backpage girls. This is why when it comes to American escorts, I prefer the ones who are well reviewed and advertise on the verification sites.[/QUOTE]If you count up her ads, she has 12 ads on the DC BP site, and 17 on the Baltimore BP site.