Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=Joe Black]I been looking @ your post for a long time and I got to say, YOU are a bad MOFO...
You got some good pics and your writting is fantastic...
Thanks for all of the info...
Mr. Black[/QUOTE]Thanks. I always appreciate a fan and I give it the old college try.

MOFO...that is EXACTLY what "Siissy Spacek look-alike" Nicole whispers to me. When her tight pussy is impaled on my cock and I am ramming the shit out of her, and she is starting to cum, she says hoarsely, "muthafucka" over and over again. That is SO hot!

Although I don't care to date her anymore, Alexus once remarked laughingly after a long and dirty-talk-filled fuck: "You are a crazy muthafucka."

I must be in the sense that I am a connoisseur of dirty talking.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]I hadn't seen Justine for quite a while, but it certainly wasn't from a lack of my desire to see her. Her cell number stopped working, and there was no other way for me to get in touch, and I hadn't seen her at all on the Ave. So when I did see her out of the corner of my eye, walking on a side street on the northern end of the stroll, I was tempted to do a boneheaded U-turn to get to her. As it was, I just pulled over and stopped on the K, and hoped I could walk to her quickly enough to pick her up. Justine always looks good enough to eat, and most assuredly would have been picked up very quickly by another monger. When I got there she was talking to another monger through his car window. When she saw me she gave me a huge smile and a wave She continued to talk to the other monger for a bit, and then he sped away, almost screeching his tires. I didn't get into what had happened, but we did get a chance to discuss it later on our way to a nice motel.[/QUOTE]Hey SuperE love the pics man. Like always I'm going to give you, CJ & anybody else their props for posting great reviews and hot pics that show that Philly has it going on when it come to SW'ers. BUT, I'm questioning this post and don't get me wrong because I have no issues with you what so ever. Remember when I asked can I use a few of your photos for a little idea I had? After saving those pics I noticed that your pictures are watermarked meaning, they have every detail on them such as time, date, camera used & even editing software if it was used. With that being said, The new justine pics have the same date & time frame as the previous report I'm hoping I'm wrong on this one, but even if I'm not it's not going to stop me from giving you prop on all the GREAT reports you post.

Hey SuperE!

I really appreciate your posts and photography- bigtime!

i have a plan to make it out your way sometime soon. Is it possible to include some idea of entertainment costs? I saw Nichole holding 60 in one photo. is this typical?

I have no right to ask this but thanks.

[QUOTE=Thunderbolt47]Hey SuperE!

I really appreciate your posts and photography- bigtime!

i have a plan to make it out your way sometime soon. Is it possible to include some idea of entertainment costs? I saw Nichole holding 60 in one photo. is this typical?

I have no right to ask this but thanks.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for your support.

I used to include the "damages" in my reports, but I stopped doing that. Every monger is different and I find myself to be far different from most, so a report of damages every time probably won't do readers much good other than provide one more thing for critics to throw a rock at for some reason or other. Sometimes I go for a quickie car BJ date at normal Ave rates, but more typically I like very long, multiple-cup, pic-taking dates at a nice motel. I don't really see much other reporting like that going on in this forum, perhaps except for Cooky to some degree. Maybe it is happening, but I just don't see any evidence of it. And I observe that even Cooky rarely mentions anything about damages.

I have written quite an extensive report on damages to which I will refer you here:

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=953281&postcount=1040[/url]

I hope this sheds some light on the subject, at least from my point of view. I don't pretend to be the ultimate authority on street prices for sex, but I do have a certain approach and philosophy that seems to work for me.

Every now and then you run into a truly gorgeous spinner on the Ave. Jamey was one of those: cute, fresh-faced, thin but not CCL. I picked her up on a hot corner at the south end of the stroll, and I knew immediately that I wanted an indoor FS date. I would have taken her to a nice motel, but I didn’t have enough time, so off to the Carlyle we went.

Jamey had absolutely no symptoms or marks of drug addiction, and she claimed not to take drugs. I tend to believe her. She said she lives with a few other girls just off the K, and all of them hook every now and then just to make some extra dough. Based on the success of our date, and her claim that the other girls she lives with are good looking and fun, I look forward to dating them as well.

We had a very nice conversation on the drive. Jamey is animated, extremely pleasant, smart and interesting. She said she was 22, and that seemed about right. She is around 5 feet 2 and 100 pounds, most definitely spinner proportions.

Jamey posed very well for pics. You can tell from her big and winning smile that she exudes a warm, friendly and outgoing personality. She was an equally good cock sucker. She could fit me all the way down her throat, which is quite rare for a girl so small. Her DT sucking technique was marvelous with varied speeds, sloppiness, licking , just the right pressures, excellent use of her mouth and throat and plenty of tongue action. I had planned at least 2 cups of FS, but her BBBJ was so nice that I just let it continue until I busted a hard nut into her mouth. She was a spitter, but no matter, she took the whole load first, and it felt great.

Having cum once, the edge was off my horniness, but I was ready to go again in about 10 minutes. I started with her sucking me again, fully planning to take her afterward in as many positions as I could, and ending with her on top (Why not? That’s what spinners are for! LOL). Once I was good and hard I first took her mish. I love to bend spinners up like a pretzel when fucking them mish; they are so light and flexible. Her pussy was tight and it felt good. She seemed to be enjoying herself, which I very much like. She was also into hearing dirty talking, and saying it herself. She really got a kick out of the “cum piggie” thing and giggled like crazy, and thought that it was really “cute.” I pounded her good mish, turned her over and did the same doggie, and ended with RCG and then CG. She bounced on top, and it was hot first to see her ass bouncing on me as I kneaded and slapped it. It was hotter still when she turned around, and was bouncing on top like I was a bronco. I grabbed her tiny soft pink nipples as she recoiled up and down on my dick. I said all manner of filthy dirty things to her as she sexily hopped up and down on me. I busted another hard nut.

Our time was almost up and there was somewhere I soon had to be, but I knew the next time I would most definitely take Jamey to a nice motel for a longer multiple-cup date. Now I have her digits and digits for her roomies so maybe I will finally schedule that SW threesome I have been meaning to experience.

Ratings? Face: 5 stars (very cute/ pretty); Body: 5 stars (on a spinner scale; thin and tight; I love a flat chest on a spinner with pinchable and suckable soft pink nipples like hers; the ass is thin but still delectable); BJ: 5 stars; Fucking: 5 stars; Attitude: 5 stars plus; Overall: 5 stars; Repeatable? Definitely! YMMV

Showing off that hot spinner body, her flexibility and spread for you to see her pretty pussy.

She was an outstanding cock sucker. Sometimes I forget to do the "flash the cash" pic at the end. I almost did this time too. We actually walked back to the room when my memory kicked in to do one.

[QUOTE=Freaklikdat]I'm hoping I'm wrong on this one, but even if I'm not it's not going to stop me from giving you prop on all the GREAT reports you post.[/QUOTE]

I know you didn't want to get into the "technical stuff" on the thread but if you must then please do. Just look at me as that friend who calls his friend out on something that he believes isn't true but still remain the best of friends. If it's one thing that I am very good with and have a passion for, it's videography & now photography, so I do know a thing or two about internal camera dates. But it doesn't take a rocket scientist to save a picture to their desktop, then right click it then hit properties to see the details of a photo. It's very odd that on the justine photos the dates are the exact same and the time frame is within the same hour I know you have many haters on the forum, but trust me I've truly became a fan of your work. Here's a perfect example [url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=931525&postcount=861[/url] you dated & reported on kate the exact same day you took her picture and it shows up on the details of the pics & just go back and look at the dates of your most resent pics of sabrina, nicole & carol. They all have the same time frame of when you reported on them. I know how it is when you have so many pics of SW'ers that you forgot you had or just never had the chance to post & I'm sure cooky knows it too, but a bogus report is completely different.

Shakespeare wrote a play about this called Much Ado About Nothing

Firstly, I couldn't care less about photo watermarks.

Secondly, I don't set the internal clock of either my camera or my photo software, so absolutely anything is likely to happen. When I have bothered to look I have seen things as odd as an origination date for a photo that is different from the creation date, or an origination or creation date or editing date or digitization date or whatever which is in the future and hasn't even happened yet!

Thirdly, when I transfer image files to be in another image file folder, as when I have previous images of the same person that I want to store together, my software has an annoying tendency (about which I care not) in certain circumstances to re-stamp the creation date to be the same as the creation date of the folder, and restart the clock at that time, even though it might stamp a current editing or access date. I have seen it do this when I copy the file as opposed to cutting the file and moving it. Why? I have no idea. My pure guess is because the software thinks it is meant to be a part of the folder, since it recognizes that it is a copy and not an original, and should be time stamped compatibly with other images in the folder. However, I have also seen(when I bothered to look) an editing or creation date before a picture was even supposedly taken, or a future date that has not yet even occurred (how weird is that!).

Fourthly, the camera date is almost never reliable, although, sometimes, if I have kept up the charge before the battery dies, and have set the camera clock recently for any reason, such as to stamp a date on an image, it might actually show an accurate date (at least until the battery dies again). If I have touched the date button inadvertently the camera date is like a time machine. It could be anything. Sometimes images actually show a semblance of dates which make sense.

Fifthly, if I cared at all about any of this, and I were an anal professional photographer, I am sure I would pay more attention to make sure all the clocks were working properly and have accurate and reliable information.

Sixthly, I am sure most of you are so thoroughly bored with the tedium of this whole discussion that you have not even bothered to make it this far in the post.

When I saw those Justine pics first thing I thought was, "does this chick only have one pair of underwear?" They are a great set of pics and I thought they looked familiar. After I read Freak's post I went back and checked and did notice they all look pretty similar. My two favorite recent pics, in fact, were posted back in October [url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=879111&postcount=452[/url] . Notice the two of her on her stomach with her ass pooched up in the air. [url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=962040&postcount=1116[/url]

I really don't care anyway. Hey maybe she was wearing the same shoes and same underwear both times (i noticed she had two different outfits) and Super confused spreads since they look exactly the same.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Shakespeare wrote a play about this called Much Ado About Nothing

Firstly, I don't pay any attention whatsoever to photo watermarks.

Secondly, I don't set the internal clock of either my camera or my photo software, so absolutely anything is likely to happen. When I have bothered to look I have seen things as odd as an origination date for a photo that is different from the creation date, or an origination or creation date or editing date or digitization date or whatever which is in the future and hasn't even happened yet!

Thirdly, when I transfer image files to be in another image file folder, as when I have previous images of the same person that I want to store together, my software has an annoying tendency (about which I care not) in certain circumstances to re-stamp the creation date to be the same as the image files in the folder (which makes some sense since it was the creation date of the folder), and restart the clock at that time, even though it might stamp a current editing date. I have seen it do this when I copy the file as opposed to cutting the file and moving it. Why? I have no idea. My pure guess is because the software thinks it is meant to be a part of the folder, since it recognizes that it is a copy and not an original, and should be time stamped similar to other images in the folder. However, I have also seen(when I bothered to look) an editing or creation date before a picture was even supposedly taken, or a future date that has not yet even occurred (how weird is that!).

Fourthly, the camera date is almost never reliable, although, sometimes, if I have kept up the charge before the battery dies, and have set the camera clock recently for any reason, such as to stamp a date on an image, it might actually show an accurate date (at least until the battery dies again). If I have touched the date button inadvertently the camera date is like a time machine. It could be anything. Sometimes images actually show a semblance of dates which make sense.

Fifthly, if I cared at all about any of this, and I were an anal professional photographer, I am sure I would pay more attention to make sure all the clocks were working properly and have accurate and reliable information.

Sixthly, I am sure most of you are so thoroughly bored with the tedium of this whole discussion that you have not even bothered to make it this far in the post.[/QUOTE]Abraham Licoln said "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."

Happy hunting.

[QUOTE=Johnny Stales]When I saw those Justine pics first thing I thought was, "does this chick only have one pair of underwear?" [/QUOTE]

Yes, I suppose some SWs do just have one pair of underwear, or at least a FAVORITE pair. Here are pics of three different dates with hot Nicole, one taken by ResidentEvil1 in his car and two by me on different indoor dates. She was wearing the SAME bra on all three occasions. She was also wearing the same bra and matching black panties three other times when I had a car date with her. She wasn't wearing any panties at all when I picked her up in her short denim skirt. Whoooohoooo! I tried to see if she also wore that bra and matching panties when she dated Cooky, but he didn't have any pics of her in her underwear. However, that insignia on the bra is fairly memorable, so perhaps Cooky remembers it as well. No matter, my point is made. Do some SWs have favorite underwear? Apparently the answer is yes. I am sure there are more examples. This was just one where the fact was very demonstrable.

[QUOTE=Johnny Stales]I really don't care anyway. Hey maybe she was wearing the same shoes and same underwear both times (I noticed she had two different outfits)[/QUOTE]

Yes, SWs apparently will wear the same shoes and the same underwear, but I don't think we have an epidemic of SWs carrying around spare outfits.

Sorry to intrude. Rockford IL guy here, been looking a the picture gallery. Noticed that there seem to be more good looking girls in Philadelphia than there are ugly ones available in Rockford. The few good looking ones we have I think all get a sugar daddy leaving the rest of us to get the very poor left overs. Your pics and Mr Cookiejar's pics always make me want to pay your towna visit. Can't afford it, but would still think could have some fun.

[QUOTE=Rob Roy]....Rockford IL guy here.... pics always make me want to pay your towna visit. Can't afford it, but would still think could have some fun.[/QUOTE]

There are several flights starting at $164 round trip. Granted that you will have to leave on a Weds. return on a Sat. Get a hotel near the strolls, and rent a small car. Hell, if I lived anywhere else, that is what I'd do! Imagine having three days and nights living out of a hotel, picking up many sw! Save up, it would be worth it.

I really don't care if a girl only wears one or two different outfits or undies, as long as they and she are clean, it is all good.