Printable View
[QUOTE=Brianastar;3426676]3 hours with a pot head for $133.33 an hr! Brilliant brother! Lmao.[/QUOTE]I just don't see the point of shiting on this other girls review. He seemed like he was happy with the service he got and the experience he had. To me this just seems petty on Brianna's part.
[QUOTE=Benz1;3427414]I agree, I would not repeat at her 250 price. Glad I saw her years ago for 150 and now I don't need to wonder about her. I'm really surprised she wrote anything on this forum because she does not like us on USA.
This is why she doesn't like us I will tell you that her pics are old and she doesn't look like a body builder anymore. If girls don't want us to comment about old pics then they should use new ones. We need more truth in advertising, especially from the Escort or MP members of this Forum.[/QUOTE]Guys remember, girls will try to charge what the market will bear but we control it! I still say that 1/2 hours should NEVER be more than $100 and full hours NEVER more than $150. Like I've said before, the girls actually laugh at those that will pay higher. They know that we can be suckers for their goods!
Jessica, not Briana.
WAY high IMO. But maybe that's just me.
[QUOTE=EdMonger;3427118]So are you saying if I ever decide to visit you hun, and that's a big if, you will charge me the same rate of $133.33 an hr. We could even leave the pot off the menu. Now I'm LMAO![/QUOTE]
Anybody here have a rule (or a guideline) NOT to see girls who don't have at least one face pic?
I know that seems kind of petty, but I like to know who's going to open the door when I get there.
Plus, I figure ANYBODY can steal a nice-figure pic off the internet and say that's it's them.
The same goes (for me anyway) for calling vs. Texting. I like to hear a girl's voice on the other end, so I know it's not a BF, scam or worse. ANYBODY can set up a fake ad (fake news. LOL) with a dummy phone number. I realize the same can be done with some faceless chick on the phone as well, but I prefer to hear (and see) at least a little of my date before attempting the dream. Plus, texting leaves a record and is a pain in the ass on one's phone :)
But then again, maybe that's just me.
[QUOTE=Girls1;3427717]Anybody here have a rule (or a guideline) NOT to see girls who don't have at least one face pic?
I know that seems kind of petty, but I like to know who's going to open the door when I get there.
Plus, I figure ANYBODY can steal a nice-figure pic off the internet and say that's it's them.
The same goes (for me anyway) for calling vs. Texting. I like to hear a girl's voice on the other end, so I know it's not a BF, scam or worse. ANYBODY can set up a fake ad (fake news. LOL) with a dummy phone number. I realize the same can be done with some faceless chick on the phone as well, but I prefer to hear (and see) at least a little of my date before attempting the dream. Plus, texting leaves a record and is a pain in the ass on one's phone :)
But then again, maybe that's just me.[/QUOTE]To paraphrase the notorious Lionel, most of the providers would only see guys who really hate their dick if they posted real face pics; nobody with any self respect would see them. IMO, there are very few providers who are attractive enough to have real face pics be an asset.
In a perfect world I would adopt your thoughts as a rule, but WM is far from a perfect hobby world so I pay my money and take my chances.
[QUOTE=Girls1;3427717]Anybody here have a rule (or a guideline) NOT to see girls who don't have at least one face pic?
I know that seems kind of petty, but I like to know who's going to open the door when I get there.
Plus, I figure ANYBODY can steal a nice-figure pic off the internet and say that's it's them.
The same goes (for me anyway) for calling vs. Texting. I like to hear a girl's voice on the other end, so I know it's not a BF, scam or worse. ANYBODY can set up a fake ad (fake news. LOL) with a dummy phone number. I realize the same can be done with some faceless chick on the phone as well, but I prefer to hear (and see) at least a little of my date before attempting the dream. Plus, texting leaves a record and is a pain in the ass on one's phone :)
But then again, maybe that's just me.[/QUOTE]I usually always try to talk to the girls on the phone before I see them. Face pics are always a plus to me but I also see why the girls don't want to post them, so it doesn't really bother me.
[QUOTE=Girls1;3427717]Anybody here have a rule (or a guideline) NOT to see girls who don't have at least one face pic?
I know that seems kind of petty, but I like to know who's going to open the door when I get there.
Plus, I figure ANYBODY can steal a nice-figure pic off the internet and say that's it's them.
The same goes (for me anyway) for calling vs. Texting. I like to hear a girl's voice on the other end, so I know it's not a BF, scam or worse. ANYBODY can set up a fake ad (fake news. LOL) with a dummy phone number. I realize the same can be done with some faceless chick on the phone as well, but I prefer to hear (and see) at least a little of my date before attempting the dream. Plus, texting leaves a record and is a pain in the ass on one's phone :)
But then again, maybe that's just me.[/QUOTE]OMG, YES. It's definitely not "just you. " Obviously, Looks Matter in this hobby. A lot. A Huge lot. And faces are a major part of looks; of beauty.
I wonder if girls seem only to think we care about their bodies? A pretty face is a big deal to me, and I presume to most of us. I'd much rather see a pretty face pic than a dozen butt pics, or for that matter a dozen FAKE butt pics. Don't get me started.
I can appreciate providers might want their faces private for security or privacy reasons. But is that really keeping them out of trouble? Tattoos are everywhere and can be used better than faces for I'd-ing people.
Looks matter to me. But performance comes first. Besides the back of their heads all look the same to me.
Benz. 2 ¢.
Looking for a good experience with a spinner or on the thinner side. Younger (under 30) that takes direction. Takes direction usually means a good personality at least with their customers.
I haven't had much luck with a younger spinner lately.
[QUOTE=xboch01;3428239]Looking for a good experience with a spinner or on the thinner side. Younger (under 30) that takes direction. Takes direction usually means a good personality at least with their customers.
I haven't had much luck with a younger spinner lately.[/QUOTE]What do you consider to be younger? There is ivy I don't think she is as young as she claims but she is definitely a spinner. I've seen her a few times and have always had great luck, maybe next time I'll ask her what her actual age is. She post ma on backpage almost everyday.
[QUOTE=SpongeBob66;3428077]OMG, YES. It's definitely not "just you. " Obviously, Looks Matter in this hobby. A lot. A Huge lot. And faces are a major part of looks; of beauty.
I wonder if girls seem only to think we care about their bodies? A pretty face is a big deal to me, and I presume to most of us. I'd much rather see a pretty face pic than a dozen butt pics, or for that matter a dozen FAKE butt pics. Don't get me started.
I can appreciate providers might want their faces private for security or privacy reasons. But is that really keeping them out of trouble? Tattoos are everywhere and can be used better than faces for I'd-ing people.[/QUOTE]One thing these women need to realize is that we'll take pictures, to their specifications, even with their own phone. Some, like myself, have experience taking pics that make it extremely difficult to identify them, yet gives a guy some idea whether she's pretty or not. It's not like she has to shell out cash to get some good pics.
I saw her at the same place. My only complaint from our 1/2 hr together was her clock watching tendencies. I made sure to let her know that CW was a big pet peeve for many of the guys on this forum. She seemed to listen. I think she could be a good long term provider.
[QUOTE=Bottum;3426931]Had a chance to ball this little cutie few days back in a nice inn off of 44St & Cydle Park. She is legit, petite, GFE, and took direction well, donated $. 2 for h h, she short and has the body of teenager. BBBJ was decent and covered full service, she wasn't into camera & pictures which is my fetish. She is paranoid about several things besides pics. In my contact with her she never gave me the motel where she was staying. Just told me it was by 131 & 44st. ; I had ask her 3 times what is your hotel? So I went to the cheap National chain one, turns out she was at lesser known one off Clyde Park not 44St. It took me and extra ten minutes to find it. She threatened to end our date, and criticize me for thinking she was at the cheap motel. It stressed me out needlessly; in the escort business communicate well with your clients, she did not. For those reasons I will not repeat YMMV.[/QUOTE]
Rae, now Rocky, is posting again. I dreamed of her in December.
Pretty girl, but not into it IMO. 'Just lay there' sums it up.
Good figure, BBBJ, CFS. $. 8 if I remember.
I might repeat in a pinch.
[URL]http://grandrapids.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/let-me-rock-your-world/32708663[/URL]
Anybody ever see Amy from back in the day?
She posted regularly 3 years ago, and I never saw her. I called once, but our times didn't match.
Nice figure, pretty. I think she went by 'Amy' then too.
[URL]http://grandrapids.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/sexy-amy-new-pic-call-now-running-special/31970993[/URL]
[URL]http://grandrapids.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/amber-rose/28415223[/URL]
Anytime I see a post on her, I will warn the mongers! Stay away from this cash and dash thief!