Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]There are more than a few Katies but was this the "bad Katie" (also has been known as 'blond Katie" in the past, but is now a brunette) I have reported negatively about who lives near Ontario and the K?

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=793299&postcount=106[/url]

Or possibly was it the Katie I recently reported on who hangs at the far northern end of the stroll?

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=952530&postcount=1036[/url][/QUOTE]There are more than a few Katies but was this the "bad Katie" (also has been known as 'blond Katie" in the past, but is now a brunette) I have reported negatively about who lives near Ontario and the K?

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/s...9&postcount=106[/url]
This is the one I was talking to, the bad Katie. She used to date a very good friend of mine a few years back and he spoke very highly of her but then she began to change and not for the good based on the reports I seen on here. Even in her heyday she wasn't my cup of tea so I only knew her to chat with for a minute when she would come to my friends garage to visit him.

T

Man, except for those distinctive almond-shaped eyes, she looks like a whole different person now from the one I picked up and reported on. Seeing how much older she looks I was thinking it must be 3 years or so but I checked the archives and see it was only Nov 2008. Obviously from a health standpoint it's better that she's chunky than CCL, but for my tastes this not-much older Carol is definitely less physically appealing than when she was a fresh-faced very petite 20yo. Sounds like the years on the street and lessened meds are making her a much less desirable date too. Better for her I suppose, but not so good for her paying customers. Any news on her sister? Is she is still in the game? I so wanted to have them together once I found out they were sisters and would do threesomes, at least back then. Unfortunately, before knowing that, when I had my chance I kicked her sister to the curb not wanting two girls in the car at the same time.

As for Maddie, I'm not into that kind of thing so your experience was a little out there for me, but it certainly made for an interesting report. You had to know that at least of a couple of our "upper-class" AMP purist brethren would be sure and tear into you for that post, so I give you props for sharing it.

[QUOTE=T Shirt]

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=793299&postcount=106[/url]

This is the one I was talking to, the bad Katie. She used to date a very good friend of mine a few years back and he spoke very highly of her but then she began to change and not for the good based on the reports I seen on here. Even in her heyday she wasn't my cup of tea so I only knew her to chat with for a minute when she would come to my friends garage to visit him.

T[/QUOTE]

Bad Katie is BAD news! Read my reports on her if you have any doubts. I have personal experience with her trying to shortchange me and extort me. SWs change and she obviously changed from good to bad. Maybe she changed back again; anything is possible, but I would be VERY wary of her if I were you.

[QUOTE=Mike 80]Man, except for those distinctive almond-shaped eyes, she looks like a whole different person now from the one I picked up and reported on. Seeing how much older she looks I was thinking it must be 3 years or so but I checked the archives and see it was only Nov 2008. Obviously from a health standpoint it's better that she's chunky than CCL, but for my tastes this not-much older Carol is definitely less physically appealing than when she was a fresh-faced very petite 20yo.[/QUOTE]

Yes, Carol does have lovely and distinctive almond-shaped eyes, and this time at least I got to see them. I first dated Carol just last year and she already looked much different from her initial appearance on the stroll as a thin spinner. You can still spin her, but you would have to eat your Wheaties first....LOL.

[QUOTE=Mike 80] Sounds like the years on the street and lessened meds are making her a much less desirable date too. Better for her I suppose, but not so good for her paying customers.[/QUOTE]

YMMV always applies and I must allow that perhaps she was having an off day. My date with her wasn't bad; it was just very mediocre in comparison to the last time I saw her (when she was high). She didn't measure up to what I personally prefer in a SW date, and she suffered in comparison IMHO to many other better current choices on the Ave.

[QUOTE=Mike 80] Any news on her sister? Is she is still in the game?[/QUOTE]

Actually I did ask about her sister and apparently she is out of the life, has a kid and a man and is very happy.

[QUOTE=Mike 80]I so wanted to have them together once I found out they were sisters and would do threesomes, at least back then. Unfortunately, before knowing that, when I had my chance I kicked her sister to the curb not wanting two girls in the car at the same time.[/QUOTE]

I have done many civvie threesomes but never a SW threesome, despite many years of mongering. Doing sisters I imagine would add some spice to the equation. I plan to put a SW threesome on the menu sometime soon, and I admire the way Cooky is often able to put one together.

[QUOTE=Mike 80]As for Maddie, I'm not into that kind of thing so your experience was a little out there for me, but it certainly made for an interesting report. [/QUOTE]

I am what I am and I have no qualms about it. I have been a serious practitioner of BDSM with civvie dates for a long time. SWs usually aren't into it and I am not one to force any woman to do anything she doesn't enjoy, not even a SW. Maddie was a combination of BDSM civvie turned SW for the day, so I went for it.

[QUOTE=Mike 80]You had to know that at least of a couple of our "upper-class" AMP purist brethren would be sure and tear into you for that post, so I give you props for sharing it.[/QUOTE]

Those seeking "higher quality women" for hire wouldn't be shopping on the K or any other such place. It is the bargain basement area of the store. Comparing a "high-class," high-priced hooker at a MP or from the internet or an escort service to a SW on the K would be like comparing a steak dinner and a hoagie. They aren't remotely similar enough to be comparable (although SOMETIMES they are the very same), and one costs a lot more than the other. Does that make it better? It all depends for what you are hungry and the amount you desire to spend. Purists who think that the only women worth paying for are in a MP or advertise on line or come from an escort service should understand that many of those same women are available on the K at a significant discount, and I have personal experience with many of these very women: steak dinners at hoagie prices. It doesn't get too much better than that.

Although some readers may think that my writing reports and taking pics has something to do with ego, I assure you that it does not. It is a personal diary, albeit publicized, of my SW experiences. I am not trying to impress anyone with the quality of woman I am able to secure for payment, as if that were somehow a reflection of my worth as well. I am not exclusively seeking "trophy SWs," although I certainly wouldn't turn any down at the right price. It is my belief that if a man is secure with himself that he will be totally comfortable with what he enjoys in a female, not because of what "beauty" or other standards others may try to impose on him externally, but rather because he likes what he likes. I find a wide range of women appealing, and I am an equal opportunity monger in many respects. I don't just date SWs who are perfect physical specimens, although anyone who has been a regular reader of my reports and pics will note that I have dated my fair share of incredibly hot looking SWs. But I also have dated average and even below average looking SWs, chubbies (even fatties) and MILFs. I truly do feel that much of the appeal I find with a woman lies between her ears, and not just between her legs. Attitude means a lot.

As to taste in SWs: when I read a monger here severely criticizing the looks of a SW another monger dated and for whom pics were provided, my main conclusion is that the criticizing monger has self esteem issues that need to be confirmed by some "absolute" standards that may or may not be his own. I suspect that he wants others to believe that he is somehow "better" because he would have us think that his standards for selection are higher. It is interesting that most of such criticizing mongers rarely provide us with pics of their exploits to demonstrate for us the "excellence" to which the rest of us should aspire. Contrary to the anonymity of the criticizers and rock throwers, those who post pics are more typically comfortable in their own skins and with their predilections, desires and choices in SWs. They generally will have a more relaxed philosophy that I have often read Cookyjar exemplify in one fashion or another by saying: "to each his own."

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Bad Katie is BAD news! Read my reports on her if you have any doubts. I have personal experience with her trying to shortchange me and extort me. SWs change and she obviously changed from good to bad. Maybe she changed back again; anything is possible, but I would be VERY wary of her if I were you.[/QUOTE]What I was trying to say is I ran into her quite by accident while visiting a good friend out at 22nd st. On her very best day I would not and did not go anywhere near her, she just wasn't my type ever. Thanks for the warning though but it was just a chance meeting with my friends former date. I have no interest in her and never will. By the way I did read your report and it seems to be in line with what I was hearing about her in the neighborhood too. Thanks for your concern Super, but believe me, there's nothing to worry about as far as I'm concerned.

T

RE: Incredibly brilliant 'advice' from Mythbuster:

"Your friend could have avoided all this by getting a room."

[QUOTE=Mad Monger]Gee, ya think? What insightful analysis! Just the advice I and every other monger out there who goes on car dates couldn't figure out and were waiting for with baited breath![/QUOTE]

What a fucking [b]MOOK[/b] you are Mythbuster. It's no wonder that I placed you on ignore. Fortunately I only have to read your dumb-ass comments when someone else responds to you.

I had not paid any attention to this person until now. Today upon seeing your post I checked him out a little bit closer. He/She/It has 147 posts in just over four (4) months and out of them I didn't see A SINGLE REPORT!

Maybe I did miss one out of all the crap he posts but if I did who can blame me? What I saw was just a whole string of BS comments and a variety of stupid remarks against several "legends" here such as Super, Cooky and even Glenn.

What useful purpose does this serve? Why has it been allowed to reach this point? I don't really know but I will officially add this "person" to my ignore list as well. So congrats there Mythbuster as you've made the list and will never make it off.

P.S. This is not an attempt to start a flame war or a pissing match at all. I am just wondering how he could reach this extent without "being reported to the moderator" and banned due to the actions.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent]RE: Incredibly brilliant 'advice' from Mythbuster:

"Your friend could have avoided all this by getting a room. "

What a fucking [b]MOOK[/b] you are Mythbuster. It's no wonder that I placed you on ignore. Fortunately I only have to read your dumb-ass comments when someone else responds to you.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Horny As Hell]I had not paid any attention to this person until now. Today upon seeing your post I checked him out a little bit closer. He/She/It has 147 posts in just over four (4) months and out of them I didn't see A SINGLE REPORT![/QUOTE]

It is somewhat of an oversimplification, but non-contributors of reports and intelligence generally have the most rocks to throw and the dumbest things to say. That goes double for members who don't post pics, but seem to have lots of opinions about the "quality" of the SWs for those who do post pics. This isn't Penthouse folks; we are talking finding women, often severely drug addicted, on the streets to pay for sex. If you want Sports Illustrated bikini models I suggest you take a copy into the bathroom and whack off to your heart's content.

[QUOTE=Horny As Hell]Maybe I did miss one out of all the crap he posts but if I did who can blame me? What I saw was just a whole string of BS comments and a variety of stupid remarks against several "legends" here such as Super, Cooky and even Glenn.[/QUOTE]

I have been accused of being overly sensitive, and I have taken some of this crap too seriously from time to time. I should take a page from Cooky's book and completely ignore some of these idiotic flamers. With Mythbuster I actually got to my boiling point, and simply placed him on ignore. It has done wonders for my blood pressure. However, every now and then I see a glimpse of his idiocy in a response from another member, and I can't resist the urge to give this dumb ass-wipe a written jab in the ribs.

[QUOTE=Horny As Hell]What useful purpose does this serve? Why has it been allowed to reach this point? I don't really know but I will officially add this "person" to my ignore list as well. So congrats there Mythbuster as you've made the list and will never make it off.[/QUOTE]

That's one way to go, and it is a way I have chosen to deal with the totally useless Mythbuster.

[QUOTE=Horny As Hell]P.S. This is not an attempt to start a flame war or a pissing match at all. I am just wondering how he could reach this extent without "being reported to the moderator" and banned due to the actions.[/QUOTE]

There should be some rules in this forum regarding continuously useless and disruptively negative or stupid posts, but that would be difficult to judge and administer. Unless a member is specifically and egregiously breaking some forum rules, then they will likely continue to hang around unscathed. We can report them as annoyances to the Admin and eventually enough complaints will get them removed. Other ways to go are to place them on ignore as you and I have decided to do with Mythbuster or just shout them down and eventually shame the stupid fuckers into silence. Unfortunately too much of that can clutter the threads which provide useful information. However, that's why I opened the "Fight Club" thread, so that ongoing arguments and shout downs can be moved there and members who just want information and pics and aren't interested in all these stupid assholes and their comments and bickering can avoid all that horseshit if they don't want to read it.

If you don’t care for big girls, HSWs, or SWs with a lot of tats, then save yourself the aggravation and stop reading or looking right here. Sabrina, however, is one of the best dates you are likely to come across in any of these categories. She is a fun gal, warm and pleasant, and up for just about anything. I have had a number of car dates with Sabrina, but never an indoor date, and I always wanted to experience that with her, so this was my chance. I also had never done a photo spread of her and this was also my opportunity for that as well.

We went to a nice motel. I was going to bring along her buddy Samantha, who I have also dated before, but I had some reservations about that, even though I have been meaning to try a SW threesome. I will get into the reasons why I chose not to have a threesome on this particular date a bit later.

Sabrina was very anxious to pose. She is aware of the USA Sex Guide, can access it on her phone, and was like a little girl at Christmas asking me when I was going to post the pics so she could see them. She was interested to see all the poses, but particularly to see the pics of her sucking cock, because she said she never had pics taken like that before, and was looking forward to seeing them posted. She was also anxious to see the pics I had taken of her buddy Samantha, and I explained to her how to find them. I also explained to Sabrina that Samantha had some issues on my last date with her which were a turn off, and that was the reason I didn’t bring her along. Samantha is good looking (even though she has gained some weight as a recent guest of the state), loves to talk dirty (is VERY good at the “Daddy” and “cum piggie” things), and can be a fun suck and fuck, but she has a bad-habit tendency to hurry you. She wasn’t but a few minutes into our BJ on my last date with her and she was pushing to fuck, and she wasn’t but a few minutes into the fuck and she was asking if I was ready to cum yet. She needs to learn that this can be a big downer. Sabrina nodded and said she had been on a threesome date with Samantha once and Samantha was fucking the guy, and she didn’t even have all her clothes off yet and was asking him if he was going to cum already. Sabrina thought that was so funny in the way and when she said it that she had to go into the bathroom to laugh. So she understood what I was telling her. She said she would have a “pep talk” with Samantha about this and maybe we could arrange a threesome at a future time.

Sabrina is a natural “model” and has a sexy “big girl” look. Some guys don’t like big girls or tats and prefer skinny girls with a more unspoiled look. I like the pristine, fresh-faced, spinner, girl-next-door look as much as anyone. However I also happen to find Sabrina’s big tits, big ass, tats, open-mindedness and warm personality very appealing.

Sabrina gives a good BBBJ: not top-of–the-line, outstanding, best you ever had, but way above average. She is enthusiastic, can DT, is wet and sloppy and will do anything you ask like suck or lick your balls or lick your cock or anything you want. She takes your whole load, swallows it and gives you a big knowing smile.

Sabrina is fun to fuck. She is a bit heavy and a little awkward to do CG or RCG but she is very flexible for a big gal to do mish and she is absolutely perfect to do doggie. She will say anything dirty that you ask of her, although she giggles with it, so it isn’t exactly sincere or convincing, as if she amusingly thinks you are harmlessly warped. But it is hot nonetheless. Fucking her doggie is THE way to end a fucking session with her. She has a terrific ass, and you can pound the ever loving shit out of her from behind while grabbing onto and/or slapping that tempting ass because she is absolutely made for that. Anyone who enjoys a big bottomed gal, or just a girl with a large, round, well shaped ass would find Sabrina to his liking.

Ratings? Face: 4 stars (pretty enough but not quite 5 star material); Body: 4 stars (she could stand to lose some weight around the middle but she has nice tits and an especially nice ass and looks very good for a big girl); BJ: 4 1/2 stars (way above average but not perfect); Fucking: 5 stars (what carried this high rating is having her doggie; that is definitely a 5 star experience); Attitude: 5 stars plus; Overall: solid 4 ½ stars (way above average); Repeatable? Yes (not perfect or outstanding, but certainly fun and worthwhile doing again) YMMV

Some shots of her tits and her sucking on them, her tats and her nice ass. I especially like the contrasting look on Sabrina20: 'cutesy' with tats: gotta love it.

Based on past view count experience, most of you will be looking at Sabrina24, where she spreads open her pussy and ass for you to get a good look. But ever since I viewed a particular angle in one of Cooky's photo spreads I have become quite fond of the angle and look of Sabrina21. That angle appeals to me and IMHO makes most girls who pose that way look very sexy.

BTW: How do you like Sabrina25 and Sabrina26 with the "Fuck Me" choker?

You have to love the facial expressions, the tongue piercing, the ball and cock licking, the halfway to DT and the messy spittle mixed with cum dripping from her mouth.

I usually only post 10 of these type per SW encounter, but these were so good (to me anyway) that I had to post a few more.

Notice Sabrina's very clean and very well manicured and decorated nails as in Sabrina41 and Sabrina46. The rest of her was just as clean. This is a SW who takes real pride in her hygiene.

[QUOTE=Acro782]Wow, that's some rant from you, dude. Guess someone's got their "panties all bunched up", and I am pretty sure it's not me. LOL. What's next? You going to put your fingers in your ears, close your eyes, then say "la la la la la"? Look, trotting out the whole "I'm a regular and you're a newbie" argument gets really tiresome. Some of us prefer to exchange certain info via backchannel, and that's our choice. Might I suggest that if you don't want to debate a point on its merits, that you follow your own advice on ignoring it?[/QUOTE]The 'point' I gather you have been constantly and annoyingly trying to make is that Super told someone what to do? Firstly, I don't see where that was the case. Secondly, that is totally irrelevant; even if it was the case, why do YOU give a flying fuck? Are you the self-appointed defender of first amendment rights on behalf of everyone in this forum? Thirdly, you yourself have TOLD Super what to do a number of times already, including what you just said ("... follow your own advice on ignoring it?)! So, go and do what you advise others to do, or am I telling you what to do, and only YOU are allowed to do that?

Let go of your hard on, asshole, and go find another sandbox to play in. You have precious little posts here and all you seem to want to do is attack a valuable contributor to this forum with your picky-shit nonsense. Keep it up and I am sure that I and many others will complain to have your ass thrown out of here.

I am really sick and tired of silly, self-important, non-contributing dick-wads like you getting exercised about bullshit like this and then continuing to harp on it like anyone gives a rat’s ass. If you are so in love with the "back-channel" then stay there. Hopefully what that means is that you need to take a few up the ass. You are so obviously envious and clearly obsessed with, in Super’s words, “nit-picky horseshit.” Until and unless you have some useful intelligence to contribute to this forum, do us all a favor and shut the fuck up and stop polluting Super’s thread with your dumb fucking tirades, disguised as moralistic concerns for freedom of speech. Nobody is tricked into thinking that you have some higher purpose in mind, and a fool can see that you violate the very principles you purport to defend. You just like to see yourself in print throwing rocks. As Super already told you, give it a rest and get a life, and give us a fucking break as well! Some of us are actually more interested in the useful information and intelligence that Super has to share than your inexperienced and pin-headed perspective.

If I were Super I would ignore your dumb ass, not because you TOLD him to, but because you have a hair across it for whatever reason and you have nothing useful to say that is in the spirit and the purpose of this forum.

Keep up your good work Super and completely ignore this idiotic SOB.

I am not in a position to be out there mongering right now, and probably don't have much of a right to voice my opinion, and I'm sure Super doesn't need anyone to defend him, so I would just say to the newbie's and negative posters, just sit back and enjoy the work people like Super and Cookie do, they do a great job!!!