General Reports

I discovered [URL]STDcheck.com[/URL] after a few scares in the past. If you haven't used it, I highly recommend it. The cost of one or two tests at the doctor is about $100-120 after insurance, but this place gives you a 10 test panel for around $130. They just take a couple blood vials and a urine sample at LabCorp. No appointment but they typically close early and I think the hours are 7:00 to 4:00 but they could vary depending on what location.

I like it because you can pay for it and it doesn't show up on your insurance. You can set it up so it doesn't send you anything in the mail and the only notifications you get are email. That way no friends or family or work knows. Great as long as you got privacy on your phone and email.

It use to give results as they come in and it takes about one day to one week per test to return but now they started upselling instant results so you have to pay an additional $30 or you have to wait for all the results before they give them to you, so like a week.

They also try to upsell you with a immediate antibiotic for a maybe pill to counter something you know is going to be positive but not sure it works. There's one or two other tests they can try to sell you but they cost over $100. I think that's Tric and I forget the other one.

I also heard that you might have to wait 2 weeks to get true results, but if you're showing symptoms I would get tested immediately. I don't know about waiting a week or two but you can get false negatives if you do it too soon.

I've never used them for treatment with a positive tests but I think they have some sort of digital consultation and treatment option. If you get a positive you can also go to your doctor but sometimes your doctor may force you to take another test to prove it, which I think is stupid when you have LabCorp results the same company they use. I think it's about the money for them.

It's a great, affordable, and private lab test when junior gets the better of you and you go raw on something dirty. LOL I can't tell you if the upsells are worth it, but they do have value. You can be out of the door for 10 tests at $130 or closer to $300 if you want a full panel. You can cherry pick some tests but if you're going to spend $100 you might as well spend the $130 and get the panel.

Do any of you not read every section of the Hampton Roads forums? I mean if you see that there's an unread post in, say, Norfolk, but you don't live there, do you just ignore it? As an example, I live in VB but if I see a post in NN, I'll read it. Given how transient a lot of the girls are, and that they post in every HR city on STG, this seems wise to me and I'd wager every member reads the new posts in every one of the Seven Cities.

I'm asking because some members, mainly newer ones but some old hands, post the same report in every city. This creates a lot of noise to get through before other members find a useful post. My thinking is that one post about a girl is plenty. Copying and pasting the report in every city adds nothing and makes things more difficult and is trally nothing more than spam and a way to get their post count up. New members want to make Senior quicker this way. Who knows what motivates the others to follow suit.

The irony is that I'm copying and pasting this in every cities General Reports section. Please reply to the Tidewater General section.

Think of this as research.

Thanks.

Yeah, I read every forum for each of the cities in the area, plus Tidewater, which I kind of consider a "controlling" forum for the south side. I am on the Peninsula, so am more interested in NN and HPT, but you never know what good info you might pick up from the other areas' mongers. About the only subject I don't always check is the sugar babies stuff, since links require an account, and I am NOT going the SB route. Too much trouble, expensive, and it's easier, and I think more fun, to find an UTR (dangerous if they develop the feels, though.).

MM.

[QUOTE=LuvNHookers;6909200]Do any of you not read every section of the Hampton Roads forums? I mean if you see that there's an unread post in, say, Norfolk, but you don't live there, do you just ignore it? As an example, I live in VB but if I see a post in NN, I'll read it. Given how transient a lot of the girls are, and that they post in every HR city on STG, this seems wise to me and I'd wager every member reads the new posts in every one of the Seven Cities.

I'm asking because some members, mainly newer ones but some old hands, post the same report in every city. This creates a lot of noise to get through before other members find a useful post. My thinking is that one post about a girl is plenty. Copying and pasting the report in every city adds nothing and makes things more difficult and is trally nothing more than spam and a way to get their post count up. New members want to make Senior quicker this way. Who knows what motivates the others to follow suit.

The irony is that I'm copying and pasting this in every cities General Reports section. Please reply to the Tidewater General section.

Think of this as research.

Thanks.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=LuvNHookers;6909200]Do any of you not read every section of the Hampton Roads forums? I mean if you see that there's an unread post in, say, Norfolk, but you don't live there, do you just ignore it? As an example, I live in VB but if I see a post in NN, I'll read it. Given how transient a lot of the girls are, and that they post in every HR city on STG, this seems wise to me and I'd wager every member reads the new posts in every one of the Seven Cities.

Thanks.[/QUOTE]I agree. It is annoying to have the same post multiple times. I'm in VB and I will read all posts in and including Tidewater and sometimes even Richmond. You Do never know if there is a good reason to drive to another city. What is most annoying to me is that the same post in each city forces one to open it just to see if there is a relevant post for me in that city.

I like variety but with an open menu. When I see a post in another city with promising fun, I'll give it a try!! I am only into the AMPs and I have found some fun through CL. I made the mistake of texting one of the STG asian girls sites. I never met any but now I get text every day with pics of asian girls in them. Sometimes two or three. ALL from different phone numbers. Blocking, Deleting and reporting doesn't help. I finally got a second line.

Three recent dreams were very different. I'm mid 50's but vigorous sex is too vigorous to be fun anymore. Dream 1 this lady her pussy is the perfect fit for me and the pleasure to vigor ratio is high. Dream 2 the lady and me are less good fit and I got to release but it was a max effort and not worth the fight. Dream 3 the lady and I were not a fit at all so the lady gave me a HJ. The HJ was relaxing and earthshaking at the same time. Is this what the massage parlor thing is about? I'm likely to hit up Gypsy next or another girl doing that kind of body worship thing. At least until dream girl 1 is back in town.

I saw a TL. Super beautiful in person. Well I tried to take a pic discreetly and my flash went off.

I played it off but she was pissed and threatened me with the guys upstairs. Made me delete all my pics.

And trash. She still saw me believe it or not. No BJ at all and said I had 30 seconds.

I made it work but now I'm getting messages that they have my IP and are following me.

And hope it was worth it. Smh. Needles to say no more TL but no photography.

I used a burner. But who knows what nerd they have behind closed walls hacking me now haha.

Anyone else had similar situations and lived?

Do any of you who wear glasses ever wear them during a massage or put the on after the flip to see the action?? I don't wear glasses so I am curious.

Ray-Ban has these glasses out with a video camera in them and am considering them for Monger purposes. I have never asked an MT to film, assuming a definite "no" would be the answer. However, if I had glasses on, there would be no reason to ask and memories could be taken home for safe keeping.

[QUOTE=Danyoyo75;7124479]Do any of you who wear glasses ever wear them during a massage or put the on after the flip to see the action?? I don't wear glasses so I am curious.

Ray-Ban has these glasses out with a video camera in them and am considering them for Monger purposes. I have never asked an MT to film, assuming a definite "no" would be the answer. However, if I had glasses on, there would be no reason to ask and memories could be taken home for safe keeping.[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://recordinglaw.com/united-states-recording-laws/one-party-consent-states/virginia-recording-laws/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Passport4;7124829][URL]https://recordinglaw.com/united-states-recording-laws/one-party-consent-states/virginia-recording-laws/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hypothetically, of course.

[QUOTE=Passport4;7124829][URL]https://recordinglaw.com/united-states-recording-laws/one-party-consent-states/virginia-recording-laws/[/URL][/QUOTE]It is legal if one party knows about it even if it's just you. But you can't record if you're not part of conversation, or video, but why would you want to have a recording of something that can come back to haunt you? That is the question I want to know. I know a local massage girl that would piss me off then record it on phone, for future leverage, and I also know she recorded a few of you unsuspecting pawns. Why? Because information is power, and power is control and money. To most of these girls, money is their only goal in life. So remember there is no trust in this game. I learned the hard way. But make no mistake I learned it well.

[QUOTE=Danyoyo75;7124479]Do any of you who wear glasses ever wear them during a massage or put the on after the flip to see the action?? I don't wear glasses so I am curious. I have never asked an MT to film, assuming a definite "no" would be the answer. However, if I had glasses on, there would be no reason to ask and memories could be taken home for safe keeping.[/QUOTE]I'm nearsighted but not enough to need glasses that close. I know one girl who wears her glasses almost all the time, including sex and shower.

I've taken pics or film of quite a few girls, sometimes surreptitiously, usually after I'd seen them several times and built up some trust. I never ever post them anywhere.

I've heard that during the initial run of that type of videocam glasses, a few nerds found that going to certain bars while wearing the glasses was unwise.

[QUOTE=Rydin;7124953]It is legal if one party knows about it even if it's just you. But you can't record if you're not part of conversation, or video, but why would you want to have a recording of something that can come back to haunt you? That is the question I want to know. I know a local massage girl that would piss me off then record it on phone, for future leverage, and I also know she recorded a few of you unsuspecting pawns. Why? Because information is power, and power is control and money. To most of these girls, money is their only goal in life. So remember there is no trust in this game. I learned the hard way. But make no mistake I learned it well.[/QUOTE]I am not an attorney. Virginia is a 1 party state, but there are exceptions and it was listed if you read the full link. I'm adding that part so you don't have to go back to find it in the link.

It is against the law to knowingly and intentionally create in any way, any videographic or still image of a nonconsenting person under circumstances which that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy if:

That person is in a state of full or partial nudity in a restroom, dressing room, locker room, hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or other location for the purpose of exposing that person's intimate parts.

The imaging device is used to record under a person's clothing for the purpose of capturing that person's intimate parts or undergarments when such parts or undergarments are concealed from public view.

[QUOTE=Passport4;7128138]I am not an attorney. Virginia is a 1 party state, but there are exceptions and it was listed if you read the full link. I'm adding that part so you don't have to go back to find it in the link.

It is against the law to knowingly and intentionally create in any way, any videographic or still image of a nonconsenting person under circumstances which that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy if:

That person is in a state of full or partial nudity in a restroom, dressing room, locker room, hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or other location for the purpose of exposing that person's intimate parts.

The imaging device is used to record under a person's clothing for the purpose of capturing that person's intimate parts or undergarments when such parts or undergarments are concealed from public view.[/QUOTE]Yes, you are right that is a given, I didn't say anything about nudity, you have to be a dumbass if you think that would be legal, by the way most AMPs have cameras and most have audio recording, my point was these girls record us more than we ever would record them. Personally it's a not a good a idea, to have evidence on your own phone or recorder, glasses etc. Audio recordings are Legal, if only one party knows even if just you. Thanks for clarifying, as some of us know, the laws are made to keep the lawyers rich, and common people scratching their heads.

Seems to be MIA. If anyone has had contact with her since this past Friday I'd appreciate hearing from you. Thanks.

I saw she's dancing at JB's on Battlefield this coming Friday night. I reached out to her to see if she was doing meet ups on tour and she doesn't while she's on tour. Countered with a FMTY. Bummer. Still looking forward to go see her dance. Anyone else headed out?