Couple days ago picked up Megan off Chestershire and mound took her to spot she got completely nude gave BBBJ then bbcip total 20 you guys pay to much she had clear skin arms legs face pussy.
Printable View
Couple days ago picked up Megan off Chestershire and mound took her to spot she got completely nude gave BBBJ then bbcip total 20 you guys pay to much she had clear skin arms legs face pussy.
Drove down Sullivant Sunday not looking to pick anyone up but more just to see what was out. Saw a thin brunet near the Sunoco station that was obviously high walking topless. She would make eye contact with cars then act pissed off when they didn't stop. Later in the day saw her again someone apparently gave her a grey t-shirt and she kept pulling it up to flash cars driving by.
[QUOTE=LDontFkinCare2;5456731]Indeed. Except things are much worse for those charged and booked, even if eventually they will walk free from the court system. Your mugshot will ruin your job prospects and lots of other damaging things will ensue. For cops, you are just a statistic and a potential source of funding for themselves and the system (the more they arrest, the better-off they are); but for the accused individuals, their lives and careers are ruined. Somebody here gave a good example of a girl who worked as a cashier, and after the solicitation charge, she could not find a job and had to see men regularly.
One other nuance. When charges and accusations are filed against someone, courts and judges cannot "prove" anything; they cannot prove innocence. All the judge can do is to find you "not guilty" (note, not innocent, but not guilty) and dismiss the case. That, however, does not necessarily make that someone innocent; it just means there was not enough evidence to convince the jury of the defendant's guilt, and because of the presumption of innocence practice, that someone walks away free. A good example is the Mueller commission work and report. The presumption of innocence stems from what in statistics is known as type I and type ii errors, or a false positive conclusion (an innocent person is convicted) versus a false negative (a guilty person is not convicted. The former is a much worse prospect and hence the presumption of innocence. So the point is that when an accusation is leveled against you, even if untrue, your reputation is tarnished for good, because, even with the not guilty verdict, some skeptics may say--well, he just walked away free because the prosecution did not do their job well enough, but potentially one could have been guilty if the police had dug deeper for evidence.[/QUOTE]You're essentially correct on much of what you said, which is why it's so important to avoid stings. In our society getting caught in a sting even if dismissed can have a big impact down the road, particularly for the guys. Police are very much aware of this but don't care in the slightest. And, as has been noted, they really don't care if the arrest is illegal. They will let the court sort that out. But an illegal arrest could seriously impact you in this society.
This isn't the tall strawberry blonde nichole on the far west of sully, this is tall long brown hair darker skinned WSW nichole. Picked her up east of central and sully. Long ass legs, and a nice ass. Maybe B size tatas Notable short tight jean shorts. Couldn't see them under the tank top short-short. So tight I didn't realize they made spray paint in jeans color. 30 yrs old. Raspy older voice sounding. BBBJ with spit, listened well no complaints, decent technique. Otherwise as usual today early afternoon not much out worth it. Lots of LEO but didn't notice anything questionable. (minus the 1 T-BSW, LOL).
Heads up guys regarding LE:. I have noticed several citations from vice in parks regarding public indecency. I think they might cruise the parks in prostitution areas sometimes hoping to bust WGs / clients. FYI.
What does Megan look like? Not sure if I have met her or not.
[QUOTE=AlwaysBareback;5457628]Couple days ago picked up Megan off Chestershire and mound took her to spot she got completely nude gave BBBJ then bbcip total 20 you guys pay to much she had clear skin arms legs face pussy.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Xmile;5458572]What does Megan look like? Not sure if I have met her or not.[/QUOTE]Well, there are two Megans and a Meghan in that same area, but ABB did not feel like getting into specifics. I could get really specific but I am not allowed to post names or mugshots, lest the report gets deleted. I have blown my load in all three of them.
[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5457893]You're essentially correct on much of what you said, which is why it's so important to avoid stings. In our society getting caught in a sting even if dismissed can have a big impact down the road, particularly for the guys. Police are very much aware of this but don't care in the slightest. And, as has been noted, they really don't care if the arrest is illegal. They will let the court sort that out. But an illegal arrest could seriously impact you in this society.[/QUOTE]On most jobs you don't have to report something you werent convicted of. While I still don't want it to happen, it personally wouldn't affect me much as I have no wife and the jobs I obtain are as easy to get as shooting fish in a barrel. But yea, for most guys if you're going for an 80 k a year job I can see it being an issue not to mention explaining it to the wife. Here's the interesting part, when they run the huge operations such as 614 and in Cleveland they don't even post the mugshots on news articles, but the smaller stings in places like Youngstown and Akron you can find them from years ago still by googling their names even if dismissed. Thats why I really would love if someone with money sued them for defamation and illegal arrest. Also depending on what area you get caught in , in this day and age they don't even waste the resources to take you to jail, they process you at the hotel room or wherever the sting is in a separate area for processing and you go home that night, go through the court system and serve no time generally. In other areas theyll book you and youll be out in 30 minutes. that has been going on since before COVID as well.
Legal stuff is a worthwhile topic and I have stuff to add, but it might be better suited for tips, tricks, arguing and bullshit. Let's talk about streetwalkers. Are there any good looking ladies under 25? If so, I have creamy gooey gifts for them.
[QUOTE=RayPugh;5458640]Well, there are two Megans and a Meghan in that same area, but ABB did not feel like getting into specifics. I could get really specific but I am not allowed to post names or mugshots, lest the report gets deleted. I have blown my load in all three of them.[/QUOTE]Brown hair probably 120 lbs pleasant personality said been on block about 2 years.
[QUOTE=AlwaysBareback;5459273]Brown hair probably 120 lbs pleasant personality said been on block about 2 years.[/QUOTE]All three Megan have brown hair, same weight, and they've all been around for five years at least.
[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5458417]Heads up guys regarding LE:. I have noticed several citations from vice in parks regarding public indecency. I think they might cruise the parks in prostitution areas sometimes hoping to bust WGs / clients. FYI.[/QUOTE]Sorry meant to say "SWs / clients. ".
[QUOTE=Chunks92;5458685]On most jobs you don't have to report something you werent convicted of. While I still don't want it to happen, it personally wouldn't affect me much as I have no wife and the jobs I obtain are as easy to get as shooting fish in a barrel. But yea, for most guys if you're going for an 80 k a year job I can see it being an issue not to mention explaining it to the wife. Here's the interesting part, when they run the huge operations such as 614 and in Cleveland they don't even post the mugshots on news articles, but the smaller stings in places like Youngstown and Akron you can find them from years ago still by googling their names even if dismissed. Thats why I really would love if someone with money sued them for defamation and illegal arrest. Also depending on what area you get caught in , in this day and age they don't even waste the resources to take you to jail, they process you at the hotel room or wherever the sting is in a separate area for processing and you go home that night, go through the court system and serve no time generally. In other areas theyll book you and youll be out in 30 minutes. that has been going on since before COVID as well.[/QUOTE]Yeah, interesting points. Just FYI, all mugshots are posted in some way on the internet, at least that I'm aware of. But you're right that in many cases if they bust you in a hotel sting they won't arrest. However, if they bust you in a street sting they alm always will arrest, as far as I'm aware.
You're situation is a good one but for many guys it's not that way. Also, if they cite you they're going to throw the book at you bc they're aware it often gets pled down / dismissed. As far as suing for wrongful arrest is concerned I doubt that will happen. The law is broad enough for the officer to arrest you but for you not to be convicted. It sounds silly, I know, but that's they way it is. "Probable cause" does not equate to "beyond reasonable doubt" in court.
Remember that they only need probable cause to make an arrest.
[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5459497]Yeah, interesting points. Just FYI, all mugshots are posted in some way on the internet, at least that I'm aware of. But you're right that in many cases if they bust you in a hotel sting they won't arrest. However, if they bust you in a street sting they alm always will arrest, as far as I'm aware.
You're situation is a good one but for many guys it's not that way. Also, if they cite you they're going to throw the book at you bc they're aware it often gets pled down / dismissed. As far as suing for wrongful arrest is concerned I doubt that will happen. The law is broad enough for the officer to arrest you but for you not to be convicted. It sounds silly, I know, but that's they way it is. "Probable cause" does not equate to "beyond reasonable doubt" in court.
Remember that they only need probable cause to make an arrest.[/QUOTE]One should keep in mind that in determining a probable cause, the notion and practice needed for the police and prosecution to file a complaint against a person and to book the person, the judge would always give preference to the police; that is the police and prosecution's arguments and "evidence" are always privileged over the person accused; put another way, the police are always a favored side in the probable cause determination. In practical terms this means that the judge would almost always agrees with the police' arguments when they file an arrest request and will agree / allow to book the accused.
In the case of the beyond the reasonable doubt idea, the favored side is supposed to be the defendant, the accused, because of the presumption of innocence, the the burden of proof is on the prosecution side. But, what is "beyond the reasonable doubt" actually? There are lots of interpretations of what it means. Some tried to quantify this idea to say that if something has at least the 80% of likelihood of occurrence, then there should not be any doubt about that. In practice, this just means that if an average Joe may conclude that something is likely to occur, then there is no reasonable double. Like for instance, if a guy shows up in the girl's hotel room, what would be the most reasonable motive for meeting with her--aha, probable, f. Cking her, therefore there is no reasonable doubt that the guy intended to engage in procuring prostitution. So the point is that the beyond of reasonable doubt is not that stringent standard as many may think. It surely depends on the type of crime, the murder standards and higher than the solicitation ones.
In terms of the rich guy who would sue the police, wel Mr. Kraft was accused of solicitation, and the masseurs, the prostitutes, ended up being the scapegoat, not the police. See here:
[URL]https://reason.com/2020/12/02/florida-masseuse-ordered-to-pay-31573-after-soliciting-robert-kraft-to-commit-prostitution/[/URL]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]