-
Chanel with J
Saw her yesterday and She completes all my fantasies. If she was BBFS I wouldn't go anywhere else. I've had the most basic / barely a rim job from Cona and the like but, Chanel knows how to toss a salad. It's my first time fully experiencing it and it's amazing. I didn't ask or bring up BBFS cause I wasn't sure if it was available. Might try Cami next if I can make myself forget about Chanel's ass.
-
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4857251]Saw her yesterday and She completes all my fantasies. If she was BBFS I wouldn't go anywhere else. I've had the most basic / barely a rim job from Cona and the like but, Chanel knows how to toss a salad. It's my first time fully experiencing it and it's amazing. I didn't ask or bring up BBFS cause I wasn't sure if it was available. Might try Cami next if I can make myself forget about Chanel's ass.[/QUOTE]FYI. Generally, non of Js stable is bb unless explicitly stated.
-
[QUOTE=Jack926;4857142]1. Allie, 2. Cona, 3. Hazel, 4. Mini, 5. Chanel.[/QUOTE]The force is strong with Jack926, although here is my slight variation.
1) Allie, 2) Mina, 3) Cona, 4) Hazel and 5) Chanel. All are good, don't get it twisted. Bless M.
-
[QUOTE=HeavySetD;4857158]Texted prior to this listed being posted up in the morning and not a word from the PO LOL has anyone that's not Toungsten, gotten any success in seeing Lyn these past few weeks or get a reply from the Booker?[/QUOTE]They've been late in getting my posts up. How early did you call?
-
[QUOTE=Jujuju1010;4857059]M's lineup right now has to one of the better groups of providers. I've seen Cona, Chanel and Allie and they are all close to home runs. I was wondering between Hazel or Mini who do you guys think is better overall? I know Mini is younger, but service wise which do you prefer. For reference, I rate them Allie Chanel Cona, but they are all fairly close.[/QUOTE]You can't go wrong with Hazel or Mini. Hazel is the more sexual one and prettier face among all from M imo. She is my CF currently and we are compatible in bed the most. She can suck nice and deep too. Her BBFS feels amazing. Mini is different from Hazel and is smaller. Both have size C, tho Minis are smaller because she has a smaller frame, but big for a small spinner. Alicia are more full C cups. Alicia has the more rounder woman's butt while Mini has the small bubble butt. Mini is the one with more energy but imo Hazel is more experience and better sex. You can't go wrong like I said. I would see both.
-
[QUOTE=Jack926;4857142]1. Allie, 2. Cona, 3. Hazel, 4. Mini, 5. Chanel.[/QUOTE]Depends on what you're looking for. Chanel and Mini, perfect bodies and I do mean perfect. Allie and Cona masters of the art of providing in the same class as Suri. Chanel a beautiful GFE with more than enough PSE thrown in and a great, sensual lover. Cona, if you're a breast obsessed monger. Mini, all out nymphomaniac with a little less of a connection unless you get her going. Haven't seen Hazel but heard great things about her.
-
[QUOTE=CookiesNCream;4856203]CIA? What agency is she with? Gah damn I need to book her right now. Been looking for this for ages! Is she out of the game?[/QUOTE]Yoona with losangelesasian.
-
She's back from Vacation?! YYUSSS! Going to see her asap. Ty for the info.
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4857251]Saw her yesterday and She completes all my fantasies. If she was BBFS I wouldn't go anywhere else. I've had the most basic / barely a rim job from Cona and the like but, Chanel knows how to toss a salad. It's my first time fully experiencing it and it's amazing. I didn't ask or bring up BBFS cause I wasn't sure if it was available. Might try Cami next if I can make myself forget about Chanel's ass.[/QUOTE]
-
Sexyfunkgirls
Do they have an active website anymore? Saw toungsten post but seem like they only have 1 working.
-
[QUOTE=NoClue02;4857364]Do they have an active website anymore? Saw toungsten post but seem like they only have 1 working.[/QUOTE]Google = sexyfunkgirls2.
-
Sfk
[QUOTE=NoClue02;4857364]Do they have an active website anymore? Saw toungsten post but seem like they only have 1 working.[/QUOTE]Not sure if they're website is active anymore. I just follow them on HX as it's more active.
-
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4856554]Jennifer. 5'2" Natural 32 C Starts tomorrow July 1.[/QUOTE]Are their pictures in the general ballpark of the actual girl, or not so much?
-
1 photos
Pop that Coochie
That ass felt so tight and juicy.
-
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4857251]Saw her yesterday and She completes all my fantasies. If she was BBFS I wouldn't go anywhere else. I've had the most basic / barely a rim job from Cona and the like but, Chanel knows how to toss a salad. It's my first time fully experiencing it and it's amazing. I didn't ask or bring up BBFS cause I wasn't sure if it was available. Might try Cami next if I can make myself forget about Chanel's ass.[/QUOTE]Was this M's Cona? How was she otherwise? I should be seeing her soon.
-
They have a website
[QUOTE=NoClue02;4857364]Do they have an active website anymore? Saw toungsten post but seem like they only have 1 working.[/QUOTE]New girl Jennifer is on there too.
[URL]http://sexyfunkgirls2.escorts.biz/jennifer31/[/URL]