BackPage Advertiser Reviews

No, they all shave some truth but not too many regularly make statements like:

"We believe in giving our best, with honest integrity, quality should be expected and we want you to come back again and again".

"You can count on our photos being REAL, recent & no switch and bait."

The last one really made me chuckle. I'm all for a ladies privacy, but photo-shop does wonders for tats n such.

[QUOTE=GeekFreak;1706463]Are you saying the other agencies and the independents are factual, but this agency misrepresents?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ThickFootballe;1706622]Care to elaborate? She certainly looks like a good one. Was interested until I saw this.[/QUOTE]I think plenty of us have been fooled by thinking she looked good. In her photo shoot sessions. With the lights, makeup, Photoshop, nice lingerie, etc.

Reality is you meet a girl w a chip on her shoulder, in a dark dirty motel, whose only looking forward to you leaving, sooner rather than later. Even if it was shifty service w a smile, I could deal with but there's no joy in this. I question now whether she's even a willing participant.

This is not a winable situation.

Good luck if you decide to play though

[QUOTE=Doinker; 1706752]No, they all shave some truth but not too many regularly make statements like:

"We believe in giving our best, with honest integrity, quality should be expected and we want you to come back again and again".

"You can count on our photos being REAL, recent & no switch and bait."

The last one really made me chuckle. I'm all for a ladies privacy, but photo-shop does wonders for tats and such.[/QUOTE]Ohhhh ok. So when you said "Too bad she works for an agency that feels it necessary to misrepresent the facts in order to entice individuals into making an appt" you really meant ALL the agencies and independents that shave some truth by misrepresenting the facts in order to entice individuals into making an appointment.

I get it.

I'm not getting into semantics. You have 18 posts, most of which were either about or supporting RCC. They are one of two agencies in town with some history. Both have been known to shave the age and misrepresent the facts some. One quite a bit more than the other. Point is Cindy is a decent girl, NOT 26 or even close. She was uncomfortable with being advertised as such. At least she's very accommodating with a smoking body. I can't say that about the last girl I tried from RCC, who turned out to be 25-30 lbs overweight with a VERY limited repertoire (and I mean LIMITED).

[QUOTE=GeekFreak; 1707062]Ohhhh ok. So when you said "Too bad she works for an agency that feels it necessary to misrepresent the facts in order to entice individuals into making an appt" you really meant ALL the agencies and independents that shave some truth by misrepresenting the facts in order to entice individuals into making an appointment.

I get it.[/QUOTE]

Here's the deal with vanessa. I gave her another whirl not that long ago, not because she was a "dead fish" but because the first time around with me, and I emphasize "with me", was probably on par with the majority of what's available out there. Given that, the first time around wasn't worth what she was asking. 2nd time around was considerably less. Compared to the first time, have to say it was a wash. Smoking body with the typical repertoire. Nothing over the top, decent interaction. Would repeat for the 1/2 hour rate. Again, the experience was "with me". Can't vouch for how she'd act with anyone else.

[QUOTE=ThickFootballe;1706622]Care to elaborate? She certainly looks like a good one. Was interested until I saw this.[/QUOTE]

She's from west of here about 45 minutes, so may be. Supposedly worked for another agency over there.

[QUOTE=Techneck;1706431]I am pretty sure this is the same chick that advertised on Craigslist years ago. If so she was 30 something then.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Doinker;1707277]I'm not getting into semantics. You have 18 posts, most of which were either about or supporting RCC. They are one of two agencies in town with some history. Both have been known to shave the age and misrepresent the facts some. One quite a bit more than the other. Point is Cindy is a decent girl, NOT 26 or even close. She was uncomfortable with being advertised as such. At least she's very accommodating with a smoking body. I can't say that about the last girl I tried from RCC, who turned out to be 25-30 lbs overweight with a VERY limited repertoire (and I mean LIMITED).[/QUOTE]If you aren't getting into semantics, then don't get into semantics.

You complained about a RCC for misrepresenting. Then you admit all the agencies and the independents misrepresent. Now it's not the fact that they all misrepresent, it's that they do more of it. I'm sorry, but for me, it doesn't matter if they're actually 100% truthful all the time, or 0% of the time. Caveat Emptor!

The fact that I have 18 posts, a few of which are supportive of RCC is completely irrelevant to me.

The point is, they all misrepresent and you just got caught bullshitting again.

You give great reviews and info, but you should stick to those because when you stray from that, it's bullshit.

[QUOTE=Doinker;1707277]I'm not getting into semantics. You have 18 posts, most of which were either about or supporting RCC. They are one of two agencies in town with some history. Both have been known to shave the age and misrepresent the facts some. One quite a bit more than the other. Point is Cindy is a decent girl, NOT 26 or even close. She was uncomfortable with being advertised as such. At least she's very accommodating with a smoking body. I can't say that about the last girl I tried from RCC, who turned out to be 25-30 lbs overweight with a VERY limited repertoire (and I mean LIMITED).[/QUOTE]I know I have a minority view with this but I really am not interested in the 20 somethings. Cindy sounds very interesting to me now that I hear she is more like 35-40.

I have to wonder if it would be more or less customers if the ad was closer to her true age?

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]

[QUOTE=GeekFreak;1707423]If you aren't getting into semantics, then don't get into semantics.[/QUOTE]Nit picking means an agenda. Let me refer to a post from the past.

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?6805-BackPage-Advertiser-Reviews&p=1472076#post1472076[/url]

Amazing how 18 minutes after that post, this one pops up.

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?6805-BackPage-Advertiser-Reviews&p=1472087&viewfull=1#post1472087[/url]

[QUOTE=GeekFreak;1707423]You complained about a RCC for misrepresenting. Then you admit all the agencies and the independents misrepresent. Now it's not the fact that they all misrepresent, it's that they do more of it.[/QUOTE]Uh, from one of my previous posts "Just keep something in mind when dealing with any of the current agencies, take whatever they say with some speculation and don't let the little head do the thinking."

[QUOTE=GeekFreak;1707423]I'm sorry, but for me, it doesn't matter if they're actually 100% truthful all the time, or 0% of the time. Caveat Emptor![/QUOTE]Hhhhmmm. I would think anyone that actually partakes regularly in the hobby would care especially if one source has an obvious pattern of behavior, more so than others. As was noted in a previous post, none of the agencies are totally truthful, some do tend to be "less" truthful than others which should be of interest in anyone who regularly hobbies. Then again, if one only partakes once in a long while and has an affinity for a specific source, I can see where you wouldn't care if "they're actually 100% truthful all the time, or 0% of the time".

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?6805-BackPage-Advertiser-Reviews&p=1545335#post1545335[/url]

[QUOTE=GeekFreak;1707423]The fact that I have 18 posts, a few of which are supportive of RCC is completely irrelevant to me.[/QUOTE]Probably not for you, but if you are going to call people out then it most likely does, and should be noted, to others as it tends to point to level of credibility.

[QUOTE=GeekFreak;1707423]The point is, they all misrepresent and you just got caught bullshitting again.[/QUOTE]See above.

[QUOTE=GeekFreak;1707423]You give great reviews and info, but you should stick to those because when you stray from that, it's bullshit.[/QUOTE]See above.

Like I said, you give great reviews and intel, but when you stray from that, it's pretty much BS and you've proven that yet again.

The fact that you seem to have a bias against RCC for misrepresenting is the nitpicking agenda in this discussion. When called out about it, you backed up a little bit and said they all misrepresent and you even brought up past posts where you've said that. Caveat emptor translates loosely to "buyer beware", and most buyers are aware enough to beware of misrepresentation. Most everyone knows to add years and pounds and subtract cup sizes from ALL the ads.

Where RCC commits it's crime, according to you, is when they say "We believe in giving our best, with honest integrity, quality should be expected and we want you to come back again and again"? And "You can count on our photos being REAL, recent & no switch and bait."

When other ads say

"My pics are real and recent" [url]http://huntsville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hot-hollie-loves-to-hug-and-kissopen-minded-and-very-fetish-friendly-28/7021141[/url]

"Have you had too many BAD experiences? They sweet talk you on the phone, then you meet it's NOTHING like the pic?

So let me put your bad experiences in the past. I'm HONEST, RELIABLE, FREAKY and offer U=N=R=U=S=H=E=D hassle free companionship. For those of you who seek the package of DISCRET PROFESSIONAL WHOS SEXY, with CLASS, and CHARM. MORE EXCUSITE IN PERSON" [url]http://huntsville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-treat-_1ooo-real-photos-guarentee-no-thugs-21/7479842[/url]

"No switch and bait! THE REAL DEAL!" [url]http://huntsville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/im-hot-extremely-pleasing-ready-to-make-you-come-andgtandgtandgtandgt-256-270-3255-20/7468232[/url]

Why single out RCC when pretty much everyone does it? Oh wait, most everyone does it, it's just that RCC does it more. Oh wait, others use the same phrases too. Who has the nitpicking agenda here?

The number of reviews someone has posted here gives a hint at how credible their reviews are because it's information about the unknown or unseen. Calling out this kind of BS requires absolutely zero credibility because the BS is right there for everyone to see. The number of posts you have provides zero credibility for backing up your BS. Believing it does is no different than believing the puffery of the ads we're talking about.

I don't have an agenda of supporting RCC. They ALL misrepresent. What I do have is an agenda for calling out poster's BS that's plain to see.

Again, you should probably stick to reviews and intel, because your nitpicking agenda is pure, glaring BS.

[blue]Gentlemen,

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.

Let's get back to the subject.

Thank You,

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=Wiseguy60; 1707625]I know I have a minority view with this but I really am not interested in the 20 somethings. Cindy sounds very interesting to me now that I hear she is more like 35-40.

I have to wonder if it would be more or less customers if the ad was closer to her true age?[/QUOTE]I'm with you there. The 20-somethings have almost always been mostly disapointing dreams. I much prefer the 30+ somethings!

[QUOTE=Luvemshvd;1710239]I'm with you there. The 20-somethings have almost always been mostly disapointing dreams. I much prefer the 30+ somethings![/QUOTE]My prime target age is 28 and have been in the game for 5 plus yrs. These gals usually know they don't have their teen youth to stand alone on anymore and are more accomodating and less likely to be a clock watcher. Have had good service from ladies in their 40's (Connie," Classy & Elegant Lady" in the HT about 5 yrs ago) as well as some of the BF gals (Ivy, Evey) who were in their early 20's. What makes this a hobby is the search for the next gem.

BD

I have seen this girl around with different names and agencies but honestly never really thought about seeing her. I was in a rush and found out she could be had for my price range and was available on short noticed. I was on my way out of town so I figured what the heck. I was not expecting much when I got there in her pics she didn't really have the look I go for. To my surprise she was a cute girl in spite of the the large tats and dark eye makeup which I could do without. She was a little thing. Although she does a little soft in the middle as I have found like 80% or better of the girls out there do. The rest the bod was put together well with a cute butt. She was very sweet and did really aim to please. Overall worth seeing.