1 photos
Three words:reverse image search
[QUOTE=Henry777;5369644]I was approached by Nancy on the SA site.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/37c64dae-88dd-4c9f-a946-9d12002107e5[/URL]
And we had a good conversation. She says she has been in town visiting a friend who had a baby. Sends me some pictures and wants to get together sometime.
We never negotiation allowance. Then she steams it up a bit by talking about what she is going to do with me.
So we agree to meet and she says she only feels safe with a HOOKUP ID. She sends me a sample picture of a HOOKUP ID. Then she wants my email.
address so she can send me a link to set it up. It has a field for credit card. She says I can put in a gift card credit card if I want.
Has anybody ever heard of this?[/QUOTE]Your "Nancy" is really Instagram Model Emblu aka Morgan Crabtree.
One of the pictures of from her Instagram was used for the SA profile.
Not sure what other folks do, but always do a reverse image search. Use several (Google, Yandex, Bing, TinEye) each will their own index and provide clues if the image is legit or not.
It is going to be expensive
I am sure there is going to be an upcharge. Now it is 4 holes available instead of 3. Or she may charge for double. LOL.
Play safe.
Dr. S.
[QUOTE=Puppy73;5373376]If you look close it sort of appears she has grown another pussy in her left arm pit. Interesting![/QUOTE]
Gingercutie5 / tigerprincess
Anyone have any experience with gingercutie5 or tigerprincess on SA? Neither name shows any results here on the forum. Am talking to both and seem to be making gradual headway; Ginger in particular seems gtg but I can't confirm that as yet.
I'll share deets if either goes anywhere.
So we belong to the same club, banned for life
[QUOTE=TDG777;5388372]Well, I was banned for life, and no matter what I try they always seem to find my new account within a few days and then kick me off. Anyone have any luck here?
In the meantime, I have had a few conversations that are worth reporting so you don't waste your time like I did (or for you to correct in case the girls are lying to me or to themselves):
Brianna: [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/92b82ca9-c394-450a-a6e2-311b1a26422c.[/URL] Her first message ignored everything I said, and asked to see me right away. I told her I like to grab a drink first. She said she prefers to get down to business. Seems clear she's either an escort, scammer, or just really fucking horny for my dad-bod, which I doubt.
MadamPenelope: [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/a4c0a0f4-119f-405f-9c5d-b15ef02a10bc.[/URL] Lesbian Dom with rules against ever touching her or receiving, as she put it, her "life changing head". Maybe this is what Doms do, they tease you for a while before giving in? No idea, never seen a Dom. She also says she requires a background check.
Okay-rae: [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/bdde418f-00ee-4529-af91-402f7355e7d1.[/URL] Has 'platonic' listed, but her messages were sweet and thoughtful. She seems nice. She said that while she is fine with going out to dinner or drinks, she isn't open to anything physical. She is however happy to sext.
I'm curious about anyone's experience with breaking through the 'platonic' thing. I've only met up with one or two of women who list 'platonic', and none of them turned down what I was offering. But I've never met up with someone who explicitly said that they weren't interested in anything physical. Any of you have experience with this? Is she worth my time to take out for a drink? My gut has always said 'no', and I've always trusted that and moved on. But I'm curious if this is just typical self-deception, and they just need a little encouragement.
Great to see you all still out there and making reports. Hopefully my account will stay active for long enough for me to contribute something more tangible.[/QUOTE]Well I quit trying, they are more investigative the the FBI.