I lied I ran the women after her was horrible
The women before the women in this post I needed a more moment so much kindness it was overwhelming that I could even believe what she said.
Well the women right after her.
I'm sure she can perform amazingly, but when I saw her, something felt a bit off. There was no issue when she got in until she started to speak (normally women like herself personalities arousing). The problem was that it seemed like she had been told something, or maybe she sensed something (pocket-watching or something like that) and asked for something that wasn't hers to ask for. I didn't like that part. I really wanted to drop her off because why experience something unnecessary when she suggested that everything was going to be okay or whatever she said?
I was overwhelmed by the surprise by the woman before her, and I needed a moment to think, so I just thought, "Okay, let's see with this one. " You know, women like her—both young and old—perform pretty well. But that day was horrible, though it seemed normal enough. I thought she was using some tactic to get me to finish. She came off too serious, and it took me a moment to realize that she didn't know what she was talking about. She wanted to be a passenger driver. I mean, she started complaining so quickly. I really need a timer to understand how long it all took. If I knew the duration, I could say it was just one of those days, but I knew even before I saw her leave and go home enjoy the feeling of winning to fold to smile.
When a woman performs amazingly one time, the very next time can be horrible. It was as if it was her first time, and she was nervous. She could have just taken a photo, made small talk, showed a Facebook page, and called it a day.
I was actually shocked by her performance. My words: someone's modern wife is out there. Someone's microwave dinner wife is out there. I saw her, and her performance is on the fritz again.
They everywhere they don't just stay in Baltimore come on
[QUOTE=BusterHymen55;7190793]A man walks down a corridor and sees a photo on the wall. The photo is a picture of a young man. The man stares at the photo and says. "Brothers and sisters I have none, but that man's father is my father's son!" Who is he looking at in the photo?[/QUOTE]There wouldn't be any complaints if it was completely true.
It would have been easier to add with no one in the room. Okay, he looks at himself, being the son.
These women do this daily; most of the time, I get them late in late day. It isn't new unless it really is. They SW, which should be a scoop, probably overnight, as they spent all day generating whatever. Nobody wants to scoop something that made nothing but expects more than can be achieved without adding what I call necessary details. They should be ready to talk, fun, sleep not I got to go here then there you had all day to walk 10 ft to the store to end their day.
Should be as easy as let's go inside.
Oh good I didn't have to sweat it out haha
[QUOTE=BusterHymen55;7192186]Incorrect on the brain teaser. He's looking at his son! He doesn't have any brothers or sisters so he is an only child. He tells us the father of the man in the picture is his father's son (meaning himself. Since he doesn't have any siblings). So the man in the photo is his son! And the trick is to find out what kind of food or drink they like or anything that they love and crave! (aside from drugs). I had a couple of them that love Jolly Ranchers! Baltimore's iconic and legendary SW / escort Millie's favorite was blue raspberry slushies! I'd get her a Wendy's value meal before each date with a blue raspberry slushie and she opened up to me with full service, smile, gfe, and a wide open menu![/QUOTE]Brothers and sisters I have none, but that man's father is me! (This was explained online.)
I never knew all that. Definitely, thank you.
Percentages of stds for sexWorkers.
Sex workers face elevated risks for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) due to frequent exposure to multiple partners. The most common STDs reported among sex workers include:
- **Chlamydia* The most frequently diagnosed bacterial STD, with prevalence rates ranging from 6. 8% to 18% in various studies 2, 3, 6.
- **Gonorrhea* Another common bacterial infection, often co-occurring with Chlamydia. Prevalence rates range from 9. 9% to 24%, depending on the population studied 2, 3,6.
- **Syphilis* Prevalence varies widely, with rates reported between 1. 6% and 30% in different contexts 1,3,6.
- **Trichomoniasis* A protozoan infection, with prevalence rates as high as 36.6% in some populations 3,6.
- **Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 (HSV-2)* Found in up to 34.3% of sex workers screened 3.
- **HIV* Sex workers are estimated to be up to 30 times more likely to live with HIV compared to other women of reproductive age, with prevalence rates varying globally 1,3.
- **Human Papillomavirus (HPV)* Commonly reported among sex workers, though specific prevalence data varies 7.
- **Hepatitis B and C* Increased rates have been documented among sex workers in certain regions 7.
These infections highlight the importance of regular screening, condom use, and access to healthcare services for prevention and treatment.
Citations:
1 [URL]https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/populations/sex-workers[/URL].
2 [URL]https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/reproductive-health/articles/10.3389/frph.2022.837102/full[/URL].
3 [URL]https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2017/07/improving-awareness-of-and-screening-for-health-risks-among-sex-workers[/URL].
4 [URL]https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7132779/[/URL].
5 [URL]https://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/most-common-stds-men-women[/URL].
6 [URL]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9292347/[/URL].
7 [URL]https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/infection-prevalence-prevention-among-sex-workers-information-health-care-workers[/URL].
8 [URL]https://prevention.ucsf.edu/research-project/sex-workers[/URL].
1 photos
Caculation of std infection of sexWorkers doing BBFS.
Chart attached is for 2 bbfs clients/week. THe rest protected.
Based on the given parameters (3 clients / day, 2 weekly unprotected clients, and maximum prevalence rates), the **average time to contract an STD** can be calculated using the weekly exposure risk for each infection. Below are the results for each STD:
(# Key Notes:
1. **Calculation Method* Time estimates assume a constant risk per exposure and use the formula:
\text{Average Time} = \frac{1}{\text{Weekly Risk}}.
This represents the statistical expectation, not a guarantee.
2. **HPV Risk* With a weekly risk of 2. 05 exposures (implying multiple HPV exposures per week), the model suggests infection is likely within **34 days** due to its high prevalence.
3. **HIV Context* While the calculation shows 5. 7 days, actual transmission risk per exposure is lower (0. 08% for receptive vaginal sex). This model uses prevalence rates, not per-act transmission probabilities.
4. **Practical Considerations*.
- These estimates use **maximum prevalence rates** from prior studies.
- Real-world risks depend on geographic location, client screening, and immune response.
- Condom use reduces transmission risk by 8095% for most STDs.
Kicking boxes of cereal but amazing finds
Ahhhhhh! Ahhh! Grrr! Ahhh! The whole purpose was to figure out when and where, but I was like—did they really do that? Nope, that was in January last year.
Go there to do that, go here to do this. Not the best answer. Even when I feel an answer is true, it still may not be good enough. It does work—maybe. Just maybe that one detail could make all the difference and help avoid it all.
Amazing finds, though! Took photos, made videos—might even have to toss a video. But even when all the details seem true enough, it still doesn't feel good enough.
