You're making generalized assumptions.
[QUOTE=JamesJ46;5236716]This is pretty smart statement of opinion. This website along with a couple of others was at one time a forum for sharing objective information. I don't think it was intended to provide free advertisement for providers posted by guys who are either getting discounts in exchange for reviews or who may be star struck by some of these ladies. Sometimes it's a little too obvious. This forum is not the only site that is misused like that. In as far as GFE is concerned it's really nothing more than a short lived quick affection fix intended to get you come back later with more money. It's just another shallow means of control and manipulation. To your point, I am sure that my dog would be much more consistently loyal than any of these women. If anyone thinks that any that any one of these providers really cares about them or any type of relationship with them then it may be fair to say that she has done a hell of a job playing you. The ones whose names show up here most frequently and in the case of one particular Wilmington provider who always creates a hell of a lot of drama here are likely the worst offenders.[/QUOTE]
I personally never said anything about "any type of relationship" with a provider. Ya'll made that assumption up. I have no relationship other than the one I pay for. I can assure you I'm not a handler (I live 600 miles away and play when I get to ILM every few months or so), and I don't get discounts in return for a review. What I AM doing though, is giving you an honest evaluation of my experiences with Mandy over the last year or two. Or in your words, "Objective". If it doesn't match up with yours or any one else.... So what?? It's MY experience. I'm telling it in the "Escort Reports" section because it's believe it or not, an "Escort Report". It's unfair to make assumptions that someone who gives a positive review has an agenda. I'm just speaking to my very specific experience, and any response that is intended to categorize me as a handler, discounter, manipulated, etc is simply being argumentative, creating a falsehood that simply doesn't exist, and is ignorant of my intentions to offer a truthful telling of my repeated positive experiences with this provider.
That's a completely different argument
[QUOTE=NCHobbyist69;5238944]I'm all for using reviews to share positive or negative reviews of providers like Mandy. In my humble opinion that's legit. What I don't think is legit is posting REPEATED defenses of a lady by the same guy after each negative review is posted. These are easy to track by clicking on the poster's profile name and viewing his posts. When I see such activity it sets off red flags that a dude posting multiple defenses of a lady getting negative reviews might have some connection with her, and thus validates the original negative review. At the end of the day, if I see a provider with multiple negative reviews I'm steering clear.[/QUOTE]That's very fair - and completely different than the last commenters statement. I will, however, defend when appropriate. When I posted my last defense (and I don't defend her often), there was a ganging up of negatives, and some were multiples, so I felt I had to give her a fair shake and express my positive experiences. Multiple defenses are a fair point, but one most also have the same guard up against those who give negative reviews multiple times.
And .... to use your own litmus test....my last defense of Mandy was well over a year ago, so hardly "after each negative review is posted".