[QUOTE=JoeB119;7505630]I am going to throw this out there as a consideration on this topic. Photos may be directed by providers and agencies are arms length.
Bottom line. It's the girls and not the agencies driving the photos. Agencies have the reputation for future engagements so do not want to see anything reflecting so poorly that will keep people away but within reasonableness, I don't think anyone cares.[/QUOTE]
Yes, touring jgirls generally have final say and supply ad photos. It doesn't mean they put a lot of thought into it or that someone didn't do all the work making them. Obviously with studio photos they go in for the photo shoot and the resulting product is the work of the studio and she gets the results. But among the photos she has, she can pick and choose which ones to supply. Or choose other photos she has.
Occasionally jgirls don't even have their own photos or don't want to use them. So the booker or shop can supply them. But the girl still had the chance and final say in that sense. So even if almost all the work or even choice was done by someone else, that's only to the extent she relinquishes it. Girls are free to pick any ad photo they wish. And they often have no awareness on the ins and outs of ad photo accuracy or strategy. Many don't put much thought into it.
[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7505922]If I account for those adjustments, it's a lot more realistic. Since 25 has never been used, I assume it's really 32+ for that category. I suspect the 23 age Koreans probably should also be moved up.[/QUOTE]
I've heard many people talk about age hints using the age listed in the ad. Maybe there is some correlation, you know better than me on that. But it's not been helpful to me because I don't want a clue that "maybe/probably she isn't old". I want to be sure.
Due to the temptation of abusing age numbers, eventually they list a 21 year old girl and she's 40+ MILF or 50+ GILF. It happened last week again with Baby Semi. 21 can be 40s or 50s.
If this were the only hint available, I can see why you want to use it. I know I'm unusual, but I found the disappointment meant it wasn't worth even looking. So in the dark ages I would walk into every appointment fully blind, without looking at ad photos or stats. I deliberately looked away at any photos, I told the booker to give me a list of names and I picked one. Once I decided on this way, I never looked even one time for more than 10 years. I was definitely happier because I kept an open mind. If the lady was older, she generally had solid service. If I had expected a young girl, I would have been less happy with that.
Now, I've moved on and just want younger girls with an occasional mature girl mixed in. So I need to use something besides ad photos and stats for that.
Jgirls tend to be mostly at least young, but young doesn't mean hot. I'm pretty flexible on looks but I'm trying to avoid the worst case there. I'd actually prefer a hot MILF over an ugly young girl so to speak.
One thing about ad photos is no matter what I think or do, most people use them and overvalue them. It's human nature. So the best we can do is if we do have info on a girl's looks, we share it and compare notes. People will eventually switch over to intel like that and naturally use ad photos less. Ad photos basically work when there is no intel.
