Confused about mixed reviews on Cat!
I think the feedback on this lady is probably the most hot and cold on this site. The last guy that posted absolutely loved her and did not even smell cigarette smoke on her. Others said she reeked of smoke and spent the whole time whining about her life.
I had taken her off my to do list but I'm wondering, what goes with this lady? Anybody want to chime in?
[URL]http://raleigh.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/mature-exotic-mix-petite-princess-often-imitated-never-duplicated-verify-my-review/24387736[/URL]
[URL]http://myproviderguide.com/raleigh/escorts/6636333[/URL]
1 photos
Sweet sexy lilly baby ripped me off
Sweet sexy lilly baby is a fraud. She's heavily on drugs, I could tell when we where together. She has marks all over her arms and neck. She made me pay upfront so she can go meet some dude, I'm assuming it was her dealer. Then when we got back to her room she spent 30 min in the bathroom. Then we finally got to business, her service was terrible she kept on nodding the whole time she feel a sleep while trying to go down on me. After everything was done I went to the rest room to clean up after I got out she rushed me out the door. Little did I know she stole my wallet nd that's the reason why she rushed me out. Please be aware of this girl.
[URL]http://raleigh.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sweet-sexy-lilly-ready-to-give-you-an-unforgettable-moment-of-bliss/24399397[/URL]
Sorry. No more PM replies to new users
[QUOTE=MrBlues;2676347]It seems like there has been a rash of arrests of BP providers recently. Way more than I can recall in such a short period of time. Any idea what is causing the sudden increase in activity from our favorite uncle?
Even more odd, as cautious as providers usually are concerning the basics, meaning no direct statements about specific tasks in exchange for cash, and that they pretty much all do a LEO check at the outset, what is causing the sudden increase in confidence in the arrest that has allowed them to even arrest providers in the first place? Have the rules changed about what we need to do for a LEO check? Are we providing too much information here or other sites and are we maybe being too trusting with sharing info via PM?
I haven't gone back and done an actual count, but it does seem like there have been an unusual number of folks that have just joined or done their first or second post ever. That's nice and all as we need new guys helping with field research, but it has made me more than a little cautious about wanting to share info. Several of these new posters seem to have a very similar writing style and never ever seem to post links or pics of the reviewed provider. Or maybe I'm getting it confused with the Fayetteville board as I visit and post in both.
Anyway, just a reminder for everyone to be extra cautious. I certainly don't want to be facing any issues with my uncle, and I absolutely don't want to see any of our special friends being arrested.
If anyone has any suggestions beyond what we all have normally done, maybe now would be a good time to share any new ones and reminders on some key advice that's been good advice for years. And, though it sounds a little strange, maybe it's a good idea for us to remind our friends that they need to be extra cautious right now and, if there is any good advice we can offer them, maybe we should. I would guess that many are a little behind in keeping up with the details in enforcement.
Just a thought.[/QUOTE]I've never liked the "senior members PM me for details" sort of thing because I feel we're all here to share. But lately I've had a barrage of PMs requesting information on different providers that I've replied to and it turns out they are almost all are pretty new users. I don't mean to be rude to anyone but I am going to be more selective who I reply to.
It seems we need to use senior status, quality of posts and date joined to really trust a poster.