Agency Discussion and Reviews

[QUOTE=Zenith540;7498072]Saw the review on Mimi, so thought I'd chance it with Ami. Did a 45 minute session. Communicated with her through a translator app. First of all, she doesn't like to kiss, something I do enjoy. She went straight to the BBBJ, jackhammering with more of her hands than her mouth. Requested 69, and she did accommodate that. Like many at this establishment, a hairy Bush, though while no off notes, not my favorite. Did some DATY and some DATO, and blew early, but not hard after about 15 minutes. So knew I had another pop I could do. But was informed only 1 pop per session, despite 30 minutes left. Somehow, I convinced her to suck some more, and did get another, more intense pop at the 30 minute mark. Was then pressed to give a tip, which seemed unreasonable, since there was still 15 minutes on the clock. At that point I got dressed and left.

So, as you can tell, not the greatest experience with Ami. However, the set up and comms with this agency were quite good. Even received a follow up text, asking how the session went. Was quite honest in my response.[/QUOTE]Hi Zenith.

Thank you for your insight. I've been thinking about her recently.

My experience and learning curve with these agency's was that you have to pay an upgrade of like $40 for a second pop. With Sakura Spa it said that it's 30 and 45 minutes are 1 pop and 1 hour is 1-2 pop.

I had some Russian / Ukraine girls that will do it but if you don't pop quickly they will start given you a handjob.

Happy Popping everyone.

[QUOTE=Zenith540;7498072]o knew I had another pop I could do. But was informed only 1 pop per session, despite 30 minutes left. Somehow, I convinced her to suck some more, and did get another, more intense pop at the 30 minute mark. Was then pressed to give a tip, which seemed unreasonable, since there was still 15 minutes on the clock. At that point I got dressed and left.

So, as you can tell, not the greatest experience with Ami. However, the set up and comms with this agency were quite good. Even received a follow up text, asking how the session went. Was quite honest in my response.[/QUOTE]Hmm good and bad. I appreciate this as it gives some info in case I felt lacking in my options this upcoming week, but I do possibly have some AMP research to continue with so I'm likely not going to make it around here especially if another Jgirl pops up.

But the bad part is the part I'm quoting. Unfortunately it's kind of on site on their profiles that 45 minutes is 1 pop. 60 minutes is 1-2 pop. 45 is my often recommended option, but I know I'm basically a one and done sad sap haha. But I've had some of the other girls at SSG to indicate they don't mind so it's not a strict rule I'd just go in expecting that it is 1 shot if you take that option and just tip to upgrade to 60 minutes if you really want. However, this is still a useful reminder that sometimes one can't convince them to bend on rules.

I wouldn't consider it abnormal though. While I can not say in any manner what JP Nanami has done it her time here, over in California you can see her historical rates. [URL]https://www.kbeautygirls.com/jp-nanami[/URL] where she has listed +50 for MSOG. So if we were to do comparative value [I] of time[/I], not discussing the girl themselves.

In OC, you could see her for 30 minutes at 280 or 60 minutes at 320. Since MSOG is +50 this means [B]330/370[/B].

Here, I can't talk about what I don't know, but let me just assume it is free with CCG. So 300 for 30 minutes, or 60 minutes at [B]350[/B].

So the C-orgs with their 45 minute pricing muddies things but it's still built in.

So if you took 30 minutes with SS88 Ami at 240 and took a MSOG tip (I'd assume 50-60?) that makes the price the same. If you took 60 m /[B]350[/B], MSOG is "free". So if you take a 45 minute session and upgrade with a tip, then it's basically the same as paying for an hour anyway unless you can convince them to tip like 20. So my opinion is if that is important to you just take the 45 and convince them to upgrade if there's more time.

Also to be very clear, I'm just reporting that as a general thing, if you browse Kbeautygirls you can see some other familiar faces and see the same thing. There are some on there with no MSOG listed, but if you peep someone I've seen rather recently [URL]https://www.kbeautygirls.com/aiko[/URL] (this is our Momona) you can also see what she is now charging over there bearing in mind that California and Nashville are different so price differences are expected, but because of organizational differences, she was actually [I]cheaper[/I] to see here if you wanted only 30 minutes and no extras, than she will be there, but more expensive here if you wanted 1 hour (Still MSOG upcharge btw).

There has been stuff written by a more valuable user about the general structure differences here [URL=https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35890-LA-J-Girls&p=7426841&viewfull=1#post7426841]Link here[/URL] and while I do disagree with some of it because well there's no 4-5 girls here to "door knock" and we struggle to get more than 1 review out before a girl leaves lol, it still gives you a community respected overview.

Visited CCG model JP Nanami a visit this past week. My first pop came immediately on finding a free parking spot right outside the door.

Looks: Pictures are of a different person, as we come to expect. She's very attractive. More attractive than Brianna, imo. Very obviously Japanese with a lean toward having a gyaru look w / long braided blonde hair with roots in tails. Great toned body, great butt (proportional, not thicc). She's been going to the gym for a year and she's proud of what she's built. She's exactly 5' tall.

Arrival: Same as always with CCG. She opened the door and greeted me enthusiastically. I spoke some Japanese which threw her off her guard. I demonstrated what little I know and she seemed to appreciated it. We joked around about it a bit. Straight to the BT and shower. No preview, but some fun banter. She has a fun personality overall.

Service: I would say she's more on the Brianna side of service. Prides herself on it. As one poster mentioned in his post, let her take control and she'll take you for her ride. She was open to what I wanted, provided multiple options. At one point I insisted on giving *her* a massage and she loved it. That opened the door for a more relaxed connection. She really opened up. Gave me some tips for my upcoming trip to Japan.

On the way back to the shower she complimented my butt and gave it a slap.

She'll be here for 2 weeks total (apparently the minimum they agree to with CCG). I recommend.

I got a look at Angelina. For those who are interested: She's a very attractive woman. Very tall with her heels on, so be prepared for that when she greets you at the door.

*edited to add height

I see now that by clicking on the rate, the pop rule is explained. So I guess I got a bargain after all, since I didn't tip beyond the 45 minute rate.

[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7498195]Hmm good and bad. I appreciate this as it gives some info in case I felt lacking in my options this upcoming week, but I do possibly have some AMP research to continue with so I'm likely not going to make it around here especially if another Jgirl pops up.

But the bad part is the part I'm quoting. Unfortunately it's kind of on site on their profiles that 45 minutes is 1 pop. 60 minutes is 1-2 pop. 45 is my often recommended option, but I know I'm basically a one and done sad sap haha. But I've had some of the other girls at SSG to indicate they don't mind so it's not a strict rule I'd just go in expecting that it is 1 shot if you take that option and just tip to upgrade to 60 minutes if you really want. However, this is still a useful reminder that sometimes one can't convince them to bend on rules.

I wouldn't consider it abnormal though. While I can not say in any manner what JP Nanami has done it her time here, over in California you can see her historical rates. [URL]https://www.kbeautygirls.com/jp-nanami[/URL] where she has listed +50 for MSOG. So if we were to do comparative value [I] of time[/I], not discussing the girl themselves.

In OC, you could see her for 30 minutes at 280 or 60 minutes at 320. Since MSOG is +50 this means [B]330/370[/B].

Here, I can't talk about what I don't know, but let me just assume it is free with CCG. So 300 for 30 minutes, or 60 minutes at [B]350[/B].

So the C-orgs with their 45 minute pricing muddies things but it's still built in.

So if you took 30 minutes with SS88 Ami at 240 and took a MSOG tip (I'd assume 50-60?) that makes the price the same. If you took 60 m /[B]350[/B], MSOG is "free". So if you take a 45 minute session and upgrade with a tip, then it's basically the same as paying for an hour anyway unless you can convince them to tip like 20. So my opinion is if that is important to you just take the 45 and convince them to upgrade if there's more time.

Also to be very clear, I'm just reporting that as a general thing, if you browse Kbeautygirls you can see some other familiar faces and see the same thing. There are some on there with no MSOG listed, but if you peep someone I've seen rather recently [URL]https://www.kbeautygirls.com/aiko[/URL] (this is our Momona) you can also see what she is now charging over there bearing in mind that California and Nashville are different so price differences are expected, but because of organizational differences, she was actually [I]cheaper[/I] to see here if you wanted only 30 minutes and no extras, than she will be there, but more expensive here if you wanted 1 hour (Still MSOG upcharge btw).

There has been stuff written by a more valuable user about the general structure differences here [URL=https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35890-LA-J-Girls&p=7426841&viewfull=1#post7426841]Link here[/URL] and while I do disagree with some of it because well there's no 4-5 girls here to "door knock" and we struggle to get more than 1 review out before a girl leaves lol, it still gives you a community respected overview.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Zenith540;7498432]I see now that by clicking on the rate, the pop rule is explained. So I guess I got a bargain after all, since I didn't tip beyond the 45 minute rate.[/QUOTE]Yeah it's all good, if you get a deal that's even better. A lot of people up north say sometimes they get negotiations on extras with the girl to get the numbers down a bit, I've tried once or twice but no dice haha. Too afraid of it ruining the mood and I don't want to be a bad representative. I take it as a win if I end up going over time with no complaints haha. SS88 Angela was really good about that.

Ah but one more question for the gallery, but how close was she to the photos? I want to test my sense because hers look like it could be an actual normal person with P.S. Instead of just made up from a model. I know that's the "normal" thing but I like noting exceptions when they're there.

[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7497163]I could DM, but I don't think anyone would consider this secret information as long as no one lists their direct physical addresses in public. CCG's old website is still up and they point you to the new domain if you follow along. But in order of general acknowledgement by the community:

1. CCG (currently CandyCocoGirl) - [URL]https://candycocogirl.com/models[/URL].

2. SSG (SunShineGirls11) - [URL]https://www.sunshinegirls11.com/[/URL].

3. SS88 (SakuraSpa88) - [URL]https://sakuraspa88.com/[/URL].

4. Queens Escorts - [URL]https://liuy-111.github.io/house/[/URL].

And of course, the rentry that covers many places, there are many that are not listed on here but if you travel it can give you a place to start. [URL]https://rentry.co/kgirls[/URL]..[/QUOTE]I'm not at all familiar with Queens. I would love some intel. DM me, if appropriate.

[QUOTE=Rebccu;7498486]I'm not at all familiar with Queens. I would love some intel. DM me, if appropriate.[/QUOTE]Unfortunately I never visited them, but the one guy who did left his report [URL=https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7475124&viewfull=1#post7475124]over here[/URL]. Honestly there wasn't anything particularly bad with the review, but for me they're a "break glass in case of emergency" kinda thing.

Personally, I didn't think she looked at all like the photos, but others have commented that she may have looked like that 5+ years ago.

[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7498461]Yeah it's all good, if you get a deal that's even better. A lot of people up north say sometimes they get negotiations on extras with the girl to get the numbers down a bit, I've tried once or twice but no dice haha. Too afraid of it ruining the mood and I don't want to be a bad representative. I take it as a win if I end up going over time with no complaints haha. SS88 Angela was really good about that.

Ah but one more question for the gallery, but how close was she to the photos? I want to test my sense because hers look like it could be an actual normal person with P.S. Instead of just made up from a model. I know that's the "normal" thing but I like noting exceptions when they're there.[/QUOTE]

Tried SS88 and booked a 30-minute session with Mimi. Her photos are pretty close to real life, and she looks even better in person. She's in her mid-20's with natural C's and a very nice body. English isn't great, but translator apps kept communication easy. We kicked things off with a bit of DATY and DATO, then moved to 69 for BBBJ. Mimi was energetic and kept things lively, and I finished a lot sooner than I expected.

Major regret: I only booked 30 minutes. Next time I'd go for 60 to have more time with her to experience more of her talents.

I was apprehensive about the information they requested but felt much better after the agent explained they requested it for security and that it was deleted after verification. The process was simple and quick with very good communication with the agent. After verification they gave me address and directions to the unit. It is in a very nice area with good facilities.

[QUOTE=Rebccu;7498486]I'm not at all familiar with Queens. I would love some intel. DM me, if appropriate.[/QUOTE]I don't live in Nashville but I am looking at the opportunities there. The agencies recently listed appear to me as AMPs. Forgive me if I am missing something, but what is the difference between these agencies and a typical AMP?

Finally tried this place out after not making it last month. Arranging things was pretty easy. I didn't have too hard of a time finding the place, either.

Cleaner boy opened the door and led me upstairs to Mimi. Photos are reasonably accurate. She's still in the middle of getting everything ready, but it's not long until we hop in the shower. Shower was great, with a little body-to-body rub and preview BBBJ.

Back on the bed for a tongue bath and more BBBJ. Switched to DATY, and turns out she's quite sensitive. We move on to mish, then CG, then finish with more BBBJ. She's not much for DFK, though.

Afterwards we just laid there for a bit, then wrap-up shower and I headed out. Minor issue as there's no clock in the room, so she had to jump up to check the time.

On the whole I had a lot of fun. I'll definitely go back to this place again.

[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7496179]Exceptions can be made by the provider in both cases.

There was [URL=https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7135726&viewfull=1#post7135726]once a story where a CCG girl[/URL] also toured as an independent and used different rules.

There was also once a story of a SSG girl that was not so open minded.

And while not a Nashville concern, but good to share for a full coverage perspective, over on the Atlanta forums, [URL=https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35127-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7481236&viewfull=1#post7481236]some have felt a bit disappointed[/URL] because this girl [URL]https://www.hi-tokyo.com/meet-our-ladies/minnie[/URL] listed East Asian only (meaning excluding those who are white men).

I offer these tales so you can be free to know that nothing is 100%. But as a general rule, the assumptions you have made are likely correct. SSG is currently empty though (Jgirls move fast through here) so if you are wishing to try for something different you will have to work with SS88 for now. Reporting on SS88 is light but on the site itself it does say "open minded" so that is usually a good sign.

Don't forget there is also the mostly overlooked Queens Escorts (if they still exist). There was only ever [URL=https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7475124&viewfull=1#post7475124]one report[/URL] on them, but I think your best bet are the ones previously discussed.

I wish you good luck in your future appointments wherever you may choose to visit.[/QUOTE]Just realized I forgot to say thanks the other day. Someone dm me a few months ago rentry when inquired about Denver agencies. Didn't really know what it was but I get it.

I saw Angelina yesterday again. This is my second visit with her. As soon as I walked in, the chemistry was through the roof and we started off where we finished last time. This lady is super engaging and willing to please. Such a sweetheart.

If you are into Latinas go see her.

I don't leave many reviews because a lot of my experiences are meehhh but she is different. It's a mix between sensual GFE with some harder pounding pieces.

[QUOTE=SnackLord;7500767]I saw Angelina yesterday again. This is my second visit with her. As soon as I walked in, the chemistry was through the roof and we started off where we finished last time. This lady is super engaging and willing to please. Such a sweetheart.

If you are into Latinas go see her.

I don't leave many reviews because a lot of my experiences are meehhh but she is different. It's a mix between sensual GFE with some harder pounding pieces.[/QUOTE]Agree, Angelina is a sweetheart and super easy to connect with. Glad she made a visit and she genuinely seemed into the whole session, especially the aerobics. Talk about starting the year with two bangers.

[QUOTE=Tbone40;7500290]I don't live in Nashville but I am looking at the opportunities there. The agencies recently listed appear to me as AMPs. Forgive me if I am missing something, but what is the difference between these agencies and a typical AMP?[/QUOTE]Agencies are usually in a private, upscale residence. It usually requires identity verification and is not a "walk-in" business, like an AMP.

AMPs are risky for both client and provider, as they are an easy target. There is usually some transactional interaction that trips up the providers and patrons.

The security surveillance in AMPs usually works against them, as it provides usable evidence.

Not so, in an Agency. For all anyone knows, you're going to your Book Club or Jelly of The Month appointment.

Agencies that communicate over encrypted apps also add another layer of security.