News and Media Reports

[QUOTE=UglyJoe;4318992]Saw this on Kidd Chris. Don't know if it will pass or what all the bill says but baby steps.

New York lawmakers are introducing a bill that would broadly legalize sex work throughout the state. Together with the advocacy group known as "DecrimNY," legislators have crafted a 13 page bill that would make it legal to buy and sell sex under certain circumstances.

Supporters of the bill say 9 out of 10 made are at massage parlors, often illegal immigrant women from Asian countries.

As of now, Nevada is the only USA State to allow legal prostitution, which is permitted in some counties.

[URL]https://webn.iheart.com/featured/the-kiddchris-show/content/2019-06-11-new-york-lawmakers-considering-bill-that-would-legalize-sex-work/[/URL][/QUOTE]Heard this on the morning mayor of Cincinnati, don't forget to send Chris / Tomas rig pics for their enjoyment. Shutup Meat.

The attached just ran in Wired magazine. Interesting info on the backpage fiasco. A nice line buried in the article agrees that Fosta / Sesta is unconstitutional but who will challenge!

[URL]https://www.wired.com/story/inside-backpage-vicious-battle-feds/[/URL]

[URL]https://700wlw.iheart.com/content/2019-07-04-hamilton-county-public-defender-busted-for-prostitution/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Gjpbka;4347573][URL]https://700wlw.iheart.com/content/2019-07-04-hamilton-county-public-defender-busted-for-prostitution/[/URL][/QUOTE]No undercover, just observe, follow, arrest.

Consenting adults often have sexual relations in public.

Be it their car in a park or dark alley, or in a gondola on the "Big Wheel" at Smales Park.

After further digging, the lady was charged not with public indecency, but loitering for prostitution and drug possession. She is currently awaiting trial in jail since she cant come up with the $3500 cash for bail. I guess her talents dont warrant her attorney paying that.

She isn't street smart, she should have hidden the drugs under the seat, then he would have taken the fall for that too.

This raises the question, isn't barter legal? I am sure she was just paying off attorney's fees. (That's being sarcastic)

His citation isn't for solicitation, just public indecency.

Still not a good thing for anyone, especially a public defender. They can argue that they became involved after he defended her the first time.

I wonder if a public defender will represent him and what will happen in the aftermath? Since it's a misdemeanor!, probably nothing other than a fine.

[QUOTE=Gjpbka;4347573][URL]https://700wlw.iheart.com/content/2019-07-04-hamilton-county-public-defender-busted-for-prostitution/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Gjpbka;4347573][URL]https://700wlw.iheart.com/content/2019-07-04-hamilton-county-public-defender-busted-for-prostitution/[/URL][/QUOTE]Looks like he may have finished the job. Looks to me theres bit of a nut on the top of her hair in the mugshot LOL Peace and watch your 6. PB.

[QUOTE=Passnby;4348901]Looks like he may have finished the job. Looks to me theres bit of a nut on the top of her hair in the mugshot LOL Peace and watch your 6. PB.[/QUOTE]How does one view said mugshot?

This is exactly why I don't pick them up.

I bet this guy stopped with the back of his car still on warsaw. Guys that make pickups on streets off of warsaw have no idea what 'discreet' is.

But I have had a girl say she doesn't want to deal with me because I want to hide in dark places, and a car is safer, then say she would do me in the porta potty that was on the curve of warsaw. She said she believes that skulking around to find places makes it more 'hot' and to that I said that's why you choose dark places, and be aware of your surroundings. But, you want to take a chance of walking out of a porta potty as a cop or UC passes. And mosquitos which are a problem with outside dates, imagine the ones landing on the excrement in the potty biting you in places. Two separate people can easily disband after the deed. It's always worked. Also every time a girl declines an outside date, I find a better looking one that will.

Also this guy got the benefit of the doubt on his charge. you wouldn't. If drugs are found and the girl doesn't fess up, which isn't likely, good bye car, it was used in commission of a felony. He got a favor that you won't.

[QUOTE=Gjpbka;4349037]How does one view said mugshot?[/QUOTE]Look her up by name in the HCJC. PB.

[QUOTE=Katmandu6999;4324782]The attached just ran in Wired magazine. Interesting info on the backpage fiasco. A nice line buried in the article agrees that Fosta / Sesta is unconstitutional but who will challenge!

[URL]https://www.wired.com/story/inside-backpage-vicious-battle-feds/[/URL][/QUOTE]I definitely think the FOSTA. SESTA will be declared unconstitutional. If anything, the courts will look at all the sites popping up in foreign countries that quickly replace the takedowns in the USA And just figure it's a stupid law to begin with that doesn't really accomplish anything.

The best way to fight bonafide sex trafficking is good ole detective work, like the old days. Taking down websites seems like lazy law enforcement, and ineffective at that.

[blue]According to Amnesty International the best way to fight trafficking is decriminalization.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=WhereDreamsGo;4348591]No undercover, just observe, follow, arrest.[/QUOTE]Its interesting that the article did not allude to whether it was a uniformed or undercover officer. I have seen UC cars follow someone and call for a marked cruiser to stop a vehicle. If you observe (window shop for awhile) you will notice the UC cars. In the past I have noted the ones I have seen in action, not just speculate about. Be safe.

[QUOTE=Passnby;4349308]Look her up by name in the HCJC. PB.[/QUOTE]Interestingly enough, she's charged with Felony prostitution, which, can only really mean one thing, per 2907.241 of the Ohio Revised Code.

Stay safe out there kids.

MM.

[QUOTE=TMeister;4349620]I definitely think the FOSTA. SESTA will be declared unconstitutional. If anything, the courts will look at all the sites popping up in foreign countries that quickly replace the takedowns in the USA And just figure it's a stupid law to begin with that doesn't really accomplish anything.

The best way to fight bonafide sex trafficking is good ole detective work, like the old days. Taking down websites seems like lazy law enforcement, and ineffective at that.

[blue]According to Amnesty International the best way to fight trafficking is decriminalization.

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]You definitely think wrong. There's no politician that matters willing to support anything that the opponents can use words like "trafficking" or "child pornography" to defend. There's no upside.

[blue]Yes, there is no way in the world that any politician will ever champion that cause. Who cares if some hippies want to smoke weed?

Oh wait, you were talking about hookers

The "trafficking" and "child pornographers" people will eventually go away because the real truth, the whole truth, is that decriminalized sex work makes the world safer for women all women. People are starting to talk about it.

The upside is not having to answer "congressman, why do you support laws that have proven to increase both rape and sexual trafficking?"

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=FirstHalf;4350526]You definitely think wrong. There's no politician that matters willing to support anything that the opponents can use words like "trafficking" or "child pornography" to defend. There's no upside.

[blue]Yes, there is no way in the world that any politician will ever champion that cause. Who cares if some hippies want to smoke weed?

Oh wait, you were talking about hookers

The "trafficking" and "child pornographers" people will eventually go away because the real truth, the whole truth, is that decriminalized sex work makes the world safer for women all women. People are starting to talk about it.

The upside is not having to answer "congressman, why do you support laws that have proven to increase both rape and sexual trafficking?"

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]And I would be delighted if that future presents itself. The weed comparison is a good one, but when it comes to fucking, I don't see the sort of enlightened attitudes your'e talking about, in fact I see the crazies re-emerging. But as time goes on, who knows?

[blue]Happening right now in the city that is supposed to be full of feminazi's cutting off guys dicks.

Send her some money

[url]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/queens-new-york-district-attorney-candidate-tiffany-caban-looks-to-decriminalize-sex-work/[/url]

Amnesty International wrote this four years ago

[url]https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/08/sex-workers-rights-are-human-rights[/url]

John Stossel just did this on Reason

[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdtIUxWg_6c[/url]

Vice did this

[url]https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mbk5pv/how-sex-workers-are-standing-up-for-themselves-and-each-other-liara-roux-motherboard-podcast[/url]

It's happening all around you, by saying it's not and calling it wishful thinking you're not helping the idea gain momentum. You are in fact lending your voice to the "crazies."

A2[/blue]

I felt I had to chime in here. I believe that although A2 is completely right, legalization will not happen in the majority of the country for several reasons. First, women use availability of sex to control their husbands. If a married guy wants to get laid, he often must cater to his wifes whims. That being said, women will and do raise hell anytime a politician wants to decriminalize or legalize sex. And they are 50% of the voters. Next, the churches, although their influence is lessening due to increasing education of people to baloney fables they are based on, (no offense to you believers out there), will fight such efforts tooth and nail. The reason for that is that religions use access to sex to control their believers, I. E. , if you want to have sex, and you don't want it to be a "sin," then you must be married. And if you want to be married then you must be a member. And to be a member you have to share our beliefs. And on it goes. The whole thing is you can't have sex if you're not conforming with our requirements. And the churches still have considerable (and I might add unconstitutional, in my opinion) influence over the politicians. Especially in the more rurl areas.

And, A2, with all due respect, when has truth ever mattered to a politician?

Cheech.