Rants, Raves, and Stupid Tinfoil Hat Wearing Conspiracy Bullshit

[QUOTE=Pubb69;3979347]Oh man! You fell for its my birthday scam. They all use that one LMAO.[/QUOTE]Chsnces are I been doing this linger than you been alive. I didn't fall for nothin. I knew it prolly wasn't true. I chose to stay anyway. I always know what I'm doing and aware of my surroundings. I just felt like givin a little charity. Now the time I had to pull my pistol on a large angry prego black woman that came at me with a knife was a scam. But that story is for a different day. Pub. I think you been at this too long. Looking back at your history nothing but negative BS in your posts. Lighten up yo! It's all good. Have some fun. Ease up with those negative vibes man. LOL.

[QUOTE=BallAllDay;3979835]Chsnces are I been doing this linger than you been alive. I didn't fall for nothin. I knew it prolly wasn't true. I chose to stay anyway. I always know what I'm doing and aware of my surroundings. I just felt like givin a little charity. Now the time I had to pull my pistol on a large angry prego black woman that came at me with a knife was a scam. But that story is for a different day. Pub. I think you been at this too long. Looking back at your history nothing but negative BS in your posts. Lighten up yo! It's all good. Have some fun. Ease up with those negative vibes man. LOL.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tooter;3979366]Well. That's not really what I said, is it? I said that she had an awesome rack and that she gave a killer BJ.

I come here to read and offer reviews on providers. Sometimes (often, ahem. Usually) providers turn out different than what we expect. It was so in this case and I wanted to share.

Overall it was a good experience. To someone else it might have been a great experience. To another it might be a bad one. To each their own.

Could this area be better? Uh, yes, of course. But in the meantime, the best we can do is provide each other with decent intel rather than knock each other around.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Pubb69;3979347]Oh man! You fell for its my birthday scam. They all use that one LMAO.[/QUOTE][BLUE]All of you guys need to read the restrictions at the top of the page. Pubb69 I am specifically telling you that you need to knock off this bullshit on the review threads and learn to use this fight thread or I will put you back on moderation and you will never, ever get off of it again. I know you have been a member for a long time but guys like you who think you're fucking cute run off new members with your constant stupid comments about their posts.

If he keeps doing it, don't respond just report his posts and I'll put a muzzle on him.

I sent you a PM about it, do it again and see if I'm fucking around.

A2[/BLUE]

[QUOTE=RandomTask101;3936810]The real issue with Trump and Trumpers is a bending of the truth or outright denial of facts. Anything that goes against their agenda or insults their hubris is labelled as "fake news" and the argument is dismissed before even being considered. To be clear, this also happens within the extreme left-wing factions, but as this alt-right faction current maintains power, they are the most dangerous.

I hope we can all return to a civil, and united society rather than devolving into these tribes under an us. Vs. Them mentality. We need better leadership in order to do this.[/QUOTE]
I agree with the synopsis at the end, but liberals are just as nasty. Basically, all the loud mouths on either side are the same in my opinion. I mean how hypocritical were all the libs with picket signs calling Kavsaugh a rapist. Yet all the women that accused their hero, Bill Clinton of the same, were baseless accusations? It will be nasty from both sides. Getting nastier every year. Its all a sham anyway. Deciding between Democrats and Republicans (especially at the federal level) is like choosing between coke and pepsi. I just hope that one day a candidate or administration will just tell it like it is and let the votes fall where they may. Trump is a bafoon, Obama was a puppet, and W had a good heart, but surrounded himself with idiots. Clinton and Reagan were the best of my lifetime. Why? Because they gravitated to the center, were most of the reasonable population resides. Don't drink the red or thr blue koolaid, stick to beer or Whiskey.

[QUOTE=Chavez98;3980564]I agree with the synopsis at the end, but liberals are just as nasty. Basically, all the loud mouths on either side are the same in my opinion. I mean how hypocritical were all the libs with picket signs calling Kavsaugh a rapist. Yet all the women that accused their hero, Bill Clinton of the same, were baseless accusations? It will be nasty from both sides. Getting nastier every year. Its all a sham anyway. Deciding between Democrats and Republicans (especially at the federal level) is like choosing between coke and pepsi. I just hope that one day a candidate or administration will just tell it like it is and let the votes fall where they may. Trump is a bafoon, Obama was a puppet, and W had a good heart, but surrounded himself with idiots. Clinton and Reagan were the best of my lifetime. Why? Because they gravitated to the center, were most of the reasonable population resides. Don't drink the red or thr blue koolaid, stick to beer or Whiskey.[/QUOTE]To be fair I don't think there was a massive amount of defense for Bill or Clarence Thomas, especially from liberal leaning women. The men as with Kavenaugh stayed largely quiet unless it helped them politically. I'll also add that Hilary caught it bad in regards to being called stupid for staying instead of getting sympathy. FWIW, I think it's strong to call him a rapist. He didn't rape anyone. From the testimony I saw he was young and did some stupid things including putting his dick in someone's face and getting to aggressive with girls. I don't think he deserves to go to jail but he should be man enough to sit down with the accusers and try to help them find closure instead of outright denying what likely happened.

Regarding Reagan, it's odd you say he gravitated towards center. From what I've read he pushed pretty far right, including moving most Americans down the service industry path that many are on today. Clinton on the other hand I will call a pragmatist who embraced business and taxes, while not shitting on the common man. For me Obama is the best president of my short life (I'm mid 30's). He didn't get a lot done, but his election brought into the light many terrible things about our political system. I think his policies, while often misunderstood, helped a lot of people.

Trump, IMO, will likely go down as the worst and if he gets a second term well I pity anyone who's working class or below.

[QUOTE=JoeLooking;3980708]To be fair I don't think there was a massive amount of defense for Bill or Clarence Thomas, especially from liberal leaning women. The men as with Kavenaugh stayed largely quiet unless it helped them politically. I'll also add that Hilary caught it bad in regards to being called stupid for staying instead of getting sympathy. FWIW, I think it's strong to call him a rapist. He didn't rape anyone. From the testimony I saw he was young and did some stupid things including putting his dick in someone's face and getting to aggressive with girls. I don't think he deserves to go to jail but he should be man enough to sit down with the accusers and try to help them find closure instead of outright denying what likely happened.

Regarding Reagan, it's odd you say he gravitated towards center. From what I've read he pushed pretty far right, including moving most Americans down the service industry path that many are on today. Clinton on the other hand I will call a pragmatist who embraced business and taxes, while not shitting on the common man. For me Obama is the best president of my short life (I'm mid 30's). He didn't get a lot done, but his election brought into the light many terrible things about our political system. I think his policies, while often misunderstood, helped a lot of people.

Trump, IMO, will likely go down as the worst and if he gets a second term well I pity anyone who's working class or below.[/QUOTE]I will respectfully disagree with you, but shake your hand and buy you a drink if we ever cross paths. And just remember when you read something on the internet, 80% of the people of writing it not only drink but have an IV of blue coolaid. Reagan notoriously reached across the aisle and won over many democrats. I was only a kid during his terms, but was a poli-sci major in my extensive undergraduate career in the land of pirates. I can not find anything on google that was in my text books 30 yrs ago. History is literally being rewritten. So take everything you read with a shaker of salt.

Not long after losing its second presidential election to Barack Obama, the GOP, so the story goes, operated on itself. Like a lung-cancer patient declaring that it's time to quit smoking, the Republican National Committee declared in a 2013 'autopsy' report that "the Republican Party must be committed to building a lasting relationship with the African-American community year round, based on mutual respect and with a spirit of caring. " A few months after that --in the wake of more than a dozen states pushing through fresh new laws to make it more difficult for African-American & Hispanic people to vote--the party crossed another Rubicon by nominating Donald Trump for president, a birther with an unquestioned record of racial discrimination and bigoted rhetoric. This was not so much hypocritical as it was suicidal.

An aging, nearly 90 percent white GOP cannot carry its candidates to electoral victory on a platform that revels in the consequences of unvarnished racism--such as Charlottesville--or the terror of family separation and placing babies in cages, IMHO. How does one maintain such a model for electoral success in a browning America? For those Republicans who indulge and silently benefit from it, voter suppression provides the leeway.

There is fear underlying this strategy, however. Trump regularly defecates on political norms, but he and the party that empowers him share a commonality. All too many Republicans excuse his abuses as they commit their own, suppressing votes and embracing the very last strands dangling off of the white nationalist fringe. Much like a white person saying the word "nigger"with the hard are'aloud in mixed company, they are free to do so as long as they expect consequences.

[QUOTE=MrGeo;4058634]Not long after losing its second presidential election to Barack Obama, the GOP, so the story goes, operated on itself. Like a lung-cancer patient declaring that it's time to quit smoking, the Republican National Committee declared in a 2013 'autopsy' report that "the Republican Party must be committed to building a lasting relationship with the African-American community year round, based on mutual respect and with a spirit of caring. " A few months after that --in the wake of more than a dozen states pushing through fresh new laws to make it more difficult for African-American & Hispanic people to vote--the party crossed another Rubicon by nominating Donald Trump for president, a birther with an unquestioned record of racial discrimination and bigoted rhetoric. This was not so much hypocritical as it was suicidal.

An aging, nearly 90 percent white GOP cannot carry its candidates to electoral victory on a platform that revels in the consequences of unvarnished racism--such as Charlottesville--or the terror of family separation and placing babies in cages, IMHO. How does one maintain such a model for electoral success in a browning America? For those Republicans who indulge and silently benefit from it, voter suppression provides the leeway.

There is fear underlying this strategy, however. Trump regularly defecates on political norms, but he and the party that empowers him share a commonality. All too many Republicans excuse his abuses as they commit their own, suppressing votes and embracing the very last strands dangling off of the white nationalist fringe. Much like a white person saying the word "nigger"with the hard are'aloud in mixed company, they are free to do so as long as they expect consequences.[/QUOTE]Do you actually believe all that? If so you really ought to widen your sources where you get your information.

[QUOTE=NepKng;4060444]Do you actually believe all that? If so you really ought to widen your sources where you get your information.[/QUOTE]So you think that voter suppression is overblown? Even if one chooses not to count gerrymandering (something done by both sides) as voter suppression, what about reducing early voting, adding I'd requirements, cutting the number of polling locations? I'm not saying that at the core the dems are less about winning and keeping power at all costs but some moves to limit power of the opposite party by republicans have been abhorrent and aren't going to hold up in court long term. As an example, just take a look at the number of appointments the governor of NC is no longer making and ask yourself what will happen if the republicans ever get all 3 chambers in NC again. As yourself why is it that a someone can become president and loose the popular vote. As yourself how a party can maintain control without winning the majority of votes in a state.

Voter supression is about more than bs tactics like reading tests. It's also about making people feel like their vote is so meaningless or will be so hard to cast that they stay home.

[QUOTE=JoeLooking;4060929]So you think that voter suppression is overblown? Even if one chooses not to count gerrymandering (something done by both sides) as voter suppression, what about reducing early voting, adding I'd requirements, cutting the number of polling locations? I'm not saying that at the core the dems are less about winning and keeping power at all costs but some moves to limit power of the opposite party by republicans have been abhorrent and aren't going to hold up in court long term. As an example, just take a look at the number of appointments the governor of NC is no longer making and ask yourself what will happen if the republicans ever get all 3 chambers in NC again. As yourself why is it that a someone can become president and loose the popular vote. As yourself how a party can maintain control without winning the majority of votes in a state.

Voter supression is about more than bs tactics like reading tests. It's also about making people feel like their vote is so meaningless or will be so hard to cast that they stay home.[/QUOTE]Voter suppression is WAY overblown. Voter fraud by the Democrats, however, is RAMPANT!

First of all Im not a liberal Hippie nor was I one in the past liberal that is. I was one of those that did think the Greatful Dead was a great band until I sobered up and said WTF a 3 hour concert and they played 4 songs. However I have voted Republican and Democrat depending on who was running that affected my life at the time. Now thats out of the way.
IMO, With BIG money in modern politics and the 24/7 News sound bites and that dag gone internet and tweet thing fanning the flames. Politics has become so toxic that people can't for the sake of themselves see how the other person can justify voting for the other idiot. Hell they / we can't even have a adult conversation without dragging the conversation in the gutter. Bill Maher, Shawn Hannity, CNN, Fox News who's your favorite? Who do you believe? Who's Fake? Who's in a bubble without facts? Who makes you want to throw a shoe at the TV? One thing for sure, all that I listed above are in it for the BIG money and ratings (Just google Bill Maher or Shawn Hannitys net worth) Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump have made these networks what they are today. When they have a controversy news blip its DOLLAR signs baby. From Lewinsky to Big tit Stormy. It's the new norm folks get use to it. My advice is vote for the smartest candidate and if they don't deliver vote their ass out of office. Or at least vote for someone instead of against someone. Most important don't talk politics with relatives over the holidays it's just too toxic these days. Enjoy each other don't let politics put a funk in the air. Happy Holidays.

[QUOTE=MegaWattMaker;4061245]Voter suppression is WAY overblown. Voter fraud by the Democrats, however, is RAMPANT![/QUOTE]It's obvious.

[QUOTE=JoeLooking;4060929]So you think that voter suppression is overblown? Even if one chooses not to count gerrymandering (something done by both sides) as voter suppression, what about reducing early voting, adding I'd requirements, cutting the number of polling locations? I'm not saying that at the core the dems are less about winning and keeping power at all costs but some moves to limit power of the opposite party by republicans have been abhorrent and aren't going to hold up in court long term. As an example, just take a look at the number of appointments the governor of NC is no longer making and ask yourself what will happen if the republicans ever get all 3 chambers in NC again. As yourself why is it that a someone can become president and loose the popular vote. As yourself how a party can maintain control without winning the majority of votes in a state.

Voter supression is about more than bs tactics like reading tests. It's also about making people feel like their vote is so meaningless or will be so hard to cast that they stay home.[/QUOTE]I really wish basic civics and economics was still a required course in high schools. That and US history that's not taught with a political slant.

[QUOTE=XHippie;4061385]First of all Im not a liberal Hippie nor was I one in the past liberal that is. I was one of those that did think the Greatful Dead was a great band until I sobered up and said WTF a 3 hour concert and they played 4 songs. However I have voted Republican and Democrat depending on who was running that affected my life at the time. Now thats out of the way.
IMO, With BIG money in modern politics and the 24/7 News sound bites and that dag gone internet and tweet thing fanning the flames. Politics has become so toxic that people can't for the sake of themselves see how the other person can justify voting for the other idiot. Hell they / we can't even have a adult conversation without dragging the conversation in the gutter. Bill Maher, Shawn Hannity, CNN, Fox News who's your favorite? Who do you believe? Who's Fake? Who's in a bubble without facts? Who makes you want to throw a shoe at the TV? One thing for sure, all that I listed above are in it for the BIG money and ratings (Just google Bill Maher or Shawn Hannitys net worth) Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump have made these networks what they are today. When they have a controversy news blip its DOLLAR signs baby. From Lewinsky to Big tit Stormy. It's the new norm folks get use to it. My advice is vote for the smartest candidate and if they don't deliver vote their ass out of office. Or at least vote for someone instead of against someone. Most important don't talk politics with relatives over the holidays it's just too toxic these days. Enjoy each other don't let politics put a funk in the air. Happy Holidays.[/QUOTE]Couldn't agree more.

So requiring an I'd is voter suppression?

If so, I guess the airlines are guilty of airline suppression.

I guess hotels are guilty of guest suppression.

My doctor's office is guilty of patient suppression.

A bank branch employee that does not know me is guilty of customer suppression.

Got it, Thanks.

[QUOTE=NepKng;4061826]It's obvious.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TheSting24;4061871]So requiring an I'd is voter suppression?

If so, I guess the airlines are guilty of airline suppression.

I guess hotels are guilty of guest suppression.

My doctor's office is guilty of patient suppression.

A bank branch employee that does not know me is guilty of customer suppression.

Got it, Thanks.[/QUOTE]And you need an I'd to buy groceries anyway, right?