Printable View
[QUOTE=NC Transplant;1086611]Come on, JM wouldn't do that. Though he MAY keep the best pussy for himself?[/QUOTE]No I promise to share the best pussy. And when I'm elected mayor here, the only "police busts" we are going to be talking about are the nice 34B or 36C types on the cute new officers I will get the city to hire.
[QUOTE=NC Transplant; 1057846]I feel so much safer now. I never did understand the "crimes against nature"? Isn't sex between a man and a woman natural?
[url]http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/09/09/1678691/2-charged-in-cornelius-prostitution.html[/url]
It didn't say, but I have to assume that they are going after ads on places like BP? [/QUOTE]Seems Like alot of footwork and trouble to make 4 charges that are misdemeanors.
[QUOTE=Hickory Guy;1086625]Seems Like alot of footwork and trouble to make 4 charges that are misdemeanors.[/QUOTE]The elections are over so everyone can go back to doing whatever it was they were doing before a couple of politicians decided to go hard. What you see with these two ladies are just two ladies who made a small mistake and then chose to not play ball with the officers. We can all learn from their mistake. They are decent girls but not really pros. If you like a really good amateur I would give Sam a call.
The mistake is discussing the implicit details of what you expect for your dollar bills yall. Keep the money about time and not about services. It seems the girls do get a little greedy when it comes to hotels and business travelers. They want the cash so bad they are willing to discuss the details. This is a no-no!
My.02. If a girl ever asks me what I 'want' either via phone or in person, before the time has been paid for, I leave or end the call. A pro never will and an amateur should know better. Only vice cops do stuff like that. If they ask me what I would like, I just tell them I have a few ideas but lets just relax and see what two friends can come up with.
So many people have been upsold that most of us are jaded and don't want to risk losing the money. That is also greed. I am as cheap as they come, but all services have a price and above that, is profit. The price has the cost wrapped into it. The $ an hour is what the cops were after.
On a side note, cell phones can be easily spied on. The only way to prevent that is to remove the battery. Google it. There are softwares under 2mb that can be put on a phone and you can listen live, real-time to a conversation through the phone mic, even when the phone is not in use. So, the phone could be on a table in a room with four people talking and the whole convo can be heard and recorded! Yikes. It is real. The cops take the phones and can do this without a warrant, so long as the evidence is not used in court. They still get the info. To that end, you may notice, there were only two charged. What about the others? Are they playing ball?
Also, you may notice in the ads that Sam got a new number. You now may put this altogether and notice other regulars that now possess new numbers, for apparently no reason. ? We could leave this all up to the detectives or just do the research ourselves. In years past, the larger problems have been in smaller towns (note the heading of this post) and one to the east with the name of a boy. These are the towns where the cops will do more of 'whatever it takes' to get the results.
Definitely, a stay away.
This may be out of context with the thread, but I've seen Sam and have subsquently read her reviews, I would def. Recommend against her for saftey reasons.
[QUOTE=Bouinage;1087120]This may be out of context with the thread, but I've seen Sam and have subsquently read her reviews, I would def. Recommend against her for saftey reasons.[/QUOTE]Glad I sign on I was about to give her a call.
Thanks Bouinage for the heads up.
[QUOTE=Bouinage;1087120]This may be out of context with the thread, but I've seen Sam and have subsquently read her reviews, I would def. Recommend against her for saftey reasons.[/QUOTE]You mean this one?
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ter-review-148519-if-you-want-to-leave-happy-then-call-me-704-499-7557-41/2381459[/url]
Did anybody hear anything about the raid last night? I went to the ' crime in Charlotte ' site, and saw there were several arrested. Looked like they were the common SW types, but they had pics of several ' Johns ' posted as well. I hope all you guys are still safe!
[QUOTE=Redskinzzfans;1087368]Did anybody hear anything about the raid last night? I went to the ' crime in Charlotte ' site, and saw there were several arrested. Looked like they were the common SW types, but they had pics of several ' Johns ' posted as well. I hope all you guys are still safe![/QUOTE]Yes, they raided the notel over on Brookshire. The one right beside the gas station where a few of the remaining SW's from Rozzle hang. They stated that there was about 20 thousand a week in drug money being made. Also stated that a prostitution ring ran out of the notel. So as a result, it's been shut down. The arrests you see are from the notel.
[QUOTE=Bouinage;1087120]This may be out of context with the thread, but I've seen Sam and have subsequently read her reviews, I would def. Recommend against her for safety reasons.[/QUOTE]No offense to her or anyone who's seen her, but as its been mentioned before, Sam is a former SW. She used to work the Hoskins Stroll. She used to make about twenty a session on the street now guys are paying her ten times that, which is unbelievable. Not sure how her service is, but like many former SW's she's a former addict with many visits to the meck mansion over on 4th street.
[QUOTE=Reggie1980;1087531]No offense to her or anyone who's seen her, but as its been mentioned before, Sam is a former SW. She used to work the Hoskins Stroll. She used to make about twenty a session on the street now guys are paying her ten times that, which is unbelievable. Not sure how her service is, but like many former SW's she's a former addict with many visits to the meck mansion over on 4th street.[/QUOTE]I do appreciate the heads up. I want to say I hear ya both (Reggie and Bouinage)
Questions though still linger. Bouinage has a review for stripper sam, but not for addict Sam. I asked if that is a mistake or if he saw stripper Sam? No response to that yet. Possibly just a mix up?
About her being a street working girl: Is the concern about her fees going up since the sidewalk days? I find that is generally the case that they raise the fee when they go from back alleys to apartments. While I am no advocate for hos, it seems to me she picked herself up by getting indoors and becoming stable. Her reviews are bland at best but I just wondered what the issue with her is, really. About the 20 times fee thing. Only a couple of idiots are really paying that much. She can be had for twice the sidewalk rates if one is so inclined to discuss it with her. For an indoor scene, that seems fair. None that I have seen really are much to look at or to dream about. The few that are do command the high fees. Also, if everybody is playing safe (I am) then what exactly is the concern. Most of these gals are addicts, but I haven't seen any crackpipes except on BP ads. I have heard 'safety issues' but can't get any clarification here or in a pm response. I would appreciate the knowledge as that is why I come here.
Off-topic: I have noted lately a lot of crap in the forums. There is alot of childish 'egging-on' and from some senior members I find it appalling. I have read the forums recently and I see where two people have a disagreement or discussion and a few third parties get involved and seem to make it worse. That is not the purpose of the forums. Are we just trying to build our post count? I rarely post for that reason, so that I can be taken seriously when the time comes, but I see that fading away. The forums are not here to be monopolized with semi witty banter. They are here for the exchange of ideas, experiences and actual knowledge. Pms are for the banter. A problem with a particular person should be taken to pm first and if you are going to bring it up as a third party, you should not be egging someone on by adding to the crap. You could tactfully try to remedy the issue for the good of the forum. I haven't seen a lot of this lately and I think its a shame. Senior member or not, some arent worth much here to the forums, but a senior that has been here a while and contributed wholly to the good of the forum should not get caught up in the childishness that goes on here. That's my time. I'll be here all week and I do accept pms. Tell me how it is.
I've seen Sam a few times. She is a decent alternative to a ATF, mainly b / see she is willing to do just about anything you ask. As far as her rates go, I have never given the amount she has posted in her ads. She is pretty much grateful for anything to be honest. Not to throw her under the bus, but if you are really in a negotiating mood, its basically a "name your own price policy". As far as the "safety reasons" go, she has the tendency to sometimes try and mount you w / o a cover. This needs to be said to keep people safe. No need in beating around the Bush any longer. Just pray she hasn't been with CharlieSheen I guess.
[QUOTE=Rental Holes; 1088155]I do appreciate the heads up. I want to say I hear ya both (Reggie and Bouinage)
Questions though still linger. Bouinage has a review for stripper sam, but not for addict Sam. I asked if that is a mistake or if he saw stripper Sam? No response to that yet. Possibly just a mix up?
About her being a street working girl: Is the concern about her fees going up since the sidewalk days? I find that is generally the case that they raise the fee when they go from back alleys to apartments. While I am no advocate for hos, it seems to me she picked herself up by getting indoors and becoming stable. Her reviews are bland at best but I just wondered what the issue with her is, really. About the 20 times fee thing. Only a couple of idiots are really paying that much. She can be had for twice the sidewalk rates if one is so inclined to discuss it with her. For an indoor scene, that seems fair. None that I have seen really are much to look at or to dream about. The few that are do command the high fees. Also, if everybody is playing safe (I am) then what exactly is the concern. Most of these gals are addicts, but I haven't seen any crackpipes except on BP ads. I have heard 'safety issues' but can't get any clarification here or in a pm response. I would appreciate the knowledge as that is why I come here. [/QUOTE]No there's no concern about her fees or a persons safety. It's always nice to get as much information about a young lady before you see her, especially in this hobby. But it comes down to what you're willing to spend and what your time with the person is worth. I'm just saying "hey, this girl was worth twenty on the streets." Now what you do with that information is up to you. Some folks do not like to see "SW's" or former "SW's turned high priced escorts." It's all about making an informed decision, that's all.
Also, I would disagree that most of these girls are addicts. True, we don't know each person's background, but in terms of escorts, a lot of the ones I deal with are not addicts. They're women who love money and can't get enough of it. Now there are some addicts out there and it shows. However, there are quite a few legitimate young ladies out here who are clean.
On another note, after reading Hollowpiont1's post, its nice to see she's negotiable on her fees.
[QUOTE=Redskinzzfans;1087368]Did anybody hear anything about the raid last night? I went to the ' crime in Charlotte ' site, and saw there were several arrested. Looked like they were the common SW types, but they had pics of several ' Johns ' posted as well. I hope all you guys are still safe![/QUOTE]Is there any way you can link the site or send to me in a message, every time I try to view it the most recent posting is from Oct.19th, its not updating.
Thanks!
[QUOTE=Gumdoor; 1087312]You mean this one?
[url]http://charlotte.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ter-review-148519-if-you-want-to-leave-happy-then-call-me-704-499-7557-41/2381459[/url][/QUOTE]Yes, sorry it took me so long to respond.
[QUOTE=Sexyblonde; 1089894]Is there any way you can link the site or send to me in a message, every time I try to view it the most recent posting is from Oct.19th, its not updating.
Thanks! [/QUOTE]I tried to find it again, but for some reason it's not there now. I went back thru history on my computer, even tried to google it again. I found plenty of stories about it, but I couldn't get the page with the pics to come up again. Sorry.