-
Not so sure
[QUOTE=Resipsaloquito;2555717]But I believe that is the Sara who once had male parts. Think Caitlyn / Bruce Jenner.[/QUOTE]I read that as well, but then I looked at her pix and thought maybe she was just being smeared on this forum by someone who was a disgruntled ex-customer.
Now that I reflect on my visit, I believe that any person who once owned the male member would have treated mine like she did. I am a big doubter on that rumor.
Also she says that she "does hair" Full time. That doesn't sound like someone who is TG.
Either way, I chalk it up to experience, and my search for quality in this hobby goes on.
Be safe and good luck to all.
-
Clover
[QUOTE=Raider1687;2556571]I really don't want to keep posting, but I can hardly keep up with the PM detail. I saw Clover today-[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sweet-and-lovely-clover/23296351[/URL].
She is the girl in the pics and has a hot body. She really wants to do things right this time, it would seem. I wouldn't say she loves doing this, but not many do. We did a little LFK and some FIV, then she gave me an all-world BBBJ, got on top for CG, RCG and K9. BBBJ was really, really good and it was different than many I have had. She is young, but skilled. I think she is worth a shot. She treated me totally fairly. Don't pay any attention to the number changes, unbeknownst to many, there are apps that give you any number area codes you want and that is why hers is 213 or whatever.[/QUOTE]Ad says she used to work for EE. Did she go by Rydeer or something like that? If so got very bad reviews.
-
No adult section in app
So I got a new phone the other day and I downloaded the same backp age cruiser app as I had before. Before I had to confirm I was over 18 to open the adult section. This new phone I guess theyou updated the app and removed the adult section. Per the notes in the app. Does anyone have any recommendations on another back page app?
Thanks.
MC.
-
Alana URL
[QUOTE=Cards1;2528525]I had a dream today about Alan. It was a great dream. She made sure my experience was a very good one. I read in one review about baby damage, well either I'm blind or she had plastic surgery because there was absolutely none visible. Her menu was wide open, from what I gathered everything is available except BBFS and Greek. I enjoyed the following items, DFK. CFS, MISH, DOGGY, BBBJ (which was outstanding) and DATY which I got the opinion she enjoyed. I definitely plan on seeing Alana again. Be safe out there guys.[/QUOTE]Can you provide a URL or contact information for Alana?
-
Backpage
[QUOTE=MasterC1667;2556825]So I got a new phone the other day and I downloaded the same backp age cruiser app as I had before. Before I had to confirm I was over 18 to open the adult section. This new phone I guess theyou updated the app and removed the adult section. Per the notes in the app. Does anyone have any recommendations on another back page app?
Thanks.
MC.[/QUOTE]You could just go on the internet and go to the website.
-
Yes
[QUOTE=Hooter12;2556824]Ad says she used to work for EE. Did she go by Rydeer or something like that? If so got very bad reviews.[/QUOTE]Same girl. Rydeer.
-
Clover
[QUOTE=Raider1687;2556571]I really don't want to keep posting, but I can hardly keep up with the PM detail. I saw Clover today-[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sweet-and-lovely-clover/23296351[/URL].
She is the girl in the pics and has a hot body. She really wants to do things right this time, it would seem. I wouldn't say she loves doing this, but not many do. We did a little LFK and some FIV, then she gave me an all-world BBBJ, got on top for CG, RCG and K9. BBBJ was really, really good and it was different than many I have had. She is young, but skilled. I think she is worth a shot. She treated me totally fairly. Don't pay any attention to the number changes, unbeknownst to many, there are apps that give you any number area codes you want and that is why hers is 213 or whatever.[/QUOTE]Had a dream today with Clover. A lot of my decision was based on this review. I have to say the review was a little over the top. Body is decent but not great. Pictures in the ad are very flattering. Not a tight body whatsoever. Baby damage in the stomach and definitely heavier than the pics would suggest. Had not fixed herself up and looked like she had just rolled out of bed. Once again though not terrible. Chatted for a while then got to business. BBBJ is good and sloppy but wanted to use hands most of the time. Its certainly not "all world. " Moved to mish and she is very loose. Not tight at all. Made tiny little noises but it was pretty much robotic. Not GFE at all. Will do light kissing but prefers not to kiss. Follows directions well and was willing to do pretty much any position. Finished with a BBBJ. Allowed CIM but jumped up immediately after first shot to spit real quick. The rest just went on me. She is a nice girl and we had a good chat. She didn't mention the time and didn't even look at the donation until we were done but she is clearly a business girl. The previous review is very generous. Quite frankly for the money there are better options. When she was with EE she got terrible reviews from being robotic and just laying there. I wouldn't go that far this time but it wasn't far from it either. She would be ok in a pinch but wouldn't be my first or second choice.
-
AnNa
[QUOTE=Hooter12;2556602]I saw her about a year ago in Covington. Was definitely the girl in the pics. She gave a great BBBJ and FS. Was very friendly and I thought she was hot. Now like I said it was about a year ago so I don't know what's up with her now. Might be somebody just using this pics but I doubt it.
[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/BodyRubs/513616-0653-lets-p-l-a-y-call-for-n-e-w-specials/16947493[/URL][/QUOTE]I text her and she replied to my questions, then asked about an updated photo and see are I see k e t s. So I'm leaning towards someone using her old photos.
-
Anyone try out this lady yet?
[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/i-want-to-play-and-meet-some-new-friends-tonight/15195064[/URL]
-
Clover
[QUOTE=Hooter12;2557407]Had a dream today with Clover. A lot of my decision was based on this review. I have to say the review was a little over the top. Body is decent but not great. Pictures in the ad are very flattering. Not a tight body whatsoever. Baby damage in the stomach and definitely heavier than the pics would suggest. Had not fixed herself up and looked like she had just rolled out of bed. Once again though not terrible. Chatted for a while then got to business. BBBJ is good and sloppy but wanted to use hands most of the time. Its certainly not "all world. " Moved to mish and she is very loose. Not tight at all. Made tiny little noises but it was pretty much robotic. Not GFE at all. Will do light kissing but prefers not to kiss. Follows directions well and was willing to do pretty much any position. Finished with a BBBJ. Allowed CIM but jumped up immediately after first shot to spit real quick. The rest just went on me. She is a nice girl and we had a good chat. She didn't mention the time and didn't even look at the donation until we were done but she is clearly a business girl. The previous review is very generous. Quite frankly for the money there are better options. When she was with EE she got terrible reviews from being robotic and just laying there. I wouldn't go that far this time but it wasn't far from it either. She would be ok in a pinch but wouldn't be my first or second choice.
[/QUOTE]I had a duo with Sheree (aka holly) and Rydeer (aka clover) while they were with EE. I didn't recognize Rydeer in the ad. Consistent with your post, she was nowhere near as thin and firm as the ad would suggest. At the time, (3-4 months ago) it appeared to me that she still had on some baby weight. I was hoping she had lost it and taken new pics. Apparently, that wasn't the case. That's too bad because I was considering seeing her again if she had lost weight and toned up.
-
[QUOTE=Enricojinx;2557875]I had a duo with Sheree (aka holly) and Rydeer (aka clover) while they were with EE. I didn't recognize Rydeer in the ad. Consistent with your post, she was nowhere near as thin and firm as the ad would suggest. At the time, (3-4 months ago) it appeared to me that she still had on some baby weight. I was hoping she had lost it and taken new pics. Apparently, that wasn't the case. That's too bad because I was considering seeing her again if she had lost weight and toned up.[/QUOTE]Since you saw them both, based on looks alone, if you had to choose between Clover & Holly, who would it be?
-
AnNa
[QUOTE=Twisted69;2557526]I text her and she replied to my questions, then asked about an updated photo and see are I see k e t s. So I'm leaning towards someone using her old photos.[/QUOTE]When I saw her a year ago or more it was a handler taking the calls or texts. She admitted that to me when I saw her because there was a slight dispute as to the length of time. She then called her handler to verify the arrangements. So when you contacted the number it was likely, if its legit, that you were speaking to a handler who couldn't send updated pics. She was good looking, a little older than the pics but the same body. Everything was good with her, a little business like, not GFE. However once again its been a least a year and those pics are old so if its her, and it may not be, she may not look like that anymore.
-
[QUOTE=Josh88;2557919]Since you saw them both, based on looks alone, if you had to choose between Clover & Holly, who would it be?[/QUOTE]I preferred Holly. Not just in looks but enthusiasm and personality. Clover gave a better BJ but that was it.
-
Holly
[QUOTE=Enricojinx;2558371]I preferred Holly. Not just in looks but enthusiasm and personality. Clover gave a better BJ but that was it.[/QUOTE]I would have to say certainly Holly.
-
Not her
[URL]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/angel-face-visiting-perfect-10-come-play-big-booty-treat/23330034[/URL]