Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=La Chic; 1105518]Okay SuperE, here goes:

5. Maddie. B movie horror porn like "Hairy Twatter" and my fav,"Throbbin Hood, Prince of Beaves."

4. Jessica. Yummy, yummy, I've got cum in my tummy.

3. Candace. Slurpee surprise.

2. Jen. Classic.

1. Leigh. Her face and hand gesture says it all.

La Chic[/QUOTE]It isn't always how much or how messy or how drooly the cum is. There are many subtle things to enjoy, depending on what you like.

Thank you for your continued attention to my contest and your thoughtful and annotated considerations when you vote.

I totally agree. I wish I could print out some of your collages (especially Champagne's) , frame them and hang them on my wall at home, work or both. But something tells me it would not go over well with others.

I should however print them and put them in a vault or deposit box. Maybe in 500 years or so SE's work will be worth millions?

Your analogy to The Mona Lisa is excellent! In addition to her smile. Take a close look at her eyes. They tell it all.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1105490]Leonardo the Vinci is a name you probably all have heard. He was an Italian polymath: painter, sculptor, architect, musician, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist and writer. Leonardo has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man, a man whose unquenchable curiosity was equaled only by his powers of invention. He is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and perhaps the most diversely talented person ever to have lived.

I would aspire to be the kind of monger Leonardo would have been, had he been interested in our hobby. Maybe he did dabble as a monger too, but the times in which he lived frowned upon anything but total discretion in such endeavors. There is a hint of playfulness in this regard reflected in the ambiguous and subtle smile on his famous painting: "Mona Lisa." What he was not permitted to express directly, some say he did very cleverly indirectly in art such as this. .

Today, of course, and especially on this website, we are not constrained by the nit-picky hang-ups of bygone eras, even though we do get some commentary from time to time that seems like a throwback to morality from the 50s. But that's all it is: a flapping of gums about outdated standards and nothing more. I can't be positive, but Leonardo was definitely a free-thinking rebel, and I would surmise it very likely that Mona Lisa just might be sucking on a cock if Leonardo painted his famous masterpiece today. Her mouth seems incredibly ripe for one. [/QUOTE]

Wish I could get my hands on her. She is definitely a BBFS candidate.

[QUOTE=Vbgent4u2c;1106086]I totally agree. I wish I could print out some of your collages (especially Champagne's) , frame them and hang them on my wall at home, work or both. But something tells me it would not go over well with others.[/QUOTE]I know a monger who lives in the Philly burbs who does exactly that. He takes photos of SWs, and prints his pics in large format, and displays them in frames on his walls. He brings SWs to his home (something I wouldn't do, but to each his own) , and, in addition to knowing this already, I have heard from several SWs who found it interesting and intriguing that he does this.

[QUOTE=Vbgent4u2c]I should however print them and put them in a vault or deposit box. Maybe in 500 years or so SE's work will be worth millions? [/QUOTE]Artists tend not to be appreciated in their lifetimes. Van Gogh's work was spurned. He only ever managed to sell one painting out of the 900 or so that he painted, for 400 francs (about $80) :

[url=http://www.vangoghgallery.com/catalog/Painting/466/Red-Vineyard,-The.html]The Red Vineyard[/url]

Now, of course, he is considered to be one of the best and most recognized painter of all time and his work is worth incalculable millions.

I am not saying I am a Van Gogh. I am just making a point. Anything is possible.

[QUOTE=Vbgent4u2c]Your analogy to The Mona Lisa is excellent! In addition to her smile. Take a close look at her eyes. They tell it all.[/QUOTE]I always thought the Mona Lisa had that "come fuck me" look. Of course, I tend to think a lot of women are saying "fuck me" with their eyes, :)

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1106029]Again, so many good ones to choose just one fav, so I will choose several. But this one would have to be at the top of my list.[/QUOTE]FINALLY an anal pic of her! This one is a definate hottie! Thanks for these pics

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1106035]Or, is she doing MY thing? :) Last but certainly not least is my favorite cock sucking pic from the last set.[/QUOTE]Come on, let's see champagne get fucked.

Nice find SuperE, I want to see this one splattered in cum.

SE, sorry if I didn't read properly and is already in your reports. I would like to know if Champagne provide Greek? (just to get the fantasy of that wonderful, great ass being worked).

[QUOTE=Vamp;1106336]SE, sorry if I didn't read properly and is already in your reports. I would like to know if Champagne provide Greek? (just to get the fantasy of that wonderful, great ass being worked).[/QUOTE]Here is my report:

[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1102518&viewfull=1#post1102518]My Date with Champagne[/url]

You tell me. :)

[QUOTE=Spa Man 1;1106273]Come on, let's see champagne get fucked.[/QUOTE] Nawwwwww.... I am having too much fun while fucking to be setting up a remote camera for photos. It is a LOT easier with a BJ.

[QUOTE=Brrr99;1106305]Nice find SuperE, I want to see this one splattered in cum.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the props. HOWEVER, people in hell want ice water too. I don't do requests, and, even if I did, it would be some trick to do so AFTER the date is over.

I rarely, if ever, do facials. It just isn't my thing. But never say never. I have "dabbled" in that on occasion. I like money shots with my cum in and streaming from their mouths, but, sometimes it just feels too good to interrupt for photos, and I prefer to have her swallow.

Let me preface my remarks by saying two things:

1. Forth Ryte has always seemed to me to be one of the good guys. He has further seemed to be one of the more intelligent and level-headed good guys, so, my commentary, wherever it disagrees with him, in no way reflects animosity. It is just a healthily different perspective and point of view, although I do agree with much of what he had to say.

2. There are some downsides to only being able to post in your own thread, but the danger of being "off-topic" isn't one of them. Just about anything for me is "on-topic" unless I start babbling in tongues or typing the phone directory. I make an honest attempt to stick to the purposes of this Forum; if I stray from that from time to time I hope you would forgive a slight detour, given that my main highway is littered with useful information.

[QUOTE= Forth Ryte]What goes on in this forum. Especially this Philly forum that is so busy and so populated with prolific sex addicts. Is sometimes just an opportunity to discuss what the poster wants to discuss. And so long as it relates. However remotely. To sex with women it should be 'on topic. '[/QUOTE]You have NO argument from me on that one.

[QUOTE= Forth Ryte]For some men, sex with a woman is wham-bam-thank-you-Ma'am. For others, it is seduction. The hunt, the dance, the pleasure. Some want more detail, other just want the essential facts. Some want to see pictures of just the girl with no part of the man, others want to see the girl actively engaged in the sex act. Variety, gentlemen, is what makes this and everything we do in life more interesting. Variety in our discussions should be tolerated and even encouraged. Jumping on someone just because YOU weren't interested in what he had to say or jumping on someone just because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used, just seems awfully small minded to me.[/QUOTE]It couldn't have been said much better: vive la differece.

[QUOTE= Forth Ryte]Some posts are two lines long and others are quite lurid and eloquent. At least one poster here prides himself on his eloquence so what in the world was wrong with one monger discussing the topic of 'eloquence'? JEEZ! Leave the guy alone if that's what he wanted to discuss in the context of the posts on this forum.[/QUOTE]Here is where we disagree. It is one thing to "discuss" or even dispute the topic of "eloquence." It is one thing to point out an oversight, like missing an attribution. It is quite ANOTHER thing to use either of these two subjects as a weapon to attack, to ascribe malevolent motivations and to impugn "integrity." If you are a student of World War II and Operation Market-Garden, that was a bridge WAY too far.

I don't need to plagiarize the work of others to "impress" anyone about my writing abilities. My vast body of work here speaks for itself as to whether I am capable of "erudition" or not. If I were to pick a spot to do that it certainly wouldn't be Wikipedia, as if that was a place nobody could easily find! That source was a quick and dirty way of getting my facts straight. However, you try making well over 2000 posts without any errors or oversights, like missing an attribution. A simple interrupting telephone call or unexpected social or business guest can make editing impossible with the new software, which allows a 60 minute window. I miss the old 24 hour window. Even with 24 hours, many mambers made more mistakes in one post than I have since I became a member here, and now they make even more (as did the attacker in question as a prime example). No amount of editing time will be enough, however, for someone with the grammar skills of a third grader.

Should the guy who vilified me have been left alone to make the leap from "discussion" to obviously hostile and vindictive presumptions? I think not, and several others clearly agreed. If you want to make rash and spiteful assumptions, and use them to jump down somebody's throat, and denounce both his talent and his character, then you had better be prepared for like treatment.

I was making a commentary in my last post about how difficult it was to edit within a 60 minute window, and I noticed a typo wherein I had mistyped "member" as "mamber," but the editing window was already closed. How I long for the old 24 hour hour editing window! It has to be hell on new members. You might not even see your post published before the editing window has already expired!

[QUOTE=The P Hunter;1106169]FINALLY an anal pic of her! This one is a definate hottie! Thanks for these pics[/QUOTE]You are more than welcome for the pics of Champagne.

I knew there were amateur gynecologists in here. The view count on a pic seems to go WAY up when a girl's legs are spread wide for an unobstructed view of her cootchie. And, I haven't seen many complaints about the same. There seem to be far fewer amateur proctologists, although there are some, like you, to be sure. In that "area" the opinions seem to have greater divergence, similar to the majority / minority differences of opinion about BJ pics. In the "end" we all like what we like for the reasons we like it.

Some mongers love to see and to fuck a SW's asshole, and others prefer neither, and some most especially would sooner NOT see them posted here. These preferences never much influenced what I decide to photograph and post. No matter what the request, pro or con, I just tend to do my own thing and go my own way. But, if the anal pic is your cup of tea, take it the way you like it, straight up or with plenty of milk and sugar, like the English prefer to drink it. :)

I was always fascinated with numbers. It intrigued me that when you jump out of an airplane, there was a terminal velocity (122 mph), beyond which you could fall no faster, after initially accelerating at 32 feet per second / per second, because of the wind resistance of the atmosphere.

In here there is no natural physical resistance of any kind, except perhaps the speed of the internet. Virtually limitless acceleration and speed is possible. I have taken note of my own acceleration and speed. Data available with the new software on this website allows one to look at the views of each thread and measure these things. I made an interesting observation. The "speed" of views on my main thread here is 30,000 to 50,000 views per month faster than any other in the ENTIRE Forum, and it continues to accelerate.

I can't begin to speculate why this is so. There are probably as many different reasons as there are viewers. The numbers I presented, however, are kind of like a "Nielsen rating" for my thread. I think back to when Howard Stern was on public radio, and would do interestingly outrageous things. His Nielsen ratings went through the roof until he was the number one disk jockey in the country as an infamous "shock-jock." I don't pretend I am another Howard Stern, but something about his Nielsen surveys stuck with me: the average radio listener at the time he took the number one slot listened to a radio show for eighteen minutes. The average Howard Stern fan listened for an hour and twenty minutes. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Those who hated Howard Stern listened to him for an average of two and a half hours. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Whether there is a common "thread" here I can't say, but something is drawing members to read and look at my stuff. All I CAN say is thank you, and I hope whatever reasons you have for doing that I can maintain and accelerate.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1106637]I was always fascinated with numbers. It intrigued me that when you jump out of an airplane, there was a terminal velocity (122 mph) , beyond which you could fall no faster, after initially accelerating at 32 feet per second / per second, because of the wind resistance of the atmosphere.

In here there is no natural physical resistance of any kind, except perhaps the speed of the internet. Virtually limitless acceleration and speed is possible. I have taken note of my own acceleration and speed. Data available with the new software on this website allows one to look at the views of each thread and measure these things. I made an interesting observation. The "speed" of views on my main thread here is 30, 000 to 50, 000 views per month faster than any other in the entire Forum, and it continues to accelerate.

I can't begin to speculate why this is so. There are probably as many different reasons as there are viewers. The numbers I presented, however, are kind of like a "Nielsen rating" for my thread. I think back to when Howard Stern was on public radio and would do interestingly outrageous things. His Nielsen ratings went through the roof until he was the number one disk jockey in the country as an infamous "shock-jock." I don't pretend I am another Howard Stern, but something about his Nielsen surveys stuck with me: the average radio listener at the time he took the number one slot listened to a radio show for eighteen minutes. The average Howard Stern fan listened for an hour and twenty minutes. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Those who hated Howard Stern listened to him for an average of two and a half hours. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Whether there is a common "thread" here I can't say, but something is drawing members to read and look at my stuff. All I can say is thank you, and I hope whatever reasons you have for doing that I can maintain and accelerate. [/QUOTE]Like Howard, you have discovered the secret to ratings: NAKED WOMEN! One only has to look at the recent reports listing to see that the Philly thread is unlike any other thread in the country. Most cities have photos that number in the hundreds but Philly has thousands from you and CJ and many on the Streetwalker forum as well. It's an old saying that Sex Sells and it can be extrapolated that even more sex sells even better.

[QUOTE=XxATLxX;1106138]Wish I could get my hands on her. She is definitely a BBFS candidate.[/QUOTE]I don't do BBFS even with a civvie, but whatever floats your boat!

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1105465]....However, the K isn't like a vending machine. It can be hit or miss on the most pleasant day of spring or summer, or chock-full of possibilities. I have struck gold on occasion on my first pass, and I have made 7 to 10 loops before finding what I wanted. Sometimes the big fish are biting like mad, and sometimes you have to be patient.[/QUOTE]This is so true! The best times and finds that I have were when I took it slow and deliberate. I have only experienced the "big fish are biting like mad" one time of all of my visits.

What is laughable is the horny dogs who race around Philly streets like it is a Monaco Grand Prix event. I'd hate to be walking when these dummies are out!

I've given up fighting with the forum's auto corrections. Not that I'm dumb or lazy, just tired of dealing with it.

[QUOTE=Hunter3203;1106658]Like Howard, you have discovered the secret to ratings: NAKED WOMEN! One only has to look at the recent reports listing to see that the Philly thread is unlike any other thread in the country. Most cities have photos that number in the hundreds but Philly has thousands... It's an old saying that Sex Sells and it can be extrapolated that even more sex sells even better.[/QUOTE]The Philly Forum overall has many pic posts of naked women, but I don't think that is the sole explanation to the popularity of MY particular thread as measured by the speed and acceleration of thread views. I was referring to my thread alone, which has a higher speed and acceleration of views not only nationwide, but also among any and all other threads in the very popular Philly Forum itself.

You may be right that sex sells. But this whole website is dedicated to that. Perhaps my detractors and those who complain about me are all wet. The popularity measures, as I previously explained them, don't lie. Despite the fact that a few members gripe about cock pics, I tend to show a lot of them and the explanation for my relative popularity could be that simple. But, I also show a wide variety of date reports, other types of pics and general commentary. As I said, I don't pretend to know the answer. But, the phenomenon clearly exists. Whatever is going on here to attract readership, members are looking in at a higher rate than any other thread in the Forum. I am NOT claiming hero-worship status. As I pointed out in the Howard Stern research, those who hated him listened for almost twice as long as his fans, and more than 8 times longer than the average radio listener, and all for the VERY SAME reasons. Whether I want to admit it or not, there is something to be said both for specific appeal as well as raising controversy. Both can draw a crowd. However, I would like to think that thoughtful writing, providing useful information and good pic contributions have an awful lot to do with it. :)

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1100240]Here is the third group of 9 nominees. There is one more group of eight to follow.[/QUOTE]That Rachel has some amazing big areolas. I'd love to see how big they get.

[QUOTE=Giani;1106859]In Ohio, we have had a few 'cage rattlers' who brag about BBFS. These guys seek attention, and get a smidgen by proclaiming their ignorance about BBFS. Jackson suggested ignoring their inflammatory posts. Mongers in the know recognize their fatally flawed ignorance. I agree: let them float away in their own boat.[/QUOTE]It would appear that both risk and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Some guys think that skydiving out of an airplane is a thrill. I wouldn't do it for a million dollars. Some guys prefer spinners, and some love chubs, and some want MILFs, and some will only settle for a cover girl. I tend to like the whole spectrum if the attitude and skills are there.

What we mongers do many non-mongers would characterize as extremely risky behavior, bordering on the insane. We troll in relatively dangerous neighborhoods, and pick up girls very likely to be drug-addicted, diseased and often armed with some sort of weapon (who can blame them with all the crazies out there, especially now this Kensington Strangler). So, we would probably be ostracized by non-mongers, and often are, even in this Forum, by those who consider themselves higher-class "hobbyists" with better self-proclaimed taste. This is especially true when the pic (s) of the girl aren't Playboy quality. We know, of course, that many of the internet girls and escorts of these same "hobbyists" were or are plying their trade on the streets of Kenzo or Broadway.

Regarding BBFS, what can I say? We are all entitled to assume our own risks. In fact, the right to do that and write about it without criticism is protected by the rules of this Forum. Apparently there are are many mongers who wish to do this and are willing to pay a SW a premium for the privilege. My SW information sources consistently tell me that 75-80% of their customers want to have BBFS. I would think that with all the info we have today about HIV, that such an activity would be something that most would want to avoid. But, then again, I am a scaredy-cat when it comes to jumping out of airplanes.

[QUOTE=Darrell2;1106898]That Rachel has some amazing big areolas. I'd love to see how big they get.[/QUOTE]Different strokes for different folks: that phrase has an especially interesting twist of double entendre for our mongering hobby.

Puffy nipples are my first choice, closely followed by perky little pink eraser niblets. However, if you like big areolae, Rachel had the biggest I ever saw on a SW date. Plus, she had the absolutely cutest face and the tightest little fuckable spinner body.

Here is another reminder pic of Rachel's nips.

[QUOTE=Fbtom;1106782]This is so true! The best times and finds that I have were when I took it slow and deliberate. I have only experienced the "big fish are biting like mad" one time of all of my visits.[/QUOTE]I have often wondered whether there are many great finds at once on the K and I just missed that fact because I took advantage of the first one I found. Because I usually try to get as far from the Ave as possible once I have made a pick-up.

However, it never fails that, when I am definitely finished a day of mongering, and either am completely out of steam from previous dates and / or I have time pressure to be somewhere important: I see a number of pretty, fetching young 'thangs' new to my eyes if I decide to make one final window-shopping pass. It is like sweet torture.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]What is laughable is the horny dogs who race around Philly streets like it is a Monaco Grand Prix event. I'd hate to be walking when these dummies are out! [/QUOTE]There would appear to be no shortage of knuckleheads roaming Kenzo. I think that if you had to pass a basic IQ test to become a monger, the ratio of mongers to girls would fall to something like 1:100.

[QUOTE=Fbtom]I've given up fighting with the forum's auto corrections. Not that I'm dumb or lazy, just tired of dealing with it.[/QUOTE]There are a few auto corrections here that really annoy me. I don't understand why some long quotations, especially the direct quotation of dialogue (which I tend to use frequently), have my double quotations transformed to single quotations. Spacing is often altered for some reason, based on some odd logic. Sentences and phrases, and numbers and phrases with commas sometimes develop small canyons between them that you didn't place there. You can't single-space the distance between paragraphs, which is awkward when you have a number of one-liners that you want to single space. Certain words ([url]nawwwww[/url], [url]yeeeehawww[/url]) become links for some strange reason. The acronym "ID" becomes "I'd," like the writer didn't know the difference (I had to go back and correct this one, for example). AND, last but not least: why can't we place smiley faces in the first draft without having to come back and edit / add them? :)

In her bra and panties; with handcuffs; topless and sucking her finger; topless with ball gag; spread wide and sucking on a pacifier; fingering herself doggie; licking my cock.

A mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted of Champagne.

Damn! There were so many great shots of champagne in that last batch. There was something for everyone. Here is one for the ass lovers: Champagne fingering herself with a doggie view.

There were just too many good pis in the last batch to select just one. Here is one for the amateur gynecologists: Champagne spread wide and sucking on her "binkie."

There were SO many good "cutesy" pics of her that it was hard to narrow it down to just one, but here is a favorite from the last batch.

There were several good kinky pics too in the last batch, but here is a favorite: Champagne ball-gagged.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1107068]There were SO many good "cutesy" pics of her that it was hard to narrow it down to just one, but here is a favorite from the last batch.[/QUOTE]Now stop it. I'm coming up there to spank your hand. Step back from the computer please! I love all of Champagne pics. Not a bad one in the bunch. She is very fuckable so please stop; Stop the teasing everytime I see her pics I get get hard. You do excellent work that I can't wait to see the next chick. Keep up the the good work!

Last, but certainly not least: I couldn't resist a favorite pic of Champagne licking my cock.

[QUOTE=Snoop Deville;1107070]Now stop it. I'm coming up there to spank your hand. Step back from the computer please! I love all of Champagne pics. Not a bad one in the bunch. She is very fuckable so please stop; Stop the teasing everytime I see her pics I get get hard. You do excellent work that I can't wait to see the next chick. Keep up the the good work![/QUOTE]Thank you for your props and your humor. I am laughing as I eat my Kung Pao chicken, pork fried rice, and spring rolls, and trying not to spill any on my keyboard.

I don't know that I can ever find a SW better than Champagne. She was perfect in innumerable ways. Some guys would "keep" a girl like Champagne, like Prohibition Era gangster Nucky Thompson did in Boardwalk Empire, which just concluded its first season on HBO. A monger actually wrote to me and told me he would do that very thing with a gal like Champagne, at least for several months. I like a terrific SW like Champagne as much as the next guy, but I also like variety. I always thought that was one of the benefits of mongering. You get to fuck a different girl every day if you want. Having eggs benedict for breakfast every morning is elegant, but sooner or later even an extravagance like that gets boring, and you long for some plain old cereal and milk.

You mentioned "spanking" and that also made me smile. Champagne, in addition to her many other charms and qualities, was adorably kinky and liked to be erotically spanked, especially while handcuffed or restrained, with a gag in her mouth, and being done doggie or having her ass fucked.

You get hard when looking at Champagne? At the end of Dennis Miller's last stand-up show he made a funny point about how to tell if your 13 year old son is actually gay, in case you had any doubts. I say show him these pics of Champagne. If you don't see an immediate bulge in his pants, then you have your answer.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1107072]Last, but certainly not least: I couldn't resist a favorite pic of Champagne licking my cock.[/QUOTE]I need to get a hold of this cutie soon.

[QUOTE=Moe52;1107100]I need to get a hold of this cutie soon.[/QUOTE]You and about 99,999 other members! :)

[QUOTE= Hunterspeak17]The past week, I've been out scouting the frozen providers, but really haven't been swooping down to pick any up, due to the uncertainty of them being a decoy or not. I'll do my best to provide a description. If anyone has any ideas on who they are, if they were a good date or not lately, or where they've been, that'd be awesome to know for my next visit:[/QUOTE]You are right to be cautious when they are bundled up. It is very difficult to tell even the ones you know, let alone decoy possibilities, with all the LE attention on the stroll for holiday shopping and this Kensington Strangler.

[QUOTE= Hunterspeak17]Blonde MILF with BSW by the Bull dealership. Northern end. I see these two out there quite frequently. I searched the pic postings, and half of me wants to think that the blonde MILF is "big tits mandy" that SuperE reported on. She does have giant juggs, but the face is very weathered compared to the pics in his spread. The BSW looks like SuperE's Precious, but again, the face is very weathered and old looking. Can someone confirm or deny that these are those girls?[/QUOTE]I have never known Big Tits Mandy to hang out anywhere else but at the south end of the K. That doesn't mean she couldn't have changed locations for the cold weather, but I doubt it. The WSW MILF you describe sounds like Jeannie. She has big tits too which would even be noticeable under heavy clothing. Jeannie definitely is a regular in the area you describe. She is no prize looker and has some fat issues, but she does have an amazing set of tatas. She also loves to take it up the ass if you are into anal.

The BSW you mention could be Precious because she can be found in that area when she is out, and she normally likes to be with one or two others. But, you wouldn't mistake Precious for a MILF.

[QUOTE= Hunterspeak17]Ashley. A very hot blonde working the same area as the two above. Thin, tight jeans with lots of lip gloss. Kinda big forehead. I saw her get into a couple cars, but not sure if they were ULE or one of us. She seemed almost too good to be true.[/QUOTE]Check my report and pics of Ashley, a thin blonde spinner. That is the area where you can usually find her.

[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1056492&viewfull=1#post1056492]My Dates with and Pics of Ashley[/url]

[QUOTE= Hunterspeak17]Sabrina. Of SuperE pic fame. I saw her a few months ago, did a relatively ok date, but she's been MIA for a while.[/QUOTE]I saw her recently, not as on a date, but on the street. She used to hang on the north end, but then she moved dead center to the Allegheny area. I noticed her this time again on the north end.

[QUOTE= Hunterspeak17]Curly Hair Nicole. I saw her out a few months back as well, and she's been MIA as well.[/QUOTE]I don't know which Nicole you mean. Check my index as I have reported on quite a few of them and taken pics of all of them.

For some reason it posted twice.

All I have to add is to READ my fucking posts, and then MAYBE you might have a chance of getting it right, instead of pulling your envious opinions from a warm dark place.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1107976]I knew there was a clique in here when I joined. I don't fit in it and don't care to. I don't kiss the asses of other mongers in here, although there are few good guys who are not full of envious venom. I just get great SW ass, write about it and take pics of it. I don't bother any of you, but a few of you seem to have your panties in a bunch where I am concerned.[/QUOTE]No there wasn't any clique. Just a bunch of guys giving honest reports and occasional photos that they girls said it was OK to post. That and random street shots to help mongers identify girls with reviews to either tell them she is good or bad. Envious venom. I think not. Seems like your just trying desperately to protect your Ego now.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1107976]I didn't twist any of your arms to open my thread; it is VERY easy just to ignore me. But envy is a VERY powerful emotion.[/QUOTE]It's hard not to open when you have girls asking you if it's true that their pictures got posted when they are in tears. So yes it's almost a duty to open and see who your are trying to screw over next. Not all girls care but some do and have reason too. Unfortunately life on the ave is hard and they lack better judgement for a few bucks to a guy who they believe and thought they could trust.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1107976]Davey1965 is the one who has taken a vacation and he should have stayed there."Outstanding" posters worthy of "praise" don't throw rocks. I don't. But I will throw back any rocks tossed in my direction twice as hard. "Catch!"[/QUOTE]Yes I did and now I am back and watching you close. And don't jinx yourself talking about rock throwing, as there are more than a few girls out there who have talked about throwing rocks at your pickup truck if they ever spotted you driving and knew they could get away with it.

"One should examine oneself for a very long time before thinking of condemning others." Moliere.

[QUOTE=Davey1965;1108060]Just a bunch of guys giving honest reports and occasional photos that they girls said it was OK to post. [/QUOTE]I don't remember that being the pic policy here. Where exactly is it in the rules? I can quote posters in the Philly area threads who have admitted that the girl asked them not to post and they posted pics anyway. I don't care personally what anyone's pic policy is; however, I don't remember ANYone jumping on them for that. I have my own pic policy and I have stated it previously many times. It is none of YOUR business what I decide to do in this regard. Neither you nor any other member determines pic policy here. You aren't the boss or regulator of my pic policy. They are big girls. They stand on the corner and sell their bodies and fill themselves with drugs. If you want to be the self-proclaimed "pic protector" of girls you fuck and who suck your cock for money, then I think that is pretty hypocritical. Set up a soup kitchen or a SW shelter, or why don't you go after their pimps and suppliers? I think they are much bigger and badder targets than someone who PAYS them to take some pics. Or go after the mongers who pay them for sex like a good little crusader. Why not indeed: because it is a LOT easier to throw an envious rock at me in here.

[QUOTE=Davey1965]That and random street shots to help mongers identify girls with reviews to either tell them she is good or bad.[/QUOTE]"Random" street shots are by definition normally taken without a girl's permission. They might even be innocent civvies. I have seen you personally identify a number of SWs this way, even when posted by others. Talk about hypocrisy!

[QUOTE=Davey1965]It's hard not to open when you have girls asking you if it's true that their pictures got posted when they are in tears.[/QUOTE]Uh Huh. You mean like all the random street shots that were identified on here by YOU?

[QUOTE=Davey1965]Yes I did and now I am back and watching you close.[/QUOTE]Get a life. You have done a LOT worse than you have accused me of doing. Perhaps you should be watching yourself!

PS: How did you get from complaining about Champagne to this bullshit? Are you wearing your panties a few sizes too tight?

Rancorous exchanges are an occasional diversionary feature of these (and all boards). Egos on both sides, for what ever reason, get inflamed, and flame throwing ensues. (All posters who have been around for a while, especially those who have achieved a certain level of recognition / notoriety on the board, can be targets of complaints and attacks over the years, including yours truly. My past reaction and the resulting elevated blood pressure and anger quotient consumed me for a little while. But these are hardly the moments of which I am most proud.

To Davey: Let it be... If you must respond, take it to PM instead making a public display of your hostility. Public attacks intended to humiliate only lead to escalation and increased acrimony. The board does NOT benefit from these attacks.

SE: let your work speak for you. Don't rise to the bait. Deep breath and step away. Clearly your pix are your own, not ripped off. Let others respond if they must, but even defenses by others fan the flames.

Both of you have long records of valuable contributions to the boards. We are grateful for them. But these rancorous exchanges often lead to MAD (mutually assured destruction), where no one comes out looking good.

Giani

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1104521]I mentioned several times now that I would prefer that voters post their selections here in my thread rather than PMing me, because it tends to fill up my mailbox. However, votes continue to come in by PM. I appreciate your interest in my contest and your votes, but I still would like that you make your preferences known here openly in my thread. I felt in a quandary over whether or not to even count the PM votes, but I started to count them initially and I don't want to squash interest in the contest, so I will continue to try to keep my mailbox clear and accept PM votes. But, I still wish that you would vote here openly in my thread.

I made an administrative decision that the overall winner of the contest cannot also be named for first place in any of the sub-contests. Also, a girl can only win in one contest category, the one she received the most votes for. I don't want just one girl to sweep many areas of the contest. The intention of having the sub-contest categories was to provide for as many different and varied winners as possible.

Just so you know the current status of the voting:

[b]Best Low-Baller[/b]: Jennifer, with Kendra right on her ass.

[b]Best Spinner[/b]: Aundrea has a slight lead; Baby Cakes and Precious are right on her cute little "tail"

[b]Miss Congeniality[/b]: It is a 4-way tie: Sexy Nicole, Staci, Cyndi and Tanya (who wouldn't want that "4-way" action?")

[b]Best Chubby[/b]: Sabrina is tied with Elektra for the lead; Dolly is "cumming" up fast; maybe we should have an oil-covered wrestle-off for this category? I bet we could fill a small stadium for the event.

[b]Best MILF[/b]: Mary Beth had an early stranglehold on this one, but Candace is now a solid contender. Maybe we should have a milk-off? LOL.

[b]Most Kinky[/b]: Justine leads, handcuffed and with a ball-gag in her pretty mouth; a few others trail in the distance,"restrained" by fewer votes.

[b]Evening Gown Competition[/b]: Jen had a strong start, but Tanika made a "strong move" from the "rear" and now has a commanding lead.

[b]Best Face[/b]: First place tie between Kitty and Melissa, with a scattered group of pretty faces trailing them.

[b]Best Tits[/b]: Big Tits Mandy leads; Alexus, Simone and Nikki are "bunched" together, tit to tit, in the pack right behind her.

[b]Best Ass[/b]: Tanika is way out in front (or should I say "rear," LOL) ; Candace is the only one even slightly close "behind" her.

[b]Best Pussy[/b]: Pamela has "opened up" a big early lead.

[b]Best Overall Face and Body[/b]: Candace holds first place and could win IF she gets more votes here than for Best MILF, or if Mary Beth wins that category; Sparkles is in the running as is Aundrea; the same condition holds true for Aundrea as for Candace: she will qualify to win in the specific sub-contest, if any, in which she gets the most votes.

[b]Best BJ[/b]: Jen is "creaming" the competition.

[b]Best Fuck[/b]: Hottie Nicole and Liz are in a dead "heat" for first place.

[b]Best FS[/b]: Baby Cakes is in the lead by a "wide" margin with a scattered field behind her; if she wins Best Spinner and gets more votes cast for her there than here, then this category winner will be the second place contender; right now that would be Spinner Mandy.

[b]Overall Best SW for 2010[/b]: early on, Aundrea had what appeared to be an insurmountable lead; however, there has been a recent virtual avalanche of PM voting for Champagne for the overall title as well as several other categories in the contest; as I explained, a girl can only win in one category of the contest, so the first award for a girl will go to the category where she received the most votes. If another girl exceeds her votes in that category then she is still eligible to win in another category where she has accumulated the most votes.

Here is a link to the pic collages for all the categories and nominees in the contest:

[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1100988&viewfull=1#post1100988] Categories and Nominees for SW of the Year Contest 2010[/url]

[/QUOTE]What an awesome year!