[QUOTE=Will008;5661996]JW spa or Moon spa. Just tell them you want the Korean flavor.[/QUOTE]Thank you, brother. I will check them out.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Will008;5661996]JW spa or Moon spa. Just tell them you want the Korean flavor.[/QUOTE]Thank you, brother. I will check them out.
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;5662164]Thank you, brother. I will check them out.[/QUOTE]Pine and Know Knots are the Korean places in San Diego.
[QUOTE=InstinctGoku;5656800]Thank you SB for letting us know.
I may skip out on this one.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5656202]Don't know how this one slipped by me when she joined that other site. But thankfully someone in the OC started asking about her. Just so I don't have to describe the possible deliciousness of her, the pic is attached. She clearly states she has management and is open about that. Quick research shows a previous girl held the handle "PrincessVienna". I've sent a PM asking for the standard info and I'll share when she replies. If that pic is accurate and properly managed, she's going to be very popular.
https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/PrincessVienna[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5656597]SMH these bookers must think with a hot body, young age and near model looks with NO PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE they can ask for high donations. She's starting in the OC for 300/ HHR 350/45 M 400/ HR.
HX is not PD nor would I pay above market scale of 200/300 for a first timer. No matter how hot she may be. Get some excellent reviews to ask for those donation levels. Sorry guys, she's above my pay grade to ask for that GPS rate.[/QUOTE]IDK, but maybe it was a good thing you all passed on her. Her most recent pictures with braces and pimples does not make her look attractive at all IMO. Yes, nice body in the picture SB's original post, but the current ones she added from November 30th and today to her HX profile not so attractive.
The new girl Momo at FEC looks hot.
Anyone find any info on her?
Reverse image search has drawn a blank.
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5665104]IDK, but maybe it was a good thing you all passed on her. Her most recent pictures with braces and pimples does not make her look attractive at all IMO. Yes, nice body in the picture SB's original post, but the current ones she added from November 30th and today to her HX profile not so attractive.[/QUOTE]When I saw those braces and latest pics I took her off my TDL. I'm with RCDK, those latest pics are not complimentary to her. Hard pass regardless of the hot body.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5665827]When I saw those braces and latest pics I took her off my TDL. I'm with RCDK, those latest pics are not complimentary to her. Hard pass regardless of the hot body.[/QUOTE]That initial pic drew a lot of interest, but the more recent pics make it look like she's had a rough 18 years.
On a lighter note, this gave me a good laugh (from her profile).
"Interests.
Finding someone that really knows what to do with me. " <- That would be her management, no?
[QUOTE=Gbrand;5665741]The new girl Momo at FEC looks hot.
Anyone find any info on her?
Reverse image search has drawn a blank.[/QUOTE]I know 100% I've seen her advertised by the same agency in either LA or OC (I like to browse up there just for fun, and in case I'm ever in the mood for a road trip). I'm fairly certain it was under the same name, but the only reviews I could find were.
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2134479396-363187[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2135054270-361446[/URL]
Same provider, just the second one was a random one off.
They both are for this Momo.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%A3%A8%EC%8B%9C[/URL]
And though it's a completely separate set of pics, I can somewhat see the resemblance, assuming two different Photoshoppers did the respective sets of pics.
Candygirlla has other ladies on the CA-kdolls roster on their site as well, and it's showing "back Dec 10th", so it's quite plausible that they're the same person.
With that said, her reviews are really solid, pretty much across the board.
Rating 8. 51.
Looks 7. 96 / Performance 8. 26.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5666028]I know 100% I've seen her advertised by the same agency in either LA or OC (I like to browse up there just for fun, and in case I'm ever in the mood for a road trip). I'm fairly certain it was under the same name, but the only reviews I could find were.
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2134479396-363187[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2135054270-361446[/URL]
Same provider, just the second one was a random one off.
They both are for this Momo.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%A3%A8%EC%8B%9C[/URL]
And though it's a completely separate set of pics, I can somewhat see the resemblance, assuming two different Photoshoppers did the respective sets of pics.
Candygirlla has other ladies on the CA-kdolls roster on their site as well, and it's showing "back Dec 10th", so it's quite plausible that they're the same person.
With that said, her reviews are really solid, pretty much across the board.
Rating 8. 51.
Looks 7. 96 / Performance 8. 26.[/QUOTE]Mom seems to have many good reviews on the LA / OC board for those that can't see T e are. Overall she's good with the two exceptions of no MSOG and guys calling her thighs "thicc" or a Latina figure. It's all opinion on looks but I don't see any real negs in looks, body or performance. No option on her per reviews and ca-kdolls. If I didn't have to buy those damn Christmas gifts I'd be there several times!
I don't know if anyone saw Ice or remember from this agency. It was back in 2012/2013.
She used to be my favorite. Solid natural B+/ C. Nice complexion and very nice ass and prefect waist. I would hold her waist and doggy. She could ride you from the top and moaned.
She stopped having sex and just gave me HJ. I then decided to end the session. I liked her so much that I even brought a coffee for her on that day. It's the first appointment of the day.
This is her review: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-6504999829-360430](Click here)[/URL]. Momo might also had reviews in OC and LA forums.
You should recognize her face and body from photoshopped pics. I thought she looked younger and hotter than pics. Beautiful big tits, thicc body, and nice booty. English has accent but felt like talking to a young Korean American. Great BBBJ. I recommended in LA.
The other Momo you found does not look as close or young as pics but still hot.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5666028]I know 100% I've seen her advertised by the same agency in either LA or OC (I like to browse up there just for fun, and in case I'm ever in the mood for a road trip). I'm fairly certain it was under the same name, but the only reviews I could find were.
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2134479396-363187[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-2135054270-361446[/URL]...[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5666229]Mom seems to have many good reviews on the LA / OC board for those that can't see T e are. Overall she's good with the two exceptions of no MSOG and guys calling her thighs "thicc" or a Latina figure. It's all opinion on looks but I don't see any real negs in looks, body or performance. No option on her per reviews and ca-kdolls. If I didn't have to buy those damn Christmas gifts I'd be there several times![/QUOTE]I saw Momo when she had a short stay with CAKD OC, didn't realize she would come visit SD. She is legit on the younger side for k-girls. I didn't ask her age (they always lie anyway) but I would believe her if she said she's in her 20's and looked younger than most providers, especially the ones we get here in SD. Face and body are more full / round than pics. I personally think the pics look better but I prefer thinner girls. A lot of the extra weight went straight to her tits and ass. Definitely not a spinner. As mentioned in other reviews, her tits are all natural and they're great. The downside is that her service isn't the best. The session was quite scripted and she was a bit "cold" at the start. She spent a lot of time in the shower with no preview and as you said MSOG was a definite no go. She also wants you to go slow and gentle. Her BBBJ and BLS was probably the highlight of the session. She's a nice girl but not sure I'd repeat. If you like them young and curvy she fits the bill.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5666854]This is her review: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-6504999829-360430](Click here)[/URL]. Momo might also had reviews in OC and LA forums.
You should recognize her face and body from photoshopped pics. I thought she looked younger and hotter than pics. Beautiful big tits, thicc body, and nice booty. English has accent but felt like talking to a young Korean American. Great BBBJ. I recommended in LA.
The other Momo you found does not look as close or young as pics but still hot.[/QUOTE]Thanks for clearing that up BA. The pics seemed a little bit of a stretch, but other things lined up such that it seemed plausible. This one, currently in SD, appears to have a solidly lower rating than the other one.
I can't see rating on TER but my guess it's because LA Momo is more experienced and more willing to please. I prefer young looking girl so I like SD Momo more. LA Momo could be a hit in SD.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5667683]Thanks for clearing that up BA. The pics seemed a little bit of a stretch, but other things lined up such that it seemed plausible. This one, currently in SD, appears to have a solidly lower rating than the other one.[/QUOTE]
Thought this was kind hilarious.
[URL]https://www.jsonline.com/story/communities/south/news/franklin/2021/12/07/masseuse-nurture-spa-franklin-facing-sexual-assault-charges/6414163001/[/URL]
An employee at a Franklin spa has been charged with having nonconsensual sexual contact with clients.
Yingfeng Huang, 58, of Chicago, is facing two counts of fourth-degree sexual assault, according to a criminal complaint filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court.
If convicted, Huang could face up to $20,000 in fines and 18 months in prison.
A Franklin police log entry from May 10 said a man, then 19 years old, requested a 45-minute massage and said a masseuse, later identified as Huang, touched his genitals without consent at Nurture Massage Spa, 6564 S. LoversLane Road.
According to the criminal complaint:
An undercover police officer went to the same spa on June 29, where Huang also touched his genitals without consent. Both the 19-year-old and undercover officer said they stopped Huang from any further sexual contact.
Huang admitted to touching both the officer and the 19-year-old and said she did so to earn extra money to send to her family. Police noted that multiple online reviews discussed the sexual contact offered at the spa.
Ms. Evon at SDAG looks pretty good.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/1653[/URL]
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5673524]Ms. Evon at SDAG looks pretty good.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/1653[/URL][/QUOTE]Dang. They're already prepping for the next business day. That's work ethic!
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5673554]Dang. They're already prepping for the next business day. That's work ethic![/QUOTE]Any intel on Evon? Hoping for younger talent.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5665960]That initial pic drew a lot of interest, but the more recent pics make it look like she's had a rough 18 years.
On a lighter note, this gave me a good laugh (from her profile).
"Interests.
Finding someone that really knows what to do with me. " <- That would be her management, no?[/QUOTE]And just like that, her profile is gone.
[QUOTE=Po4456;5674036]Any intel on Evon? Hoping for younger talent.[/QUOTE]Have not seen Evon yet but pics are fake as usual.
[URL]https://buondua.com/ugirls-u314-model-zhao-jia-qi-%E8%B5%B5%E4%BD%B3%E7%90%AA-66-pictures-12490[/URL]
If young is the most important factor for you I'd say go try Momo over at FEC.
[QUOTE=Apharmd;5674626]Have not seen Evon yet but pics are fake as usual.
[URL]https://buondua.com/ugirls-u314-model-zhao-jia-qi-%E8%B5%B5%E4%BD%B3%E7%90%AA-66-pictures-12490[/URL]
If young is the most important factor for you I'd say go try Momo over at FEC.[/QUOTE]
I definitely prefer going to the AAMPs if I want FS, but when our favorite agencies bring unknown talents and uses fake pictures I'm not too excited about scheduling. I haven't been to FEC in almost a year for that reason. The good thing with SDAG is they still bring known talents like Petra, Ash, Kiko, etc. so I'm more willing to go.
I'm glad there are places like 108, 7 and now VIP that are bringing beautiful ladies to our city and allowing us to see their lineup before paying the HF.
[QUOTE=Apharmd;5674626]Have not seen Evon yet but pics are fake as usual.
[URL]https://buondua.com/ugirls-u314-model-zhao-jia-qi-%E8%B5%B5%E4%BD%B3%E7%90%AA-66-pictures-12490[/URL]
If young is the most important factor for you I'd say go try Momo over at FEC.[/QUOTE]Good Ol' Mr. Cong. LOL.
Whenever I see a certain class of pics I assume they pulled it from Xiuren / you-Girls / Tuigirls, etc. That set of pics. When it's just the body, with a blurred face, then I at least hope it's a similar body type, but when they show the face and claim ethnicity other than Chinese it gives me a chuckle, since most of the models from that set of publications are Chinese. Those ads on Adultsearch and such that promise everything anyone could possibly want, and seem to be a dozen ads & numbers funneling to a small group of ladies in seedy motels, have a lot of pics taken from that collection. I see ads all the time w / models I recognize, but it's when they use the well known JAV stars, especially ones I like, that I really get annoyed. Hahaha.
FEC seems to often favor the P.S., though I've seen them use outright fake pics, but SDAG sometimes gets carried away. And I like SDAG. They were my first agency dealing (think Bunny / Kiko was my very first), but I still see one of my ATFs, Bryn being advertised in different cities w / the same pics from 7 or so years ago.
[QUOTE=SirBishop;5666229]Mom seems to have many good reviews on the LA / OC board for those that can't see T e are...[/QUOTE]Moms sure have it rough during the holiday season. LMAO.
I was scrolling through trying to see thoughts on Momo when I stumbled across that and got a good laugh.
I'm sure everyone already knows how great Petra is but I'll add on. Saw her the other day and she did not disappoint.
I would definitely recommend and will repeat. PM for more details.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5675538]
FEC seems to often favor the P.S., though I've seen them use outright fake pics, but SDAG sometimes gets carried away. And I like SDAG. They were my first agency dealing (think Bunny / Kiko was my very first), but I still see one of my ATFs, Bryn being advertised in different cities w / the same pics from 7 or so years ago.[/QUOTE]Byrn- another name and favorite of mine from the fast. I loved her long legs and huge boobs. Yummy!
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5675538]Good Ol' Mr. Cong. LOL.
Whenever I see a certain class of pics I assume they pulled it from Xiuren / you-Girls / Tuigirls, etc. That set of pics. When it's just the body, with a blurred face, then I at least hope it's a similar body type, but when they show the face and claim ethnicity other than Chinese it gives me a chuckle, since most of the models from that set of publications are Chinese. Those ads on Adultsearch and such that promise everything anyone could possibly want, and seem to be a dozen ads & numbers funneling to a small group of ladies in seedy motels, have a lot of pics taken from that collection. I see ads all the time w / models I recognize, but it's when they use the well known JAV stars, especially ones I like, that I really get annoyed. Hahaha.
FEC seems to often favor the P.S., though I've seen them use outright fake pics, but SDAG sometimes gets carried away. And I like SDAG. They were my first agency dealing (think Bunny / Kiko was my very first), but I still see one of my ATFs, Bryn being advertised in different cities w / the same pics from 7 or so years ago.[/QUOTE]I remember one agency in LA was using pics of Eimi Fukada and said "100% real pics". Really!? At least pick a less popular JAV actress if you're going to try to lie about fake pics. These days both FEC and SDAG have been hit / miss with the newer talent and the fake / P.S. Pics make it hard to tell what I'm going to find behind the door. I just can't help myself when I see new talent though. Always hoping to find that new ATF haha. Thankfully places like here exist where I can at get some intel.
I'm not into short hair, but SDAG has a new girl Vira.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SplashMe[/URL]
*sigh*.
Sometimes I need to just trust my instincts and scratch my own itch instead of letting Jr. Do the driving. I actually tried to book Gia and SDAG said she wasn't available, so I texted FEC and they responded immediately. SDAG replied again saying yes, then no, then yes again, but since I'd already inquired w / FEC I felt obligated at that point. I was really, and I mean REALLY tempted to apologize to FEC and go w / SDAG, but alas.
I really wanted to like Momo, but I also knew I was setting myself up for potential disappointment, and yeah. I was disappointed. I'm not going to review her on T3 R, because I'd feel obliged to be a little too honest. So here's the highs / lows of tonight's adventure.
Looks-wise, I'd say that those pics are indeed her, though P.S.'d and probably some years back. Also she's very inked (big back piece and a sizable one on the leg) Artistically they're decent, but if you want that pristine unblemished look, they are large tattoos. She's a little heavier than the pics, though not chubby or anything. Just not the slim kind of curvy that the pics give the impression of, but rather very "normal" build, if you will.
She's decent looking, though she tends to have her eyes on the closed side, which don't give her a flattering look, and definitely not like the wide-eyed appeal of the ad. However. She did pop them peepers open a couple of times, and it was a huge difference.
Booker quoted as $270/ hr or $300/ hr w / 2 pops. Dropped the $300 at the start, got 1 pop and she asked at the end if I wanted change. I almost said "yes please," but I felt like it would be pretty lame.
I always go to any of these spots (agency OR AMP, hell, even strip clubs) freshly showered, teeth brushed, etc. If the agency gal wants to shower anyway, that's generally fine w / me, since the showers can generally be rather fun. Not this one. Probably the slowest and least eventful shower I've had at either agency, and felt like an intentional time sink. I was regretting my decision to check her out already.
Dried off and she had me lay down and everything just felt a little off. She gave a solid BBBJ, that really took me a while to warm up to given the awkward vibe, and it wasn't until I suggested 69 that she got me up and I could really appreciate her head game. View in 69 was pleasant, and kitty had that relatively tasteless kind of clean. This was definitely the highlight of the night.
I asked for the cover and she put it on, but then started jerking me off vigorously, then lubed us both up and really started jerking it and I was like "whoa, whoa, whoa. Easy there. " Went in mish and went slow because she kept having this "you're too big" expression on her face (plot twist: I'm not LOL), so that was a bit off putting and I just had to try and think happy thoughts instead.
Her breasts / nipples are apparently super sensitive, and I'm not a rough person, but her "OMG so sensitive" reaction left me skipping any further having to do w / her breasts.
She kind of positioned herself in a manner to keep things a bit shallower and after a bit kept checking the condom and I pulled out a little confused and she announced "condom change". (O_O)?
I laid down and she goes through a whole cleaning ritual of us both, before putting on a new hat w / her mouth, but seemingly also trying to get a pop. More lube, more jerking, then CG to completion. It was that "just the tip" kind of CG, and I was already over the whole evening.
Clean up then she snuggled up to me, which felt a little weird. Kind of nice, but very out of place. After a short while it was time for another shower, and it wasn't until I'd gotten dressed (this is where she asked if I wanted change), that I got my first kiss of the night. Closed mouth on the lips, and then another brief one once I had my shoes on and was about to depart.
This is the 2nd time I feel a bit cheated by an FEC offering. My first 2 times w / them were great, the last 2 have been considerably disappointing. Unless they get the proven talent down here, I'll probably stay away at this point.
Oh well. You win some, you lose some.
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5676215]I'm not into short hair, but SDAG has a new girl Vira.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SplashMe[/URL][/QUOTE]She's definitely not new. That's Nova from a few years back. She's been hopping around w / different names and even been w / CA-Kdolls a little. Supposedly she's "open minded" these days, or as CA-KD puts it "BB available" LOL.
I saw her a couple times a few years back. The first time was okay except for the room and her breath smelling like smoke. I'm also not into the pixie cut.
The second time was slim pickings and I said fuck it, and it was okay, but at least no smoke smell.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/nuri-escort-los-angeles-416355[/URL]#erotic.
[URL]https://losangelesescortlist.com/nuri/[/URL]
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5676250]She's definitely not new. That's Nova from a few years back. She's been hopping around w / different names and even been w / CA-Kdolls a little. Supposedly she's "open minded" these days, or as CA-KD puts it "BB available" LOL.
I saw her a couple times a few years back. The first time was okay except for the room and her breath smelling like smoke. I'm also not into the pixie cut.
The second time was slim pickings and I said fuck it, and it was okay, but at least no smoke smell.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/nuri-escort-los-angeles-416355[/URL]#erotic.
[URL]https://losangelesescortlist.com/nuri/[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks DW! Yes, I remembered the name Nova. Yeah, not into smoke breathe either.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5676242]*sigh*.
Sometimes I need to just trust my instincts and scratch my own itch instead of letting Jr. Do the driving. I actually tried to book Gia and SDAG said she wasn't available, so I texted FEC and they responded immediately. SDAG replied again saying yes, then no, then yes again, but since I'd already inquired w / FEC I felt obligated at that point. I was really, and I mean REALLY tempted to apologize to FEC and go w / SDAG, but alas.
I really wanted to like Momo, but I also knew I was setting myself up for potential disappointment, and yeah. I was disappointed. I'm not going to review her on T3 R, because I'd feel obliged to be a little too honest. So here's the highs / lows of tonight's adventure.
Looks-wise, I'd say that those pics are indeed her, though P.S.'d and probably some years back. Also she's very inked (big back piece and a sizable one on the leg) Artistically they're decent, but if you want that pristine unblemished look, they are large tattoos. She's a little heavier than the pics, though not chubby or anything. Just not the slim kind of curvy that the pics give the impression of, but rather very "normal" build, if you will.
She's decent looking, though she tends to have her eyes on the closed side, which don't give her a flattering look, and definitely not like the wide-eyed appeal of the ad. However. She did pop them peepers open a couple of times, and it was a huge difference.
Booker quoted as $270/ hr or $300/ hr w / 2 pops. Dropped the $300 at the start, got 1 pop and she asked at the end if I wanted change. I almost said "yes please," but I felt like it would be pretty lame.
I always go to any of these spots (agency OR AMP, hell, even strip clubs) freshly showered, teeth brushed, etc. If the agency gal wants to shower anyway, that's generally fine w / me, since the showers can generally be rather fun. Not this one. Probably the slowest and least eventful shower I've had at either agency, and felt like an intentional time sink. I was regretting my decision to check her out already.
Dried off and she had me lay down and everything just felt a little off. She gave a solid BBBJ, that really took me a while to warm up to given the awkward vibe, and it wasn't until I suggested 69 that she got me up and I could really appreciate her head game. View in 69 was pleasant, and kitty had that relatively tasteless kind of clean. This was definitely the highlight of the night.
I asked for the cover and she put it on, but then started jerking me off vigorously, then lubed us both up and really started jerking it and I was like "whoa, whoa, whoa. Easy there. " Went in mish and went slow because she kept having this "you're too big" expression on her face (plot twist: I'm not LOL), so that was a bit off putting and I just had to try and think happy thoughts instead.
Her breasts / nipples are apparently super sensitive, and I'm not a rough person, but her "OMG so sensitive" reaction left me skipping any further having to do w / her breasts.
She kind of positioned herself in a manner to keep things a bit shallower and after a bit kept checking the condom and I pulled out a little confused and she announced "condom change". (O_O)?
I laid down and she goes through a whole cleaning ritual of us both, before putting on a new hat w / her mouth, but seemingly also trying to get a pop. More lube, more jerking, then CG to completion. It was that "just the tip" kind of CG, and I was already over the whole evening.
Clean up then she snuggled up to me, which felt a little weird. Kind of nice, but very out of place. After a short while it was time for another shower, and it wasn't until I'd gotten dressed (this is where she asked if I wanted change), that I got my first kiss of the night. Closed mouth on the lips, and then another brief one once I had my shoes on and was about to depart.
This is the 2nd time I feel a bit cheated by an FEC offering. My first 2 times w / them were great, the last 2 have been considerably disappointing. Unless they get the proven talent down here, I'll probably stay away at this point.
Oh well. You win some, you lose some.[/QUOTE]Thanks for totftt and this elaborate review.
[QUOTE=DRaj123;5676296]Thanks for totftt and this elaborate review.[/QUOTE]At this point I'd, personally, only go w / FEC for their well reviewed proven providers. I should've held off a day & gone to see Ash at SDAG today, instead. LOL.
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5676215]I'm not into short hair, but SDAG has a new girl Vira.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SplashMe[/URL][/QUOTE]I actually have alot to say about Vera / Nuri / Luna K / Yaya.
I was a repeat customer with her for about two years back in LA.
She was booked through Kiki's booker up there for the longest time, till she left to a more general agency.
(Sidenote, if Lyn from that booker ever comes down, she's a complete winner.).
Anyway, Vera's photos are some of the most accurate you'll see from SDAG. Her tits are the most photoshopped part (at least last time I saw her.).
So, I saw her for the longest time, and she slowly lost the "spark. " She was great, and overtime got jaded to it all. Maybe it's different now, or maybe she's just as jaded. The sessions went from enthusiastic, to going through the motions over the times I saw her.
It's been about two or three years since I've seen her, so I kinda want to give it a go and see if she's gotten any better.
She always kept her body real tight, and she is definitely a spinner. Facially she isn't as hot as Kiki, but is in the same league body wise.
She also (at least was) very very tight, but didn't complain about size. So that's a win win.
Either way, she is deff an "open minded" provider, and was known to be for about 1/4 mongers back in LA.
[QUOTE=BlaneJames;5677493]I actually have alot to say about Vera / Nuri / Luna K / Yaya.
I was a repeat customer with her for about two years back in LA.
She was booked through Kiki's booker up there for the longest time, till she left to a more general agency.
(Sidenote, if Lyn from that booker ever comes down, she's a complete winner.).
Anyway, Vera's photos are some of the most accurate you'll see from SDAG. Her tits are the most photoshopped part (at least last time I saw her.).
So, I saw her for the longest time, and she slowly lost the "spark. " She was great, and overtime got jaded to it all. Maybe it's different now, or maybe she's just as jaded. The sessions went from enthusiastic, to going through the motions over the times I saw her.
It's been about two or three years since I've seen her, so I kinda want to give it a go and see if she's gotten any better.
She always kept her body real tight, and she is definitely a spinner. Facially she isn't as hot as Kiki, but is in the same league body wise.
She also (at least was) very very tight, but didn't complain about size. So that's a win win.
Either way, she is deff an "open minded" provider, and was known to be for about 1/4 mongers back in LA.[/QUOTE]I wonder if she took a break from when she was down here as Nova 5 years ago. And if her spark comes and goes over the years. She had more fire the first time, but notably less the second. Personally I can't get into her, but I will attest to the historic accuracy of the photos and that she was very fit. If you like them petite & fit, and don't otherwise mind the age or pixie cut, she might be the one for a number of why'all.
If I'm counting right that's 6 name changes. I tried her once and did not have a good time in the past. Won't be repeating.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5677557]I wonder if she took a break from when she was down here as Nova 5 years ago. And if her spark comes and goes over the years. She had more fire the first time, but notably less the second. Personally I can't get into her, but I will attest to the historic accuracy of the photos and that she was very fit. If you like them petite & fit, and don't otherwise mind the age or pixie cut, she might be the one for a number of why'all.[/QUOTE]
Has anyone been able to seen Evon yet?
I have some time to see a provider, and am debating if I should see her or not.
[QUOTE=BigWaffle;5677599]If I'm counting right that's 6 name changes. I tried her once and did not have a good time in the past. Won't be repeating.[/QUOTE]Same here. She was either having a bad day or has an attitude problem. Probably the only provider from this agency that I actually never wanted to see again.
[QUOTE=BigWaffle;5677599]If I'm counting right that's 6 name changes. I tried her once and did not have a good time in the past. Won't be repeating.[/QUOTE]There was another provider by the name Eleven with this group in OC that I saw earlier this year. Definitely not the same as this Vira girl. The Eleven I saw was one of the youngest k agency girls I've seen with a great body and perfect natural breasts. Would love to see her again if she ever came to SD or even OC.
[QUOTE=MisterO;5679076]There was another provider by the name Eleven with this group in OC that I saw earlier this year. Definitely not the same as this Vira girl. The Eleven I saw was one of the youngest k agency girls I've seen with a great body and perfect natural breasts. Would love to see her again if she ever came to SD or even OC.[/QUOTE]The Eleven your talking about is better known as Lyn, she only really tours the east coast and Chicago. Sometimes she'll visit the OC. She won't tour LA. Not sure about San Diego.
[QUOTE=DblEspresso;5680651]The Eleven your talking about is better known as Lyn, she only really tours the east coast and Chicago. Sometimes she'll visit the OC. She won't tour LA. Not sure about San Diego.[/QUOTE]Is that the same Lyn that used to work alongside Glow in LA / OC a few years ago?
[QUOTE=Dmzhost;5680718]Is that the same Lyn that used to work alongside Glow in LA / OC a few years ago?[/QUOTE]No. That Lyn works with Sunny.