Printable View
[QUOTE=Ggininder;4437350]Just curious, if you bang the kgirls in their off-days for free, do you still pay to bang them on their working days?[/QUOTE]Once I get into that relation with some of kgirls, no I don't visit them during their working days. Doesn't mean I'm banging them for free. Nothing in this world is free unfortunately. But it's still cheaper than having a girlfriend, in a sense LOL.
[QUOTE=Kakashiz;4437188]Cami body alone is worth price of admission for me, thicc and tanned but loves getting drilled. YMMV.[/QUOTE]Depends how big you are. I'm hung and thick so I can't pound her pussy hard, she let's maybe about 50-60% of my cock inside her pussy, but she will let my tongue in her mouth are the whole time I'm fucking her, but I can't do any deeper because she will show signs of discomfort. Personally I don't mind not getting full penetration, because her pussy still feels super tight around my cock.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4437019]Sharing / reviewing, in my eyes, primarily function as a way to add to the general community knowledge base and serves as a data point for others to assess their interest in seeing the girl in question. Personal preference shouldn't be a factor as you don't know how kinky, vanilla, perverse, debased, etc. The people here are. There are multiple examples here where one poster found this particular girl amazing and another would find her lackluster. And vice versa. I say to cast the dice and let the individuals of this community decide whether they find her worthwhile. Depriving her of exposure could unintentionally and potentially lose her some business and she could be goner sooner than later because of it.
I do find it ironic that you withhold information on what you like and in the next sentence you solicit others to share.[/QUOTE]Selfish & ironic lmao!
Like nobody else likes the asian school girl look.
[QUOTE=TomKeen;4437223]If you guys haven't had the pleasure, Sia is worth trying. Built like a Kgirl stripper with great legs tits and ass. She loves to fuck.
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/sia-escort-los-angeles-482148[/URL][/QUOTE]Yah, she has been my fav for the past 4 years. Seen her in Austun, LV, and Tysons Corner as well.
She won't be here for long she said. Saw her 5 times already since she's been back in LA.
[QUOTE=Bigwood;4436937]Me too. She reached out yesterday. And I told her before to not contact me as long as she was charging extra for MSOG.[/QUOTE]They get #'s from other bookers. I'd text them back asking to stop but after while they'd still text me. Not interested in their line up anyways.
[QUOTE=DashingD;4437616]Did the other night.
Her pics are real just heavily touched up in the face and stomach. She had some great skills tho, super sexy demeanor and great BBBJ. She seemed to enjoy it too, even tho she was a bit tired end of the night.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the info, stomach as in baby fat? And would you repeat LOL.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4437953]Yah, she has been my fav for the past 4 years. Seen her in Austun, LV, and Tysons Corner as well.
She won't be here for long she said. Saw her 5 times already since she's been back in LA.[/QUOTE]She isn't in LA long? Any idea where she's heading to next?
[QUOTE=Advoc8;4438353]Thanks for the info, stomach as in baby fat? And would you repeat LOL.[/QUOTE]Baby fat with a little extra haha.
I would repeat but only if pickings were slim.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4437953]Yah, she has been my fav for the past 4 years. Seen her in Austun, LV, and Tysons Corner as well.
She won't be here for long she said. Saw her 5 times already since she's been back in LA.[/QUOTE]Could anyone PM me her contact info? Much appreciated brothers.
To book, be prepared to provide refs. Never ever lead with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM and probably KUP. The places you -want- to be in, will ignore you. They ain't got shit to play 20 questions with why'all newb asses. If a booker is going to take you either way, then he / she won't ignore you, will ask you for more deets, and then you can follow up with the above list that I mentioned. M also never ever never never never provides ref no matter how much you beg so you can just forego her as a ref. The -want-to-be-in-bookers- will never work with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM / KUP-they're unsafe and will take anyone with half ass pseudo screening.
If you're completely new. The list I gave in sentence #2 is your in. If you -can- provide the -want-to-be-in-bookers- then you'll obviously get a response from the bookers that are friendlies.
Not that any of you immortal nubs would give a shet, but you guys should ask former SAG ladies, like Mindy7, about Irene from Irvine and why they left her and why anyone with a heart should stop making appointments with SAG. It's not merely about them not screening and bringing in potentially dangerous visitors. The kind of losers that rob or worse. But it's that Irene herself exercises poor ethical standards of work. Ask Mindy.
[Q[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/MilkAndHoney[/URL]
Yes, I enjoyed her a few times. Is Sia also using my favorite Monika pics? Or they were the same person and I just gotten senile.
Monika pics: [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/monika-escort-los-angeles-336737[/URL]
[QUOTE=DashingD;4438878]Could anyone PM me her contact info? Much appreciated brothers.[/QUOTE]
To be clear, I wasn't throwing shade at you. You just reminded me of who I was.
I wouldn't share if I see many high rollers. Just want to help guys without deep pocket to have at least a decent experience. Guys who like my girls or share made me want to share more. I always appreciate feedback and reviews from other guys.
When I found a girl I like, I will post here for you too. I don't do PM, never did.
[QUOTE=KimchiPowerJP;4436986]I like TOFTT. I like surprise. But most of time, I get surprised by how ugly she looks like. Everyone has their own taste. I like high school student looks. I don't think any of you like my taste. There is no point sharing. Does anyone know any k provider look like high school student? Please PM me if you know any? Thanks happy hunting.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4440722][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/MilkAndHoney[/URL]
Yes, I enjoyed her a few times. Is Sia also using my favorite Monika pics? Or they were the same person and I just gotten senile.
Monika pics: [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/monika-escort-los-angeles-336737[/URL][/QUOTE]They are the same person.
[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4436980]Her relationship Won't last long. I fk cami nonstop on her off day and had fun for like 7 months. Once I found out her real age and all the lies came with it. It's done between us. Never take hooker seriously.[/QUOTE]I'm assuming when you saw her OTC it was BBFS CIP also correct?
For me, yes.
[QUOTE=CreamInside;4441438]I'm assuming when you saw her OTC it was BBFS CIP also correct?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4440722][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/MilkAndHoney[/URL]
Yes, I enjoyed her a few times. Is Sia also using my favorite Monika pics? Or they were the same person and I just gotten senile.
Monika pics: [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/monika-escort-los-angeles-336737[/URL][/QUOTE]Why are the only photos at this link for "Lure"?
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/MilkAndHoney[/URL]
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4442664]Why are the only photos at this link for "Lure"?
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/MilkAndHoney[/URL][/QUOTE]You need to be whitelisted by him to see the pictures. Else you'll see just the dummy album.
Thank you to whoever started the asian pleaser la forum. That's exactly what we need. Honest reviews, descriptions, details, opinions.
We can all argue about age and bookers or whatever but in the end, we just want a great session and this info helps a lot!
[QUOTE=TorobBbbj;4443343]Thank you to whoever started the asian pleaser la forum. That's exactly what we need. Honest reviews, descriptions, details, opinions.
We can all argue about age and bookers or whatever but in the end, we just want a great session and this info helps a lot![/QUOTE]I second that all the way. Will contribute my own there this week.
[QUOTE=TorobBbbj;4443343]Thank you to whoever started the asian pleaser la forum. That's exactly what we need. Honest reviews, descriptions, details, opinions.
We can all argue about age and bookers or whatever but in the end, we just want a great session and this info helps a lot![/QUOTE]Great idea. The format has been established on the OC board and seems successful. One idea I would like to see incorporated is general location, eg. DTLA, Mid-Wilshire, etc. For some (like me), that can be a factor as whether or not to see a gal.
So is anyone in the know as to whether or not Yoco is back? Some "new" reviews with weird phone numbers on the monkey site, but with regard to reliability that site is about the same as our politicians' promises to look out for us.
[QUOTE=TheLibrarian;4438905]To book, be prepared to provide refs. Never ever lead with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM and probably KUP. The places you -want- to be in, will ignore you. They ain't got shit to play 20 questions with why'all newb asses. If a booker is going to take you either way, then he / she won't ignore you, will ask you for more deets, and then you can follow up with the above list that I mentioned. M also never ever never never never provides ref no matter how much you beg so you can just forego her as a ref. The -want-to-be-in-bookers- will never work with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM / KUP-they're unsafe and will take anyone with half ass pseudo screening.
If you're completely new. The list I gave in sentence #2 is your in. If you -can- provide the -want-to-be-in-bookers- then you'll obviously get a response from the bookers that are friendlies.[/QUOTE]I seldom post, but when I do, it's either confirming a fact or helping with unanswered question. But these KTE / SAG / EUK / SIX / FRUIT / KUP are the new kids on the block who are here to take advantage of noobs. Besides the point, don't use them as a reference. Won't help your case.
Between Glow and Lyn, who is the hotter of the two? And who has better service?
[QUOTE=TheLibrarian;4438905]To book, be prepared to provide refs. Never ever lead with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM and probably KUP. The places you -want- to be in, will ignore you. They ain't got shit to play 20 questions with why'all newb asses. If a booker is going to take you either way, then he / she won't ignore you, will ask you for more deets, and then you can follow up with the above list that I mentioned. M also never ever never never never provides ref no matter how much you beg so you can just forego her as a ref. The -want-to-be-in-bookers- will never work with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM / KUP-they're unsafe and will take anyone with half ass pseudo screening.
If you're completely new. The list I gave in sentence #2 is your in. If you -can- provide the -want-to-be-in-bookers- then you'll obviously get a response from the bookers that are friendlies.[/QUOTE]Who are the want-to-be-in bookers? I'm good with Ca-K Dolls but I don't know anyone else.
[QUOTE=Veni1;4444238]Great idea. The format has been established on the OC board and seems successful. One idea I would like to see incorporated is general location, eg. DTLA, Mid-Wilshire, etc. For some (like me), that can be a factor as whether or not to see a gal.[/QUOTE]I created an asian agency section for this reason. But if the name asian pleaser fit the bill I'm cool with it.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31512-Non-BB-Korean-Asian-Agency-Review-and-discussion[/URL]
[QUOTE=Veni1;4444728]So is anyone in the know as to whether or not Yoco is back? Some "new" reviews with weird phone numbers on the monkey site, but with regard to reliability that site is about the same as our politicians' promises to look out for us.[/QUOTE]Fake number and review. Drumming up interest to herald her return. Hang in there. All will know when "the legend" returns.
[QUOTE=SpaceShuttle77;4445178]Between Glow and Lyn, who is the hotter of the two? And who has better service?[/QUOTE]I would go with Lyn. Glow is way past her prime.
Any comments on her on Sia before? She looks familiar did she go by another name previously?
I prefer Chanel / J (so far) vs Chanel / M.
Chanel / J review: [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-escort-los-angeles-507801[/URL].
Chanel / M review: anybody? Mr. T?
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4445833]Any comments on her on Sia before? She looks familiar did she go by another name previously?[/QUOTE]Origional Sia has always been "Sia" that started at Hobart location many years ago. Since than she travels all over now.
They're was also another lower tiet khouse that promoted a Sia as well few years ago. But, it didn't last.
She is a girl to be seen.
[QUOTE=SpaceShuttle77;4445178]Between Glow and Lyn, who is the hotter of the two? And who has better service?[/QUOTE]Totally 2 different type of girls.
Obviously Lyn is hotter in my opinion. For me both still offer a wonderful session.
Haven't seen M's Chanel, but J's is providing a solid, better than average experience. And she is a fantastic rimmer.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4446085]I prefer Chanel / J (so far) vs Chanel / M.
Chanel / J review: [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-escort-los-angeles-507801[/URL].
Chanel / M review: anybody? Mr. T?[/QUOTE]
She is mainly known as Sia but now she uses a different name sometimes. I like her so I think her service is above average.
Here is her old pic when she was at K-Town where I first saw her: [URL]https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/sia-213-952-4260-vacation/5848aa34221e539b998b4673[/URL].
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4445833]Any comments on her on Sia before? She looks familiar did she go by another name previously?[/QUOTE]
I am thankful they are still bringing in new girls who made me happy. I will review girls I liked and you guys tell me if the girls disappoint you. I want to help the noobs not be taken advantage of since I am willing to TOFTT on any booker.
[QUOTE=DailyFantasy;4444862]But these KTE / SAG / EUK / SIX / FRUIT / KUP are the new kids on the block who are here to take advantage of noobs.[/QUOTE]
For me (of the girls working today) -.
Sexy Shannon- SAG (painful drive though).
Cari- J (on vacation right now, she is my perfect body type).
Cona- M (best BB exp).
Channel. J (that ass is special).
BTW I started this hobby back in the Love Kim / Sexy Lohan / Suri days so have seen my share. Those gold old days.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4446085]I prefer Chanel / J (so far) vs Chanel / M.
Chanel / J review: [URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-escort-los-angeles-507801[/URL].
Chanel / M review: anybody? Mr. T?[/QUOTE]Chanel from M is very sexy, model type body and sensual, BBFSCIP and vs from J, she has a bigger then average Asian girl face but body is busty with slight chub, oh and no BBFS at all.
Service wise M side wins all the way compare to J, her look was so so and service was standar.
Go with M's Chanel, you won't regret it.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4445833]Any comments on her on Sia before? She looks familiar did she go by another name previously?[/QUOTE]When she was booked by J, she went by Monika.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4446917]I am thankful they are still bringing in new girls who made me happy. I will review girls I liked and you guys tell me if the girls disappoint you. I want to help the noobs not be taken advantage of since I am willing to TOFTT on any booker.[/QUOTE]I'm in the scene nearly as much as I used to be for a variety of reasons (like wanting to pour as much as I can into my 401 k). But it has been and will continue to be Cona. I've seen her a lot and the. She was gone for awhile but when she came back she remembered me and we chatted (as best we could). She asked about my work etc and our first session was as close to making love as possible with a provider. Even went over by 15 minutes. Of course the Cona Lucia duo was pure, raw and unadulterated sex. Do yah. It's Cona Cona and Cona for me.