I apologize if you misunderstood, sir
[QUOTE=WarrenAJeffers;3456416]Models. Is that what we're calling them now? LOL.[/QUOTE]I never suggested that others should refer to them as models. It's my own personal preference. Given the troubles a lot of hobbyists on here have had getting decent, safe service-I simply don't find the term "providers" suitable for me. Yet I think it sounds better then "biotches", which was the term used by the fellow hobbyist whose post I replied to. I had hoped that others would have gotten more out of what I wrote than my use of the term "models". Unfortunately, I was wrong. The mistake is mine and I own it.
Just saw your latest post and it is telling. You did read way to much into first post
[QUOTE=SilverBaron;3465383]There are a lot of people to be wary of in the hobby. B. S. Comes in all forms, all sizes, shapes and colors and from every possible direction. If I feel I have a legit reason to avoid her, I will.
The fact that she may be a control freak doesn't speak to whether or not her service is good or bad. Any hobbyists looking to hook up with her should first seek the answers to these questions:
Is her environment safe? Is her price reasonable? Does she upsell? Is she promising services that she does not provide? Does she have chemical issues?
Everyone is a f. King control freak to some degree and on some level. I'll base my decision whether or not to see a particular girl on valid, legit reviews. It sounds like you have an ax to grind.
With this girl-so you might not be the most objective person to take advice from.[/QUOTE]What the fuuk are you talking about. I was not angling regarding review of anyone or whether you should go for it or anything like that. Just pointed out a sociological observation.
OH I have no ax to grind. Do not know her, never went near that person. And never would for specific reasons, nor would I recommend my buddy to do so. NOW, it seems as if YOU may have some bias in favor of her. I guess you are just a fan of a person that would dog a gal who wants to be independent of a pimp wannabee as this manager type, Chocolate. And I can only now realize that your posts are an attack on me due to your bias. Guess what, you DID read way too much into my original post. That is very clear now. I care not what you do or your criteria. I just posted on the proclivity of certain persons who act a certain way. In this case, a control freak "manager". Sorry if you do not like my pointing out a possible psychotic flaw in your favored friend / associate / whatever.
You percieve from a false assumption
[QUOTE=Freedom2B;3477942]What the fuuk are you talking about. I was not angling regarding review of anyone or whether you should go for it or anything like that. Just pointed out a sociological observation.
OH I have no ax to grind. Do not know her, never went near that person. And never would for specific reasons, nor would I recommend my buddy to do so. NOW, it seems as if YOU may have some bias in favor of her. I guess you are just a fan of a person that would dog a gal who wants to be independent of a pimp wannabee as this manager type, Chocolate. And I can only now realize that your posts are an attack on me due to your bias. Guess what, you DID read way too much into my original post. That is very clear now. I care not what you do or your criteria. I just posted on the proclivity of certain persons who act a certain way. In this case, a control freak "manager". Sorry if you do not like my pointing out a possible psychotic flaw in your favored friend / associate / whatever.[/QUOTE]I've never met her, either. And having read back several months over your previous postings-I suspect I know why you would never see her. Your postings tend to be highly judgemental of certain types of people which you clearly don't like. No one attacked you, Freedom. But-since you went there-referring to another human being as a "biotch" could be considered unusually cruel for someone who has to pay for it-don't you think? You just recently called another girl a "fatty". And I'm attacking YOU? From what I have read, you have a very long history here of posting extremely cruel and disrespectful comments toward certain people. And you call ME biased? You'd never hear me talking about another person the way you talk about these people-whether I like them or not. It's not my place to pass judgment on them. And-in case you didn't get my point the first time, let my state it a different way: These girls personal lives is NO business of yours. PERIOD! Unless it affects you personally! Yeah-somebody is psychotic. As well as obsessed. To quote you: "I just posted on the proclivity of certain persons who act a certain way". Those are YOUR words. I'm doing the same. Now-you have every right to think and feel any way you want to about certain people. But, please don't deceive yourself into believing that you yourself are perfect. I know for a fact that I am not. And-according to your posting history here-neither are you!
OK, now you are a trained clinician.
[QUOTE=SilverBaron;3481995]The quality of providers in the area leaves a lot to be desired. But-that does not entitle you to abuse them, judge them unfairly or spend your time wasting theirs.
No matter how they look or whether or not they meet the standards of someone with a Narcissistic Personality Disorder. They are human beings, and as such (on that basis alone) deserve respect.[/QUOTE]No NPD here.
You are a fool. You act as if I am abusing them. To their face. You are a total fool. Start reading all the posters threads here. As if I am the only one pointing out fat, ugly, scrawny, picked skin, sloppiness, on and on. Are you for real? I speak in truthful statements, not political correctness. That is a fact and THAT is not being foolish here. When posters talk of back handed actions of a person, such as a pimp / mgr who is USING and truly abusing these persons / providers and taking from them, and then I refer with a Biottttch term (OH WOW< HOW ABUSIVE), which is the truth in fact, then you get all high and mighty? Maybe YOU have a Messianic Disorder. Go mind your own business and read the terms of service on here. You are in violation and now you have made me be in violation by responding to your nonsense. Go ignore yourself. I suppose if I use terms like slender, sexy, athletic-like-a-volleyball player, alluring, hott, and so forth, then you shall attack me or others as being shallow, objectifying, misogynistic, materialistic and other assorted DSM-V recognized disorders.
By the way, not sure what country you hail from, but in this country, Freedom of Speech still exists. Freedom of opinion also hails and those are not "entitlements". You are just a troll on this internet.
Regarding under the radar
I have regularly posted about how to post on CL, be coherent, non threatening, and attempt to write a clear and concise request for a paramour. I will not share their digits. I worked long and hard, with numerous failures, in between. If you're too lazy, it's not my problem. Both my regulars screen and respond to respectful ads. Any pm for digits will no longer receive any response. They do not even want me sharing any information, that's why they're under the radar.