These are the reasons I hate seeing some providers.
Printable View
These are the reasons I hate seeing some providers.
My Tin Foil Hat Has Small Satellite Dishes Attached.
BB, granted, things change and those that jump back in are usually welcomed with open arms based on their past posts blended with their current contributions. Some fade in and out of the woodwork for various reasons as mentioned. What Trigg7272 said is good advice, check the posting history and make a call on that.
BUT with a lunatic out there hurting girls, everyone should be on alert to whom they give info to. That's good sense, not paranoia / conspiracy based and the main point of my throwing caution.
The names that were argumentative in the past and jump in after 2 years to argue again or support a low integrity / argumentative member (usually supporting the same member each time) then vanish back into obscurity are also more what I was also posting about to watch out for. The MHMP (Mulit-Handle, Multi-Persona) members remind me of Roger the Alien on American Dad, always has the right person available to step in when needed.
Adding on, one of these well-preserved long-stored away screen names from the past that are DM'ing members asking for Provider intel could be a clandestine alias of the culprit hurting providers. That IS Tin Foil Hat stuff BUT I'd rather be safe than sorry for the providers' sake.
I Pay You, your point is spot on as well that circumstances change and screen names are sometimes abandoned. Many that experience that usually start their new life on the Forum mentioning their past name to help gain some instant creds, unless they are wanted by or are under scrutiny by the FBI (Female Board Investigators, LOL) but the fact is that there are also a number of current screen names that ARE some of those "well known" members from that same era you mention using new names today and have entire battalions set up.
I posted my initial post to heed caution with whom you share info with if you don't do some background work to help protect the Providers safety.
Grain 56.
[QUOTE=BuckBundy;5513225]Some people get long term SO's, some people move, some people have finances change, and some people just get tired of the asshats on here and need a break from it. I don't blame blame a guy who wants to see someone he's comfortable with to get back in the game.
While I understand where you guys are coming from, take off the tin foil hats for a bit. Not everyone is a creeper.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=IPayYou;5513306]Haha I was just fixing to resond the same way without the tin foil hats reference. Changing phones and emails sometimes means changing names. Been here since the Jag and early Strokin J. Lighten up Francis.[/QUOTE]I think we ALL want to protect the Providers without a doubt.
[QUOTE=Grain56;5513858]My Tin Foil Hat Has Small Satellite Dishes Attached.
BB, granted, things change and those that jump back in are usually welcomed with open arms based on their past posts blended with their current contributions. Some fade in and out of the woodwork for various reasons as mentioned. What Trigg7272 said is good advice, check the posting history and make a call on that.
BUT with a lunatic out there hurting girls, everyone should be on alert to whom they give info to. That's good sense, not paranoia / conspiracy based and the main point of my throwing caution.
The names that were argumentative in the past and jump in after 2 years to argue again or support a low integrity / argumentative member (usually supporting the same member each time) then vanish back into obscurity are also more what I was also posting about to watch out for. The MHMP (Mulit-Handle, Multi-Persona) members remind me of Roger the Alien on American Dad, always has the right person available to step in when needed.
Adding on, one of these well-preserved long-stored away screen names from the past that are DM'ing members asking for Provider intel could be a clandestine alias of the culprit hurting providers. That IS Tin Foil Hat stuff BUT I'd rather be safe than sorry for the providers' sake.[/QUOTE]Do either providers have pics we can share via PM? Blanket party time?
[QUOTE=OWG;5514253]Do either providers have pics we can share via PM? Blanket party time?[/QUOTE]No pics available. Both providers were UTRs on the board and their numbers were given out by the key holder so it "was" a most likely trusted senior member. That's where the pulling the old names out of storage adds a little concern to the DMs asking for info. You can read about it in the UTR Thread over the past couple weeks.
Grain 56.
Someone I believe it was Grain 56 on a post not long ago said something about providers have to pay for their ads on the sites like Lc and stg. I asked today and they don't pay anything for ads. What the sites get out of it is the rights to any pictures posted in the ads. Also only a few sites that they actually post on like Lc, stg, adult search, and eroticmonkey, the rest just auto feed from those sites, like megapersonals and sumosearch and adult index. I was told that the provider I asked about it has found her ad pics on porn websites and such. So the sites make their money by selling the pictures that are posted by the providers to other sites and from ad revenue. So now I'm stumped as to why Lc will ban you over leaving a bad comment or review since they don't get paid by the girl posting the ad anyway other than the rights to their pictures.
[QUOTE=Dugglc;5515234]Someone I believe it was Grain 56 on a post not long ago said something about providers have to pay for their ads on the sites like Lc and stg. I asked today and they don't pay anything for ads. What the sites get out of it is the rights to any pictures posted in the ads. Also only a few sites that they actually post on like Lc, stg, adult search, and eroticmonkey, the rest just auto feed from those sites, like megapersonals and sumosearch and adult index. I was told that the provider I asked about it has found her ad pics on porn websites and such. So the sites make their money by selling the pictures that are posted by the providers to other sites and from ad revenue. So now I'm stumped as to why Lc will ban you over leaving a bad comment or review since they don't get paid by the girl posting the ad anyway other than the rights to their pictures.[/QUOTE]Thanks Diggic for clarifying the info, makes sense, but I still wouldn't necessarily say the girls don't "pay".
My guess to why LC will still remove the Bad Comments when they give out free ads is that since they actually do get "paid" by the girls (via reselling their pics in perpetuity which can be huge dollars over time) that if they post negative reviews on those generously giving girls, that the girls will stop giving them "FREE" pics to make money from.
Take from Peter (or in this case Petra) to Pay Paul (big internet).
Grain 56.
[QUOTE=Grain56;5515676]Thanks Diggic for clarifying the info, makes sense, but I still wouldn't necessarily say the girls don't "pay".
My guess to why LC will still remove the Bad Comments when they give out free ads is that since they actually do get "paid" by the girls (via reselling their pics in perpetuity which can be huge dollars over time) that if they post negative reviews on those generously giving girls, that the girls will stop giving them "FREE" pics to make money from.
Take from Peter (or in this case Petra) to Pay Paul (big internet).
Grain 56.[/QUOTE]It was Aubrey that gave me the info while she was reposting her ad and I was helping her get set up here so she can read her reviews both good and bad and get subscribed to threads so she can improve or her service knowing what someone did or did not like. She knows not to be posting anything other than maybe a short thank you when someone post a good review for her. She said back in the BP days they did have to pay for their ads, but now it's just ad revenue and selling their pictures that finances the sites. She said that they can pay to have their ad updated on a regular or hourly basis, but if they just keep their own ads updated there is no charge. You can if you are tactful about it post not so good info on the comments or review section. Like last week when I saw Lorena I posted both a comment and a review saying she is a $200 one pop stop if that's what you want. Without saying it was a ripoff which it was, you can get the info that it's a $200 for 15 minute date that most people won't be interested in. I know there are people that don't know about our forum and only depend on those comments and reviews to choose who to see.
Every single post you have is commenting on someone else's post. Not one and I mean not one that you actually did a post on it's own. The one who is worthless is actually YOU! You want digits from me, you need to actually post a legit session! Basically all you have are 42 posts of garbage and that is why I didn't give you any digits. You don't qualify, and to all Gate Keepers, I would not give digits to ChaseL. He needs to prove himself first. Hasn't done it yet and I don't think he ever will.
RP.
Not sure what happened to you, but those digits I gave you are legit. Maybe you punched in the wrong number by mistake. You could have come back to me by PM and ask me about it. But you instead decided to attack me for no good reason. Other GateKeepers warned me about you. But I ignored them, gave you a chance and you blew it. So to Gatekeepers who warned me about ChrisXr, I apologise for not listening to you. I made a mistake and it will never happen again. ChrisXr is now on the avoid list, like he is on yours.
RP.
[QUOTE=RP469;5518044]Not sure what happened to you, but those digits I gave you are legit. Maybe you punched in the wrong number by mistake. You could have come back to me by PM and ask me about it. But you instead decided to attack me for no good reason. Other GateKeepers warned me about you. But I ignored them, gave you a chance and you blew it. So to Gatekeepers who warned me about ChrisXr, I apologise for not listening to you. I made a mistake and it will never happen again. ChrisXr is now on the avoid list, like he is on yours.
RP.[/QUOTE]You call it gatekeeping, I call them white knights who defend 35+ junkies who raw dog every John they get their hands on.
Some people just want to watch the world burn.
[QUOTE=RP469;5518022]Every single post you have is commenting on someone else's post.
Not one and I mean not one that you actually did a post on it's own. The one who is worthless is actually YOU! You want digits from me, you need to actually post a legit session! Basically all you have are 42 posts of garbage and that is why I didn't give you any digits. You don't qualify, and to all Gate Keepers, I would not give digits to ChaseL. He needs to prove himself first. Hasn't done it yet and I don't think he ever will.
RP.[/QUOTE]Yeah, it's true that he doesn't actually do reviews, but are his posts one trillion times better than a real review? The bar for the "value" of non-reviewing commentators has already been set pretty high by another member recently if you recall.
Maybe we need a New Thread called the "I Don't Do Reviews but Have a Lot of Opinions On Your Reviews" Thread. Maybe we can get Jag (although he actually did do reviews) to Moderate it. LOL.
Grain 56.
[QUOTE=ChrisXr;5518430]You call it gatekeeping, I call them white knights who defend 35+ junkies who raw dog every John they get their hands on.
Some people just want to watch the world burn.[/QUOTE]So why do you always come back crawling to me for digits?
RP.
[QUOTE=RP469;5518022]Every single post you have is commenting on someone else's post. Not one and I mean not one that you actually did a post on it's own. The one who is worthless is actually YOU! You want digits from me, you need to actually post a legit session! Basically all you have are 42 posts of garbage and that is why I didn't give you any digits. You don't qualify, and to all Gate Keepers, I would not give digits to ChaseL. He needs to prove himself first. Hasn't done it yet and I don't think he ever will.
RP.[/QUOTE]It's called supplementary information, big boy. I don't post much because I frankly don't have much to add other than what's already been said or if I feel someone else needs additional verification on a dream. Thus, why I was in no rush to be "upgraded" to an SM despite being a member for what? 3-ys now? Unfortunately, the very few UTRs I see don't need additional mongers & some are just lonely housewives and / or engaged that just want something private on the side. With your logic, I take it you'd want me to post about women you'll never get to touch? This isn't Penthouse letters, Hoss.
In regard to Christina B's number, I already got the contact information from another member that doesn't refer to himself as a gatekeeper. LOL. She ain't a UTR. So what exactly are you gatekeeping? A reckless "public" servant? Regardless, I got enough information from someone else basically giving me the year make & model of your f150 in addition to a pic of what you look like as you apparently are geared heavily toward streetwalkers. We have essentially 2 to 3 types of mongers. Those that don't necessarily have to pay for dreams, but like the business aspect of it without the emotional headache before and / or afterwards. Then you have the oldies and / or pervs that buy small knick knacks like groceries to even full fledged trips & plane tickets under the impression that this one really "likes" me. (Please refer to Michele1 L & Father Time buying Ms. Eye Rolls a handheld game.) Then there's you, the unmanicured sasquatch that's either married / divorced to something as equally & physically repugnant & uses what little power he has over needled-out desperate women.
Some people pay them to go away while others pay them to compensate for their own insecurities & disparaging attributes.
[QUOTE=ChaseL;5519259]It's called supplementary information, big boy. I don't post much because I frankly don't have much to add other than what's already been said or if I feel someone else needs additional verification on a dream. Thus, why I was in no rush to be "upgraded" to an SM despite being a member for what? 3-ys now? Unfortunately, the very few UTRs I see don't need additional mongers & some are just lonely housewives and / or engaged that just want something private on the side. With your logic, I take it you'd want me to post about women you'll never get to touch? This isn't Penthouse letters, Hoss.
In regard to Christina B's number, I already got the contact information from another member that doesn't refer to himself as a gatekeeper. LOL. She ain't a UTR. So what exactly are you gatekeeping? A reckless "public" servant? Regardless, I got enough information from someone else basically giving me the year make & model of your f150 in addition to a pic of what you look like as you apparently are geared heavily toward streetwalkers. We have essentially 2 to 3 types of mongers. Those that don't necessarily have to pay for dreams, but like the business aspect of it without the emotional headache before and / or afterwards. Then you have the oldies and / or pervs that buy small knick knacks like groceries to even full fledged trips & plane tickets under the impression that this one really "likes" me. (Please refer to Michele1 L & Father Time buying Ms. Eye Rolls a handheld game.) Then there's you, the unmanicured sasquatch that's either married / divorced to something as equally & physically repugnant & uses what little power he has over needled-out desperate women.
Some people pay them to go away while others pay them to compensate for their own insecurities & disparaging attributes.[/QUOTE]Oh how nice of you to finally reply. You know the green "online" indicator never lies. I thought I might have scared your silly ass off. Well glad you are on board. So to update you, your supplementary information is absolutely worthless. I need more to prove you are legit. Why don't you do yourself a favor and do a real review on a real provider, or is that too difficult for you to do. I guess so. I don't need to hear a bunch of excuses from a loser like you who can't even do a single legit post. So my advice to you, don't ask for digits from me again. Oh BTW I like that you put in a read request in. So when you received it you will know that you just got on the shit list.
RP.
[QUOTE=ChaseL;5519259]It's called supplementary information, big boy. I don't post much because I frankly don't have much to add other than what's already been said or if I feel someone else needs additional verification on a dream. Thus, why I was in no rush to be "upgraded" to an SM despite being a member for what? 3-ys now? Unfortunately, the very few UTRs I see don't need additional mongers & some are just lonely housewives and / or engaged that just want something private on the side. With your logic, I take it you'd want me to post about women you'll never get to touch? This isn't Penthouse letters, Hoss.
In regard to Christina B's number, I already got the contact information from another member that doesn't refer to himself as a gatekeeper. LOL. She ain't a UTR. So what exactly are you gatekeeping? A reckless "public" servant? Regardless, I got enough information from someone else basically giving me the year make & model of your f150 in addition to a pic of what you look like as you apparently are geared heavily toward streetwalkers. We have essentially 2 to 3 types of mongers. Those that don't necessarily have to pay for dreams, but like the business aspect of it without the emotional headache before and / or afterwards. Then you have the oldies and / or pervs that buy small knick knacks like groceries to even full fledged trips & plane tickets under the impression that this one really "likes" me. (Please refer to Michele1 L & Father Time buying Ms. Eye Rolls a handheld game.) Then there's you, the unmanicured sasquatch that's either married / divorced to something as equally & physically repugnant & uses what little power he has over needled-out desperate women.
Some people pay them to go away while others pay them to compensate for their own insecurities & disparaging attributes.[/QUOTE]Great post mate. Agreeing with most of what you said. We should avoid bringing up information about each other. I understand this thread is meant to deal with petty disagreements and shit posting. However, we have to define a fine line between these junkies and the few gentlemen and johns.
I completely understand the reasoning for the Gatekeepers wanting to distance themselves from the others. The false illusion they share about keeping their fiendish-looking SW away from the general masses makes sense. I don't post about every encounter with these crackwhores and don't plan on changing it to please these "Gatekeepers🤡.
For the boomers, simps, and narcissists. I'm going to keep focusing on what I've been doing. I'm here to read up on the good, bad, and the unknown of this hobby. Just mentioning personal information about others trying to enjoy this hobby shouldn't be brought up. If you got issues with me, I don't fucking give a fuck. I'm here for the bitches, not you.