Printable View
My favorite story of her is when she was arrested being a guy up with a high heel.
[QUOTE=DiverDown69;5383795]This one advertises all over the place. Spread the word!
[URL]https://orlando.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/elite-companionship/279537750715[/URL]
[URL]https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/2021/01/22/titusville-police-pair-arrested-armed-robbery-dating-app-scam/6669517002/[/URL][/QUOTE]
I always ask for a verify pic.
Some get back to me and it is better the advertisement.
Most are not, sorry safety policy we do not send pics.
Girl does not send a verify photo. Just say no pic no go.
Or will look for the girl in the advertisement in the lobby.
My favorite, oh I can not go down.
One of the tricks I use at a hotel.
I wait until another car pulls up.
I say that is me see you in lobby.
Safety first guys.
Very clever. The ol' I fucked your mom comeback. Classic! Looking thru your 170+ post I don't see the report about fucking my mom though, or any other chick. The only report I see is the report of the girl getting out of "your car" that was stolen from Instagram.
Here is my #2 post TrollingOBT.
[QUOTE=PussySmasher;5444439]I am sorry I fucked your mom. But you don't have to hate me for it.[/QUOTE]
Abiding dude,
So I appreciate your post and previous posts since you clearly are a contributing senior member providing feedback on experiences and even by name contact information on providers but you did make some incorrect assumptions regarding my post. I don't think the admins need to vet all senior members. I merely asked what the criteria was. I do however think some members should be flagged and possibly restricted a senior member status if you have 170+ post of garbage by the time you reach the 6 month wait period. The admins do a very good job at restricting personal real name information or blocking argumentative post (even you have a censored argumentative post) for example so I don't think it's a stretch for them to also keep the site free of worthless post especially when so much weight is placed on senior status. Most members use the senior status to limit who they communicate or share information with. Next, I don't expect anyone to do the work for me. It was through my work that I even discovered P.S.'s ridiculous history of garbage post and lies. I do agree the site is a wealth of information but P.S.'s senior status discredits all other senior members status that was earned with valuable information. Thank you for your feedback.
[QUOTE=Lebowski69;5444489]So the guy/gal who writes a post with a new (fake) account complains about a dude who makes 170 bad posts and is a senior member and doesn't think he is credible. Then wants the Admin to vet all SM so he can believe what they say without doing his own research. If your taking advice from a guy who calls himself pussysmasher perhaps it's on you. Just take any and all info you get with a grain of salt do your homework (read someones previous posts)and you will find out what's actually going on. This site is a wealth of both useful and useless info it's up to you to figure out what to believe.
The dude abides.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PSisaDouche;5446886]Very clever. The ol' I fucked your mom comeback. Classic! Looking thru your 170+ post I don't see the report about fucking my mom though, or any other chick. The only report I see is the report of the girl getting out of "your car" that was stolen from Instagram.
Here is my #2 post TrollingOBT.[/QUOTE]Says my stalker that got really but hurt so bad he / she decided to spend time to make an user name on me and has no posts other than to try and harass me with. I'd say I won. I hope whatever I did that made you so mad I can do again and again you stupid fuckboy! I feel really inspired now. Welcome to the ignore list, your ass did it all for nothing! LOL.
I've never been called "fuckboy" by another dude before. That's awkward as hell. I'm starting to understand why you don't have any actual real reviews of fucking chicks.
[QUOTE=PussySmasher;5447438]Says my stalker that got really but hurt so bad he / she decided to spend time to make an user name on me and has no posts other than to try and harass me with. I'd say I won. I hope whatever I did that made you so mad I can do again and again you stupid fuckboy! I feel really inspired now. Welcome to the ignore list.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ClamNewb;5447159]Abiding dude,
So I appreciate your post and previous posts since you clearly are a contributing senior member providing feedback on experiences and even by name contact information on providers but you did make some incorrect assumptions regarding my post. I don't think the admins need to vet all senior members. I merely asked what the criteria was. I do however think some members should be flagged and possibly restricted a senior member status if you have 170+ post of garbage by the time you reach the 6 month wait period. The admins do a very good job at restricting personal real name information or blocking argumentative post (even you have a censored argumentative post) for example so I don't think it's a stretch for them to also keep the site free of worthless post especially when so much weight is placed on senior status. Most members use the senior status to limit who they communicate or share information with. Next, I don't expect anyone to do the work for me. It was through my work that I even discovered P.S.'s ridiculous history of garbage post and lies. I do agree the site is a wealth of information but P.S.'s senior status discredits all other senior members status that was earned with valuable information. Thank you for your feedback.[/QUOTE]Right after Lebowski69 called your sorry loser ass out and I put you on ignore you create yet another account! You have some serious mental problems. Once again I'm glad I got you riled up to waste your time on me, I'm winning! :] Glad I got you but hurt once more. Where are all your posts you stupid hypocrite asshole? No one is on here to entertain you fucking idiot. No one forces you to read my posts moron.
P.S. I put your new account on ignore and will do so with any other fake accounts your loser stalking fucking faggot ass creates.
Pussy Smasher.
-Senior Member.
Wow such an angry vile post with the toddler like name calling. Seems you are more riled up than I am. Glad I was able to strike a nerve by calling your collection of garbage posts out. Senior member or not, everyone can see who you. The 180 garbage lying post speak for themselves.
If you click to open an ignored post doesn't that defeat the purpose? Take care pussy smasher, enjoy posting garbage to a forum that knows you're a fraud.
Non Senior member, non fraud.
PSisaDouche is out.
[QUOTE=PussySmasher;5448674]Right after Lebowski69 called your sorry loser ass out and I put you on ignore you create yet another account! You have some serious mental problems. Once again I'm glad I got you riled up to waste your time on me, I'm winning! :] Glad I got you but hurt once more. Where are all your posts you stupid hypocrite asshole? No one is on here to entertain you fucking idiot. No one forces you to read my posts moron.
P.S. I put your new account on ignore and will do so with any other fake accounts your loser stalking fucking faggot ass creates.
Pussy Smasher.
-Senior Member.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BigStud47;5469390]It's her fucking snap you can't handle it take her off your friends on snap!! She can speak what she wants on her damn snap!![/QUOTE]What a fucking douche complaining about how she uses her SC to vent her feelings.
Nickoglock has shown his true colors a few times on this board, dude is a real douche nozzle and is already known to be on a few "DO NOT SEE" lists of some local girls.
I tried to post an apology. I was really freaked out and lost it.
Again my apologies and somethings were taken out of context.
[QUOTE=PapiCholo;5469472]What a fucking douche complaining about how she uses her SC to vent her feelings.
Nickoglock has shown his true colors a few times on this board, dude is a real douche nozzle and is already known to be on a few "DO NOT SEE" lists of some local girls.[/QUOTE]
What's up with the sudden onslaught of one post wonders asking rookie questions but seem to know about the places and girls names already? There have been like 8 or 10 in just the last day or so. By the wording of questions and prior knowledge it almost seems like one guy making multiple accounts and trolling for possible PMs. Everybody knows I like helping new guys and tourists out, but new to the AMP scene and tourist is one thing, asking newbie questions on a first post when you seem to already know the places and girls names is another.
[QUOTE=Dugglc;5488765]What's up with the sudden onslaught of one post wonders asking rookie questions but seem to know about the places and girls names already? There have been like 8 or 10 in just the last day or so. By the wording of questions and prior knowledge it almost seems like one guy making multiple accounts and trolling for possible PMs. Everybody knows I like helping new guys and tourists out, but new to the AMP scene and tourist is one thing, asking newbie questions on a first post when you seem to already know the places and girls names is another.[/QUOTE]Sometimes it is long term members that have lost some creds and are trying to get back in the favor. Other times it truly is new people that have read the board for eons without participating or are acting the part to try to fit in quickly. Currently, one immediately comes to mind, just my opinion and my point of view.
However, it is that time of year again when seeds need to be planted to nurture future (February 2022) Senior Status accounts. 25 posts + 6 months.
It happens a few times a year, always in waves and, as usual, it won't take too long to figure out who's behind many of the new accounts. Normally when you see a newbie that knows all the names and places, speaks of experience, seamlessly fits into "certain" conversations, comes to the aid of a quickly losing-favor / struggling lass, props up a member that has started to lose credibility for things like over promoting or White Knighting the same girl over and over, posting a LOT of posts with seemingly the knowledge of a scholar but actually posts no real reviews, likes to stir the pot with some mongers or maybe does nothing but speak negative of the providers that won't touch them with a 10 foot pole. That's most likely them. Usually when casual members start to figure out the obvious patterns, they need to move to new ground. Some names get retired, others are put back for more character development. Heck, a couple on here changed sides (good to evil or vice-versa) like a Professional Wrestler does over the years.
Some accounts wither on the vine and die out, others thrive while others maybe saved for a rainy day. There are accounts dating back 3, 4 even 5 years that are aging like Tennessee Mountain Ginseng. When the time is right or the situation warrants, they will be plucked and be shown the light of day.
Just my take from afar.
Grain 56.
[QUOTE=PussySmasher;5491799]Making sex videos AKA porn is a federally protected right falling under the 1st amendment. Regardless even if you pay for it. Period.
The law has repeatedly shown at the highest courts (People vs. Freeman and New Hampshire v. Theriault) that once the person is being videoed engaging in sex, even.
If you paid them, are no longer considered a prostitute but an actress.
Unlike fearmonger Gain 56 states you do not need any permit or license or any other BS he stated.
This does not make it legal for you to film fucking your dog, your sister, fucking out in public, torturing during sex that leads to permanent injury, etc. Ie; anything obscene.
-Your Pussy Smasher Scholar.[/QUOTE]I am happy you finally gave a review of someone. Disappointedly, it was a review of me and not actually of a provider. We'll keep waiting for provider reviews. LOL.
People vs. Freeman is from a US State, not the US Supreme Court. It is applicable in CA (which NOW, today has some of the most stringent laws for producing porn) and not in FL.
Same for New Hampshire vs. Theriault. Yes, sometimes rulings are looked at for reference in legal cases BUT each state and community (in some instances) have different laws. So laws of California may not have bearing in FL.
No one ever said that you can't make a video as you suggest. It is protected. That was already said. However, if YOU want to pay a chick money to appear in a "sham" video she is producing through her "sham" production company, go for it! That description is what this discussion was originally about, purely a hypothetical situation that was asked about. It never was about "can I shoot a porn? I said earlier and I stand by my comment that I personally would not want to defend myself in that situation of paying the girl to be an actor.
[QUOTE=Icarus00;5491820]The vast majority of porn is privately commissioned were the producer (I. E. The guy who's paying for the production) is the supporting lead in the film and he's doing exactly what you just said is illegal. In actuality it is illegal, but that would never be tested by any prosecutor. Once the act is being filmed, the product becomes the film not the act and the film of course is protected by the 1st amendment. See Stanley v Georgia and Ginzburg v US.[/QUOTE]I am happy you recently came out from your 5+ year ago single post hibernation to discuss this matter. The two cases you site are for possession of and distribution of porn, not actual porn production. Your point of it becoming a tangible entity instead of an act once it's dome is somewhat accurate but there are NOW laws in place that require records be obtained and kept to verify all actors are of age at the time of production if the production was done after a certain date. Those records can be asked for at any time through proper channels. One of these cases you mention is from 1966 if I am reading that right. A lot has changed in the production industry as have the laws. Luckily the rights to own or possess porn are still in tact.
As far as who produces what, my reply of obtaining permits, the locally required permits (not a license) was to remove 100% of the possibility that your fantasy production could be criminally challenged. Purely a fantasy situation. You CAN shoot what you want with whomever you want. I am basing my beliefs to obtain proper permits solely on comments made from a relative who has worked in the industry for over 15 years in 3 cities doing production, 2 major production cities and one minor. He won't work in California any more, "too restrictive" he said. I stated that this is what a large production company with millions and millions in assets would do. I am not referring to what a want to be Ed Powers that stands there with his VHS Camcorder while he is doing some girl in a darkly lit room would do. That guy will probably get arrested. He will have to pay lawyers and go to court to fight and / or remove the charges, probably successfully but it will cost him tens of thousands of dollars to do so. My way, removes 99.9999% chance of getting charged for a crime no matter what.
Porn Hub removed thousands upon thousands of videos because of the newer laws. THEY (a huge company) didn't want to risk violating the law. They wanted to remove a 99.9999% chance of being charged. Smart.
Like Vino said, this discussion is making a mountain out of a molehill. I'm going to let you "legal team guys" keep pissing in the wind and thinking it's raining. I am going inside.
Grain 56.
[QUOTE=Grain56;5492335]I am happy you finally gave a review of someone. Disappointedly, it was a review of me and not actually of a provider. We'll keep waiting for provider reviews. LOL.
People vs. Freeman is from a US State, not the US Supreme Court. It is applicable in CA (which NOW, today has some of the most stringent laws for producing porn) and not in FL.
Same for New Hampshire vs. Theriault. Yes, sometimes rulings are looked at for reference in legal cases BUT each state and community (in some instances) have different laws. So laws of California may not have bearing in FL.[/QUOTE]Dear dumb fucking idiot, what I report on is real shit everyone can use that is 1 trillion times better than a review, got it stupid? I know retards like you have a hard time understanding stuff like that. It's OK you're special, let me guess Downs Syndrome is what you have? If it makes you feel any better, my first review will be when I fuck your mom in the ass hard. Also the United States Supreme Court was involved you dumb fucking asshole, not just California as Justice Sandra Day O'Connor denied a stay of the California Supreme Court's judgment. Therefore idiot, People vs. Freeman is commonly used in every state. I stand by everything I wrote on those laws and you only succeeded in making a fool of yourself yet again! Now go back inside (the smartest comment you made yet) to your mom's basement and hide jerking off to your gay and animal porn.
[QUOTE=PussySmasher;5492814]Dear dumb fucking idiot, what I report on is real shit everyone can use that is 1 trillion times better than a review, got it stupid? I know retards like you have a hard time understanding stuff like that. It's OK you're special, let me guess Downs Syndrome is what you have? If it makes you feel any better, my first review will be when I fuck your mom in the ass hard. Also the United States Supreme Court was involved you dumb fucking asshole, not just California as Justice Sandra Day O'Connor denied a stay of the California Supreme Court's judgment. Therefore idiot, People vs. Freeman is commonly used in every state. I stand by everything I wrote on those laws and you only succeeded in making a fool of yourself yet again! Now go back inside (the smartest comment you made yet) to your mom's basement and hide jerking off to your gay and animal porn.[/QUOTE]First of all, my screen name is Grain 56 not Gain 56 as you keep writing, possibly the repeated error comes from a reading / retention deficiency. Secondly, you apparently didn't read (or maybe didn't comprehend) my post in the portion that referred specifically to you. I clearly said that individual state cases CAN be applicable to more than one state. It is still a California ruling. I also agreed with your comment and said you CAN make what ever porn you want and you CAN also pay to legally defend same if you don't take steps to bulletproof your production from prosecution, so don't be so butt hurt.
When some one agrees with you, you shouldn't get so angry.
My post from the beginning was explaining a process to receive the maximum protection from prosecution based on a FANTASY situation in that isn't real, not citing the legality of making a porn. Grasp? Nothing more, nothing less. No one I am aware of said that you can't legally make a porn.
You reverting to automatically getting all panty-wadded and calling someone stupid and an idiot then talking about how your going to get their momma reminds me of another member on here that does EXACTLY the same thing when they become flustered and over-stimulated when sitting at the adult table. Kind of suspicious the similarities. The only thing you missed in your tirade that "they" usually do is to say that the providers YOU see are really good and the ones I see are really bad. I guess since you don't have any real provider reviews to fall back on, you weren't able to make that claim comparing providers.
Just because you don't understand that no one was saying you can't make a porn or that you don't have First Amendment rights or questioning any of the legal rights to do so, doesn't make them wrong.
Yes, I meant to misspell your Forum name in the title. LOL.
Amber Waves of Grain 56.