Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=Vbgent4u2c; 1105105]Awesome variety. [/QUOTE]

Thank you.

[QUOTE=Vbgent4u2c]What goes into your selection for the collages?[/QUOTE]That is a long story, with a continuing "paint-on-the-wall" analogy, which you will understand soon enough, so, here goes:

I used to just bunch all my pics together and post all of them at once after a report, sort of like throwing paint against a wall. Sometimes there might be 60-100 or more pics posted this way for one SW. I got many complaints for this, some rock throwers and assholes letting off steam to be sure, but some were reasonable people who suggested that so many pics together was "visual overload." I saw their point. So, I started to post pics just 10 at a time, allowing some time in between the posts, in order that they might be better absorbed and appreciated."Throwing my paint on the wall," then seemed to be much more like careful brush strokes. This seemed to dramatically increase the views per pic in the pic gallery. That was not necessarily my aim, but it was a good measure of the change being more successful and appealing to those looking at the pics either in the gallery or in my thread.

A member with fashion magazine expertise, and a professional eye for female beauty through photography, PMed me and suggested that a lot of my pics were of the same type, even in groups of 10, and it was not as eye catching and interesting as more variety in poses and types of pics might be. I resisted this thought at first (I can be stubborn, in case you didn't already know, LOL) , but I thought about trying this in deference to his professional experience and expertise in these matters. What this change would entail would be taking my pics out of time sequence order and placing them in groups specifically for the differences in what was being worn (or not worn) , poses, angles, use of props, distance of the camera to the subject, etc. In other words, to give each set of 10 a better VARIETY. Now my "paint on the wall" was not only more carefully applied, but with more attention to detail. This makes it more interesting to view each set of 10 not only as a batch of pics in the pic gallery, but also as pic icons to open when posted in my thread with each post, and clearly when combined together in a collage.

If the dramatic increase in views per pic of my stuff is any measure, both of my pic posting changes have been very well received.

[QUOTE=Vbgent4u2c]Those eyes are magnetic. Even if the pupils are drug induced.

Great job! [/QUOTE]Champagne is a self-admitted popper of opium-derived pills (percs and roxys). An opiate is a downer and pinpoints the pupils, as Giani pointed out for us. However, I agree with you: the look on her face and in her eyes was alluring and magnetic, nonetheless.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1105108]And. Last, but certainly not least: Champagne licking my cock like an all day sucker![/QUOTE]SuperE. I admire all your work. Truly. This one drives me SO crazy. Great stuff. I could look at her pics all day. And the services you describe from her makes me want to drive three plus hours to find her. Thanks.

[QUOTE=Giani; 1105118]I told SE I might put together a collage of effects of stimulants on eyes. Roman women knew the effect of dilated pupils on their beauty, and would use Bella donna (a poisonous plant) on their eyes to dilate them. See if you don't think the women in the collage have attractive eyes! Dilated eyes indicate arousal, and doesn't that look good to us.

I picked up a few images from the web to illustrate the effect, and that classic image of the hottie hitting the dipper.

Oh yeah-and one image of a girl with her eyes rolled back! Whew. [/QUOTE]All I can say is WOW, great stuff! I will have to agree that dilated eyes are an erotic appeal.

[QUOTE=KantDelay;1105133]SuperE. I admire all your work. Truly. This one drives me SO crazy. Great stuff. I could look at her pics all day. And the services you describe from her makes me want to drive three plus hours to find her. Thanks.[/QUOTE]Hey Kant,

Super's work is terrific.

I am going to be in Philly the middle of next month. If you are there the same time I am maybe we can coordinate our resources for some Champagne reconnaissance?

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1105131]Thank you.

That is a long story, with a continuing "paint-on-the-wall" analogy, which you will understand soon enough, so, here goes:

I used to just bunch all my pics together and post all of them at once after a report, sort of like throwing paint against a wall. Sometimes there might be 60-100 or more pics posted this way for one SW. I got many complaints for this, some rock throwers and assholes letting off steam to be sure, but some were reasonable people who suggested that so many pics together was "visual overload." I saw their point. So, I started to post pics just 10 at a time, allowing some time in between the posts, in order that they might be better absorbed and appreciated."Throwing my paint on the wall," then seemed to be much more like careful brush strokes. This seemed to dramatically increase the views per pic in the pic gallery. That was not necessarily my aim, but it was a good measure of the change being more successful and appealing to those looking at the pics either in the gallery or in my thread.

A member with fashion magazine expertise, and a professional eye for female beauty through photography, PMed me and suggested that a lot of my pics were of the same type, even in groups of 10, and it was not as eye catching and interesting as more variety in poses and types of pics might be. I resisted this thought at first (I can be stubborn, in case you didn't already know, LOL) , but I thought about trying this in deference to his professional experience and expertise in these matters. What this change would entail would be taking my pics out of time sequence order and placing them in groups specifically for the differences in what was being worn (or not worn) , poses, angles, use of props, distance of the camera to the subject, etc. In other words, to give each set of 10 a better VARIETY. Now my "paint on the wall" was not only more carefully applied, but with more attention to detail. This makes it more interesting to view each set of 10 not only as a batch of pics in the pic gallery, but also as pic icons to open when posted in my thread with each post, and clearly when combined together in a collage.

If the dramatic increase in views per pic of my stuff is any measure, both of my pic posting changes have been very well received.

Champagne is a self-admitted popper of opium-derived pills (percs and roxys). An opiate is a downer and pinpoints the pupils, as Giani pointed out for us. However, I agree with you: the look on her face and in her eyes was alluring and magnetic. [/QUOTE]I agree. The changes are for the better. Definitely more artisic.

[QUOTE=KantDelay;1105133]SuperE. I admire all your work. Truly. This one drives me SO crazy. Great stuff. I could look at her pics all day. And the services you describe from her makes me want to drive three plus hours to find her. Thanks.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for your props.

Looks are not everything. I have slept with women who were 12s on a scale of 10, and it was like fucking a bored piece of cardboard. For me, everything starts with attitude. If a woman has a great 'tude then that covers a lot of other flaws she might possess. Assuming a given of impeccable hygiene, and a great attitude, everything else is gravy. Looks are an important "gravy" to be sure. After all, I hate to eat my turkey and mashed potatoes dry. Throw in some fresh beans, biscuits and cranberry sauce (sexual skills) and you have a feast worth remembering. Champagne had it all: CLEAN and WHOLESOME (a SW doesn't get any better) , a WONDERFUL and WARM personality, an absolutely GORGEOUS face and body, a love of FILTHY, DIRTY conversation, an erotic PLAYFULNESS capable of awakening the dead, and sexual abilities that are OFF THE HOOK!

Cephlapod Love pointed out a little while ago that I had taken some better money shot pics of Candace than I posted for her in my money shot contest in September. I recently re-posted a good money shot of Candace as a reminder pic when someone voted for her a Best MILF, and Giani included this shot in his collage, which discussed pinpoint pupils. Whew! Talk about "connections."

ANYWAY, all this talk about money shots, including Dripper's mentioning it again some time ago (we all know how much Dripper adores money shots) , reminds me that I promised you a reprise of my money shot contest as a special division of the BJ competition. Jen's "waterfall of cum" pic won the initial money shot contest. This time I thought I would change it up a bit by re-introducing the nominees, but then narrow it down to MY 5 favorites from the total field of 19. You aren't limited by my biases in any way; you can vote for whomever you like. Awards will be presented to the top 5 places, so, if the voting is too light, my top 5 favorites may just be the winners.

This part of the contest will be a little different. Since money shots are near and dear to my heart, you can make up to 5 votes in priority order. Votes will be "weighted" by the place in which they are voted (a weight of 5 for your first place vote. 4 for your second place vote, etc.).

Here is the first group of 10 nominees for the money shot contest out of a total of 19. They are shown in no particular priority order. The number associated with each pic is the alphabetical order of the nominee.

This is a mosaic collage of the first 10 nominees just posted.

The second and final group of nine nominees.

Mosaic collage of last group of nine nominees.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1105248]Mosaic collage of last group of nine nominees.[/QUOTE]They're all outstanding money shot pics, but Sparkles gets my vote.

A collage of my 5 favorites, labeled in priority order.

[QUOTE=Hammerin;1105263]They're all outstanding money shot pics, but Sparkles gets my vote.[/QUOTE]Great! Sparkles was one of my top 5 favorites.

[QUOTE=Giani; 1105118]I told SE I might put together a collage of effects of stimulants on eyes. Roman women knew the effect of dilated pupils on their beauty, and would use Bella donna (a poisonous plant) on their eyes to dilate them. See if you don't think the women in the collage have attractive eyes! Dilated eyes indicate arousal, and doesn't that look good to us.

I picked up a few images from the web to illustrate the effect, and that classic image of the hottie hitting the dipper.

Oh yeah-and one image of a girl with her eyes rolled back! Whew. [/QUOTE]I did a very cursory review of SW eyes from my own album of pics, and, surely enough, there were a bunch with dilated pupils. I have compared them to an eye illustration with one normal pupil and one dilated.

It will be interesting to review my entire collection, and also to take some close-up eye pics on future dates.

I did a hot hard bodied spinner last summer. Girl was trouble but the small head thougth for the big one. She would get a 60 bag and sniff it up. Eyes would dialate like silver dollars. Pretty big and not attractive. She was so thin and such. Dam hard body but not worth the trouble on the snow. I always wonder if it got the best of her. She was a f in hottie. What an ass. But it was interesting to see the eyes change.

That is why I miss the Collage girls who were not into the drugs, just a good play for pay and they even enjoyed a good orgasm themselves.

Keep up the good posts you guys in this Fourm

Your posts of dates with "crack eyes" is right on the money. I have to say that the girl in the upper right of your 'dilated' collage has some of the hottest eyes I have ever seen. They not only say bedroom, but "push that big boy home!" For me, the eyes are in the upper echelon of sex organs, and are especially potent in being able to arouse.

Can you either give us the link to your original image post (of the upper right girl), or even better, reframe (at 646 x 646... wish the new software allowed higher resolution) and repost the picture to emphasize those eyes? My favorite quote from a butter-using provider was to call butter (crack) the "panties down" drug. You can imagine that quote stuck with me. She would attend the dipper just before taking care of business-intense.

The flood of compliments confirm our conclusion of the quality of your work. Your recent use of collage's raises it up a level. Good work, thanks from all of us droolers out here. But leave time away from the computer for 'other' activities, and take your camera!

Bravo.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1105299]I did a very cursory review of SW eyes from my own album of pics, and, surely enough, there were a bunch with dilated pupils. I have compared them to an eye illustration with one normal pupil and one dilated.

It will be interesting to review my entire collection, and also to take some close-up eye pics on future dates. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Amp Guide;1105382]I did a hot hard bodied spinner last summer. Girl was trouble but the small head thougtht for the big one.[/QUOTE]Been there, done that. LOL.

[QUOTE=Amp Guide]She would get a 60 bag and sniff it up. Eyes would dialate like silver dollars. Pretty big and not attractive. She was so thin and such.[/QUOTE]Usually, dilated eyes are very attractive, and a girl on a stimulant like coke would be a lot more fun than a girl on a downer like dogfood. (I used "horse" above only because it fit the line from the song, but the "snow" fits better in your particular case).

[QUOTE=Amp Guide]Dam hard body but not worth the trouble on the snow. I always wonder if it got the best of her. She was a f in hottie. What an ass. But it was interesting to see the eyes change.[/QUOTE]That may just have been her personality. I have known many coke or crack heads to just be off the wall normally, especially if they are younguns, but even more so when they are high. Read my report on "Little Bits," if you want an extreme example that I experienced. On our date her eyes were almost all pupil from recent crack hits.

[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=842815#post842815]"Little Bits" of Hell[/url]

Being with a girl high on a stimulant can be fun, but there can be such a thing as too high to enjoy, whether up or down the drug ladder.

[QUOTE=Amp Guide]That is why I miss the Collage girls who were not into the drugs, just a good play for pay and they even enjoyed a good orgasm themselves.[/QUOTE]Girls from the burbs or "working" their way through school, and looking to make some extra dough, are available on the Ave, but they tend to be in the minority. Whether we like it or not, the big driving force behind the number and variety of SWs on the K is the thriving drug business that surrounds the stroll.

[QUOTE=Amp Guide]Keep up the good posts you guys in this Fourm[/QUOTE]I just have a one-word reply to that: [url]Yeeeeeeeeeehawwwwwww[/url]!

[QUOTE=Giani]The EYES have it! (AND. We are amazed at your new level of posts.)[/QUOTE]Thank you for commenting positively on my number of posts. (Or, maybe you meant their improved quality? Thank you in either case). I do not seek some "number," like a score in a sports contest; I just have a lot to say, reports to make, and pics to post; it's my hobby and what I do. I recently blew right by 5000 pic attachments to my reports (including my NJ threads) without even noticing or mentioning it (until now) , and now I am rapidly approaching 6000. I suppose there are several reasons that I stopped celebrating 1000 pic anniversaries: they are coming so fast now that I hardly have time to blow out the candles on one cake before there is another; the total pic count is not really indicative of the number of original pic attachments when a good number are reprised (as for my contest) , collages, favorites, etc. It would be way too much trouble to just count the originals. Let's just say that there are a LOT, nonetheless.

Regarding quality: I have been having a great deal of fun with my contest, making collages and doing some extra things beyond merely reporting and photographically chronicling my exploits. So, I am happy that you are enjoying it.

[QUOTE=Giani;1105399]Your posts of dates with "crack eyes" is right on the money. I have to say that the girl in the upper right of your 'dilated' collage has some of the hottest eyes I have ever seen. They not only say bedroom, but "push that big boy home!"[/QUOTE]The girl you referenced was Jaime and the pic of her eyes was from an overall pic of her "pushing the big boy home," as you very accurately characterized. I have attached the whole pic of Jaime "gobbling" her Thanksgiving dinner: ME!

[QUOTE=Giani]For me, the eyes are in the upper echelon of sex organs, and are especially potent in being able to arouse.[/QUOTE]If anything I am a face and an ass man. I am attracted to a cute and pretty face and the eyes are an important part of that: so expressive.

[QUOTE=Giani]Can you either give us the link to your original image post (of the upper right girl), or even better, reframe (at 646 x 646... wish the new software allowed higher resolution) and repost the picture to emphasize those eyes?[/QUOTE]

I did exactly as you asked and re-posted the original 640 by 480 pic of Jaime (you can't post 640 by 640 here), as I noted above.

[QUOTE=Giani]My favorite quote from a butter-using provider was to call butter (crack) the "panties down" drug. You can imagine that quote stuck with me. She would attend the dipper just before taking care of business-intense.[/QUOTE]The "panties-down drug," I LOVE it! The butter helps to "slide" them off. :)

[QUOTE=Giani]The flood of compliments confirm our conclusion of the quality of your work. Your recent use of collage's raises it up a level. Good work, thanks from all of us droolers out here.[/QUOTE]Thank you. What was once a horrendously complicated task to create a collage has been made extremely simple for me by an additional piece of pic software. Now it is very easy and fun, so I am glad it is also appreciated.

[QUOTE=Giani]But leave time away from the computer for 'other' activities, and take your camera!

Bravo. [/QUOTE]This time of year the LE presence tends to be higher normally in Kenzo because of Christmas shopping and it is extra high because of this high profile Strangler business. So, it doesn't pay to be too visible and do too much trolling. However, I am still window shopping on the stroll and keeping my "eyes" peeled for gems.

[QUOTE=Mike Twist]Hit the ave from Harrisburg yesterday at 7pm and found- nothing It was completely (almost) deserted. I saw 1 or 2 girls out-total. I did see two TV vans doing live reports and a large LE presence which probably didn't help. Hope this is not a trend. [/QUOTE]I just noticed your post, but I thought it was worth some commentary.

7 PM is normally a prime time to go trolling under normal circumstances. It is after the rush hour, so you avoid the commuter mongers, and the evening girls are waking up from their naps and anxious to make some dough for their wake-up hits.

However, these are not "normal" circumstances. It is the Christmas season and LE presence is higher than it usually is in Kenzo to watch over the shoppers. Then there are the two criminals being sought by LEOs on the Ave, one of them being the now notorious Kensington Strangler. So, LE is out in force more than ever, and they are particularly watching the hot SW corners. Add to that the cold weather. SWs are well aware of the stepped up LE presence. With that and frigid weather they may only be inclined to do what is barely necessary to feed their habits, most especially if they have outstanding warrants. Also, be looking for them at some indoor haunts where they can dash in or even linger if permitted, and keep warm, like Martins, the laundromat, the DDs, McDs, other fast food joints, etc.

You didn't say how many passes you made on the stroll while still coming up empty. However, the K isn't like a vending machine. It can be hit or miss on the most pleasant day of spring or summer, or chock-full of possibilities. I have struck gold on occasion on my first pass, and I have made 7 to 10 loops before finding what I wanted. Sometimes the big fish are biting like mad, and sometimes you have to be patient.

[QUOTE=Vbgent4u2c;1105145]I agree. The changes are for the better. Definitely more artisic.[/QUOTE]Leonardo da Vinci is a name you probably all have heard. He was an Italian polymath: painter, sculptor, architect, musician, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist and writer. Leonardo has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man, a man whose unquenchable curiosity was equaled only by his powers of invention. He is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and perhaps the most diversely talented person ever to have lived.

I would aspire to be the kind of monger Leonardo would have been, had he been interested in our hobby. Maybe he did dabble as a monger too, but the times in which he lived frowned upon anything but total discretion in such endeavors. There is a hint of playfulness in this regard reflected in the ambiguous and subtle smile on his famous painting: "Mona Lisa." What he was not permitted to express directly, some say he did very cleverly indirectly in art such as this. :)

Today, of course, and especially on this website, we are not constrained by the nit-picky hang-ups of bygone eras, even though we do get some commentary from time to time that seems like a throwback to morality from the 50s. But that's all it is: a flapping of gums about outdated standards and nothing more. I can't be positive, but Leonardo was definitely a free-thinking rebel, and I would surmise it very likely that Mona Lisa just might be sucking on a cock if Leonardo painted his famous masterpiece today. Her mouth seems incredibly ripe for one.

SuperE,

Keep up the good work.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1105103]I couldn't neglect you amateur gynecologists! Here is a clear view of Champagne sliding my purple "instrument' up her cunny.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=YoHimBeBrother; 1105491]SuperE,

Keep up the good work. [/QUOTE]When you say "keep UP the good work." Do you mean: mongering, finding gems, taking pics, keeping my member "up," or all four? LOL :)

Okay SuperE, here goes:

5. Maddie. B movie horror porn like "Hairy Twatter" and my fav,"Throbbin Hood, Prince of Beaves."

4. Jessica. Yummy, yummy, I've got cum in my tummy.

3. Candace. Slurpee surprise.

2. Jen. Classic.

1. Leigh. Her face and hand gesture says it all.

La Chic

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1105436]I did exactly as you asked and re-posted the original 640 by 480 pic of Jaime (you can't post 640 by 640 here), as I noted above.[/QUOTE]The limitation of the OLD software was a 640 by 480 resolution (I think). I was mistaken in saying you can't post 640 by 640, because apparently you can. I have been reducing the resolution of my posted pics more than required ever since the new software was installed. Maybe I should re-post them all? LMAO :)

I missed two quotation marks and an attribution, and a rock thrower was cowardly enough to hide in another thread to throw his rock at it. And, he has the cahones to accuse ME of not having integrity? You get 60 minutes with this new software to edit a post. Mine tend to be on the long side, not to mention that I often write several long reports in succession. Much has the potential to be missed. If I bothered to correct all the mistakes of others who post in my thread alone, it would be a full time job. For example, there were numerous errors by the rock thrower in question: "their writing style?" Learn to combine a plural object with a plural subject. If you state a separate thought within a sentence: separate it from the rest of the sentence with a semi-colon and not a comma! Learn when to use commas in a sentence to separate whole thoughts; you tend to miss that a LOT! Learn to separate conjunction phrases from the sentence with commas (in fact, just study comma use, period; your command of punctuation SUCKS!). Learn to SPELL Leonardo da Vinci (NOT Leonardo di Vinci, DUH!). "Born 500 years too soon?:" this should have been connected to the sentence with a colon; it is NOT a complete thought.

I may have missed two quotation marks and an attribution, but I didn't lift my entire post from another source. The vast majority of it was creatively my own. Most importantly, I wrote it using good English!

I also didn't accuse you of having no integrity just because your English is piss poor. Your agenda was not to correct; it was to attack. There is a wide gulf between pointing out oversights and character assassination.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1105676]I missed two quotation marks and an attribution, and a rock thrower was cowardly enough to hide in another thread to throw his rock at it. And, he has the cahones to accuse ME of not having integrity? You get 60 minutes with this new software to edit a post. Mine tend to be on the long side, not to mention that I often write several long reports in succession. Much has the potential to be missed. If I bothered to correct all the mistakes of others who post in my thread alone, it would be a full time job. For example, there were numerous errors by the rock thrower in question:"their writing style?" Learn to have a plural object with a plural subject. If you state a separate thought within a sentence: separate it from the rest of the sentence with a semi-colon and not a comma! Learn when to use commas in a sentence to separate whole thoughts; you tend to miss that a LOT! Learn to separate conjunctions from the sentence with commas (in fact, just study comma use, period; your command of punctuation SUCKS!). Learn to SPELL Leonardo the Vinci (NOT Leonardo di Vinci, DUH!)"Born 500 years too soon? :" this should have been connected to the sentence with a colon; it is NOT a complete thought.

I may have missed two quotation marks and an attribution, but I didn't lift my entire post from another source. The vast majority of it was creatively my own. Most importantly, I wrote it using good English! [/QUOTE]Hey SE, no one likes a sniper and they usually get what they deserve. This is just a suggestion as you have helped me out several times over the last 6 months. Whenever I write something for here or my local paper I generally go to my word processor and write it and spell check it there first. Then I copy and paste to my post here. Keep up the good work, thanks for your tips and I hope that POS gets pulled over after some stem queen has stuffed all of her sjunk in his car.

[QUOTE=G Malav;1105679]Hey SE, no one likes a sniper and they usually get what they deserve. This is just a suggestion as you have helped me out several times over the last 6 months. Whenever I write something for here or my local paper I generally go to my word processor and write it and spell check it there first. Then I copy and paste to my post here. Keep up the good work, thanks for your tips and I hope that POS gets pulled over after some stem queen has stuffed all of her sjunk in his car.[/QUOTE]You make an excellent suggestion; however, sometimes I don't know before I start a post that I might feel inspired to do several, and I am a fast typist. The upside is that I can finish long posts quickly. The downside is that I don't always catch the oversights. However, I seem to have far fewer than this guy did.

Even if you use a word processor, and do all the corrections before pasting the post here, there are several self-correcting mechanisms in the new software that can make certain errors unavoidable if you don't know about them. For example, the software automatically assumes you meant "I'd" and not "ID" when you use that acronym. It corrects "da" to "the" (as in "da Vinci" to "the Vinci"). You will note that it did that in your quotation of my post before I had a chance to change it.

I have never attacked anyone for the picky shit that this guy did, and CERTAINLY NOT to make the leap from noting an oversight to a brazen accusation of having no integrity. However, if someone wants to come at me with this or any other crap, then I will give it right back in spades. He had enough grammatical errors in his post to make a third grader be ashamed.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1104368]Thank you for your thoughtful post, Gran Lenchote, and all the work and research you obviously put into it.

I have mongered in many cites across this country. I am sure there are a few cities where the local mongers would contend they have the best quality and variety of SW talent; however, IMHO, there are a few, if any, that come close to equaling what we have in the Philly area.

It's not really that there are that many gripers. It's just that the gripers are more vociferous in posting their nonsense than the far different perspective from the great multitude of more quiet supporters. I get dozens of PMs of congratulations and well wishes every day from all over the country. I have never gotten an angry PM even once since I have joined this website (of course now I will get one just so a griper can prove me wrong, LOL). The gripers prefer to be visible and post their poison for all to see. Griping in private seems to give them little satisfaction, because I can merely ignore it. The only negativity in a PM has come when I wouldn't give someone what he wanted, typically contact information. I have made my position on that matter pretty clear, but here is a link in case anyone missed it:

[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1103234&viewfull=1#post1103234]Getting Contact Information from Me[/url]

The griping has pretty much ceased since the Admin made a specific ruling about that nonsense. There were a few serial antagonists who seemed to have have a chip on their shoulder where I am concerned, and the Admin just got fed up with it. Here is the link to it:

[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1089133&viewfull=1#post1089133]Admin Comments on Criticism[/url]

I am glad, because I don't go rattling anyone else's cage and I don't appreciate it when they come and rattle mine. There apparently are still a few who didn't read the new ruling and continue to criticize. I don't mind some good-natured ribbing, but I am smart enough to distinguish between that and ill-intentioned criticism, which is now banned where I am concerned. I intend NOT to violate that in reverse by criticizing others, unless they attack me or a friend on the Board for what I believe are very misplaced and ugly agendas. That will be particularly the case where pic criticism is concerned. I have never criticized a pic anyone has ever posted in this Forum and I don't like it when others criticize pics, even when they aren't mine. These complaints usually come from members who have posted few if any pics themselves. My position on this is that; if you don't like the pics another has posted then post some of your own and demonstrate how it's done.

I have made this same argument, but pic complaints have little or nothing to do with logic and everything to do with envy. That is the ugly but simple truth.

We have a pic gallery for many reasons; I'd for the girls dated, and just to admire females sexily posed, naked, spread and showing us their cootchies, sucking, fucking, whatever floats your boat. However, some pic viewers think that their criteria for what should be shown should rule what others post. They should start their own pic gallery somewhere and administer it with their own rules.

"Free speech" is what complainers squeal about. They claim the right to their own opinions. But, there is a fine line between having your own opinion, and needlessly trampling on someone else. A classic, if extreme, example of that are all these nasty protests at the funerals and gravesites of those known or suspected of being gay. All of them are braying like donkeys about their "freedom of speech," while holding up lewd and insensitive signs and slogans of gay protest for the bereaved family and friends to see. I hope the Supreme Court rules to keep these silly assholes outside of a 1/2 mile zone of privacy from any funeral, funeral procession or internment ceremony. I guess you could say we have had our own such ruling here in a different context, as noted above.

You really did some work on this and have some good insights!

I have not been insensitive to reasonable and well-intentioned suggestions. For example, I used to block my pics in groups of 40-60 and often more with and after a report. Some complained that this was just visual overload and I agreed. I started to group them 10 at a time (now with collages and a favorite) and spread over time so they could better be visually absorbed and appreciated. I had another valuable suggestion that I was bunching the photos in time sequence such that there were a lot of a similar type together. So, within each set of 10 posted I started to vary the type and poses, and even the time sequencing for visual variety. This change quite dramatically increased the number of views per pic in the gallery, so I suppose the change has been successful and well received.

I spit up my coffee on that one. Bravo! It takes a few mouse clicks to very rapidly navigate the pic gallery, and they don't have to open my thread if they don't want to see a lot of pics, because, guess what, there will be a lot of pics!

This was never about how difficult I made anyone's life in the Forum by posting so many pics. It was always about how I should either conform to someone else's idea of what I should be or do, OR, MUCH more likely, pure unadulterated ENVY!

Guilty as charged. I don't go looking for trouble, but, if it comes looking for me, I am surrounded by a mine field with machine gun towers and missile launchers. I don't suffer fools gladly, and I have no compunction about ripping someone a new one if I feel like it. I can be a bit of a narcissist, but that is no crime. I don't bully others and kick sand in their faces on the beach looking for a fight (well, I admit that I did so once, but many didn't see that I was just demonstrating how easy it is to be a horse's ass in here and attack). I just do my own thing and go my own way. Am I opinionated? You bet! Some may think insufferably so. But, my opinions are not in the faces of others unless they attack first. My thoughts are just that, what I think. You are free to express your thoughts as you choose too. Just don't do it while spitting in my face.

That is extremely perceptive of you. 99% of the time they feel slighted because I wouldn't give them contact info for one reason or another. I have previously explained my position in this regard. Some members seem to take this very personally like they are entitled to get this information. So they take the pissing contest public in some way. One guy went off the deep end about this and started making very serious public and private threats, which, of course, is a big no-no in the rules of this Forum. For this he was banned.

These 'encounters' always seem to have a similar pattern: some member PMs me and tells me how much he admires my work, etc, and wants some contact information. I explain my position and even send him a link to my reports on this. He tries to convince me that he isn't one of the bad guys and would never do what that jerk did to me and I shouldn't let one guy spoil it for everyone else. I still refuse. Then come all the insults: I think too much of myself; I am a jerk, whatever. This, of course, is WONDERFULLY INTELLIGENT psychology to get me to change my mind and he takes it public to show in one way or another what an ass he thinks I am, and tries his best to 'pee in my Cheerios. ' Childish? : yes. But I suppose it is just human nature and stuff we all learned in Kindergarten.

I normally have a lot to say about most things, but about this I only have two words; no comment.

This is very prescient on your part and classic psychology. We hate most in others what we most hate in ourselves. Yes, I can come across as egotistical and a narcissist. Therefore, I draw criticism from the same. There is no mystery there. It isn't about changing me or explaining anything readers couldn't figure out or sharing information. It is about self-loathing. I am simply what their souls see in the mirror. They have a choice of torturing themselves or flogging me in writing. In either case they are exorcising their own demons.

You made perfect sense to me, even the part about my being a jerk and a narcissist on occasion, LOL. You did thorough research and you have keen insights (well, with a few exceptions I can't comment upon for Administrative reasons). Thank you for your diligent effort and well-reasoned opinions.

Same to you my friend. [/QUOTE]Not to mention that Super along with myself and many others here have donated time and resourses to this hobby.

PC out

In her bra and panties; topless; with ball gag; doggie view; spread with pacifier; licking and sucking my cock

Collage of the last ten pics posted.

Too many good ones in this set! ; here is one of her ass. It reminds me that I had both holes with that view! :)

Got to love the shot in the mirror with a view of her perky tits as well as her back tat.

Cutesy pic!

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1105712]Got to love the shot in the mirror with a view of her perky tits as well as her back tat.[/QUOTE]Is it me or is the tat on her shoulder really reversed?

[QUOTE=Seva Lurker;1105772]Is it me or is the tat on her shoulder really reversed?[/QUOTE]The short answer: yes, it is reversed.

There is a long answer, but it would bore the crap out of 99% of you. :)

In her bra and panties; topless; with a pacifier; with handcuffs; in the mirror; flexible spread; licking and sucking my cock

A mosaic collage of the last set of ten pics posted.

Again, so many good ones to choose just one fav, so I will choose several. But this one would have to be at the top of my list.

Champagne is cute as a button and here she has a "button" in her mouth to emphasize the point!

Or, is she doing MY thing? :) Last but certainly not least is my favorite cock sucking pic from the last set.