Bullshit that has Nothing to do With Pussy

[QUOTE=EyeEatAss;5666800]Alpha's go after weak, vulnerable people. They get average / homely women that cake on the make-up to look "somewhat" attractive. Alpha's have low self-esteem and try to compensate by being a "big" guy. Beta's have a higher IQ and make more money. The smart good looking girls are more attracted to beta's due to their intelligence and cool, laid-back demeanor.

Perhaps you'll learn that as you mature. This is coming from a now "beta" guy who has been in the "entertainment" industry and occasionally still is.[/QUOTE]You're defining alpha as a narcissist. Not all alphas are narcissists nor are all betas smart and make a lot of money. In fact a lot of betas are betas cause they're stupid and have no skills occupationally / socially. You can ad hominem attack me all you want but the psychological literature is quite clear on this. Women have 2 mating strategies, go after the best genes or go after the best provider. They get passed around the clubs go after the best genes when they're young. As the wall approaches they try to cash out w a beta provider. She will never have the same burning desire for the beta provider that she did w the alphas she met at the club. The top 5% of men have both good genes (at least phenotypically) and can provide as well, if not better, than the beta providers.

[QUOTE=LolBoat;5667793]No more than 5%, all races included but there are alot less alphas that are ashkenazi jews, asian or indians. Just being honest.

Plenty of betas get girls, they are just lucky to be tall and reasonably attractive and not completely socially inept. some of them are lucky to come from wealthy families.

[/QUOTE]Ok, only 5% are Alphas? So is the worry that there aren't enough women left for the other 95% of the male population? Or that women only mate with Alphas so only 5% of the population ever marry, unless they're tall and attractive and rich?

So according to this, the average man (who is neither an Alpha nor tall and rich) is unlikely to find a partner and marry?

[QUOTE=Jinurso;5668485]Ok, only 5% are Alphas? So is the worry that there aren't enough women left for the other 95% of the male population? Or that women only mate with Alphas so only 5% of the population ever marry, unless they're tall and attractive and rich?

So according to this, the average man (who is neither an Alpha nor tall and rich) is unlikely to find a partner and marry?[/QUOTE]On tinder men find women attractive on a typical bell curve distribution. Most women are near avg. Women think 70% of men are below avg. This is obviously impossible by definition. That doesn't mean only 30% of men get married but the other 70% is going to have a rough go of it for a while. Most women get passed around by the 30% in their 20's and then settle once their expectations become more in line w reality.

[QUOTE=SgtSlapaHoe;5667848]You're defining alpha as a narcissist. Not all alphas are narcissists nor are all betas smart and make a lot of money. In fact a lot of betas are betas cause they're stupid and have no skills occupationally / socially. You can ad hominem attack me all you want but the psychological literature is quite clear on this. Women have 2 mating strategies, go after the best genes or go after the best provider. They get passed around the clubs go after the best genes when they're young. As the wall approaches they try to cash out w a beta provider. She will never have the same burning desire for the beta provider that she did w the alphas she met at the club. The top 5% of men have both good genes (at least phenotypically) and can provide as well, if not better, than the beta providers.[/QUOTE]Sounds like you're a bit defensive (Beta characteristic perhaps? I'm not even going to go on about this. You treat women as if they are wh*res! Word of advice: Try going for Ladies!

[QUOTE=Jinurso;5668485]Ok, only 5% are Alphas? So is the worry that there aren't enough women left for the other 95% of the male population? Or that women only mate with Alphas so only 5% of the population ever marry, unless they're tall and attractive and rich?

So according to this, the average man (who is neither an Alpha nor tall and rich) is unlikely to find a partner and marry?[/QUOTE]LOL! Love it!

[QUOTE=SgtSlapaHoe;5668564]On tinder men find women attractive on a typical bell curve distribution. Most women are near avg. Women think 70% of men are below avg. This is obviously impossible by definition. That doesn't mean only 30% of men get married but the other 70% is going to have a rough go of it for a while. Most women get passed around by the 30% in their 20's and then settle once their expectations become more in line w reality.[/QUOTE]Ok, so only 5% are Alpha (too small a number for me to worry about), and most men get married at some point, so there's a lid for every pot, but the takeaway seems to be that as long as you're somewhere in the top 30% you should be fine. Is that about right?

[QUOTE=EyeEatAss;5668733]Sounds like you're a bit defensive (Beta characteristic perhaps? I'm not even going to go on about this. You treat women as if they are wh*res! Word of advice: Try going for Ladies![/QUOTE]Ad ho·mi·nem.

Adjective.

(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

" Perhaps you'll learn that as you mature" EyeEatAss.

That's text book ad hominem. So much for betas being high IQ.

[QUOTE=SgtSlapaHoe;5668994]Ad hominem.

Adjective.

(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

" Perhaps you'll learn that as you mature" EyeEatAss.

That's text book ad hominem. So much for betas being high IQ.[/QUOTE]Sounds like you used it as a noun. Pot meet kettle! You may be seated!

Why is the current generation so hung up on labels? And pronouns? A lot of good that will do when Xi and Putin take over. Smh.

No kidding.

[QUOTE=GaryMan;5669388]Why is the current generation so hung up on labels? And pronouns? A lot of good that will do when Xi and Putin take over. Smh.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jinurso;5668966]Ok, so only 5% are Alpha (too small a number for me to worry about), and most men get married at some point, so there's a lid for every pot, but the takeaway seems to be that as long as you're somewhere in the top 30% you should be fine. Is that about right?[/QUOTE]More or less and most men do not get married.

[QUOTE=Jinurso;5668485]Ok, only 5% are Alphas? So is the worry that there aren't enough women left for the other 95% of the male population? Or that women only mate with Alphas so only 5% of the population ever marry, unless they're tall and attractive and rich?

So according to this, the average man (who is neither an Alpha nor tall and rich) is unlikely to find a partner and marry?[/QUOTE]These days, yes it is unlikely. Marriage and birth rates are dropping off a cliff across all western countries. Online dating and de-based currencys are literally bringing out the barbarian nature of female mating strategies.

[QUOTE=LolBoat;5669790]More or less and most men do not get married.

These days, yes it is unlikely. Marriage and birth rates are dropping off a cliff across all western countries. Online dating and de-based currencys are literally bringing out the barbarian nature of female mating strategies.[/QUOTE]Show me some scientific evidence, this looks like incel bullshit justifying not getting laid before 20 if ever.

Or don't get remarried after a Divorce.

[QUOTE=EyeEatAss;5669313]Sounds like you used it as a noun. Pot meet kettle! You may be seated![/QUOTE]"You can ad hominem attack me."

"Attack" is a verb. "Ad hominem" is an adverb. The only noun is "you".

Adverb: ad hominem.

1. In a way that is directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

"these points come from some of our best information sources, who realize they'll be attacked ad hominem".

I'm don't dude.

A. K. A. (Also Known As) hitting "The Wall. " After age 35 women get in desperation mode for finding a suitable man.