Yea, if you have to go, go for ss only
[QUOTE=Sid63;7463515]Yes, this is her. Just like the pics.
150 for SS. It is expensive. She is quite mechanical. But like I said she's totally reliable, safe, good comms, easy to book if you have a short window to work with.
I've never gone longer than SS.[/QUOTE]I booked for 1 hr, I hardly get anything more than a SS. I personal didn't like the service and won't return. But she is real and legit.
Oh, that's why I think I have saw her pictures before
[QUOTE=FaslFasl;7466659]Saw her a few times when she was doing the sugar baby thing on Seeking. She was better experience then and never even mentioned condoms. Everything was always more of an escort experience though and I stopped contacting her because the time spent together and getting a room wasn't worth it.
When I saw she started advertising on the escort sites, I reached out from a different number and booked a SS for cheap, since that's pretty much what we use to do anyway. It was a very different experience. Looks so much worse. Heavy usage. Went into the bathroom to smoke before like others have said. Insisted on condom even though we've done it without before, and she remembered me. Overall I just couldn't believe how much worse she looked. Pictures are way off. I wrote her off at that point.[/QUOTE]So apparently from seeking.
Is she legit and worth the visit?
[URL]https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/3139206132[/URL]
Women in ad are not the same as provider
[QUOTE=Incognito1234;7469391]Wow! I thought those ads were just a representation of someone who looks similard. It's great that you were able to see the actual women in the ad.[/QUOTE]I don't think he was saying the provider was same as girl pictured in the ad. I've never had a date from one of those ads that were the same girl in the ad.
Happy hunting.