BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=Niceguy52;1259588]Have not seen her. Was tempted. Saw her profile on Naughty Reviews. She has one review and quess what? Her review was written by the same person as her own profile. Sent a private message to let them know that this was very odd LOL. Never heard back. I would stay away.[/QUOTE]That is always curious, and it has kept me on the sideline for a while with at least one that turned out to be the real deal and so much more satisfying than a quick snack, but their set up if the girl hasn't been snagged from a post somewhere by the site it kind of acts like " the you know review" in that you fill in the name, ad and stats to start your review, so possible legit, but would make me think twice. It does seem to be the guy that got booted in a bunch of drama, and it suddenly occurs to me who that drama might have been with, mmmm, also makes me think that a distant connection that was only a odd feeling I got might be more than just imagination. Might also explain why a guy I know got quoted $$$$$ just to see it basically then got a call back that for another $$ he could at least taste it. Now I am going to have to give it some thought, when I started typing all I was going to do was mention the protocol for nr reports. The reviewer has thrown up some new AMP reports on there lately also, and if his profile pic is accurate I would guess some providers might be charging him a higher rate than someone like myself.

Kayla

That's not her in the pic.

BFDeal.

Quote Originally Posted by Heritage View Post
Well, Ilapp's negative report on Kayla must have at least gotten her attention. In her new ad, she basically says she has behaved badly, is sorry, has been humbled, and will be better now. Those are her most flattering pictures. Any takers? Not sure I will repeat for a while.

Heritage.

http://indianapolis.backpage.com/Fem...ude-32/4794398



She now has a different number, is not using her name at all, and is using a pic that once again, looks breast appropriate, but is probably not her, and definitely not her at this point in time.

[QUOTE=Ilapp;1262107]She now has a different number, is not using her name at all, and is using a pic that once again, looks breast appropriate, but is probably not her, and definitely not her at this point in time.[/QUOTE]If she was the chick in the new pic, she'd put almost every other provider out of business (assuming she also had the services to match). Since the events that took place with you, the number changes AND false pics, why would anyone want to see her?

[QUOTE=Ilapp; 1262107]Kayla.

That's not her in the pic.

BFDeal.

Quote Originally Posted by Heritage View Post.

Well, Ilapp's negative report on Kayla must have at least gotten her attention. In her new ad, she basically says she has behaved badly, is sorry, has been humbled, and will be better now. Those are her most flattering pictures. Any takers? Not sure I will repeat for a while.

Heritage.

[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/Fem.ude-32/4794398[/url]

She now has a different number, is not using her name at all, and is using a pic that once again, looks breast appropriate, but is probably not her, and definitely not her at this point in time.[/QUOTE]The address does not work. Either you fat fingered it in or it is no long good.

I know it's not her in the pic because when I got up to her room (at hotel near airport back in, say December or January I think) , I saw this "fugly" (acronym for well, you know) hag of an older woman, probably in her late-40s. The pic she uses is of a woman who appears to be in her late-20s or early-30s. I told her I left my car running and ran to the elevator. This is what I've been preaching about in regards to backpage. Most of the women on there are scammers. If she returns to backpage, maybe she can come up with a more accurate name, like "Beefer" or "Summer Teeth." Sum are here, sum are there (yes, another acronym).

Now introducing my new walkoff line: It's not a real event until they serve beer.

BFDeal.

P. S. That's a slam on all these stupid festivals we're about to see advertised in newspapers and on grocery-store bulletin boards everywhere. Except for the festivals that actually serve boooooze.

[QUOTE=Fudge1;1262340]The address does not work. Either you fat fingered it in or it is no long good.[/QUOTE]

For the Hoosier mongers out there, go to [url]http://www.tineye.com/[/url] This will help you find out if the providers are using their own pics or someone else. Just enter the BP provider ad or upload the pic to see if it's legit. Hope this helps, stay safe.

Jiat2001

I saw this ad and was curious.

[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sky-4-lunch-must-see-new-in-town-420-friendly-19/4823851[/url]

So I researched and found this posted 2 days ago, don't if it is real, just thought I would share.

[url]http://illinois.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/warning-rip-off-sky-schuamburgs-finest-click-here-19-27/8801853[/url]

[QUOTE=Indyjim1970; 1263795]I saw this ad and was curious.

[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sky-4-lunch-must-see-new-in-town-420-friendly-19/4823851[/url]

So I researched and found this posted 2 days ago, don't if it is real, just thought I would share.

[url]http://illinois.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/warning-rip-off-sky-schuamburgs-finest-click-here-19-27/8801853[/url][/QUOTE]Good find! I wouldn't even risk it.

410 708 5069

It came up to two girls Eve / Eva and Kelly The number says Vegas Escorts but 410 area code is off the east coast in the Maryland area. The girl in Indianapolis is blond haired and named Kelly staying up in Castleton area and says she needs a DAAADY on BP. The other girl Eve / Eva is brown haired and much younger and supposedly in Vegas. I would be very leery of this Had contacted Kelly but believe I will pass after doing some research. Watch your backs out there gentlemen. This doesn't pass the smell test for me.

[QUOTE=Indyjim1970; 1263795]I saw this ad and was curious.

[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/sky-4-lunch-must-see-new-in-town-420-friendly-19/4823851[/url]

So I researched and found this posted 2 days ago, don't if it is real, just thought I would share.

[url]http://illinois.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/warning-rip-off-sky-schuamburgs-finest-click-here-19-27/8801853[/url][/QUOTE]Nice GOOG work! I keep seeing her pics and she apparently can't be photographed without her tongue hanging out like a retard. I wonder if she thinks that's "hot." If so, someone needs to correct her.

[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/looking-for-a-great-therapeutic-massage/4733041[/url]

Anyone seen her. I emailed her. She seems nice but just covering all bases.

Since the CL review thread is dead, I'll post this here.

I went to see Kat today. She's not a small woman, and not especially attractive, but she give the best massage I've ever had. I'll definitely be coming back to her when I'm in town again.

She operates out of her apartment in south indy. I didn't feel threatened or anything. .60 for the hour, extra to be had. I walked out for $.10.

If any body has any inquiries, feel free to PM.

[QUOTE=IrishLaddie; 1255361]Well,

A few weeks ago, I had the misfortune of being stood up at the door for the first time by a provider who got spooked about me being LEO, but since we have worked that out. One thing however was she sent me a invite to become a member of P411 for a free trial offer. All I had to do was get some references to answer on my behalf and it was all good.

Well I used four non P411 girls and one that was a member of the sight (who was a sweetheart for doing so). Now, P411 contacted me and said the only one they could use was the member provider and instead wanted to know my work information unless I saw another P411 member who would give me a reference.

HELL to the FREAKING NO! Why the hell would they need my work info? But, I could instead pay the $85 bucks and that was cool. Like some LEO a hole wouldn't pay $85 to get info?

I understand the need for the verification process, I just think it was a scam to ask me about where I worked.

Maybe I am wrong.[/QUOTE]P411 is one of the three well-established verification networks out there (the other two I know of / use are Roomservice2000. Com out of Chicago and Date-Check. Com). It's based in Canada, where the only thing illegal are brothels. It's key security feature is system emails. A lady knows if she gets an email thru the system that the guy making a date request is at least using the system and not just passing along someone else's I'd as his. Nothing's foolproof. Gina keeps on top of things, and if someone gets thru, she takes the necessary steps to keep the rest of us safe. I've been a member for a few years. So many hot providers on P411 (8400+ total listings, more than D-C and RS2K combined, I believe) I could never see them all, LOL (mostly outside of Indiana, but there are a few really good Indy-based girls on there such as Abby / Abra).

Just because you got P411 without a second P411 escort to vouch for you doesn't mean you won't be scrutinized by potential dates. Some require more vouches than others. On Date-Check, some girls will only see "Gold" or "Platinum" level guys, etc.

From the Info page: There are two levels of membership; basic (verified only) and basic plus (verified with at least one "OK"). In the future we may also add a "premier" membership that includes a more thorough background check, for those providers with extra safety and discretion requirements.

Hammer

[QUOTE=Jiat2001; 1262995]A way to check if the pics are accurate.

For the Hoosier mongers out there, go to.

[url]http://www.tineye.com/[/url]

This will help you find out if the providers are using their own pics or someone else. Just enter the BP provider ad or upload the pic to see if it's legit. Hope this helps, stay safe.

Jiat2001[/QUOTE]Suppose a girl in California and a girl in New York are using the same pic they lifted from a girl in Texas. Suppose the girl in Texas is really the girl in front of the camera. Suppose that pic has been on all three sites long enough for Tin Eye to captured them in its inventory. With that said, entering any one of these pics into Tin Eye will / should result in the other two being found. So now we know that three girls have that same pic on their site. But, there is no way Tin Eye can tell us that the girl in Texas is the girl in front of the camera and the California and New York girls are the pirates.

[QUOTE=Golfcart;1266039]Suppose a girl in California and a girl in New York are using the same pic they lifted from a girl in Texas. Suppose the girl in Texas is really the girl in front of the camera. Suppose that pic has been on all three sites long enough for Tin Eye to captured them in its inventory. With that said, entering any one of these pics into Tin Eye will / should result in the other two being found. So now we know that three girls have that same pic on their site. But, there is no way Tin Eye can tell us that the girl in Texas is the girl in front of the camera and the California and New York girls are the pirates.[/QUOTE]Theoretically, that could easily happen. In my experience, however, either all the girls are using fake pics (scammers) , the provider has moved to another city (traveling or moving on) , or there is no provider (camgirls).