Escort Reports

[QUOTE=Shampoo55;4932267]Hey Amigo, I don't know you and have no idea how experienced you are in the hobby, but the whole story sets my Spidey Senses on red alert. fwiw

First, what does being verified on a website have to do with ones personal safety? My point is that a scammer can sign up, LE can sign up, an alien can sign up, my dog can sign up! lol. So from this chair "verified" means only a very little. One had to send their ID to that Elkton website to "get verified" and that didn't stop LE from doing that, signing up for the site and "getting verified!"

Second, in my experience the addition of a 3rd party into the mix is a HUGE red flag. If some dude met me in the parking lot and not the girl, I would thank him politely and immediately leave! Too many things could go wrong under that scenario.

Again, when a girl tells me she is from out of town, I have a jaundiced eye toward the situation. I want to see she is reviewed and a good provider, not a hit it and quit ripoff artist.

Everything the guy said sounds like a scammer to me. A slick scammer will accuse YOU of being the shady character in order to divert your attention from the fact that they are the scammer. That's just scammer 101 : put you on the defensive. [/QUOTE]Thanks but I'm not new to this. It was risky but just thought I'd TOFTT. Someone's got to do it. And yeah I agree that getting verified doesn't guarantee anything or stop one from hurting the girl but why would you give someone your identity and then assault or rob them. Kittyads says they verify your I. D. , not sure what that means but it's better than nothing. And some higher end girls / agencies require screening. I thought it was more like that. BTW, he didn't think I was shady, he thought I was some other guy in the lobby and that guy looked shady. And I didn't give any personal info basically just said I was self employed, which I am.

As for 3rd parties, girls usually have a friend / pimp that usually looks after them. So that could always be an issue. But yeah you usually don't meet them beforehand. I don't think he was originally going to meet me if I was verified. I just don't get what the point of verifying is if this is a scam they run.

[QUOTE=UofDGuy;4936640]I've seen Gina before but she isn't a fan of DATY.[/QUOTE]That sucks. It's like a guy turning down head. And guys like me that are into DATY love huge labia. Who else is out there. With appropriate begging Serena will go for it and she has tasty large lips.

I'm not sure 'HUGE' describes Gina's labia. The do hang a bit sorta like Katie for those who know her. I guess if you don't get out much, you might call that huge.

My memory of Gina is when she asked me for my favourite position. When I told her, she said '69 is not a position'. I'm like WTAF? LOL.

[QUOTE=Dbf3251;4937540]That sucks. It's like a guy turning down head. And guys like me that are into DATY love huge labia. Who else is out there. With appropriate begging Serena will go for it and she has tasty large lips[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HomeyD;4938439]I'm not sure 'HUGE' describes Gina's labia. The do hang a bit sorta like Katie for those who know her. I guess if you don't get out much, you might call that huge.

My memory of Gina is when she asked me for my favourite position. When I told her, she said '69 is not a position'. I'm like WTAF? LOL.[/QUOTE]I've seen lots of girls and I would put Gina and Katie in the really big labia box. So who qualifies as "huge" for you. Apparently I'm missing out on a girl with truly massive labia.

[QUOTE=Dbf3251;4939735]I've seen lots of girls and I would put Gina and Katie in the really big labia box. So who qualifies as "huge" for you. Apparently I'm missing out on a girl with truly massive labia.[/QUOTE]Doesn't do full, but breaker-six-nine is an option. I would definitely consider huge.

[URL]https://elkton.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/exotic/find-my-gag-reflex-challenge/880310935338[/URL]

[QUOTE=Dbf3251;4939735]I've seen lots of girls and I would put Gina and Katie in the really big labia box. So who qualifies as "huge" for you. Apparently I'm missing out on a girl with truly massive labia.[/QUOTE]I'm saying the Gina and Katie are more like #5 (maybe #4) but with less meat going on and not like the meaty single pic. Depending how this post renders. Of course you could Google 'large labia' for a fuller spectrum. Haha.

[QUOTE=HomeyD;4940893]I'm saying the Gina and Katie are more like #5 (maybe #4) but with less meat going on and not like the meaty single pic. Depending how this post renders. Of course you could Google 'large labia' for a fuller spectrum. Haha.[/QUOTE]Fair point, but tjeu are definitely bigger than 4. So what provider has those Guiness Book of World Record meat flaps. I mean. I've easily played with 100 pussies and they are definitely top 10.

[QUOTE=DixieNormous69;4937255]Thanks but I'm not new to this. It was risky but just thought I'd TOFTT. Someone's got to do it. And yeah I agree that getting verified doesn't guarantee anything or stop one from hurting the girl but why would you give someone your identity and then assault or rob them. Kittyads says they verify your I. D. , not sure what that means but it's better than nothing. And some higher end girls / agencies require screening. I thought it was more like that. BTW, he didn't think I was shady, he thought I was some other guy in the lobby and that guy looked shady. And I didn't give any personal info basically just said I was self employed, which I am.

As for 3rd parties, girls usually have a friend / pimp that usually looks after them. So that could always be an issue. But yeah you usually don't meet them beforehand. I don't think he was originally going to meet me if I was verified. I just don't get what the point of verifying is if this is a scam they run.[/QUOTE]Hey, not trying to be argumentative, but I could not disagree more. I guess it goes to show everyone has their own risk tolerance level. Hey that's fine, just not for me.

TOFTT is fine and encouraged, but within limits. I'd be aghast if a newbie decided to use TOFTT as a justification when their Spidey Senses were on high alert. But no, someone does not have to do it. Go into a bad situation and get injured, ripped off or arrested. Sigh. Any guys that decides to take that risk is fine, they just need to accept the fact taht at times things might not go as planned.

There are plenty of idiots out there so it is a facility to say the fact that a girl or her pimp got verified and that means they wouldn't rip off anyone. Think about it. What monger is going to complain to LE about getting ripped off by a prostitute? It is the perfect scam. PLUS, you really think LE would take such a theft seriously? Oh you were trying to do something illegal, patronize a prostitute, and she / they ripped you off? We'll get right on that! NOT! Even if you got injured or your ride damaged, there is a legal concept called "clean hands" which means don't go to LE or the courts for help / remedy when you started off doing something illegal.

What I think the dude was trying to do was to get you off your game or divert you focus or attention. He says, he thought you were someone else and might not allow you to see the girl. He could have said anything, but he wants you to let you guard down and get you thinking about anything else other than the fact that he's about to rip you off.

Finally, while a lot of girls might have handlers, boyfriends or dudes around, my experience suggests it is best to avoid those girls. If a girl has a "handler" then technically she is being "pimped" or trafficked and thus is a prime target of LE. We have all seen that that kind of activity draws some pretty powerful attention. So IMHO it is wise to avoid such situations if possible.

So no, the fact that KittyAds "verifies" a girl means nothing in reality. What can one do with that "verification" to stay safe? If I remember the original post, the KittyAds "verified" girl had a dude meet you, took your money and then stiffed you. So how did the verification process work out? Didn't sound like it helped, rather provided a false sense of security. So that is what I am trying to point out. Don't get a false sense of security from some online "verification" process. There are many ways to exploit something like that and the bad guys will figure out new ways every day to do that. So applying general "rules" is designed to keep one safe.

On the flip side of the coin, why would you send a copy of your D / L to a prostitution website to "get verified?" Oh sure I guess that could make a girl feel safer, but what happens if the website decides to post real names as associated with the prostitution website? What if the girl gets you real name and decides to extort you or call your wife, SO or employer? Maybe the website tries to extort you to have your data removed? Perhaps LE seizes the site and the data? Think it won't happen? There are examples around on each of these.

This is just how I see things and perhaps my view is too careful? Maybe others don't care about taking risks? Just trying to share another way to look at the situation as this site is about dudes helping other dudes. Maybe no one cares and don't mind losing money or getting attacked or arrested?

Happy hunting and above all be safe!

[QUOTE=HomeyD;4940893]I'm saying the Gina and Katie are more like #5 (maybe #4) but with less meat going on and not like the meaty single pic. Depending how this post renders. Of course you could Google 'large labia' for a fuller spectrum. Haha.[/QUOTE]This convo is now on a whole other level LOL.

So I've been working on a girl online but getting nowhere. Can't even get a response, I'd sware it was a number collector but it was a 302 number. She keeps posting even when Im trying to get with her.

Edit: she responded with a very confusing mssg. I hit her back we’ll see where this goes.

[QUOTE=Strange;4942143]So I've been working on a girl online but getting nowhere. Can't even get a response, I'd sware it was a number collector but it was a 302 number. She keeps posting even when Im trying to get with her.

Edit: she responded with a very confusing mssg. I hit her back well see where this goes.[/QUOTE]New pics posted are of a thick girl. Sent me some bs about having a handler so she can't meet people anymore. Pretty sure it just wasn't for her. Now she's asking for $20 prepayment. Hopefully eventually she won't be a scam. Haha just listening to myself. I'll just find a different chocolate spinner. This one is not worth the bs.

[QUOTE=Strange;4943576]New pics posted are of a thick girl. Sent me some bs about having a handler so she can't meet people anymore. Pretty sure it just wasn't for her. Now she's asking for $20 prepayment. Hopefully eventually she won't be a scam. Haha just listening to myself. I'll just find a different chocolate spinner. This one is not worth the bs.[/QUOTE]Must be something going around? Last SB want to-be I ran into was clueless, but certain she knew it all. Apparently what worked for her friend was gospel and how things are suppose to work. Friend had collected $5 K from some dude for college. But she wouldn't tell me over what length of time. Would never say what she was worth and kept asking for how much I had. That's a stripper or pro mentality and stupid approach as I'll pay what it takes for the right girl, but I'm not giving up a negotiating stance. Oh and started with I had to have CashApp or PayPal so I could send her money when she needed it or needed something, irrespective of meeting. Must have been a FinDom dude the GF had and was able to manipulate at will? Tried to help her see alternatives, but for someone seeking 'higher education' her mind was closed and locked tight.

I guess the nice thing about criminals and scammers is that they are usually not too bright and if the dude thinks with the big head, gets a bit of education on the hobby / scams, then they are easily avoided as you did. Sometimes it is just a matter of giving them anough rope, and not rushing into something.

[QUOTE=UofDGuy;4936640]I've seen Gina before but she isn't a fan of DATY.[/QUOTE]Sad to say Gina has gone downhill. She doesn't look as good as her pictures anymore (which are all old), has questionable hygiene, and she is a clock watcher.

[QUOTE=Lance547;4945795]Sad to say Gina has gone downhill. She doesn't look as good as her pictures anymore (which are all old), has questionable hygiene, and she is a clock watcher.[/QUOTE]My impression of Gina from a few years back was that she wasn't all that to start with: clock watcher, limited menu, poor attitude, etc.

But now she has gone down hill from there? Where do I sign up!? I just know I can get a better date than other dudes or "fix" her to get what I want! <sarcasm .

Thanks for the report / info. Hope others read & take heed.

[QUOTE=Antipooh;4939753]Doesn't do full, but breaker-six-nine is an option. I would definitely consider huge.

[URL]https://elkton.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/exotic/find-my-gag-reflex-challenge/880310935338[/URL][/QUOTE]"She" looks like a trans to me, that's probably why she doesn't do FS because you will find out.