Sugar Daddy Sites

[QUOTE=BlackBone;7563224]Good to know she is legit. Unfortunately I don't return to Cali until the 29th so. Opportunity missed.[/QUOTE]Ali seems like a GND pro. From all signs I'm seeing. She now is in Vegas FWIW.

[QUOTE=Rollory;7565802]Ali seems like a GND pro. From all signs I'm seeing. She now is in Vegas FWIW.[/QUOTE]There are UTR / Pros on any sugar site. She was on SDM too and was asking 600. I didn't bite. She's cute but not hot enough for 600. I've had girls with her looks or better in the 300/400 range off SDM. I'm not paying the extra "White girl tax". LOL Her menu was good though and was ok with swallow and CIP. The reverse image check on PIM looks like she did some camgirl stuff before.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7565832]There are UTR / Pros on any sugar site. She was on SDM too and was asking 600. I didn't bite. She's cute but not hot enough for 600. I've had girls with her looks or better in the 300/400 range off SDM. I'm not paying the extra "White girl tax". LOL Her menu was good though and was ok with swallow and CIP. The reverse image check on PIM looks like she did some camgirl stuff before.[/QUOTE]I LOL'd at that "White girl tax" comment! Yeah, I would agree about that being a bit high. I'm really trying to keep my max at 400 regardless. Oddly enough, she never showed up in my searches near me here in LA, but I do keep the height filter set pretty low (I prefer really short girls) so maybe she's taller than what I've set.

[QUOTE=Grail47;7565870]I LOL'd at that "White girl tax" comment! Yeah, I would agree about that being a bit high. I'm really trying to keep my max at 400 regardless. Oddly enough, she never showed up in my searches near me here in LA, but I do keep the height filter set pretty low (I prefer really short girls) so maybe she's taller than what I've set.[/QUOTE]LOL There's an Asian girl tax too but not as bad as the White girls. This chic Ali is petite at 5'3". I like my girls at any height. Especially at extreme tall or very petite. I've had quite a number of 5'10"/5'11" girls with sexy long legs. And tiny spinners. If this chic had been a cuter "American" blondie next door type. I might have paid that tax. LOL But only if time was a few hours and the menu was good.

Some Japanese sugarbaby pussy for ya.

[QUOTE=RanManCan;7561669]"Sounds more like" is an example of a copular verb, Edgar Allan Poe.

FarFarAway is well aware MPs aren't on Seeking. He said that because doesn't like the transactional stuff on seeking as it brings too much attention to the site.

Besides, leave the old guy alone, he's only got so many days and pussy encounters left.[/QUOTE]Dude, you need to clear your inbox.

I'm curious about these girls on SDM, some who've messaged me back at least once, others were figuring out details. Has anyone here had encounters with any of them?

Kitty:

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=72397684[/URL]

Wants 600 ppm.

Deena.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=74559928[/URL]

Started messaging, but not good comms.

Sophie.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=74569700[/URL]

Started messaging, but not good comms.

Vanessa.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=74413775[/URL]

Started messaging, but not good comms.

[QUOTE=Grail47;7568792]I'm curious about these girls on SDM, some who've messaged me back at least once, others were figuring out details. Has anyone here had encounters with any of them?

Vanessa.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=74413775[/URL]

Started messaging, but not good comms.[/QUOTE]I've talked to Vanessa but she went quiet. Last message was she wanted something consistent. Which I do offer but as ppm. Guessing she wants an allowance. I see she has now a comment that's hidden. Usually that means a daddy may have gave her a negative comment and she hid it or the daddies profile is hidden. So be a little wary when you see that on a girl's profile. She at least did say she's open to intimate meet ups. No money talk.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7568975]I've talked to Vanessa but she went quiet. Last message was she wanted something consistent. Which I do offer but as ppm. Guessing she wants an allowance. I see she has now a comment that's hidden. Usually that means a daddy may have gave her a negative comment and she hid it or the daddies profile is hidden. So be a little wary when you see that on a girl's profile. She at least did say she's open to intimate meet ups. No money talk.[/QUOTE]OK, thanks much for the feedback! I can report back on the others if there are updates.

So, I've been messaging with a new SB and due to the distance, we might try to meet up at a spot equidistant between us. I know of "day use" hotels and figured that this is the best option. Has anyone here had experience with renting a room at the day use hotels? Any recommendations in the Montebello or Whittier area?

I am so sick of seeing this on profiles. It is everywhere. What do these chicks mean by it?

My intention is to bang your little brains out. It is as simple as that. But that surely isn't (only) what they want, they want to be courted too, mostly.

[QUOTE=Grail47;7572587]So, I've been messaging with a new SB and due to the distance, we might try to meet up at a spot equidistant between us. I know of "day use" hotels and figured that this is the best option. Has anyone here had experience with renting a room at the day use hotels? Any recommendations in the Montebello or Whittier area?[/QUOTE]If the site is [URL]dayuse.com[/URL]. From looking at their average prices it doesn't seem that far off from paying full price. The low prices around 60/70 I'd just get a Motel 6 at that price for the whole day. The benefit I'm really only seeing is if you need a room early before usual check in times of 2/3 pm. If you need a room around noon or earlier in the morning. Whenever I've needed a room I've always tried to keep it under 100. I've usually spent 40 to 80 on average. Sucks that hourly motels are being phased out big time to curb prostitution. But street hos will always be around. LOL.

[QUOTE=Grail47;7572587]So, I've been messaging with a new SB and due to the distance, we might try to meet up at a spot equidistant between us. I know of "day use" hotels and figured that this is the best option. Has anyone here had experience with renting a room at the day use hotels? Any recommendations in the Montebello or Whittier area?[/QUOTE]No recs in that area, but have used dayuse once. Got a room for 10-2 pm and when I checked in the manager said to just call direct and ask for a day rate room. He quoted a little less than the dayuse rate.

So you may want to call around to motels and see if they offer day rates.

[QUOTE=Domelike2020;7573150]No recs in that area, but have used dayuse once. Got a room for 10-2 pm and when I checked in the manager said to just call direct and ask for a day rate room. He quoted a little less than the dayuse rate.

So you may want to call around to motels and see if they offer day rates.[/QUOTE]This all helpful info, thanks much! We've got plans to meet up on Monday, so I still have time to check around. I hope it will be a fun midday excursion!

[QUOTE=Domelike2020;7573150]No recs in that area, but have used dayuse once. Got a room for 10-2 pm and when I checked in the manager said to just call direct and ask for a day rate room. He quoted a little less than the dayuse rate.[/QUOTE]10 am to 2 pm is the usual sweet spot meet up times for me too. Especially if a girl is a little far away. I rarely get a room nowadays unless they're about an hour away. But I've also brought those girls home if they were cool with it. I mostly bring a girl to my house now or have some car fun with them. That timeframe is good to hopefully avoid rush hour traffic which happens on the weekends unfortunately nowadays as well LA traffic sucks all the time now.

[QUOTE=Calorie;7575523]That is called answering a question that no one asked. Kind of like a false exculpatory statement.[/QUOTE]To actually answer your question:

No. She is way out of the typical range for potential sugar baby arrangements. Too old, too expensive, too dominant (yes, she can act submissive for pay, but she's not at all naturally submissive), and too public. She is not a good fit for what I (and probably most here) find works best in sugar arrangements. Younger (18-28), less life experience (especially upscale experiences), less secure financially, and more comfortable letting her SD lead, plan and control dates and other activities, including under the sheets are the "sweet spot" of sugaring.

For most (or at least for me), strong masculine mindset women, especially dominant and independent women make for poor sugar arrangements. These women attract simps, not Daddies.