Good pooce.
Printable View
Good pooce.
[QUOTE=AmgPhilly63;7463513]They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.[/QUOTE][BLUE]It's all about CC processing. Banks prohibit sites that talk about prostitution from having merchant accounts. Since Fosta/Sesta passed its worse. Seeking/Cuddle Comfort do that so they can keep processing payments. They know exactly what is going on on their sites as do their banks but because they pull a Louis Renault (obscure film reference) whenever they catch somebody "Prostitution on our dating site, we are SHOCKED I tell you, SHOCKED."
It's as simple as that.
A2[/BLUE]
[QUOTE=AmgPhilly63;7463513]They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.[/QUOTE]Uncertain about the accuracy of this. Both seeking and what'syourprice are from the same parent, W8 tech. The information I was able to find from the CC site is:
Registered in England & Wales No. 12081037.
Registered Address:
Cuddle Comfort Ltd, International House, 12 Constance Street, London, E16 2 DQ, United Kingdom.
I was on WYP for a while, I was having an easier time paying for my membership w / prepaid debit card. Their sites use the same payment processor. However, that hasn't generally proved to be the case, and I'd say paying the membership is a crapshoot.
The site itself says to pay using Google pay on the Android version of the phone app.
I just noted the motto that comes up when you log on now.
You know what you want, find it on seeking.
Of course, read literally this is mild, but this is the game they play, to tease what it is without being overt.
And the policing is so random and selective, it is admittedly very very frustrating. However, women seem to like it and know it best, so that is why we go there.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463165]Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.
Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.
Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:
References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."
Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.
Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.
They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.[/QUOTE]I have adjusted my intro letter. Now there is no mention of anything that could be construed as ppm or any other "arrangement". But I do allude to having fun in a way that no one can misconstrue as anything other than hitting the FC. If they respond I go straight to txt. No problems the last few months I been doing it this way.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463871]Uncertain about the accuracy of this. Both seeking and what'syourprice are from the same parent, W8 tech. The information I was able to find from the CC site is:
Registered in England & Wales No. 12081037.
Registered Address:
Cuddle Comfort Ltd, International House, 12 Constance Street, London, E16 2 DQ, United Kingdom.
I was on WYP for a while, I was having an easier time paying for my membership w / prepaid debit card. Their sites use the same payment processor. However, that hasn't generally proved to be the case, and I'd say paying the membership is a crapshoot.
The site itself says to pay using Google pay on the Android version of the phone app.[/QUOTE]Thats nice. Well I got news for you. It is ABSOLUTELY the same people behind it. I created an account on there and within 10 minutes my cc account was banned. I immediately filed fraud chargebacks with my card and stuck it to them.
Did you get banned?
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463165]Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.
Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.
Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:
References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."
Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.
Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.
They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.[/QUOTE]
Yes, they have double standards in banning people. It is at their own discretion.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463894]I just noted the motto that comes up when you log on now.
You know what you want, find it on seeking.
Of course, read literally this is mild, but this is the game they play, to tease what it is without being overt.
And the policing is so random and selective, it is admittedly very very frustrating. However, women seem to like it and know it best, so that is why we go there.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7467695]Did you get banned?[/QUOTE]I did not, but I am sure my account has a demerit against it, and if there were to be another accident (truly, I am no whoremonger and I really try to be careful), I'm sure that profile would be history.
How are autistic men like me supposed to get laid now?
The demographic cliff is pretty much here. Birthrates started dropping off in 2007 when the housing market collapsed so expect there to be alot less younger girls and alot of the 30-45 crowd now.
The 2010 through 2017 period was FIRE.
[QUOTE=Ghost323;7458703]Hi Gents. Anyone met with this one on Sugardaddymeet? Goes under Cheekymiss. She comes off a bit pushy. Sent number within first few emails and a bit pushy to meet. Lives in Burbank and giving pro vibes.[/QUOTE]She will only allow you to pop once and will push you to finish quickly. Additionally, she always has something else to do after you pop and can never stay for long. Don't even think about a second round. She needs everything cover. Make sure you don't give her anything until everything is finished. If you do, she'll find an excuse to leave immediately and won't answer your calls or texts afterward. She only responds when she needs help. By the way, if you don't like the smell from 420, it's better to see someone else, as she is a heavy smoker.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7468934]I did not, but I am sure my account has a demerit against it, and if there were to be another accident (truly, I am no whoremonger and I really try to be careful), I'm sure that profile would be history.[/QUOTE]You got lucky there. It's getting very hard to get back on once you're banned.
Let me know if you guys need me to share some new methods to get back on Seeking once you're banned.
[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7473447]Let me know if you guys need me to share some new methods to get back on Seeking once you're banned.[/QUOTE]How you are able to get passed selfie check, I believe they do retina scan and immediately bans new profile.