Sugar Daddy Sites

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7458793]I've messaged with her. Requires condoms for everything. Pushy too with me. I passed. Might be pro.

Point of me looking for non-pros and sugarbabies is to fuck with no rubbers and get that GFE. Just had a new petite baby from the site yesterday at my house. That pussy felt great and with no damn rubbers! LOL. Pics and videos of her sucking and riding me. Ooooweee![/QUOTE]Yeah I quoted her 150-200 per meet to get her off my back and it worked LOL. She got upset and rude. Blocked her number.

[QUOTE=Ghost323;7458918]Yeah I quoted her 150-200 per meet to get her off my back and it worked LOL. She got upset and rude. Blocked her number.[/QUOTE]LOL Wanting anything more than that per meet and requiring condoms is whack. Plus she's not that hot.

I mostly take the advice I give, but fall off the wagon now and then.

Don't report women on seeking, it comes to no good.

I was in touch w / someone from the site, and texting. She made it clear she was an escort (come to me, asked for a deposit in advance via Chime), not even close to a SB. So I reported her, with a screenshot of her texts saying this stuff.

I get an auto email thanking me for reporting her, and then a few hours later, that canned email that *I* have violated the community standards and have to watch a video on that. We'll see if that turns into even more trouble for that profile. They likely tally up demerits and if they have any more 'trouble' w / you, then ban the profile. I'll try to push back w / customer service, but they usually take the approach (if they ban you) that their decision is final and they won't explain why they did something.

I had a profile on What's Your Price a few months ago, and the exact same thing happened. There's no doubt W8 tech / seeking is a PITA to work with.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7459565]I mostly take the advice I give, but fall off the wagon now and then.

Don't report women on seeking, it comes to no good.

I was in touch w / someone from the site, and texting. She made it clear she was an escort (come to me, asked for a deposit in advance via Chime), not even close to a SB. So I reported her, with a screenshot of her texts saying this stuff.

I get an auto email thanking me for reporting her, and then a few hours later, that canned email that *I* have violated the community standards and have to watch a video on that. We'll see if that turns into even more trouble for that profile. They likely tally up demerits and if they have any more 'trouble' w / you, then ban the profile. I'll try to push back w / customer service, but they usually take the approach (if they ban you) that their decision is final and they won't explain why they did something.

I had a profile on What's Your Price a few months ago, and the exact same thing happened. There's no doubt W8 tech / seeking is a PITA to work with.[/QUOTE]Instead of screenshotting, if you can find their ad, include the link when you report. Usually works for me and they get banned.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7458793]I've messaged with her. Requires condoms for everything. Pushy too with me. I passed. Might be pro.

Point of me looking for non-pros and sugarbabies is to fuck with no rubbers and get that GFE. Just had a new petite baby from the site yesterday at my house. That pussy felt great and with no damn rubbers! LOL. Pics and videos of her sucking and riding me. Ooooweee![/QUOTE]Hey Lexx how'd you get to messaging on SDM? Doesn't it require photo verification nowadays to send a msg and even a like.

[QUOTE=FabricBuster;7460114]Hey Lexx how'd you get to messaging on SDM? Doesn't it require photo verification nowadays to send a msg and even a like.[/QUOTE]I have no problems doing a photo verification. Did that and the subscription and started messaging honeys.

Don't know about the like you're talking about. If you mean "matching" with a girl. That's not necessary. You can message any girl you want to.

[QUOTE=SugarLifeNow;7457340]Hey everyone Dave here, new SLN girl in Lakewood, her name is Nisha and she is 21. She can be submissive at times and is open minded. For example, she is not into anal but is willing to try, and she is not into girls but is willing to consider a 3 sum, would also consider MFM. She loves having her neck and behind her ear kissed, and being fingered. Not into rough sex as far as choking and slapping, but likes to be pounded. She likes giving head, just can't deep-throat, but is ok for CIM. OK for BBFS, but doesn't allow CIP. Low-Mid range PPM.

[URL]https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/Babygirlnisha/[/URL][/QUOTE]Imma try and give her a shot. Not into the chocolate variety too much ill admit but a young skinny submissive play thing is hard to say no to. I hit her up on seeking and dry convo though.

[QUOTE=Ghost323;7460180]Imma try and give her a shot. Not into the chocolate variety too much ill admit but a young skinny submissive play thing is hard to say no to. I hit her up on seeking and dry convo though.[/QUOTE]Don't be afraid of the dark side padawan. LOL Chocolate pussy is great pussy too. I have all the skittles flavors in my collection. LOL.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7460320]Don't be afraid of the dark side padawan. LOL Chocolate pussy is great pussy too. I have all the skittles flavors in my collection. LOL.[/QUOTE]I want to "thumbs up" this comment with an LOL! .

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7459565]Don't report women on seeking, it comes to no good.[/QUOTE]Totally agree! The last thing I want from Seeking admin is attention. I keep profile pics & text and I take a pic of all onsite messages I get and send. I also keep a full log of offsite texts I get up to a successful meet & greet with her. Hard drive storage is cheap. Begging Seeking admin for reinstatement is a PITA, unless you have a full record of evidence at hand.

Plus, in my experience, reporting bad actors, scammers, cat fishers and others rarely (perhaps never) results in that user getting punished.

Congrats. I just met up w / 'Christy' - (IK her real name too).

She's been singing the song w / me that she needs 1 K per meet, which seemed counter to your experience. We M&G after some significant hassle, she is in LA and took Uber (uber-expensive).

She stuck to her guns. She did mention she was a little submissive, likes getting spanked, but betrayed nothing like you experienced. I LFKed her, but that's it. She's still nice.

I'd just say, she fucked you for sport, so more power to you. The fact I am an old bald guy could have something to do with it.

[QUOTE=Dsteezy;7452173]I've had a pretty specific roster for a while. A live in who I've been with sometime. Spiritually / yogi spinner who's German / Jewish / Italian.

As well as this Polish older woman who just has me under her spell. Thankfully she enjoys the company more then what I want to provide financially, as well as another 19 white girl from Newport and lastly my bit of Latin spice. From Argentina born and raised.

While I will say this girl doesn't seem as new to the site as the what her profile will suggest. I will say that she was eager to please. Met up for some drinks at a hotel in South OC that has a nice bar as well as good food. Talked for 2/3 hours and then decided to enjoy the rest of the evening upstairs. She was extremely submissive, eager to please and could not get enough. Put 2 or 3 loads inside her that night and she asked to stay, which I agreed to. Only for her to wake me up and begging for me to go again in the morning.

Won't say what I had to provide but it was next to nothing and she's already reaching out to tell me she's sore but thinking of me and wants to meet again.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ee953e77-0bde-4b7d-aec2-fb2f1c0b5312[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Grail47;7460359]I want to "thumbs up" this comment with an LOL! .[/QUOTE]You got to taste the rainbow man! LOL Today is the last day of my sub on sugardaddymeet. And I have to say it's a worthy competitor to seeking and hella cheap at 50/ month. I have hooked up with two Latina girls, White girl and a Black girl. Have another Black girl ready to fuck. And finally a cute young Japanese girl that I'm about to close the deal on. Ages between 19 and 24. Reasonable ppms between 200 to 400. Plus a bunch of other ongoing conversations.

I'm stopping the sub because I want to see if SDM allows established conversations to continue after. One thing I hated about Seeking is once you stopped your sub. You couldn't keep an established conversation going. That is stupid as fuck and now at 150 a month even dumber and a lower value. Keeps the riff raff out?! LOL Don't give a fuck if someone thinks I'm riff raff. I put importance on the value something gives me in return.

SDM giving me 4 honeys to fuck in a month's time is a great return in value.

You Grey Poupon dudes. Keep wasting your money on seeking.

[QUOTE=Ghost323;7458703]Hi Gents. Anyone met with this one on Sugardaddymeet? Goes under Cheekymiss. She comes off a bit pushy. Sent number within first few emails and a bit pushy to meet. Lives in Burbank and giving pro vibes.[/QUOTE]She is or at least was on seeking too. Same deal, condoms for everything. I talked her down in how much and went to see her. Pics are old and she's gained a lot of weight since.

Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.

Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.

Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:

References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."

Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.

Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.

They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7463165]Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.

Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.

Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:

References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."

Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.

Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.

They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.[/QUOTE]They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.