[QUOTE=Desparado;4856400]So its not her in the pics then?[/QUOTE]Is it ever the pics of the girl? What keeps this interesting. What's behind door number 1? .
You're welcome for my TOFTT.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Desparado;4856400]So its not her in the pics then?[/QUOTE]Is it ever the pics of the girl? What keeps this interesting. What's behind door number 1? .
You're welcome for my TOFTT.
[QUOTE=Oramo;4856499]Is it ever the pics of the girl? What keeps this interesting. What's behind door number 1? .
You're welcome for my TOFTT.[/QUOTE]Sometimes. Better question is is she really a "spinner" when somebody calls her a spinner. Dudes just like to use and over use the word to the point where "spinner" ends up meaning not fat these days. She is listed as 120 while others I have seen there listed at 100 are not spinners. Sometimes people will use the word simply when a girl has small breasts, LOL.
[QUOTE=Desparado;4856923]Sometimes. Better question is is she really a "spinner" when somebody calls her a spinner. Dudes just like to use and over use the word to the point where "spinner" ends up meaning not fat these days. She is listed as 120 while others I have seen there listed at 100 are not spinners. Sometimes people will use the word simply when a girl has small breasts, LOL.[/QUOTE]Subjective term for sure. By spinner I mean small. Small frame, small waist, not tall. Thinner then the pics. Perhaps 105 lbs, b cups. Toned and a great figure.
Cannot say surprised but sad to see them go. They had some nice ladies, and kept 262 prices in check. Not many options in burbs now. Hope Better days will be here soon.
Anybody see this new gal Tamara? Looks like she is in Deerfield. Please give a review if you have seen her. She looks TGTBT.
Thank you!
[URL]https://classyladiesofchicago.escortbook.com/model-new-amazing-tamara-45504[/URL]
[QUOTE=BillFourFree;4858615]Anybody see this new gal Tamara? Looks like she is in Deerfield. Please give a review if you have seen her. She looks TGTBT.
Thank you!
[URL]https://classyladiesofchicago.escortbook.com/model-new-amazing-tamara-45504[/URL][/QUOTE]I 2nd that!!
This agency has some HOT little numbers. I want reviews damnit! I want to see someone while I wait for Madisen to come back.
[QUOTE=SAnderson75;4858887]I 2nd that!!
This agency has some HOT little numbers. I want reviews damnit! I want to see someone while I wait for Madisen to come back.[/QUOTE]I saw Tamara during her last visit. Cute girl and fun but not the one in the picture.
If you want hot like the picture, see Emily, Sonya, or Elin (who is thinner than the pictures).
[QUOTE=Oramo;4857462]Subjective term for sure. By spinner I mean small. Small frame, small waist, not tall. Thinner then the pics. Perhaps 105 lbs, b cups. Toned and a great figure.[/QUOTE]Yeah, she sounds OK, thanks for your review, not sure what "great" means, its so subjective, a "spinner" though doesn't just mean small or short, a spinner has narrow / slender hips, not just a small waist that turns into a bubble butt. There are few true spinners, but I agree it is a fun term to throw around.
[QUOTE=HandsomeGent47;4837278]Any intel on this one?
[URL]https://chicago.rubratings.com/170909[/URL]
Noticed she's near Lincolnshire and says she also offers doubles with a friend.[/QUOTE]Looks same as [URL]https://www.slixa.com/illinois/chicago/krystianarose[/URL].
[QUOTE=Desparado;4864215]Yeah, she sounds OK, thanks for your review, not sure what "great" means, its so subjective, a "spinner" though doesn't just mean small or short, a spinner has narrow / slender hips, not just a small waist that turns into a bubble butt. There are few true spinners, but I agree it is a fun term to throw around.[/QUOTE]Posts like these make me realize we need a better system for reviews.
How about we keep to something like this format:
Name of Provider:
Contact info / Angecy:
Face Ranking 1-10 "Describe face examples "GND" if she looks like a celebrity then point this out.
Body Ranking 1-10 "Describe Breast Size, overall body shape (Fit, Slim, Average), and any notable or un-notable features.
Massage Ranking 1-10 "Self Explanatory".
Personality Ranking 1-10 "Was she mechanical, easy to talk to, happy go lucky or super serious".
Summary of experience:
Describe your experience in detail.
Would you recommend: Yes / No and why.
I'm not a mod so I cannot enforce this rule but, this surely would help communication between mongers make it much easier to evaluate if you want to see her or not.
Thoughts, suggestions?
What's a Spinner to one is a BBW to another. We can generally all agree that a Spinner is a cute well proportioned super babe.
[QUOTE=AngelBravo;4865407]Posts like these make me realize we need a better system for reviews.
How about we keep to something like this format:
Name of Provider:
Contact info / Angecy:
Face Ranking 1-10 "Describe face examples "GND" if she looks like a celebrity then point this out.
Body Ranking 1-10 "Describe Breast Size, overall body shape (Fit, Slim, Average), and any notable or un-notable features.
Massage Ranking 1-10 "Self Explanatory".
Personality Ranking 1-10 "Was she mechanical, easy to talk to, happy go lucky or super serious".
Summary of experience:
Describe your experience in detail.
Would you recommend: Yes / No and why.
I'm not a mod so I cannot enforce this rule but, this surely would help communication between mongers make it much easier to evaluate if you want to see her or not.
Thoughts, suggestions?[/QUOTE]There's literally another site that does that in review format. This is more for quick updates, short reviews, and banter.
Dreamt of Zara at 262.
Latina about 115-120. I peg her age to be around 29, but she can pass as a 24 year old.
Face 7 - GND look, doesn't use much makeup if any at all. Curly short hair, possibly Puerto Rican. Reminded me with the hair like a latin version of the sister of Ferris Bueller. It could be an 8 to someone else but my ranking standards are pretty high given I'm young myself.
Body 8 - She's thin, has B Size, cute butt, few Tattoos all over, in all about 6. She has a nice figure but is very soft and not super toned. I can tell she had kids because of the saggier breasts, about 5'4".
Massage 6 - She's kind and soft but don't expect a masseuse.
Personality 10 - I'm ranking this the highest, as she was super friendly; very personable and not at all awkward. I can tell she wild is you want her to. Menu is obviously open but I like to play it safe so can't comment on that. This wasn't her first rodeo as I can tell she has had experience since backpage days.
This entire dream occurred at a decently nice Hotel, prices on site.
[QUOTE=AngelBravo;4867090]Dreamt of Zara at 262.
Latina about 115-120. I peg her age to be around 29, but she can pass as a 24 year old.
Face 7 - GND look, doesn't use much makeup if any at all. Curly short hair, possibly Puerto Rican. Reminded me with the hair like a latin version of the sister of Ferris Bueller. It could be an 8 to someone else but my ranking standards are pretty high given I'm young myself.
Body 8 - She's thin, has B Size, cute butt, few Tattoos all over, in all about 6. She has a nice figure but is very soft and not super toned. I can tell she had kids because of the saggier breasts, about 5'4".
Massage 6 - She's kind and soft but don't expect a masseuse.
Personality 10 - I'm ranking this the highest, as she was super friendly; very personable and not at all awkward. I can tell she wild is you want her to. Menu is obviously open but I like to play it safe so can't comment on that. This wasn't her first rodeo as I can tell she has had experience since backpage days.
This entire dream occurred at a decently nice Hotel, prices on site.[/QUOTE]I've seen her twice this year and had a similar experience. Personality was great. Will see again.
[QUOTE=ApplePiePussy;4866012]There's literally another site that does that in review format. This is more for quick updates, short reviews, and banter.[/QUOTE]Indeed, the value here is to vet for scammers and frauds. Ideally everyone will do their share of TOFTT and report back the girls who are outright scammers, liars. etc. Hopefully enough confirms will make it easier for the rest of us to avoid and thereby removing them from the market. It also follows that diamonds in the rough may not always be posted. Too many newbies and lurkers will pounce and flaw the diamond. One has to do their own mining.