News and Media Reports

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2836898]Makes you wonder about many of the providers. A claim that they wouldn't have had sex with him if they weren't high? As many here know, most of them do it to support their habits. The other question is how many of them allowed the pictures or videos at the time and now are claiming they didn't?

[URL]http://fox6now.com/2016/03/15/bradford-harrington-faces-29-new-charges-accused-of-getting-women-high-recording-sex-with-them/[/URL][/QUOTE]Several years ago, I went out for beers with this guy and several other members of this board. The guy fancied himself as the patron saint of female junkies. A normal monger would make the scoop and look for a place to park. This guy would make the scoop and head for a Mickey the's to feed the girl. He would feed, cloth, and bathe these girls and give them money and even a place to sleep. He had quite an extensive photo collection back then and I would guess that by now he probably knew almost every street walker junkie in town. I'm guessing that LE knew his car and were waiting for him to make a pickup. They probably interrogated the girl seperately who threw the guy under the bus (junkies are not known for a sense of gratitude).

I'm sure his photo collection was even more extensive when he was stopped. . It is easy to imagine other SW's piling on to avoid arrest. This guy's life is ruined. Not because he is evil, but because he failed to respect the boundaries that are essential to this hobby.

[QUOTE=DewPoint4157;2838482]Several years ago, I went out for beers with this guy and several other members of this board. The guy fancied himself as the patron saint of female junkies. A normal monger would make the scoop and look for a place to park. This guy would make the scoop and head for a Mickey the's to feed the girl. He would feed, cloth, and bathe these girls and give them money and even a place to sleep. He had quite an extensive photo collection back then and I would guess that by now he probably knew almost every street walker junkie in town. I'm guessing that LE knew his car and were waiting for him to make a pickup. They probably interrogated the girl seperately who threw the guy under the bus (junkies are not known for a sense of gratitude).

I'm sure his photo collection was even more extensive when he was stopped. . It is easy to imagine other SW's piling on to avoid arrest. This guy's life is ruined. Not because he is evil, but because he failed to respect the boundaries that are essential to this hobby.[/QUOTE]I didn't recognize him from the picture, but after your post I ran the number I had in my phone. Damn! Deleted all the info I had in my phone, but it's still out there somewhere. I feel bad for him, he's actually a good guy.

"The new charges filed on Tuesday, March 15th include the following: . Prostitution -- Non-marital sexual intercourse".

What? Charges were filed for non-marital sexual intercourse? Where the fuck am I. In Saudi Arabia?

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2836898]Makes you wonder about many of the providers. A claim that they wouldn't have had sex with him if they weren't high? As many here know, most of them do it to support their habits. The other question is how many of them allowed the pictures or videos at the time and now are claiming they didn't?

[URL]http://fox6now.com/2016/03/15/bradford-harrington-faces-29-new-charges-accused-of-getting-women-high-recording-sex-with-them/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CharlieKane200;2839262] Deleted all the info I had in my phone, but it's still out there somewhere.[/QUOTE]Hopefully that "somewhere" isn't still in his phone which is now in a police evidence bag LOL! Luckily they'd probably have no reason to want to talk to everyone in his phone, but I'd at least comit that number to memory so you know not to answer it just in case.

[QUOTE=DewPoint4157;2838482]Several years ago, I went out for beers with this guy and several other members of this board. The guy fancied himself as the patron saint of female junkies. A normal monger would make the scoop and look for a place to park. This guy would make the scoop and head for a Mickey the's to feed the girl. He would feed, cloth, and bathe these girls and give them money and even a place to sleep. He had quite an extensive photo collection back then and I would guess that by now he probably knew almost every street walker junkie in town. I'm guessing that LE knew his car and were waiting for him to make a pickup. They probably interrogated the girl seperately who threw the guy under the bus (junkies are not known for a sense of gratitude).

I'm sure his photo collection was even more extensive when he was stopped. . It is easy to imagine other SW's piling on to avoid arrest. This guy's life is ruined. Not because he is evil, but because he failed to respect the boundaries that are essential to this hobby.[/QUOTE]Sure sounds like someone that may be a member here. Anyone MIA this week?

[QUOTE=DieselMike;2839500]Sure sounds like someone that may be a member here. Anyone MIA this week?[/QUOTE]He is a member, don't ask for his handle, I don't think is should be given out. I've talked to him, not a good situation.

Be careful he knew this girl for a couple of years. Any one of these girls will flip on you to save there skin and most times we have much more to loss.

[QUOTE=Msteresc;2839684]He is a member, don't ask for his handle, I don't think is should be given out. I've talked to him, not a good situation.

Be careful he knew this girl for a couple of years. Any one of these girls will flip on you to save there skin and most times we have much more to loss.[/QUOTE]But if you play with fire long enough you will get burned. As Winston discovered in 1984, everyone will flip under the right circumstances. As Victor Ortiz found out in his fight with Mayweather, protect yourself at all times.

[QUOTE=FlaFlaFlowhi;2839269]"The new charges filed on Tuesday, March 15th include the following: . Prostitution -- Non-marital sexual intercourse".

What? Charges were filed for non-marital sexual intercourse? Where the fuck am I. In Saudi Arabia?[/QUOTE]Even more harsh - 17 counts of capturing an image of nudity. These new charges span at least two years, and have a lot to do with lewd photos and videos allegedly found on Harrington's phone.

He should have used an iPhone and encrypted it.

[QUOTE=Oakly;2839800]Even more harsh - 17 counts of capturing an image of nudity. These new charges span at least two years, and have a lot to do with lewd photos and videos allegedly found on Harrington's phone.

He should have used an iPhone and encrypted it.[/QUOTE]May be with their consent and be harmless but also dangerous. In reality, if you're going to keep / store them you should cover your A $$. They may not like the idea but you should get a picture of their I'd to show that they are of age and get a signed release for them because she can change her story at any given time.

One thing that I'm curious about regarding the IPhone and encryption pertains to a living person. Apple is fighting the work around for the IPhone and those people are dead but what would happen if you are alive? Could they go to court and get a judge to rule that a person must reveal the security / unlock code? I could see a judge going both ways depending on the severity. For national security it may pass muster but if it is for pictures / videos would that fall under the 5th amendment and self incrimination?

[QUOTE=LoveSmallPerky;2839838]Could they go to court and get a judge to rule that a person must reveal the security / unlock code? [/QUOTE]If it's a terrorist I say why bother the judge when you can just waterboard the prick for the password? Even if he doesn't give it up, at least we got to waterboard a terrorist. It's a win / win!

[QUOTE=MikeH123;2839410]Hopefully that "somewhere" isn't still in his phone which is now in a police evidence bag LOL! Luckily they'd probably have no reason to want to talk to everyone in his phone, but I'd at least comit that number to memory so you know not to answer it just in case.[/QUOTE]I'm not worried about being in his directory; I'm just hoping he deleted the texts.

[QUOTE=Msteresc;2839684]He is a member, don't ask for his handle, I don't think is should be given out. I've talked to him, not a good situation.

Be careful he knew this girl for a couple of years. Any one of these girls will flip on you to save there skin and most times we have much more to loss.[/QUOTE]Exactly what you said. This is the point I was originally trying to make. Don't keep the images or pictures because these girls can flip on a dime and claim they never authorized any of the images or video. Next thing you know it you find yourself in a world of shit.

Did he have images of just one provider or did he have multiple images / video of other girls? Are we talking SWs. BP girls. Girls off of Craigslist? They went back to November 2013.

If a guy takes nude pics of a woman, whether it be his girlfriend, wife, paid companion, whatever, and she later says that it was done against her will or while she was intoxicated / stoned, the guy is in deep shit? Or if the guy has sex with her, apparently consensual, and she later says she did not consent?

I realize there are many ways for this stuff to bite a guy in the ass, but it's pretty messed up. Would a waiver / consent form even help if the woman later claimed that she was impaired by drugs or alcohol?

[QUOTE=DieselMike;2840895]If a guy takes nude pics of a woman, whether it be his girlfriend, wife, paid companion, whatever, and she later says that it was done against her will or while she was intoxicated / stoned, the guy is in deep shit? Or if the guy has sex with her, apparently consensual, and she later says she did not consent?

I realize there are many ways for this stuff to bite a guy in the ass, but it's pretty messed up. Would a waiver / consent form even help if the woman later claimed that she was impaired by drugs or alcohol?[/QUOTE]DieselMike -.

So many ways to be burned here. This applies to the act itself. With or Without photos. Bite you in the ass and then completely ruin your life. Yes its entirely messed up.

There was a member here that has since relocated to a nicer warmer climate. He posted his encounters and escapades on pornhub. I always told him be careful with what you are doing.

She may say yeah go ahead and take the picture (s) or video (s) at the time. She may say I have no problem with it. You may even give her extra money to take the pictures or video. But she can claim they were taken against her will, she was impared, forced, and then deny consent at any time.

Signed waivers are one way. It got so bad in Florida and in California that porn producers were recording the consent to prove there was no impairment and that the actor / actress was a willing participant.

Be careful my friends.

[QUOTE=Star67;2841679]DieselMike -.

So many ways to be burned here. This applies to the act itself. With or Without photos. Bite you in the ass and then completely ruin your life. Yes its entirely messed up.

There was a member here that has since relocated to a nicer warmer climate. He posted his encounters and escapades on pornhub. I always told him be careful with what you are doing.

She may say yeah go ahead and take the picture (s) or video (s) at the time. She may say I have no problem with it. You may even give her extra money to take the pictures or video. But she can claim they were taken against her will, she was impared, forced, and then deny consent at any time.

Signed waivers are one way. It got so bad in Florida and in California that porn producers were recording the consent to prove there was no impairment and that the actor / actress was a willing participant.

Be careful my friends.[/QUOTE]You can look for it there. Friend goes to Real Estate Convention. Friend meets two babes in the bar. Drinks later, on to their bedroom. He's eating pussy on Number 1, while Number 2 is calling desk (yep pre-cell phone days) and yells rape. Long and short, he gets convicted of 3rd degree sexual assualt, winds up on CCAP, and loses all future credibility with future clients (non-clients). It was a set-up from the beginning. Babes sue him civilly for damages after conviction. They lose, he loses, Lawyers win.

So if you think about it, you're further ahead to be caught with a known prostitute than to date a woman out of a bar. If the hooker claims rape, well, gee, not much credibility there. If two realtors from a small town in Wisconsin claim rape, well kiss your nuts goodbye.

Coochie (damn, dis sum heavy shit) Eater.

God Bless You All.