-
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7272248]I still fuck hot girls and not all are dead fish. But alot can be pillow princesses. That's boring as fuck. I need a girl that can give a great BJ and knows how to ride and moan. I'm not paying good money just for a pretty face. You better know how to work a dick for that money too.
While I like all races of women. That's why I appreciate Black girls a little bit more than the others. They usually know how to freak you in bed. After that freak wise from my experiences are the Asian and Latina girls. And not surprisingly it's the White girls that are more often than not the pillow princesses. Specifically American White chics. European White chics can still put it down on you in bed. There are pillow princesses in all races. But from my experiences not as much as the American White girls. And I've had plenty of White girl booty.[/QUOTE]Agreed, white girls are the absolute worst. Plus if you go too hard on them they may just call the cops, claim rape and boom you're in jail and need to post bail. White girls are awful. When you look at it objectively they're really not even that good looking either, most are sloppy fat, bleach their hair and look like shit once you get them naked. I get the best performance out of asian girls, they know how to play the game, telling you how handsome you are and yelping about how big your dick is. LOL Plus all the noises, my buddy said it best they sound like a dog chewing on a squeaky toy. Plus they generally have tighter pussies and better skin. Next I'd say latinas, I've had some baddies from Colombia, Venezuela and CR. Black girls are too hit or miss for me, they're either fantastic sexually (rare) or just horrible / ghetto (most common). Plus they have way more STDs. I'll probably stick with my sweet spot asians / latinas.
-
[QUOTE=Chupacabra;7273325]Agreed, white girls are the absolute worst. Plus if you go too hard on them they may just call the cops, claim rape and boom you're in jail and need to post bail. White girls are awful. When you look at it objectively they're really not even that good looking either, most are sloppy fat, bleach their hair and look like shit once you get them naked. I get the best performance out of asian girls, they know how to play the game, telling you how handsome you are and yelping about how big your dick is. LOL Plus all the noises, my buddy said it best they sound like a dog chewing on a squeaky toy. Plus they generally have tighter pussies and better skin. Next I'd say latinas, I've had some baddies from Colombia, Venezuela and CR. Black girls are too hit or miss for me, they're either fantastic sexually (rare) or just horrible / ghetto (most common). Plus they have way more STDs. I'll probably stick with my sweet spot asians / latinas.[/QUOTE]Asian girls can be very nice. And I do give it to them on their skin. They have great skin care routines. The thing with Black girls if you go looking for ghetto. That's what you're going to find. The nonpros and sugarbabies that I've found that were Black were rarely ghetto. It's the street ho's that can be ratchet. And ghetto can be in any race. The Latinas have the barrio, that's their ghetto. And White girls have trailer parks, that's their ghetto. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=MrBlueSea;7272030]She will aim high and run over you if you let her.[/QUOTE]That sounds like a warning! LOL.
-
Low monthly subscription
Thinking of hopping onto a sugar site again. But not Seeking fuck that high monthly subscription! I saw some that use the credits pricing model like SB uses. So fuck those too for now. How's sugardaddymeet for you guys nowadays? It's one of the OG sugar sites like Seeking. They're technically actually older than Seeking. Their monthly is alot more reasonable at 50 bucks. I've been familiarizing myself with navigating their site again.
-
Fc
-
[QUOTE=StubbornMule;7278871]What does FC stand for?[/QUOTE]"F**k Chamber. ".
-
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7249317]This was clickbait on my SM, I miss the old days of the torpedo bras. Too bad you can't see the video.[/QUOTE]That pic is definitely AI.
-
[QUOTE=StubbornMule;7278871]What does FC stand for?[/QUOTE]Acronym for silly sounding Fuck Chamber. Where you take girl to fuck. Hotel, motel, house, etc. I just say fuck or bedroom. Chamber sounds weird as fuck to me. I'm like what do you have a dungeon or castle? LOL.
-
Good 'ol FC
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7279048]Acronym for silly sounding Fuck Chamber. Where you take girl to fuck. Hotel, motel, house, etc. I just say fuck or bedroom. Chamber sounds weird as fuck to me. I'm like what do you have a dungeon or castle? LOL.[/QUOTE]I know the acronym but my mind goes to fuck cave. Not that I've drug my women in by the hair, well, maybe once or twice but she liked it.
-
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7277711]Thinking of hopping onto a sugar site again. But not Seeking fuck that high monthly subscription! I saw some that use the credits pricing model like SB uses. So fuck those too for now. How's sugardaddymeet for you guys nowadays? It's one of the OG sugar sites like Seeking. They're technically actually older than Seeking. Their monthly is alot more reasonable at 50 bucks. I've been familiarizing myself with navigating their site again.[/QUOTE]I've used on the east coast a fair bit, it's pretty good. I'm going to LA later this month and posted a few leads I got.
MyBlueSea posted her: [URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=73398859[/URL] said she was good.
I was looking for info on these two, but didn't get much response. Have you seen them before?
Kayla, 24 (Fullerton).
[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...72660437&nsp=1[/URL] "mutually beneficial arrangement. Also stay in the Bay Area" (so maybe a professional sugar baby?
SpoiledgF25,25 (Lake Forest).
[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...63553207&nsp=1[/URL] "full time mom. Mutually beneficial".
I'm on both Seeking and SDM, find the interface pretty similar, but it seems like some areas of the county are dead, others just seem to have a lot. I think even season to season plays a factor. I just like SDM becasue I've never had an issue of getting banned while I hear stories of guys losing access to Seeking because some girl complained about them.
-
[QUOTE=Bigsqueeze;7279251]I know the acronym but my mind goes to fuck cave. Not that I've drug my women in by the hair, well, maybe once or twice but she liked it.[/QUOTE]I'd rather use cave than chamber. LOL Chamber sounds creepy as fuck. I'm Dracula and come into my chamber. Bwwaahahhaaha. I'll just stick to fucking and bedroom.
-
[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7279724]I've used on the east coast a fair bit, it's pretty good. I'm going to LA later this month and posted a few leads I got.
MyBlueSea posted her: [URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=73398859[/URL] said she was good.
I was looking for info on these two, but didn't get much response. Have you seen them before?
Kayla, 24 (Fullerton).
[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...72660437&nsp=1[/URL] "mutually beneficial arrangement. Also stay in the Bay Area" (so maybe a professional sugar baby?
SpoiledgF25,25 (Lake Forest).
[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...63553207&nsp=1[/URL] "full time mom. Mutually beneficial".
I'm on both Seeking and SDM, find the interface pretty similar, but it seems like some areas of the county are dead, others just seem to have a lot. I think even season to season plays a factor. I just like SDM becasue I've never had an issue of getting banned while I hear stories of guys losing access to Seeking because some girl complained about them.[/QUOTE]Haven't paid yet for a sub on sugardaddymeet. So can't provide input on any girls. But it looks to be promising. Just wish they'd give access to the advanced search to see how many girls are close to me in the 18 to 20 range. Without paying for a sub.
-
Sarah
[URL] https://members.seeking.com/member/9e60c950-578b-45f0-b73b-9702110f7a63[/URL]
Online only. When I found her, she put Baltimore as her location. She has since changed her location to North Carolina and now LA. I don't why she even bothers. She's at a school in Philly and has a boyfriend. I wonder if the boyfriend knows about her posting, LOL.
-
[QUOTE=MrBlueSea;7281313]I have subs on SDM and SLN. SLN needs more members, but I have struck gold a few times. Can't go wrong with SDM, lots to choose from especially back east and the midwest.[/QUOTE]Sugarlifenow's homepage looks familiar. Is it a credits pricing model like secret benefits? All those that use a credits pricing model are all owned by the same company. It's the same girls on each site.
-
[QUOTE=Lexx1;7279048]Acronym for silly sounding Fuck Chamber. Where you take girl to fuck. Hotel, motel, house, etc. I just say fuck or bedroom. Chamber sounds weird as fuck to me. I'm like what do you have a dungeon or castle? LOL.[/QUOTE]When I started this thread that acronym was already in use on baldys thread or maybe it was richmond. So we just kept on using it here. To me it sounds kinda high schoolish. But I always get a laugh when I see / hear it. Also I do not believe anyone outside of usasg uses it, so its kind of like a secret handshake.