CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1071941]I really miss good ole [b]Davey1965[/b]. This would be right up his alley. Davey knew everything that happened down on Kensington Avenue. If anyone would know, it would be Davey1965. CookyJar[/QUOTE]Well one thing I do know is that wasn't me peeping. Although having peep access to the Carlyle or other spots could.

Be very funny to say the least. The stories heard over the years are funny.

Now Cooky, maybe you can help with something I don't know. I heard a girl named Jamie overdosed and died at one.

Of our favorite $10 houses. I haven't had a chance to talk with the owner yet but wondering if you know whom it may be. I know it's not "little Jamie" or one of the twins as I spoke with both of them yesterday and although the heard.

Of the situation as well they don't know who it was. I do have a feeling of a recent relapse by that name who hung out at the house, but just doing my homework first.

[QUOTE=Davey1965;1073290]...Now Cooky, maybe you can help with something I don't know. I heard a girl named Jamie overdosed and died at one of our favorite $10 houses. I haven't had a chance to talk with the owner yet but wondering if you know whom it may be. [/QUOTE]No! I don't know which Jamie.

I heard the same story. I didn't believe it. I was waiting to verify it myself with a visit. I also heard this story from a SW. She claimed that LE was keeping the house on their radar. I am waiting for things to calm down before visiting by myself. I don't want to perpetuate an unsubstantiated rumor. I don't like messing with anyone's money.

The place is a dump, but it has one redeeming positive feature. The owner – I half trusted the owner, he is not a user. Most of the other $10 spots are run by users and double as shooting galleries. You cannot trust users. The owner of that particular $10 spot is just a lonely dude trying to make some extra bucks.

JMHO.

CookyJar

PS: Nice to see you're still around.

[QUOTE=Scoundrel;1073362]Sucks doesn't it! Evidently there no longer is a general photo gallery so now we can not view the thumbnail pics as they are posted. I used to like the easy access and the ability to click on the thread button to read of the adventure. Now it seems you need to visit each forum separate to search out new pics then there is no longer a thumb view, you have to click on the link. I hope Jackson does something with it.[/QUOTE]The photo gallery and thumbnails were one of the best navigational tools. If you saw a picture you liked, you could click on the link and read the post. Now the process has reversed, you've got to read the review and if the girl sounds nice, click on the link. The problem is: Often the link will be to a blurry distance recon picture with no details, a picture of some guy's dick, a gapping asshole or pussy, or some ugly undesirable girl. It's like shooting blind. Picture viewing in this format is going to be hit and miss.

Unfortunately for me; my whole purpose for visiting this site were the photos. I posted the photos of the girls I found on the street. I wasn't posting pictures of the girls I found on this site.

Hopefully Jackson is just tinkering with the new software and the gallery and thumbnails will pop-up soon.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Derek Phx;1073533]I sure hope you are right. Like you, I browsed almost daily and would read my local reports and then move on to the photo gallery.[/QUOTE]The Philly forum is a busy spot, especially when it comes to pictures. I hate thinking I am going to have to navigate link by link though every set of pictures posted.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1073523]The photo gallery and thumbnails were one of the best navigational tools. If you saw a picture you liked, you could click on the link and read the post. Now the process has reversed, you've got to read the review and if the girl sounds nice, click on the link. .

Hopefully Jackson is just tinkering with the new software and the gallery and thumbnails will pop-up soon.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]I sure hope you are right. For me it's all about the pictures. I love looking at your stuff, I'm sure you have seen what I'm up to as well. Of couse I have nothing like your quantity. I do get some good stuff down here in Tampa from time to time though. Without the picture pages you might miss my posts.

Skip out!

[QUOTE=Davey1965; 1073290]

I heard a girl named Jamie overdosed and died at one of our favorite $10 houses. I haven't had a chance to talk with the owner yet but wondering if you know whom it may be. [/QUOTE]I did a little recon today. It's true; I got it straight from the horse's mouth. A girl named Jamie did die in the house last Friday.

I spoke with the owner, he is OK. I did not want to be too morbid so I did not question him about who the girl was exactly. He did say he was not providing rooms for about two weeks. I suspect that the heat will be on while LE investigates.

There are at least two Jamies and one Jamielynn in Dukes old photo index and SuperEloquent has a Jamey in his favorites photo list. I have one Jamie in my files and one Janie (the search feature wasn't working for me. And there is always the possibility that she was new or an unknown. We may never know for sure.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1073380]I am surmising about the reasoning behind the latest new format of this website, but here is my two cents worth:

1. I like the new format. It is crisper and cleaner with softer hues. It is easier to read and easier on the eyes.

2. I don't think too many serious mongers will miss the photo gallery. It was mostly for guys to ogle pics anyway IMHO than to use to find women for sex, which is the stated purpose of this Forum. It also had to be a bear and costly to maintain, and probably chewed up a lot of memory. Besides, the vast majority of the pics posted in the photo gallery were becoming advertisements by commercial providers, joke postings, posts from the internet, etc. Very, very few were of "real" and available women.

If we get the photo gallery and thumbnails in reports back, terrific. But, I can live with it either way. We shall see. [/QUOTE]

I would rather have seen Jackson place a few restrictions on what pictures and how many pictures could be posted. I would rather have seen a five picture limit for each girl, no ads, no jokes pictures, and SW pictures only. He could have also reduced the required resolution / size.

All 'changes, ' are not necessarily good.

JMHO.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1073777]

There are at least two Jamies and one Jamielynn in Dukes old photo index and SuperEloquent has a Jamey in his favorites photo list. I have one Jamie in my files and one Janie (the search feature wasn't working for me. And there is always the possibility that she was new or an unknown. We may never know for sure.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]Hey Cookie,

Sorry about that girl. Thanks for the run down on the various "Jamies. "

Can you help me out with links? I tried searching with the new website, but can't get it narrowed down enough to find them. Or perhaps some search advice?

[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love; 1073943]Hey Cookie,

Sorry about that girl. Thanks for the run down on the various "Jamies. "

Can you help me out with links? I tried searching with the new website, but can't get it narrowed down enough to find them. Or perhaps some search advice? [/QUOTE]I don't think the search feature has come online. I did a search for Alexus and could not find her by doing a search yet when I strolled down I was able to find her. It is possible that all of the features of the new software have not been added. It is not uncommon for software companies to develop different sections in stages.

I looked in Dukes old Photo Index and SuperEloquent's Favorites Pic Post and found three Jamies. I also checked my personal private file to locate a Jamie and a Janie.

Jackson is probably busy. Hopefully, he will provide us with a list of forum changes and new directions when time permits.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1074060]I am having trouble logging on at my other computers. I am able to log on from my lag top. I am not able to log on from my desk tops.

Another one else having log on issues?

CookyJar[/QUOTE]I have a set of pictures which I was preparing for uploading before the software switch. They are cropped, reduced and edited for posting. Unfortunately I cannot log on to USASG from that computer or either one of my other computers. To make matter worse, this lap top is not on the same network as my other computers. What to do? What to do?

Is anyone else having trouble logging on.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Seva Lurker;1073051]CJ, don't be selfish. There are those of us who LOVE those 'itty bitty titties'. I'm one of them. :D[/QUOTE]

Have I got a girl for you! IMHO – She is pretty enough for the purpose intended (if you know what I mean. She's thin but not emaciated. Her personality and attitude are fantastic. And if you don't mind a few freckles (which I don't, I think we have a match.

(As is the norm with me, I've forgotten her real name. This should not matter; I am certain someone will recognize her and give up the right name. For the purpose of this review let's call her Betty)

If you like itty bitties; you're going to love [size=3][b][ATTACH=CONFIG]112108[/ATTACH][/b][/size].

ROFLOL.

I've got a bunch of photos of Betty. So let's get on with it and see how this new software works.



CookyJar

It was a great way to see what was going on. Can Jackson PLEASE install it. I am sure lots miss it. I travel alot and love to see the other other areas where I visit. Like Vegas LA Miami.

I know he is swammped with the upgrade. Keep up the good work

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1073955]I don't think the search feature has come online.

I looked in Dukes old Photo Index and SuperEloquent's Favorites Pic Post and found three Jamies. I also checked my personal private file to locate a Jamie and a Janie.

Jackson is probably busy. Hopefully, he will provide us with a list of forum changes and new directions when time permits.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]Thanks Cookie,

I followed your lead and looked into Duke's photoguide and found the Jamies listed there. Just could not find the other ones! But now I understand why.

This has got to be a BIG change and probably a few weeks till the kinks are worked out.

[b] Just imagine what Jackson is doing right now if the photo gallery was an unexpected victim of the website transformation? [/b] My guess is he knows where his bread is buttered and is probably as frustrated as we are!

Hang in there!

Me Too!

[QUOTE=AMP Guide; 1074115]It was a great way to see what was going on. Can Jackson PLEASE install it. I am sure lots miss it. I travel alot and love to see the other other areas where I visit. Like Vegas LA Miami.

I know he is swammped with the upgrade. Keep up the good work[/QUOTE]I've been through a number of software upgrades and they all suck wind at first. Usually as the improvements come on line things get better. Let's hope that's what's going to happen in this case.

I've been trying to upload some pictures and the new process sucks (for now. Maybe after I've had more practice, I'll think better of the new features. The new picture up-loader seems to have a mind of its own.

Can someone tell me how to embed a single picture in a post?

In the mean time here are a few more links to Betty.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love; 1074119]Thanks Cookie,

I followed your lead and looked into Duke's photoguide and found the Jamies listed there. Just could not find the other ones! But now I understand why.

This has got to be a BIG change and probably a few weeks till the kinks are worked out.

[b] Just imagine what Jackson is doing right now if the photo gallery was an unexpected victim of the website transformation? [/b] My guess is he knows where his bread is buttered and is probably as frustrated as we are!

Hang in there! [/QUOTE]I am thinking the same thing. I wish there was some was we could help. This is a free site and because of the subject matter, I can't see any way for Jackson to charge for his services. Most of the guys using this site are not going to be willing to give up credit card information. Therefore, he has got to rely on advertisements, for income. His income from advertisements is likely tied to the number of visitors, users and site patrons. He could move the site in the direction of escorts and Hi-end providers like certain other sites have done but that nook is crowded.

I am thinking Jackson needs us as much as we need him. Without the picture section he is going to lose a lot of lurkers and guys who visit the site just to ogle pics.

JMHO.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1073777]I did a little recon today. It's true; I got it straight from the horse's mouth. A girl named Jamie did die in the house last Friday.

I spoke with the owner, he is OK. I did not want to be too morbid so I did not question him about who the girl was exactly. He did say he was not providing rooms for about two weeks. I suspect that the heat will be on while LE investigates.

There are at least two Jamies and one Jamielynn in Dukes old photo index and SuperEloquent has a Jamey in his favorites photo list. I have one Jamie in my files and one Janie (the search feature wasn't working for me. And there is always the possibility that she was new or an unknown. We may never know for sure.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]I'm not in the area, but when I get back I'll have to talk to him. It's not Supers Jamey as I called her and she is fine. I have a strange feeling it may be Jamielynn. Hope I'm wrong on this one as I've known her before she ever came out on the streets. I did search the obituaries and found nothing there either.

[QUOTE=Seva Lurker;1073051]CJ, don't be selfish. There are those of us who LOVE those 'itty bitty titties'. I'm one of them. :D[/QUOTE]

Betty - Have I got a girl for you! IMHO – She is pretty enough for the purpose intended (if you know what I mean. She's thin but not emaciated. Her personality and attitude are fantastic. And if you don't mind a few freckles (which I don't), I think we have a match.

[size=3][b][post=1074126]Click me: For more Betty[/post][/b][/size]

[QUOTE=Davey1965;1074305]I'm not in the area, but when I get back I'll have to talk to him. It's not Supers Jamey as I called her and she is fine. I have a strange feeling it may be Jamielynn. Hope I'm wrong on this one as I've known her before she ever came out on the streets. I did search the obituaries and found nothing there either.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Davey1965;1074305]I'm not in the area, but when I get back I'll have to talk to him. It's not Supers Jamey as I called her and she is fine. I have a strange feeling it may be Jamielynn. Hope I'm wrong on this one as I've known her before she ever came out on the streets. I did search the obituaries and found nothing there either.[/QUOTE]Well the last time I saw her was about a month ago and she was really in orbit. She walking is such a manner that was a half walk half hop and was stopping sometimes to make mocking gestures to morning traffic

Street

What initially drew me to Betty was the stylish hat, cute freckles and pig tails. The pig tails made for a spectacular set of handles to hold on to and gently guide her as she gave me a sloppy BBBJ and later while doing it during doggie.

CookyJar

Betty is one of the most accommodating girls that I have meant in a long while. She is undoubtedly an all around provider. Nothing I requested was denied. It wasn't just that every thing was offered that made Betty a delightful date – it was the fact that everything was done in such a delightful manner.

[size=3][b][post=1074466]Click here For links to: Betty – An All Around Provider (continues) [/post][/b][/size]

CookyJar

This whole series of upskirt pictures were for you. [size=3][b][post=1070049]click here[/post][/b][/size]. I remember reading in one of you post that you liked upskirt pictures. The 'Search Feature, ' isn't working so I wasn't able to find that particular post. It was hard enough finding Darlene's pictures.

What do you think of the new photo setup?

CookyJar

PS: Is anyone else having trouble logging on and staying loged on?

My only regret is that I didn't take Betty to the Carlyle or somewhere better suited for hardcore fucking. I wish I could have laid her right. She is the kind of girl you can bang out on a chair doggie style, or laid out on a table or up against a wall (Godfather style). Betty was open to all kinds of positions and willing to follow directions. She gladly sat in front of me on the bed as I wrapped her pig tails in my hands and face fucked her. She didn't deep throat, but who the fuck cares (not I).

CookyJar

Did I mention that Betty was an all around (everything goes) type of girl? That's right, everything was on the table. She offered, but I didn't partake. I did accept the BBBJ and hardcore doggie fuck. She banged back her narrow little ass as hard as she could, moaning and making with the nasty talk, knocking me out a couple of times. That's when I grabbed her by the pig tails and pounded into her like I didn't know any better.

[size=3][b][post=1074605]Click here: For Betty – An All Around Girl for You [I] 'itty bitty titties'[/I] lovers (continues)[/post][/b][/size]

CookyJar

I was going to display a picture for all of the anal Connoisseurs. I thought better of it and decided to make you anal lovers search for it. Betty did say she likes to get to know the guy first before she offers up the butt.

Some of you guys are not going to like Betty and decide she is too nasty. Whoa! Wait one bleeping minute. Where the hell do you get off judging this sweet innocent little girl with her pig tails? This is not a church outing. She is just offering what the market wants. Don't judge less you be judge. Amen? Amen!

[b][i] (Just because I take the picture and post the picture doesn't mean I like the picture.) [/i][/b]

Would I date Betty again? In a heart beat. YMMV.

CookyJar

Don't let the innocent face and pig tails fool you. Betty is a bad little girl. After a couple of rough SW experiences, I don't do anal anymore. Nor was I in the mood for a couple of the other suggestions Betty made (nobody puts anything up my ass). And, I am sorry to say, I just wasn't prepared for any of her other suggestion. Maybe next time! (Boy, I wish I had taken that blue pill when I had the chance)

[size=3][b][post=1074631]Click here: to see Bad Betty (continued)[/post][/b][/size]

CookyJar

I had a ton of trouble getting on the first day, but since then it's been good.

Hopefully Jackson is making a list of fixes and enhancements, checking it twice, so we can continue to be naughty and nice!

Are.

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1074066]I have a set of pictures which I was preparing for uploading before the software switch. They are cropped, reduced and edited for posting. Unfortunately I cannot log on to USASG from that computer or either one of my other computers. To make matter worse, this lap top is not on the same network as my other computers. What to do? What to do?

Is anyone else having trouble logging on.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1074141]I am thinking the same thing. I wish there was some was we could help. This is a free site and because of the subject matter, I can't see any way for Jackson to charge for his services. Most of the guys using this site are not going to be willing to give up credit card information. Therefore, he has got to rely on advertisements, for income. His income from advertisements is likely tied to the number of visitors, users and site patrons. He could move the site in the direction of escorts and Hi-end providers like certain other sites have done but that nook is crowded.

I am thinking Jackson needs us as much as we need him. Without the picture section he is going to lose a lot of lurkers and guys who visit the site just to ogle pics.

JMHO.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]There are ways to pay for things electronically and covertly. I for one would be willing to pay maybe $5 to keep the riff raff like me out!

[QUOTE=Mythbuster;1074669]There are ways to pay for things electronically and covertly. I for one would be willing to pay maybe $5 to keep the riff raff like me out![/QUOTE]I would too.

I've have this type of discuss before on other sites. The amount of money is not the issue. It's making a bunch of law breaking criminals believe that it is safe to give up their personal information that could possibly be used to identify them. Sure everything is fine for now, but what if the republicans get control of the government? What if the bible beaters decide to rid the country of you evil fornicators? If you think that there were a lot of civil liberty changes made in the name of national security. Just think of all the changes that would be made in the name of the Lord. They are already talking about closing down the internet. First they'll collect all of the information gathered by the porn sites and then run you guys out of town, after they tar and feather you.

ROFLMBAS.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar]
I remember reading in one of you post that you liked upskirt pictures. The 'Search Feature, ' isn't working so I wasn't able to find that particular post. It was hard enough finding Darlene's pictures.

What do you think of the new photo setup?

CookyJar.

PS: Is anyone else having trouble logging on and staying loged on? [/QUOTE]I did see that post that you made. Sorry for not thinking of thanking you previously. As for the new format, let's hope that issues will be quickly addressed. I haven't used it enough to comment. Since the forum is free to use, I'm trying not to [url=http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/dont-look-a-gift-horse-in-the-mouth.html]"look a gift horse in the mouth"[/url] as the expression goes.

I was only doing very limited viewing for a few days from about 9-20 until 10-08. With financial difficulties, it is hard to only look and not participate. My bank has become VERY aggressive during this time period. Things are getting better as I now have a job for the first time in over a year. A sympathy offer from an acquaintance to work in his sweatshop helped keep me a float lately. A far cry from my capabilities, similar story with others that also work there. This past month, I had three possibilities with one finally willing to take me on a temp arrangement. No more sweatshop for me!

I was averaging about fifteen applications by face to face visits and online per week. This lead to about three interviews a week that were from about one to three hours each, over a nine month period. Some possible opportunities even lead to having multiple interviews with the same company! One in particular had me there four times for about about six hours total, not including the hours learning their specific product over a week! Not one single offer for a real job, various excuses given. Most common being that I have fantastic experience and knowledge, but no degree.

Now that I have a job, I have to catch up quickly before I end up living along side a SW in an abando.

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1074632]Don't let the innocent face and pig tails fool you. Betty is a bad little girl. After a couple of rough SW experiences, I don't do anal anymore. Nor was I in the mood for a couple of the other suggestions Betty made (nobody puts anything up my ass. And, I am sorry to say, I just wasn't prepared for any of her other suggestion. Maybe next time! (Boy, I wish I had taken that blue pill when I had the chance)

CookyJar[/QUOTE]You can plainly see how much of her actually sees the sun!

[QUOTE=Fbtom;1075375] Now that I have a job, I have to catch up quickly before I end up living along side a SW in an abando.[/QUOTE]Glad to see that you're still around. Your level head brings a certain calmness to the forum.

I am a real fan of what we call 'Upskirt. ' I don't particularly like that title and prefer to think of them as 'Tease Shots. ' They remind me of the 'Good Ole Days, ' when women worn dresses more often than pants. Back then getting a peek of a little thigh was enough to bring a rise to a young man heart. Most often a glimpse under a frock was accidental. Some pretty young thing, with lovely thighs, would sit and forget to close her legs causing every guy in the class to go hard. Every once in a while a bad girl would flash you trying to get your attention. And then there was sweet little Pinky, who at age 13 was built like a brick shit house and intentionally sat on her front stoop minus panties teasing me. As she tried to steal me from her older sister.

Today's short skirts and thongs leave nothing to the imagination. When skimpy clothing, women's lib, free love and today's modern women first became the rage, I was all for it. Now, seeing what it all became and what we a missing; I am not so sure. Like I said, 'All change is not necessarily good. '

BTW, Good luck on the New Job. Life is full of ups and downs. It's the bumps that make it interesting.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1075429]Glad to see that you're still around. Your level head brings a certain calmness to the forum.

I am a real fan of what we call 'Upskirt. ' I don't particularly like that title and prefer to think of them as 'Tease Shots. ' They remind me of the 'Good Ole Days, ' when women worn dresses more often than pants. Back then getting a peek of a little thigh was enough to bring a rise to a young man heart. Most often a glimpse under a frock was accidental. Some pretty young thing, with lovely thighs, would sit and forget to close her legs causing every guy in the class to go hard. Every once in a while a bad girl would flash you trying to get your attention. And then there was sweet little Pinky, who at age 13 was built like a brick shit house and intentionally sat on her front stoop minus panties teasing me. As she tried to steal me from her older sister.

Today's short skirts and thongs leave nothing to the imagination. When skimpy clothing, women's lib, free love and today's modern women first became the rage, I was all for it. Now, seeing what it all became and what we a missing; I am not so sure. Like I said, 'All change is not necessarily good. '

BTW, Good luck on the New Job. Life is full of ups and downs. It's the bumps that make it interesting.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]Oh yeah I hear you and understand fully! I remember when I was younger in the early seventies and women wore short skirts and loose fitting tops without bras. Too easy as it didn't take much effort to sneak a peek at panties, or bare unshaven crotches, and tits with erect nips. Hell, it seemed as if my step-mother was the only one in the neighborhood to wear a bra back then. So that would explain my interest in "up skirts" and "down blouse" views of women. My young mind has images forever etched of woman's erect nips gyrating in multiple directions under a silky looking polyester blouse. Also the fine firm legs and ass of my bitchy music teacher. I disliked her, but fucked her in my mind often, LOL! She was a absolutely fine looking spinner, firm all over, perky firm breasts with erase head sized erect nips. Always revealing something since it seemed as if she didn't care, or got off knowing kids were getting boners looking at her.

Later in the eighties, short-shorts made of terry cloth were popular. Often the girls didn't wear panties and would accidentally expose themselves while sitting at sporting events for all to see.

Thanks for the compliment and well wishes. I would like to have my "ups and downs" to be limited only in the bedroom with a woman, riding each other hard, LOL!

So, did you ever hook up with Pinky?

[QUOTE=Tony Damato;1075569]That is one disgusting looking chick![/QUOTE]Ah dude, you decided to sign up on USASG and then thought a good plan would be to wander in and insult people's choices of dates?

Perhaps it might make some sense to post reports of your finds and pictures of your dates, before passing judgment?

You aren't off to a great start in this Forum and others are watching. But don't worry, it isn't a fatal error. Just adjust your style, add a few reports and you'll get along well.

Good hunting!

[QUOTE=Tony Damato;1075569]That is one disgusting looking chick![/QUOTE]

Well [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5095-Banned-Users-List&p=1076140&viewfull=1#post1076140]he made it.[/url]

As someone already pointed out, 5 posts, 5 slams. You might want to consider retiring now while you're still batting 100%.

There is a small icon located at the bottom of each post. It is a 'report the post' to the moderator. Jackson may have his hands full with the upgrade and answering the ton of emails regarding it, but I'm sure he'd take the time to add you're name to the [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5095-Banned-Users-List]Banned Users Hall of Shame[/url]. You may want to peruse through that elitist list and see what caused their demise. One oft cited reason is 'looking to cause trouble'.

You may also want to read the [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/index.php?pageid=forumrules]Forum Rules[/url], especially the second and third ones. The primary purpose of the USA Sexguide is to exchange information on where to find P4P ladies.

If you want to participate, please do so. I am sure we would all love to see what you consider prime SW material.

But if you want to criticize and be obnoxious, go somewhere else and save one of us mongers and Jackson a lot of time working to get you banned.

[QUOTE=Seva Lurker; 1076037]Well [url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5095-Banned-Users-List&p=1076140&viewfull=1#post1076140]he made it.[/url]

Save one of us mongers and Jackson a lot of time working to get you banned. [/QUOTE]Actually, I didn't see the icon initially and had to do some looking around before I found it. If I had been smarter I would have just reported Tony instead of responding.

BTW the icon is a little caution sign. Three sided triangle in the lower left corner of the grey bar at the bottom of each post.

I don't mind taking a minute or two to report egregious reports like those. I guess the couple of minutes is a small price to pay to "pay something back" to the forum and help keep the quality of the site up. Eh, so I do a little "civic duty" here from time to time.

[i]or am I up on my high horse now? <g [/i]

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1075429]

I am a real fan of what we call 'Upskirt. '.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]I am too and obviously there are many more of us who share that 'view'.

There was a story in the Tucson, AZ paper numerous years ago. About an office building in the downtown area. Lots of glass and a on a slight incline so that at one point the sidewalk on the outside was low enough for a person walking by to be floor level on the inside.

Seems there was one lady who worked there liked to wear short dresses and her desk was there by the outside window.

More than one guy walked into the fire main sticking out from the building right there as they partook of the sights. After one fairly serious injury, the windows were darkened. :(

[QUOTE=Seva Lurker; 1076573]I am too and obviously there are many more of us who share that 'view'.

There was a story in the Tucson, AZ paper numerous years ago. About an office building in the downtown area. Lots of glass and a on a slight incline so that at one point the sidewalk on the outside was low enough for a person walking by to be floor level on the inside.

Seems there was one lady who worked there liked to wear short dresses and her desk was there by the outside window.

More than one guy walked into the fire main sticking out from the building right there as they partook of the sights. After one fairly serious injury, the windows were darkened. . [/QUOTE]Real upskirts are damn near impossible to capture on camera. Usually when someone captures a real upskirt it's an accident. Most of the time, a real upshirt is a picture taken of a main subject which includes a secondary subject (girl) unknowingly showing more then she is aware.

Staged upskirts aren't easy, either. I am not working with a big budget. I cannot pay for a crew, private location, director, actors and etc. My staged upskirts are all taken in public locals, where all of the obvious dangers prevail. It ain't easy. Ignoring the dangers, I do have some ideas I'the love to try. I want to do a upskirt on a crowded SEPTA vehicle and on a SEPTA bus bench. I have an idea for doing an upshirt in a supermarket or restaurant. Believe it or not the staging is not the biggest problem. Finding a willing subject is not the biggest problem. The problem is finding a girl in a skirt.

LOL ;)

CookyJar

StreetWalkers like most employees need to be evaluated as individuals. A good employer knows that sometimes bad job placement is the cause of bad performance. Sometime it is as simple as location, or putting together a compatible team. Before I set aside a worker as useless, I try to determine if there is a reasonable cause for their failure.

Most negative reports that involve 'Rushing, ' are most often preceded by, 'We drove to my favorite parking spot, ' or 'We found a dark spot to park, ' or the rare 'She suggested a nice spot where we parked. ' Not all, but most, reports of rushed dates take place in cars. Certainly, no one likes to hear, 'Are you ready to cum? ' Regardless of the circumstances, we especially don't expect to hear it within moments of beginning whatever we are doing. However, I would suspect that you are more likely to hear such comments during a $20 car date. Considered this; the monger receiving a quickie BBBJ sitting in the front of his car is doing most of his thinking with his little head, while his date is thinking of the warrants she has and the fact that no outside spot is 100% safe from LE, thugs and civilians. I myself tend to hurry more during a car date. Just as, I tend to be (as I have often reported) uncomfortable in many of the $10 spots I have visited. Thinking that every SW is going to be willing to give head for an hour while parked in a secluded area in one of the most dangerous neighborhoods in the city, where police routinely patrol, is probably unreasonable. It has been my experience, rushing occurs more often during a car date and is less likely to occur during an inside date. I cannot remember ever being rushed at my private inside spot, and I have very rarely been rushed during a date at the Carlyle. (Usually I forewarn the young lady: Please don't make me waste my time driving to the Carlyle or waste my money on a room if you don't have the time. If you have babysitting, boyfriend or any other problem; tell me now)

What does this have to do with Rosa? I have never had a car date with Rosa. Having said that; I wouldn't recommend Rosa for a straight-up BJ car date. Her BBBJ isn't her best attribute. And, because she is the nervous type, I believe she is more relaxed indoors. Also, I believe she is more use to fucking. Rosa is not the freaky type. She is not going to lick your ass, swallow you shot or let you ram a finger up her ass. As much as she tries to hide her ass, I believe she knows that most guys, once they see it, want to hit it doggie. Rosa is a better inside fucking date, than an outside BJ date – IMHO.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Freaklikdat; 923261]. First I passed her by mainly because of the way she was dressed (same reason I never picked up Moyua. She was dressed in baggy dickie pants hanging off her butt, air force ones, down jacket & big hoodie with her hair slicked back in a ponytail looking more like a butch than a SW.

All in All I would hook up with Rosa again but only for BJ's & doggy.

YMMV[/QUOTE]Every since FreakLikDat first post her pictures Rosa's body has fascinated me. Since that first review Rosa has been reported on several times by me and others. IMHO she is hit and miss. Others have reported that she rushes and has a negative attitude. I am not going to refute these claims, however; I'the like to try and add some suggestions for those who still choose to partake of Ms Rosa's attributes.

(To see my first review on Rosa, [size=3][b][post=957542]Click here: Rosa, A big Fish in Another Pond[/post][/b][/size])

Rosa has a very distinct body type. She is not a spinner. Her nicely shaped boobs taper down to a slim waist, firm belly and then flow out to shapely hips and firm round ass. Her coffee colored skin is smooth and flawless. Her face is by no means ugly, although my pictures may not do her justice, I will not claim her to be a raving beauty. What sets Rosa apart is her body.

(If you meet Rosa on the street the first thing you notice is the baggy clothing she likes to wear. At first I couldn't understand why she prefers the baggy style when she has such a nice body. Then I remembered a conversation I had with a close female friend of mine who also was gifted with a nice behind and who also preferred baggy grab. According to my friend; some women wear loosely fitting clothing in an effect to discourage men from making unwanted cat calls. I can only imagine the attention Rosa would get wearing a pair of nicely fitting jeans. You might think that because of her chosen profession Rosa would want such attention. But, most of the attention would probably be from guys passing by, LE, and rapist)

[QUOTE=La Chic; 1051499]

Having seen CJ's report and pictures from March I figured she was worth a try. Boy, was I wrong. Went to the ten dollar house thinking I would like to take my time and enjoy this tasty morsel. Got in the room and she pulls her shirt up and pants down and says "let's go. " WTF! I had to insist that she undress and let me explore a little. Not to happen. She did undress a little more and had my dick in her mouth right away. No technique. No style. No nothing. After thirty seconds she states in her broken English "you hard. You ready. You fuck me. " I told her to suck me some more. Same bullshit. Thirty seconds of lackluster and rushed performance and, then, the same refrain. I got a few more minutes of oral time and a little exploring then off to MISH. I have to admit she has some nice breasts and a tight kitty but her rushing and impersonal way killed everything. Finished up and got out. I will definitely not repeat. NEVER EVER.

Be Safe,

La Chic[/QUOTE]Rosa's attitude? After reading some of the negative reviews on Rosa I had to stop and think. While I have had better, I've also had lots worst. I also believe, some monger's do not take the time to consider the many aspects of what they are doing. Sometimes we forget that we are dealing with individuals and that there are sometimes vast differences in the girls we date. Not every girl is going to give a great BBBJ, not every girl is comfortable fucking in a car, [b]not every girl is going to be willing to lay down on that nasty mattress[/b] and not every girl is intelligent enough to understand and appreciate our every need. In short; YMMV.

Click Here: [size=3][b][post=1077313]Re: Rosa & Katie – YMMV (Continues) [/post][/b][/size]

CookyJar

Wham, bam, Thank ya mam. That is the how most guys approach their SW dates. They figure it is alright to treat the girl like a tramp because they are paying their hard earned money. They think that because they are paying, it should not matter whether they are in a front seat or a disgusting $10 room – they are paying their 20 bucks and they want their GFE.

I take a little different approach than most. I figure, if I am paying my money I am going to do everything possible to make sure I get what I want. If that includes using a little imagination – so be it.

My last date with Rosa turned out to be a great one. It included pole dancing, a lap dance, my good friend Katie, a BBBJ from Rosa, a really hot doggie fuck with Rosa bending over the couch and a CIM finish with Katie sitting in front of me with my dick in her mouth. Nobody rushed, nobody complained and a good time was had by all.

Click Here: To see [size=3][b][post=1077318]Rosa – YMMV[/post][/b][/size]