[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/after-backpage-u-s-investigates-massage-escort-websites-that-now-dominate-market-11568548800[/URL]
Printable View
[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/after-backpage-u-s-investigates-massage-escort-websites-that-now-dominate-market-11568548800[/URL]
[QUOTE=Thunderbolt27;4458994][URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/after-backpage-u-s-investigates-massage-escort-websites-that-now-dominate-market-11568548800[/URL][/QUOTE]The article requires having a subscription. Subscribe or sign in which I'm not doing. The other way is messing with the css of the webpage but I'm not doing that. This article confirms what I've been thinking for a while is that police use eros as well to do stings and not just listcrawler and adultsearch and every other site still live. The scary part is is that what if they are stinging women and using them as props to lure john dohes. Its been done before on listcrawler with one chick who used to provide. The police have used Eros a lot in the past and they are back at it again.
With eros I usually contact them if they have social media post which I get to in my own ways. I do this for one main reason and its to verify if they are the ones posting the ad and believe it or not I have found many instances where the woman is a model or star but doesn't do bookings or services and sometimes its explicitly stated in their profile or they are in a totally different state when the ad is live here in atl. Its happened on both eros and listcrawler so beware.
To give you an example right freaking now on EROS!! There is an ad with the name MYA Becker. The ad is live in two different states! Uses the same number Same Email. The one in the other state says here until Monday and the other is live in Atlanta. WTF is eros doing? They are not checking a thing at all. That is one instance of a fake ad that seems real but is not and is potentially LE. Beware my dudes. On listcrawler you will also see comments where they will say she is worth it or great service. Its a trick to believe they are real especially on the ads with barely any history. I do not know if we are allowed to expose ads that are fake in this forum so I won't post the links here but if you search the names I stated you will see what I'm talking about with the mya ad on there that is in two states live. When a girl leaves a state to another the eros ad is usually taken down from the previous state and the state she is live in is the only place its available.
[QUOTE=Thunderbolt27;4458994][URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/after-backpage-u-s-investigates-massage-escort-websites-that-now-dominate-market-11568548800[/URL][/QUOTE]Still need subscription to read the full article. As far as the feds looking into eros, em, etc. If you think your on a site that law enforcement isn't aware of then your a f-ing idiot. All sites are investigated, the reason they pushed the button on backpage is because how big it became. The same thing was about to happen to CL a decade ago! They just decided to back out before it did and that's when BP stepped up. The cycle will continue with whichever site decides to steps up to be the number 1. Eros been around long before BP existed but they didn't go after them bc alot of providers and johns didn't use it as much because of the price it charges woman to advertise and the price woman charge johns to see them. The low price points that CL and BP had made them the number 1 site quickly. If little ol me can check how much traffic a website is getting then I know for a fact the feds can and with grave more detail. Uncle Sam doesn't like not getting a piece of the pie, especially when the pie keeps getting bigger and bigger.
I just want to share one instance where people on listcrawler are stating they saw a particular woman when in reality and doing research it is fake. This is possibly an le sting operation just FYI please be aware especially if these images surface on eros as an add. This ad [URL]https://escortbabylon.net/image_list/4043225693[/URL] is fake and there are comments saying they saw her and she was awesome. The woman in the pics is a model with over 1 million followers on instagram and has a youtube channel lmao. You guys who fall for this need to stop especially the ones new to the game. This is one is obviously using fake pics but some other ads use girls of real girls in other states.
Also one red flag I want to point out is that most LE stings happen on the weekends. Take note on the dates the ads have been up. All weekends. I won't be posting the instagrammers name as we all know google indexes sites within days or even hours so we don't want her name appearing on this site.
Tread carefully with the ads you see and contact.
[QUOTE=Jrody1;4461078]I just want to share one instance where people on listcrawler are stating they saw a particular woman when in reality and doing research it is fake. This is possibly an le sting operation just FYI please be aware especially if these images surface on eros as an add. This ad [URL]https://escortbabylon.net/image_list/4043225693[/URL] is fake and there are comments saying they saw her and she was awesome. The woman in the pics is a model with over 1 million followers on instagram and has a youtube channel lmao. You guys who fall for this need to stop especially the ones new to the game. This is one is obviously using fake pics but some other ads use girls of real girls in other states.
Also one red flag I want to point out is that most LE stings happen on the weekends. Take note on the dates the ads have been up. All weekends. I won't be posting the instagrammers name as we all know google indexes sites within days or even hours so we don't want her name appearing on this site.
Tread carefully with the ads you see and contact.[/QUOTE]Have to agree with you on this one. I wanted to see what was up with this suspicious post so I hit her up from one of my burner accounts. This "chick" or LEO was asking me to send her pics of my Richard to prove I was clean. Immediate red flag as there's no way I'm sending any real pics to any provider. I laughed as I casually hit the block button on my burner app.
Really pays off to do your research before attempting to TOFTT, or in this case, trust those so called comments or reviews on LC. Just my two pennies. Stay on top of your game my friends.
#54.
[QUOTE=Jrody1;4461078]I just want to share one instance where people on listcrawler are stating they saw a particular woman when in reality and doing research it is fake. This is possibly an le sting operation just FYI please be aware especially if these images surface on eros as an add. This ad [URL]https://escortbabylon.net/image_list/4043225693[/URL] is fake and there are comments saying they saw her and she was awesome. The woman in the pics is a model with over 1 million followers on instagram and has a youtube channel lmao. You guys who fall for this need to stop especially the ones new to the game. This is one is obviously using fake pics but some other ads use girls of real girls in other states.
Also one red flag I want to point out is that most LE stings happen on the weekends. Take note on the dates the ads have been up. All weekends. I won't be posting the instagrammers name as we all know google indexes sites within days or even hours so we don't want her name appearing on this site.
Tread carefully with the ads you see and contact.[/QUOTE]Maybe 1 in 10 comments / reviews are anywhere near true on LC. As a matter of fact, you can count on the first few being from the provider or her pimp. It's hilarious sometimes because most of them are too dumb to even make up a new handle. The pic thing seems to be a theme as of late. But you are right, be careful contacting anyone from that site that has not been mentioned here. A rule of thumb; never send them anything that can be construed as intent to have sex. For me that includes agreeing to bring a condom, having ANY specific act mentioned in text and most of all, if she seems too good to be true. She is. I'm sure I miss out on some legit, good ones, but as anyone can see, LC is a pit with thousands of ads. Missing a few for caution is a risk I'm willing to take.
[URL]https://reason.com/2019/10/18/this-is-a-culture-war-sex-work-decriminalization-bill-in-d-c-draws-14-hours-of-passionate-public-testimony/[/URL]
[URL]https://reason.com/2019/10/21/sarasota-county-sheriff-office-entrap-underage-teen-sex/[/URL]
[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;4501929][URL]https://reason.com/2019/10/21/sarasota-county-sheriff-office-entrap-underage-teen-sex/[/URL][/QUOTE]That's standard protocol for catching child predators. The police usually register on adult sites, such as this one, and pretend to be over 18 at first like everybody else on the site. Then, they get you talking to them and confide to you that they are really under 18 years of age. Which is really illegally as damn near all of these adult sites put up a disclaimer that you must be 18 years of age or older. The police already engage in an illegal act by placing an ad with a false age and it gets even worse when they send out naked pics of "supposed teenagers" to try to lure desperate guys.
Most guys dismiss these temptations, but there's always one or a few who fall into this trap. They meet the "supposed teenager" and then they are arrested and charged with soliciting sex from a minor. Smdh. The fact is, all those guys were on an adult site looking for adult women when they were baited by the police. That's entrapment if you ask me and that was the same shit that was done on this site a while back by the police. They don't go on kiddie sites looking for adult men, they come to adult sites trying to trick and trap desperate gullible thirsty men. That's the good ole law enforcement for ya. They're just looking out for the safety of our kids on "adult sites"! Smh.
[URL]https://times-herald.com/news/2019/10/ccso-human-trafficking-victims-found-during-prostitution-sting[/URL]
In researching the bust that took place in Newnan the other day, Fox is misleading readers and viewers that some underage girls were picked up but no other news outlet is reporting that. I often wonder whether or not any real under-age girls are caught during these stings even when it is reported. Compare just these two for yourself.
[URL]https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/prostitution-sting-in-coweta-county-discovers-victims-of-human-trafficking[/URL]
Vs.
[URL]https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/coweta-county/10-arrested-in-prostitution-bust-at-metro-atlanta-hotel-mugshots-/958922175[/URL]
Happy Hunting and Stay Safe.
[QUOTE=JohnnyMapalo;4513013]That's standard protocol for catching child predators. The police usually register on adult sites, such as this one, and pretend to be over 18 at first like everybody else on the site. Then, they get you talking to them and confide to you that they are really under 18 years of age. Which is really illegally as damn near all of these adult sites put up a disclaimer that you must be 18 years of age or older. The police already engage in an illegal act by placing an ad with a false age and it gets even worse when they send out naked pics of "supposed teenagers" to try to lure desperate guys.
Most guys dismiss these temptations, but there's always one or a few who fall into this trap. They meet the "supposed teenager" and then they are arrested and charged with soliciting sex from a minor. Smdh. The fact is, all those guys were on an adult site looking for adult women when they were baited by the police. That's entrapment if you ask me and that was the same shit that was done on this site a while back by the police. They don't go on kiddie sites looking for adult men, they come to adult sites trying to trick and trap desperate gullible thirsty men. That's the good ole law enforcement for ya. They're just looking out for the safety of our kids on "adult sites"! Smh.[/QUOTE]Underage is scary. Even the idea that you might go see someone who advertised as 21 (3 years away from underage) is too creepy. What if they lied and were 17? ICK! I prefer 25+ just to be safer. Besides avoiding "getting caught", it's just a creepy idea that you might (even by accident) contribute to shady practices around underage girls. Consenting adults is one thing, but straying into childhood. Shudder.
[QUOTE=AZGuy987;4521305]Underage is scary. Even the idea that you might go see someone who advertised as 21 (3 years away from underage) is too creepy. What if they lied and were 17? ICK! I prefer 25+ just to be safer. Besides avoiding "getting caught", it's just a creepy idea that you might (even by accident) contribute to shady practices around underage girls. Consenting adults is one thing, but straying into childhood. Shudder.[/QUOTE]There are more shady practices around 18-19 y/o's than 16-17. And a young woman who is 17 1/2 is arguably not a child. Nor are they all mature, responsible adults when they are 18, or 20....or 25.
I realize you have to set the legal age for this or that at some exact number, but doesn't make it a magic number.
However, it is very dangerous that a 17 1/2 why / o could get a fake I'd that says she is 20 and if you have sex with her, then you can be arrested and charged with contributing the delinquency of a minor and had a huge part of society branding you a "pedophile" and whatever else.
But that's just humanity for you, and it's just the way it is.
[QUOTE=AZGuy987;4521305]Underage is scary. Even the idea that you might go see someone who advertised as 21 (3 years away from underage) is too creepy. What if they lied and were 17? ICK! I prefer 25+ just to be safer. Besides avoiding "getting caught", it's just a creepy idea that you might (even by accident) contribute to shady practices around underage girls. Consenting adults is one thing, but straying into childhood. Shudder.[/QUOTE]I'm very thorough about backgrounding girls I fuck, especially the sugar baby types; over the years, I've found surprisingly many 16-17 year olds.
Most are doing it of their own volition; you can imagine the allure of a thousand dollar payday to some high school sophomore, and there really is nothing preventing them from running an ad. Spoofing your age online is the easiest thing ever.
I can only remember one girl who was obviously being trafficked. She was 16, and she was being run out of a motel on Tara Blvd by the "Bloods" (a well known street gang) along with a bunch of other girls. She was a runaway. An acquaintance of mine actually put a few raw loads into her, and she was on my radar but I found her info. I was going to do her raw too, had it all set up! Dodged that bullet.
Realistically, probably any monger who's been fucking rental pussy for twenty years has dicked some teen pussy. That's just numbers at work. If you're 99% successful at avoiding it, but you fuck a thousand girls (easy to do over a monger career), you've still done a whole high school softball team (that's ten girls for those unfamiliar with the sport).
That said, it's important to use every kind of risk-mitigation available; I usually only see girls if I can independently verify their age (ie. I don't depend on IDs, since you can order IDs online as easily as you can order pussy.).
O.
Is anyone else having issues with [URL]listcrawler.com[/URL]? It's going directly to [URL]eros.com[/URL].