Nice Pics of ginger SuperE. Damn You mean you managed to bargain a overnight stay and no gag ball, handcuffs or cumpiggy doll. What about the nude pics or the cock in her mouth pics. Don't tell me your cock fired his publicist already. LOL
Printable View
Nice Pics of ginger SuperE. Damn You mean you managed to bargain a overnight stay and no gag ball, handcuffs or cumpiggy doll. What about the nude pics or the cock in her mouth pics. Don't tell me your cock fired his publicist already. LOL
Nice looking girl, good job Super, too bad she don't show the goodies.
[QUOTE=Mike Sweeney;1092825]Nice looking girl, good job Super, too bad she don't show the goodies.[/QUOTE]Oh, she most certainly did. But just to me, and not to all of you. :)
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1092667]Thanks for the additional pics. I love your big round beautiful ass. Is rear entry parking permitted at your establishment? If so, is it included with your "normal" hourly rate or are we talking extra?
[/QUOTE]By the ample driveway, I would assume rear entry parking is available and you can park your truck there. You may need to buy a permit if your truck is larger. Lmao
[QUOTE=Jicarlo;1092745]That girl is sexy![/QUOTE]I thought so too, and not just the way she looks, but also the way she acted.
[QUOTE=Freaklikdat;1092807]Nice Pics of ginger SuperE. Damn You mean you managed to bargain a overnight stay and no gag ball, handcuffs or cumpiggy doll. What about the nude pics or the cock in her mouth pics. Don't tell me your cock fired his publicist already. LOL[/QUOTE]I didn't happen to have my kinkster-kit with me, but it may not have made any difference. She had a great attitude, but she made it quite clear that she was willing to pose for just a few photos, and not for anything nude, and certainly not in BJ pics. She was not the usual SW one might find on the K. Whether she was relatively inexperienced or genuinely shy (where pics are concerned) I can't tell you. It was what it was. But, it wasn't for lack of my trying to convince her.
My cock was hardly disappointed in her performance, but his publicist will have to rely on my telling the story rather than also giving it full illustration.
[QUOTE=Mike Sweeney;1092825]Nice looking girl, good job Super, too bad she don't show the goodies.[/QUOTE][QUOTE= Supereloquent]Oh, she most certainly did. But just to me, and not to all of you.[/QUOTE]I know what you meant, and I wasn't picking on you with my reply, Mike. I was only joking and I am sure you understood that, because you seem to be a genuinely good guy.
But, there are serious points to be made regarding pics. Some viewers would be happy to see just one pic of a SW in her street clothes for ID purposes. They think that is quite enough. Others enjoy multiple pics and angles. Others like to also see what she looks like fully unwrapped, especially if considering her for a FS date. Others love to see some erotic poses in the process. Others love BJ and money shots.
Some like nudes but not certain types of shots, such as close-up pics of her pussy or asshole. Some don't like BJ pics. Some don't like numerous pics regardless of the type. I have come to the inevitable conclusion that, regardless what I decide to do, I can't please or accommodate everyone. My attitude has been that I will do what I feel like doing when posting pics, and perhaps even more of it if I get what appear to me to be unreasonable and unproductive complaints. HOWEVER, I have shown myself to be open to commentary that seems rational, reasonable and well-intentioned. I have revised my pic-posting approach to incorporate posting 10 thumbnail icons at a time, with a collage of them so you can generally see what is in the batch before opening them. I have labeled the pics in such a way that you know the type of pic before even opening the icon blindly, and you have a sense of them from the collage. I usually also post my favorite (s) from each group. I used to post the pics by time sequence, so the clothed pics would come first, then the undressing, then the nude then the BJ pics. This was not much variety within each set of 10, so I started mixing the types of pics and angles of poses within each set. This provided more visual appeal and viewing popularity.
I am not insensitive to what members want and like. However, there is a way to get what you want if you are truly sincere and serious about it, and there is a way to demonstrate that you are just being a horse's ass and running off at the mouth, in which case you will NOT get what you want. The likelihood is that such complainers don't want anything so much as they want to hear themselves bray like a donkey.
The changes I have implemented in my pic-posting philosophy have apparently been well received. The view counts of my pics are are WAY up in comparison to what they used to be. To me this is as good a barometer as any that my changes are for the better.
Back to Ginger: my pics are more than enough to ID her; the bikini pics are more than enough to see that she is fine physical FS material. The only possibilities left are for prurient interest, and what's wrong with that? Then it just becomes a question of what you like, and prefer to see in naughty pics of a woman. That has as many right answers as there are readers on this website. The complainers should keep that fact in mind when they profess to speak for others, or even adamantly for themselves, on the subject of what kinds of SW pics are not "appropriate" for this Forum.
[QUOTE= Runner8]I got a good laugh from your comment Tim. I totally agree with being able to blend in to the scenery on the ave. It's so much easier there, then on Broadway. When cruising the B, it's like sooo obvious. I feel like I stick out like the sorest thumb there. Screaming."look at me!" I always have an alibi![/QUOTE]Having an alibi on Broadway is essential, but it doesn't prevent you from being profiled. LE in Camden can give you a ticket for loitering in a disorderly area if they feel like it. So what if you were profiled, because there are likely only two reasons a white guy is driving there, or a white girl is walking the street, and neither of them is legally a good one. Sure, you can probably beat the ticket, but that's not the point. It is still a big fat pain in the ass. The risk / reward ratio is very different now in Camden with all this stepped-up ticket activity.
The K is ENTIRELY different. It is racially mixed. There are many legitimate stores and eateries. There is an elevated train and a bus line (there is a bus line on Broadway too, IF one were waiting for a bus, and could make that argument). There are many shoppers and commuters from the burbs. It is very difficult to profile potential mongers (except at night, another reason I usually prefer the day, or if you make it obvious, like picking up SWs right on the stroll).
The one possible exception is when you have to circle back at either the northern or southern end of the stroll. I see mongers using the same routes to do this. You might as well hang a sign on yourselves by your driving behavior. I find it much more discreet to go a few blocks out of my way when circling back, and I always use a different route. But, if convenience works for you, go for it. You must be the same knuckleheads I see making a U-turn to pick up girls right on the Ave.
[QUOTE= Runner8]If the "good people on Letterly" were smart, they would install a 25 cent toll and get rich![/QUOTE]If that happened some mongers would still be too dumb to avoid it.
[QUOTE= Runner8] Stay safe and smart.[/QUOTE]Wise advice, but if you are smart you don't need it, and if you aren't you probably won't follow it. :)
[QUOTE= Jicarlo]That's not a bad find Street, not bad at all. I have to give her an "A" for freaky oh another for price. But the only thing that has me a little puzzled is the white stuff? It could be a lot of things but I'm curious. I know most of these girl don't get out to the GYNO much but I've seen stranger stuff. And have done even nastier.[/QUOTE][QUOTE= Wolfgang]That's candida. A yeast infection.
Kinda related to mushrooms, sorta.
DOn't let if freak you out. Just use alcohol wipes afterwards and you should be fine. [/QUOTE]There are 522 different things that can result in a whitish vaginal discharge / rash (look it up!). I know I am way out of my element of expertise to diagnose exactly what may be wrong from a photo, given these very numerous possible conditions. But, apparently some people can not only be dead certain of the cause, but also prescribe a remedy. Other things than a yeast infection can cause similar symptoms, including bacterial vaginosis, chlamydia and gonorrhea. Then, of course, there are the other 518 things it might be depending upon other symptoms that might be present to narrow it down. Having a medical professional look closely at it and do diagnostic tests is the only way to know for certain.
If it really is a yeast infection, alcohol wipes wouldn't likely do much to combat it. Yeast infections tend to be prevalent when normal protective bacteria are destroyed, as when one takes antibiotics. Using alcohol wipes will destroy the good protective bacteria along with the bad. What you really need with a yeast infection is anti-fungal medication.
Anyone here is welcome to do anything they like, protected or not, but when I am staring at a white discharge from a SW's cooze I don't just assume she needs to change her panties and / or bathe more often, and that it is no big deal. I stick with a BJ at that point, but that's just mamby-pamby me.
Street, it may have been the case that you didn't see the discharge when you were with her. It seems more obvious in some photos than others. Or, maybe you just weren't concerned about it, or whatever. There are literally hundreds of things it could have been that are harmless. I give you credit for publishing the photos anyway and noting it. This isn't about criticism. It is about information and intelligent discussion. I doubt that anyone really knows or ever will know what it was for sure, and we probably all have exposed ourselves to things we can't see that have far greater risks.
I have been a paramedic in three of the surrounding five PA counties for nigh on thirty years, and I totally concur with SuperEloquent's information. Chances are, if it is vaginal thrush / candidiasis that she would be "itching like hell" and trying to scratch with a bottle brush. I'm more inclined to think that a bacterial cause is most likely [gonorrhea / chlamydia], or a protozoan, I. E. Trichomoniasis.
The condom should have prevented transmission, however, there may have been contact with the surrounding areas. If it's trichomoniasis, you'll most likely develop a slight to moderate "fishy" odor. An M. D. Usually uses Flagyl [Metronidazole] to treat the disorder. If it's bacterial, and you washed up after exposure, you greatly lessened the chance of transmission.
A seven day course of application of [non-Rx] Tolnaftate 1% [Tinactin] cream will take care of most common mycosis [yeast].
I always keep an item called Hibiclens in my mongering gym bag, it isn't an irritant like alcohol, and provides hospital grade eradication of organisms from the skin. It's about $8. 00 per pint at most pharmacies.
I instruct the STD / bloodbourne pathogen portion of th PA Paramedic training course at one of the area's educational facilities. I am by no means an expert. But I'd be on the safe side and go to one of the free care facilities under an assumed moniker.
Best of luck, and thanks for having the fortitude to post the picts!
[QUOTE=Tonsil Hockey;1093989]I have been a paramedic in three of the surrounding five PA counties for nigh on thirty years, and I totally concur with SuperEloquent's information. Chances are, if it is vaginal thrush / candidiasis that she would be "itching like hell" and trying to scratch with a bottle brush. I'm more inclined to think that a bacterial cause is most likely [gonorrhea / chlamydia], or a protozoan, I. E. Trichomoniasis.[/QUOTE]Thank you for concurring with my information. I defer to someone with considerably more expert medical expertise than I. However, I must also caution against narrowing a condition down to a few insidiously transmittable possibilities. That is especially because we are basing this on a pic and have relatively little other concrete information for a diagnosis. There are 522 things that it could possibly have been, the vast and most probable majority of which are relatively harmless. That doesn't mean anything other than the point I was initially trying to make: we don't know what it was, and speculating about and assigning a specific diagnosis or even a range of diagnoses, is not necessarily constructive.
[QUOTE=Tonsil Hockey]The condom should have prevented transmission, however, there may have been contact with the surrounding areas. If it's trichomoniasis, you'll most likely develop a slight to moderate "fishy" odor. An M. D. Usually uses Flagyl [Metronidazole] to treat the disorder. If it's bacterial, and you washed up after exposure, you greatly lessened the chance of transmission.
A seven day course of application of [non-Rx] Tolnaftate 1% [Tinactin] cream will take care of most common mycosis [yeast].
I always keep an item called Hibiclens in my mongering gym bag, it isn't an irritant like alcohol, and provides hospital grade eradication of organisms from the skin. It's about $8. 00 per pint at most pharmacies. [/QUOTE]That is all useful information. I particularly found the Hibiclens suggestion very serviceable as a quick bath likelihood for junior after BBBJs.
[QUOTE=Tonsil Hockey]I instruct the STD / bloodbourne pathogen portion of th PA Paramedic training course at one of the area's educational facilities. I am by no means an expert. But I'd be on the safe side and go to one of the free care facilities under an assumed moniker.[/QUOTE]Periodic testing is wise advice for all of us, given that we are engaging in a hobby which involves relatively risky activity.
[QUOTE=Tonsil Hockey]Best of luck, and thanks for having the fortitude to post the picts![/QUOTE]YES!
Street shares and reports what he finds, and often shows us their pics. If everyone did that we would have abundant, useful information. He didn't manufacture these girls in his garage or invent them. He doesn't have his ego invested in them. He is showing us what is out there: the good, the bad and the ugly. He is straight-forward and no-nonsense about what he likes; he lives in the world of mongering REALITY and not in Fantasyland. Appreciate what he contributes and congratulate him when he has the courage to post INFORMATION, rather than revealing your obvious insecurities by throwing rocks.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1094790]There are 522 things that it could possibly have been, the vast and most probable majority of which are relatively harmless. That doesn't mean anything other than the point I was initially trying to make: we don't know what it was, and speculating about and assigning a specific diagnosis or even a range of diagnoses, is not necessarily constructive. [/QUOTE]Good point SuperE. I tend to think she has one the the lessser ailments, She didn't have any of the normal street wear you see on most SW and she does care about her health. This is not wishfull thinking. Other then the anal fun with the toy we just did the pictures. I just had a 15. 00 BBBJ a hour before. Truthfully She just was not that much into me, but that is not something I blame her for. She was willing to do a BBBJ if I had wanted one.
I also tend to think what ever the ailment is may been made worst by her period that had just ended. No matter how clean a woman is those kittys get pretty funky during that time.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1094790]Street shares and reports what he finds, and often shows us their pics. If everyone did that we would have abundant, useful information. He didn't manufacture these girls in his garage or invent them. He doesn't have his ego invested in them. He is showing us what is out there: the good, the bad and the ugly. He is straight-forward and no-nonsense about what he likes; he lives in the world of mongering REALITY and not in Fantasyland. Appreciate what he contributes and congratulate him when he has the courage to post INFORMATION, rather than revealing your obvious insecurities by throwing rocks. [/QUOTE]Thanks SuperE. I try to keep it real. I do think most of us want to see a wide range of SW's of various degrees of attractiveness. Reality can be hot. Very hot. These are women that YOU CAN ACTUALLY OBTAIN for 10. 00, 20. 00 or 30. 00, and many find that exciting. Men can get in their car tomorrow, and with some luck can find a woman we post on this site, or some other SW that is just as good. To these Men those of us that are making real reports with pictures are doing something important.
Street
[QUOTE= Member #1759]Street I appreciate your humble manner, honesty & contributions. Keep up the good work.[/QUOTE]Double ditto to that, Street.
[QUOTE=Street Steve; 1094911]Good point SuperE. I tend to think she has one the the lessser ailments, She didn't have any of the normal street wear you see on most SW and she does care about her health. This is not wishfull thinking. Other then the anal fun with the toy we just did the pictures. I just had a 15. 00 BBBJ a hour before. Truthfully She just was not that much into me, but that is not something I blame her for. She was willing to do a BBBJ if I had wanted one.
I also tend to think what ever the ailment is may been made worst by her period that had just ended. No matter how clean a woman is those kittys get pretty funky during that time. [/QUOTE]I assumed it was something like that. Others seem ready to assume the worst. They should be thankful for the honest intel that they receive from you, and not be so ready to throw rocks and pile on. That's a big problem on this site. As soon as someone wants to step forward and make continued meaningful contributions, there is a small group of troublemakers that are ready to take him down like a pack of wild dogs. These people all seem to have a similar profile: relatively few contributions and / or mostly meaningless babble, and a history of attacking. They seem to have one of the oldest psychological motives known to man: the bullying syndrome. It happens on the playground and it happens here. Some people will just never grow up.
[QUOTE=Street Steve]Thanks SuperE. I try to keep it real. I do think most of us want to see a wide range of SW's of various degrees of attractiveness. Reality can be hot. Very hot. These are women that YOU CAN ACTUALLY OBTAIN for 10. 00, 20. 00 or 30. 00, and many find that exciting. Men can get in their car tomorrow, and with some luck can find a woman we post on this site, or some other SW that is just as good. To these Men those of us that are making real reports with pictures are doing something important.
Street[/QUOTE]There are many aspects of this hobby that are fun and exciting. You always provide real and valuable information about that. If everyone in the Philly Forum did even a small portion of your level of reporting we would know about every single girl on the stroll.
I to Am thankful to the honest talk on here. Some guy wouldn't have published some of the pictures but he did! And thats what mongering is all about, not everything out there is super models There are some diamonds in the rough you guys provide some good info like prices locations and times that make it easier for others and that is what I love not been stingy. I might pass some of you guys on the stroll in 10 days I'll be the one with the super model in the car! LOL
I have seen this spinner a number of times on the southern end of the stroll, sometimes hanging out with a taller gal with streaked hair who looked like she might be a friend. For a number of different reasons the opportunity had never been right to pick her up. She was no incredible beauty, but she was pretty enough, and she had what appeared to be a thin and appealing bod.
This particular morning she was flying solo and I stopped to chat her up. Her personality was cheerful, which is always a good sign, and I asked her if she wanted to go for a ride. She gave me a big wink and we walked to my car.
She mentioned that she had a place, but it was pretty far away, and I didn't really have time for a long date or a long drive. So I decided instead to head for the Carlyle. I told her what I had in mind: FS and pic-taking. She asked what I was planning to spend, and I gave her my standard base rate, plus the promise of a tip if things went well. She was cool with it. The only thing she was against was having her arms photographed. My guess about that proved to be correct: some nasty-looking abrasions and needle tracks.
Liz was a very enthusiastic cock sucker. She couldn't even nearly DT me, but it wasn't for lack of trying. She would gag and apologize, but I told her it was fine, and it was. A DT suck isn't the only thing that is important. She furiously and sloppily worked as far down on me as she could, with a lot of tongue action, licking up and down my shaft. After sucking on the boys, she would slowly lick up the shaft like she was licking a candy cane, flutter her tongue on the tip and then take me into her mouth and use tongue swirls and heavy sucking action. I asked her to hold and lightly tickle my balls as she did this, and I was just getting into my dirty-talking routine. I have not emphasized this enough in past reports, but it isn't often so much what you say as how you say it that makes talking dirty arousing. It can be very erotic to be saying sweet things with a nasty tone (for example, snarling, "That's it! Be a good girl! Be a sweetie!", or saying very nasty things in a very soft voice (for example, whispering breathlessly, " Fuck me sl*ut! "). Better yet is changing voice even within the same utterance, from sweet to nasty, with the words sometimes matching and sometimes not necessarily matching the tone of voice, or, a cute phrase, like one of my all-time favorites: cum piggie. She really was getting into understanding how the dirty talking was turning me on, just as she looked up at me with big wide eyes and I blasted a load into her mouth while saying, "Take it all, like a good little suck bi*tch." She swallowed it as small cum rivulets streamed down each side of her mouth, which was in a big grin.
We still had time for more, and I wanted to do exactly what one should be able to do with a spinner: "spin her." She started on top by sliding onto me CG style. She bounced up and down on me, moaning and screaming the whole time. I pulled her towards me by grabbing both nipples between my thumbs and forefingers, and stretching them out. This made her bounce harder and screech louder. She squealed even more raucously as I increasingly applied more pressure. I picked her up by her hips and started to shift her around on my cock. She took the hint and edged around on her heels as I turned her to the RCG position. Most women have good looking asses, but not always spinners, depending upon how skinny they are. However, Liz's ass looked very inviting and I slapped it as it bumped and jiggled in front of me. With every spank she would make a high-pitched squeak, which was SO titillating. She levered herself up on her hands and knees, spread her knees as wide as she could and plunged herself up and down on my dick. Her pussy was squishing as she sank onto me, and then pushed herself up in rapid succession. I was talking dirty the whole time, but after about 15 minutes of this I hissed, "Take my hot load, fuck piggie," and busted a hard nut as my body arched into the air underneath her. Damn that felt good!
On the way back I asked her about the gal I usually see her with on the stroll. She said her name was Jessica, and they were roomies. I have no complaints about Liz, but Jessica always looked to be prettier and have a more inviting body shape (not that I have anything against spinners). They didn't have digits (so what else is new) , but I got an idea of their usual schedule and where they hang.
Ratings: Face: above average (pretty, but not quite as cute or beautiful as some others on the stroll) ; Body; above average (this score would have been higher had she not had bruised arms; her body was fairly tight and attractive for a spinner without being concentration-camp gaunt) ; BJ: above average (B minus for actual grade, but an A for effort) ; Fucking: well above average (this is her highest and best sexual use IMHO) ; Attitude; outstanding; Overall Experience: well above average (primarily on the strengths of her attitude and fucking skills) ; Repeatable? Yes. YMMV
Mosaic collage of the last ten pics I posted of Liz.
My favorite pic of Liz from the last set of 10 posted.
[QUOTE=Jicarlo;1095079]I to Am thankful to the honest talk on here. Some guy wouldn't have published some of the pictures but he did! And thats what mongering is all about, not everything out there is super models There are some diamonds in the rough you guys provide some good info like prices locations and times that make it easier for others and that is what I love not been stingy. I might pass some of you guys on the stroll in 10 days I'll be the one with the super model in the car! LOL[/QUOTE]You are welcome. I hope you have a great time when you are here. It's an adult candy store on on the K most days and nights, so treat yourself to your confection of choice. :)
Metalmanix posted this report about a month ago in which he also took pics of two encounters:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?4137-Streetwalker-Reports&p=1082649&viewfull=1#post1082649]Brittany and Elle[/url]
I recognized immediately that I had several recent dates with Brittany, even though Metalmanix had not remembered her name. I posted pics of her with my report. The pics showed what she looked like when she initially hit the stroll, and several months later, and 30-40 pounds lighter:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1063952&viewfull=1#post1063952]My Report on Brittany[/url]
What I didn't recognize immediately is that I had also dated the other girl he pictured: Elle. When I dated her she said her name was "Ellie." Here is a link to my report and pics of her from last summer:
[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=842296&postcount=380][b]Ellie[/b][/url];[b][blue]**[/blue][/b];[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=842299&postcount=381]Nude/Spread/Doggie[/url];[url=http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php? p=842302&postcount=382]Sucking[/url]
I don't have a good excuse for why I didn't remember that I had also dated "Elle" (apparently the current way she prefers to spell and pronounce her name).
1. I haven't seen her on the stroll for a very long time.
2. The name differential.
3. The tattoo now in the center of her chest, which wasn't there when I dated her last summer, so that must be a new addition.
4. The date was not very memorable.
5. Maybe I have dated so many SWs in the past 2 years of posting here and in the past 15 years or so of mongering in Philly, that they are all starting to run together. One thing is for sure; it is a lot easier to keep them straight with pics. Just like here with "Elle," I sometimes eventually recognize a past encounter.
You can fairly conclusively tell from the collage below (another very effective use of the collage for side-by-side comparisons) that my "Ellie" is the same gal as Metalmanix's "Elle." The face and the hair match up pretty well. Even the tits look the same. The only difference is the center tattoo, but a year has passed since my date with her. And I have seem that tat on others in a similar location. It must be popular.
ANYWAY... for what is it worth, my experience with Elle was OK but I have had many that are much better on the K. As always, YMMV.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1095121&viewfull=1#post1095121[/url]
Ay Liz. Love this girl. I always had a great time with Liz. I'm glad to see she's still working and giving great service. Thanks for the report and pics SuperE. Brings back fond memories for me.
Be Safe!
La Chic
Sluttypie apparently was a bad girl and had to go stand in the corner. She has been confined to her own thread in Louisville and can't post anywhere else, so I guess that throws cold water on our public banter back and forth. That's too bad because I was really starting to enjoy conversing with her. It is so rare that we hear a provider's point of view, let alone one that seems to be quite intelligent, is into being kinky and likes to share her naughty pics.
She is somewhat miffed that the guys on the Louisville Board don't write very detailed reports or post many pics. However, to get people to voluntarily change their behavior in this regard just isn't realistically likely to happen. People have all sorts of reasons for not doing this and they have a right to having these reasons. I shared this with her and she agreed. This is another thing I like about her. She seems to have an open mind. I don't know why the guys on her local board can't play nice with her But, that is their business.
I still am communicating with Sluttypie privately, and she has given me the OK to share what she has to say publicly. I think we have some things we could learn from a female viewpoint.
She loved the pacifier pics I shared of Liz. She thought they were sexily cute. She promised to get a pacifier and take some pics for me, and I will share them with you.
Sluttypie also loves the mosaic collages I have created for her from her pics. She wants more of them to post in her thread, and for her own personal collection.
I think that continuing this banter, and sharing it, together with her pics, will prove very entertaining, useful and will provide something we don't generally get a chance to hear about and see in this Forum.
Here is a collage of Brittany that shows, left to right, when she first hit the Ave in late spring, later in the summer when she had lost 30-40 pounds, and even later when she had shed yet some more weight. It looks like her tits are gradually disappearing, but she has a much more appealing overall shape. Often when a chubby girl loses a lot of weight her face isn't as attractive, but her face seems to have become less blemished and even cuter.
She is a sweetie and one of the best BBBJ or FS dates you might find on the K.
Fantastic collages. Glad my work could go to good use. However, I'm starting to think that your 'Ellie' and the 'Elle' that I met may be different. While they do look similar based on the two photos that I took -- my memory of her is much different than the pictures that you posted.
It may be that the streets have definitely taken a toll on her and that has really changed her appearance. Who knows.
[QUOTE=Metalmanix;1095738]Fantastic collages.[/QUOTE]Thank you. I am having a lot of fun with these, but they also can prove quite useful especially for side-by-side comparisons.
[QUOTE=Metalmanix]Glad my work could go to good use.[/QUOTE]A picture can say a lot more than a description. You are to be congratulated for posting some.
[QUOTE=Metalmanix]However, I'm starting to think that your 'Ellie' and the 'Elle' that I met may be different. While they do look similar based on the two photos that I took. My memory of her is much different than the pictures that you posted.
It may be that the streets have definitely taken a toll on her and that has really changed her appearance. Who knows. [/QUOTE]A year on the streets can be like ten years of "normal' life, and a girl can look different after a year on the K. You dated her recently and probably have a fresher memory of her than I do. However, that's what makes the pics so useful in making a comparison. If you look closely at the pics side-by-side, she is a match in so many ways: the shape of the face, nose, forehead, set of the eyes, cheeks, mouth, chin, and even the general style and color and length of her hair, although this is easy to change. Then there are the other matches: the size and shape of the body, the size and shape of the tits, even the look of the nipples. And, of course, there is the close match on the name.
Nothing is for certain, but, if this isn't the same girl, she could be her twin sister IMHO. The only thing that really doesn't match up is the tat. If my pics had the tat it would be hard to reconcile, but my date with her happened last summer and she could easily have added it since then.
[QUOTE=Mmppt]Drove by a bit around the K today around lunch. Saw one blonde in front of the brightside academy in heels flipping her hair and strutting back and forth. Seemed a little too obvious. She was standing in plain sight of a traffic guard and students. Possible LE?[/QUOTE]A SW in heels is rare, but there are a few who wear them. Strutting and hair flipping is normal for some SWs, although the MO for most is standing still, staring and / or waving. However, decoys are more usually posted in the evening when the commercial and commuting activity on the K is substantially over, and, regardless of the time of day or night, they would normally be posted on a relatively deserted corner, and not directly in front of a traffic guard and a school at lunchtime. That would be an inappropriate show for the kiddies, and it would make things awkward to monitor and potentially dangerous to young innocent bystanders to set the sting in motion. Anything is possible, and maybe LE undercover is trying to throw a major league curve ball with these circumstances, to entice us into swinging at a bad pitch, but I wouldn't bet on it.
[QUOTE=La Chic; 1095667][url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1095121&viewfull=1#post1095121[/url]
Ay Liz. Love this girl. I always had a great time with Liz. I'm glad to see she's still working and giving great service. Thanks for the report and pics SuperE. Brings back fond memories for me.
Be Safe!
La Chic[/QUOTE]I am glad to be of service. I am also trying to hook up with Liz's roomie, Jessica. Jessica is a looker even by civvie standards.
Face closeups; sucking pacifier; topless; nude; mirror shot; sucking my cock
Mosaic collage of the last ten pics I posted of Liz.
My favorite pic of Liz from the last 10 posted. I just love pacifiers. And, the double image and multiple angles presented by the mirror makes the shot more interesting IMHO.
Close-ups of face; tongue sticking out; sucking on pacifier, topless; nude; sucking on my cock
A mosaic collage of the latest 10 pics I posted of Liz.
My fav Liz pic from the last set of 10 posted.
And, of course, I cannot bid final adieu to my report and pics of Liz without my fav pic of her licking my cock. :)
Some people have plenty of money, but still choose to look for bargains when the blue light is flashing at K Mart. I suppose you could place me in that camp. I never felt a need to impress anyone with the labels on my clothes or the store where I bought something. I fortunately learned some life lessons about that early on. My first summer job was in a clothing factory. One of my jobs was distributing the labels to be sewn into the clothing. Depending upon where it was to be shipped, there were different labels. So, the dresses that went to Macy's got one label and the generic brands got other labels. They were made of the same material, and sewn in the same way on the same equipment by the same people. The only difference was the destination, and the ultimate retail price tag. My second summer job was in a corn cannery. We had labels there too: we had labels for national brands like Del Monte and labels for generic brands for grocery chains. It was the same corn, the same cans, and the same canning process. The only difference was the label.
You can walk down the aisle in any grocery store or pharmacy and see a nationally well-known brand next to a generic brand. There is usually a significant price differential. Yet, many people elect to buy the better-known national brand. Why? : there is a perception of higher quality and value. There are other commodities that are basically alike such as beer and cigarettes. Taste tests have conclusively proven that the vast majority of consumers cannot tell one brand of cigarette or beer from another, yet many are fiercely loyal to their brands. It is a classic conflict of perception versus reality. Does that make those who choose national brands wrong or stupid? : of course not. They are doing what we are more or less psychologically programmed to do as human beings.
What does that have to do with mongering and finding women for sex? : EVERYTHING. Given a similar looking woman, some would define the price one pays or the place one procures as reflective of a perception of high self-worth. Yet we have illustrated time and again that the very same girls who are plying their trade on the internet and with escort services are also doing so on the K at a drastically reduced rate. That argument should be moot for those who would claim that SWs are inherently inferior merchandise. They aren't. Some SWs can be a little worse for wear, but no more so than the bait and switch you can get on line. At least on the streets you basically see what you are getting. Granted, the bottom of the barrel is more likely to be found on the streets than on the internet, but that is just reality. Some people like to get used merchandise at swap meets or garage sales; it is all perception and individual choice. People should come to understand that your choice of purchases has less to do with who you are and more to do with what you like and prefer. We all like different things; it doesn't make us better or worse than someone else. Comdemning the purchase says a lot more about you than the person making the purchase.
This brings me to the inspiration for this post: an ad with pics run by Lovejenna, an escort advertiser (see collage of her as pics below). I noticed this ad primarily because it was posted in Louisville where my good friend Sluttypie lives. Then I noticed that Lovejenna was only passing through. However, her pics reveal a loveliness that seems to be top shelf. Her prices are too: "starting" at 400? And requiring "screening?" She is a beautiful specimen but I can get 20 car BJ dates for that on the K, and Street can probably negotiate 40, and we sure don't have to endure any "screening" process, LOL. I don't begrudge anyone choosing Lovejenna as a purchase. Just as those who choose nationally-advertised brands over generics, a deep psychological need is obviously being fulfilled to feel one is getting the best and paying top dollar for it. Me? : I will continue to be searching for the ever elusive gem next to the proverbial flashing blue light (no, not the bubble gum machine, LOL) on the Ave.
There is dumb mongering and then there is DUMB mongering. A fellow member here put me onto this little tidbit:
[url=http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/prostitution/never-call-cops-consumer-complaint-about-your-hooker]Hooker Consumer Complaint[/url]
I thought that it was bad when a monger did a U-turn on the Ave, and pulled up right next to a SW with LE nearby. But, complaining to LE about getting screwed on a SW transaction? That takes the cake!
Someone should have told this guy that the BBB of SW transactions is right here on this website.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1096450]There is dumb mongering and then there is DUMB mongering. A fellow member here put me onto this little tidbit:
[url=http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/prostitution/never-call-cops-consumer-complaint-about-your-hooker]Hooker Consumer Complaint[/url]
I thought that it was bad when a monger did a U-turn on the Ave, and pulled up right next to a SW with LE nearby. But, complaining to LE about getting screwed on a SW transaction? That takes the cake!
Someone should have told this guy that the BBB of SW transactions is right here on this website. [/QUOTE]Actually there SE I recall a couple of other stories like that one. Some people never learn (like putting a cup of hot coffee in their lap while driving).
[QUOTE=Seva Lurker;1096614]Actually there SE I recall a couple of other stories like that one. Some people never learn (like putting a cup of hot coffee in their lap while driving).[/QUOTE]I still get a kick out of that woman who sued McDonald's for spilling a hot cup of their coffee on her lap and burning her cootchie. She initially asked for a 20k settlement and McDonald's refused on principal. In the eventual court case she was awarded $2.86 million. The trial judge reduced the award to $640,000 and the parties agreed to a confidential amount before it went to appeal. But, all this for someone too dumb to know that you don't know that coffee is hot and that you don't pop the lid between your knees? There are many lessons to be learned from this, including that taking your first loss can be the best decision, regardless who may be at fault, and never overestimate the intelligence or underestimate the big-corporation hatred of the average American jury. Now you will notice that every cup of coffee served by any restaurant chain has a warning label that the coffee is hot. DUH!
I once read the label of a cough syrup for kids under 12. One of the warnings was not to operate heavy machinery?
There used to be a TV show called "America's Dumbest Criminals." The escapades I remember best included one guy who complained to LE about some bad dope he bought. Another guy wrote a bank robbery note to the teller on his deposit slip. And, then there was the group who forgot to fill the tank on their getaway car.
An IQ test was never a requirement for being a criminal, OR a monger. When I see a story about a monger complaining to LE about getting ripped off by a SW, or someone picking up a girl right on the Ave with a squad car half a block behind him, or any number of other boneheaded moves, it becomes very clear to me that some mongers may never learn until they suffer consequences for their actions.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1096656]I still get a kick out of that woman who sued McDonald's for spilling a hot cup of their coffee on her lap and burning her cootchie. She initially asked for a 20k settlement and McDonald's refused on principal. In the eventual court case she was awarded $3 million. There are many lessons to be learned from this, including that taking your first loss can be the best decision, regardless who may be at fault, and never overestimate the intelligence or underestimate the big-corporation hatred of the average American jury. Now you will notice that every cup of every coffee served by any restaurant chain has a warning label that the coffee is hot. DUH!
I once read the label of a cough syrup for kids under 12. One of the warnings was not to operate heavy machinery?
There used to be a TV show called "America's Dumbest Criminals." The escapades I remember best were one guy who complained to LE about some bad dope he bought. Another guy wrote a bank robbery note to the teller on his deposit slip. And, then there was the group who forgot to fill the tank on their getaway car.
An IQ test was never a requirement for being a criminal, OR a monger. When I see a story about a monger complaining to LE about getting ripped off by a SW, or someone picking up a girl right on the Ave with a squad car half a block behind him, or any number of other boneheaded moves, it becomes very clear to me that some mongers may never learn until they suffer consequences for their actions. [/QUOTE]We could carry this one on forever. There are so many really dumb things done every day. While I was in the service, a senior NCO with 19. 5 years got busted for selling dope. While being led to car in cuffs, he supposedly asked if this would affect his retirement. DUH?
As to learning from their actions. I doubt that. If we did we wouldn't have so many three time losers in jail right now. .
Time to go unstuff the turkey and stuff me. .
Happy Thanksgiving.
[QUOTE=Seva Lurker; 1096660]We could carry this one on forever. There are so many really dumb things done every day. While I was in the service, a senior NCO with 19. 5 years got busted for selling dope. While being led to car in cuffs, he supposedly asked if this would affect his retirement. DUH?
As to learning from their actions. I doubt that. If we did we wouldn't have so many three time losers in jail right now. .
Time to go unstuff the turkey and stuff me. .
Happy Thanksgiving. [/QUOTE]Turkeys have a reputation as being one of the dumbest animals. They are supposedly so dumb that, when it rains, they often look up at it and drown themselves in the process. That's why we call stupid people "turkeys."
You are so right that we could carry on how dumb some people and some mongers are forever.
This is a particularly appropriate metaphor today. Happy Thanksgiving to all! Eat your turkey and don't be one. :)
I just don't trust BP ads. I would love to have Jenna. If I could be sure that is who I'm getting. Fact is,"If it looks too good to be true." And I can't afford 400 to find out. Even if she is real, IMHO, no pussy worth all that. Truth is once you walk in the door, you're screwed.
Slutty Pie is worth the drive. If I had to trust the ads. She comes across as a real person.
Mostly I do prefer SW because as you say Super. I can see what I. M getting. A bird in the hand so to speak.
Stay Safe.
L T M