BackPage Advertiser Reviews

Anyone have experience with her? Is she legit? I could only find recent info on another blonde Nikki, not her.

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/nikk-nikki-naughty-or-nice-and-always-tight/49170462[/URL]

[QUOTE=StingrayJones;3639277]Anyone have experience with her? Is she legit? I could only find recent info on another blonde Nikki, not her.

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/nikk-nikki-naughty-or-nice-and-always-tight/49170462[/URL][/QUOTE]I don't have an experience with her but I know she (and her sister) is legit. You are right, I don't think I saw many reviews on her either.

[QUOTE=Goodson2000;3639428]I don't have an experience with her but I know she (and her sister) is legit. You are right, I don't think I saw many reviews on her either.[/QUOTE]Saw her st plaza. Fair price. Good performance. I'd recommend a short term experience. Gets the job done.

[QUOTE=Goodson2000;3638712]What's up with all those phone number only ad on BP? A new trend, or any agenda behind?

Before that, all new ads were with non-937.[/QUOTE]It appears to be a move by BP to prevent explicit ad content or any appearance of pay for play. There is no longer an option to give a description for ads in the dating category.

[QUOTE=Ceenote;3640737]It appears to be a move by BP to prevent explicit ad content or any appearance of pay for play. There is no longer an option to give a description for ads in the dating category.[/QUOTE]I agree. And BP automatically converted those ads with wrong words into a digits only one.

But then this Rip Off Hall of Shamer got around the restriction. She uses words like "sexy".

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/pic-from-today-and-video-sexy-sweet-clean-princess-treat-yourself/52349067[/URL]

This one uses "curvy""busty".

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/last-day-visiting-a-few-days-only-busty-curvy-playmate-j-cups/53330947[/URL]

Maybe not wrong words triggering it. Is it possible that BP requires further proof who she is beyond the SNS account?

Whatever it is, BP is dying.

[QUOTE=Goodson2000;3638712]What's up with all those phone number only ad on BP? A new trend, or any agenda behind?

Before that, all new ads were with non-937.[/QUOTE]I wonder if all the older ads are just being recycled and the new ones have the restrictions.

Late post, but saw Taylor again. Decent massage and excellent HJ. I would really, really, really like to fuck that big ass of hers, but I'm always just satisfied by her hands. As for the issues with communication that others have mentioned with her. She's older, but she has all this high tech phone / technology that I don't think she's great at using haha. She can be a little talkative but, I just tune it out. Every experience with her has been pleasant and I'll continue seeing her regularly. I think I'll go for the home run next time.

[QUOTE=Brandon2779;3642320]Late post, but saw Taylor again. Decent massage and excellent HJ. I would really, really, really like to fuck that big ass of hers, but I'm always just satisfied by her hands. As for the issues with communication that others have mentioned with her. She's older, but she has all this high tech phone / technology that I don't think she's great at using haha. She can be a little talkative but, I just tune it out. Every experience with her has been pleasant and I'll continue seeing her regularly. I think I'll go for the home run next time.[/QUOTE]Big ass you say? Who's Taylor?

The restriction on BP forced Kayla Nicole to put her duo partner's pics on her ad.

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/MenSeekWomen/937-951-1151/51554582[/URL]

Usually she uses her own pics and some words to describe her duo partners. She has 3 different regular duo partners. Because of the new BP restriction, she has no other way to let buyers know she has a duo partner currently. This time it is ItsSommerTime, a former USA advertiser. It's an old pic of her though. (BTW the Kayla's ad is at M4 W section, not at W4 M).

So I still don't know what is triggering the minimalist ad. The consensus is there must be a no-no words. I'm not sure as I see other ad with words, and Kayla's ads are usually not as explicit or provocative.

[QUOTE=WileyJake;3642995]Big ass you say? Who's Taylor?[/QUOTE]Ad is down right now. But she's been reviewed numerous times. It's usually under the Massage section. Older woman. Her body is very strange LOL she's pretty slim from the tits up. But her stomach and ass are quite large, not generally my cup of tea. But she usually wears stuff that hides her stomach and shows the booty. &the ass is soft and looks nice.

I tried containing her several times last night crickets almost every time. And idea on how to get a hold of her? Kayla Nicole

I can't find anything on her. Anybody have intel?

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/sexy-cherokee-dream-catcher/51986047[/URL]

Thanks,

BK.

[QUOTE=Betakai532;3644350]I can't find anything on her. Anybody have intel?

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/sexy-cherokee-dream-catcher/51986047[/URL]

Thanks,

BK.[/QUOTE]Saw her about a year ago at her place (I assume it was) near Fairborn. Got a sub-par massage and that was all. Wouldn't recommend.

[QUOTE=Betakai532;3644350]I can't find anything on her. Anybody have intel?

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/sexy-cherokee-dream-catcher/51986047[/URL]

Thanks,

BK.[/QUOTE]Waste of time, crappy massage, annoying chat the entire time, no extras save your money.

In my opinion, she isn't worth the price of admission. She tries to upsell, but I wouldn't expect anything but disappointment with the additional compensation. There are much better values out there. If anyone has experienced more than an overpriced HJ, I'd like to hear about it. As always YMMV.

[QUOTE=Betakai532;3644350]I can't find anything on her. Anybody have intel?

[URL]http://dayton.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/sexy-cherokee-dream-catcher/51986047[/URL]

Thanks,

BK.[/QUOTE]