2006 Archived General Reports

[QUOTE=TexasMonger]Android67:

The girls he photograps, although may not be pretty...[/QUOTE]Sure, if you are seeking a wife, a long term relationship or someone to show off to moms, the family or the fellows - you might want to do your search elsewhere and not here among the girls I post. But, if you are just in the mood to have your dick sucked, try out that new supply of viagra, or just get you freak on - there may be something here for you.

There are better sources out there, that is for sure. But, I still do not understand what all the complaining is about. Whenever I check out the Photo Gallery I see any number of girls pictured fully clothed, walking down an Avenue, somewhere. If you removed the clothing from some of the girls pictured in the Photo Gallery, I am willing to bet that some of them will have bodies’ similar, if not worst then the girls I post. If you could turn these girls around and get a glance at their faces, I bet you will discover that a few of them look like shit. How about this? Some of the girls pictures presented fully clothed in these forums, walking away from the camera, may not be providers.

On the other hand, the pictures I post, that are so often complained about, are all of providers. Does anybody depute that? They may not be top models, but they are out there. And more important (to me anyway), what you see is what you get. I am giving you a look at what is beneath the wrapper, inside the box, under the hood.

I know that some of you are dealing with these girls, even the black ones. I see guys both black and white out there picking these same girls up. Not all of them may be posting on this site. But, I do not believe that every guy on this site, in this forum, only picks up Dymes or 10s. Where are all of these fine women? I drive the same streets. Either I am blind or I am by passing the 10s, 8s and 7s to pickup only the trashy types. (By the way - the trashy types sometimes give better service, and that is a fact.)

I think that part of the problem maybe that most guys on this site would rather date only WSWs and seem to comment more often on the WSWs. I have noted that girls like Janie get a larger raise/reaction then, let us say, a girl like Sabrina. I do not think there was one post directed as a reply to Sabrina. This does not bother me. We all have our preferences. Myself, I like the Hi Yellow girls or the nicely tan ones (and for some reason, the blond ones - maybe it is because of all of the Dumb blond girl jokes).

From the start I said I was an equal opportunity hunter. Because I am black (and it's my camera) there is bound to be a slight slant towards BSWers, in the skin tones of the girls I present. This is bound to happen for any number of reasons, one of which is that some WSW's on the K will not date blacks - go figure.

Like I said none of this bothers me. What bothers me is that many of you seem to think that I have some control over the looks of the girls I post. Like these are my girls or something. They are strangers. I do not mind individual comments on an individual girl. Janie was thin, sickly looking and I did not mind guys pointing that or things like that out. Prehaps, I have not noticed that she was thin, I certainly did not notice her skin tint problem. Tell me if you think a individual girl is ugly. That type of comment is welcomed, and it is your opinion. What bugs me are general comments like,” The girls he photograps, ....may not be pretty." That sounds like they are somehow my girls. They are not my girls.

On the other hand, keep posting - what the fuck - who cares?

Oh, yeah! Thanks for the suggestions, TM. I am aware of many different lighting techniques. Back in the good old days I used camera filters, diffusers, lights bouncing, light handlers, dodging, Burning techniques, flares, flash globes/filters, along with various developing systems and more to get a desired effect. But for this, my trusty standard camera flash will have to do.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Cookyjar]I asked Janie to give me a post looking back like she was waiting for her boyfriend to slide inside her. This is what she did. Not much ass to get in the way, and a nice shot. This is one of the reason that I'd like to try her again.

Lean and clean, what more can you ask?

CookyJar[/QUOTE]

Damn, she does have a very sexy face and those titties are still nice. Put 15 more lbs on her and she's be really stunning, but still looks good.

And I'm in awe of CookyJar's excellent work on here. He should just ignore any of you losers who criticize his choices, because you are just jealous...or maybe only partly heterosexual if you don't understand why some of us love pussy, however "imperfect" sometimes.

[QUOTE=Peter Johnson]Damn, she does have a damn sexy face and those titties are still nice.[/QUOTE]Yes, Peter, we are proud of our women here in Philadelphia and of our chronicler Cookyjar.

But Peter, you need to help us out here. [b]Eight out of Ten[/b] pictures our chronicler most recently showed us were of a girl's ass cheeks and asshole. You know, the asshole, or rectum, from which people take a shit. As you know, those holes smell pretty bad and in fact are the body part that most people use to insult other people. In other words, as the photos well show, they're a disgusting place that people wipe daily but don't really need to look at for sexual purposes.

So Peter, in your post you showed your appreciation of the face and titties of a woman, which are natural sexual attractants. Thus your opinion of the asshole pictures will be valuable to other readers here:

• Do you think that showing off a woman's ass and shithole helps men find women for sex?
• Do you agree that a person posting a picture of an asshole is in no way attracted to assholes in general, for example those of his own sex?

Please answer YES to both questions. Otherwise we could be in danger of violating forum principles, and we would lose a widely acclaimed contributer to our forum here in the City of, um, Brotherly Love.

[QUOTE=Cookyjar] What bugs me are general comments like,” The girls he photograps, ....may not be pretty." That sounds like they are somehow my girls. They are not my girls.
[/QUOTE]
But if you had any kind of game they could be your girls.

I posted this elsewhere, but you guys seem very knowledgable, so I thought I'd you too.

Is the LE check when the SW grabs your crotch and flashes her tittie for you to grab or do they sometimes just show their bra and in these cases, are you allowed to look at their tittie?

So how is this LE check usually initiated? Does the SW just do it as soon as she gets into the car or do you need to say something to initiate it?

And do all SWs do it and more importantly, do you mess with any SWs who don't do it and risk that they are LE?

Finally, have there been any cases where female LE will grab your crotch or flash their bra and then still arrest you?

Sorry if any of these are dumb questions, but they must be asked...Thanks..

No reason to feel embarased about asking newbie questions. After all it's better than getting arrested by some decoy.

Just follow some basic rules such as don't negotiate unless she gets in. Do the check and drive a good distance on empty streets to make sure you are not being followed.

After the sw gets in I drive away and I ask if I can grab her. The sw will grab your dick or ask you to show it. I use the term grab because you are not implicating yourself. If you say can I touch your tit then if the sw is a decoy then it's possible that the term can be used as probable cause for criminal intent to solicit arrest.

You should always do the check. I have never met a sw will refuse to do the check.

No female decoy wants to be touched. Sometimes male vice decoys will do this because after all it's free fun.

Took a ride on the K Sunday night (actually Monday morning), starting all the way down at Front & Thompson and continuing up to Frankford Hospital, and then all the way back again. On this night, I was amazed at the number of decent-looking ladies out for a stroll.

Mostly WSW's on this night, with a smattering of LSW's and only a couple of BSW's. Far more interesting than the quantity, though, was the unusual *quality* of talent, IMHO. There were quite a few I'd rate at 6 or 7, and even one 8+ in the vicinity of Margaret-Orthodox -- a far cry from the often sub-par offerings that are usually available. Hopefully it's a trend that'll continue.

I didn't partake -- being the ch*ckensh*t that I am, I only stop once in maybe 10 outings -- and it was probably just as well, because it seemed that right around 4:00 AM on my back leg, somebody threw the 'LE switch' -- all of a sudden, there were marked units all over the place, just sort of "hanging out" at Little Lou's, at the 7-11, at Somerset, the bend at Front, and so on.

They didn't seem to be aggressively chasing the SW's -- it was more like they were just showing the flag at strategic locations, as it were. What struck me as odd was that it was like they all just 'appeared' at once.

Concerted effort, or paranoia on my part? You make the call.

[QUOTE=Peter Johnson]
Finally, have there been any cases where female LE will grab your crotch or flash their bra and then still arrest you?[/QUOTE]

Thats THE most important question. The answer is, yes, in some jurisdictions they can and have. In some jurisdictions, male decoys have gone so far as to completion. Never read about this with a female decoy.

Truth be told, the LE check is a myth, a misnomer. That myth will get you in jail.

Its all built out of the idea that police can't entrap you in any illegal scheme. So they can't coerce you to do something, or initiate something which is illegal. The truth is, they can.

The police can't formulate a plan, plant the idea in your head, and then instigate/coerce/harass you to do the plan, just to prosecute you. But if you have any inclination to do the plan and do it...thats your ass, and you now need a clever attorney to clean it up.

Just to frame it how far they can go...a LEO, in a drug sting, could inhale a volume of marijuana in your presence, just to prosecute you for doing the same.

If you expose your genetalia in your car during a sting, but bail for any numerous reasons...you -could- get snatched for indecent exposure.

Now, I do remember reading a case where a sting can't verbally coerce you. Meaning, the lady can't walk up and same dumb shit like "Please give me $50 for sex, or I will blow my f'n head off." Also, they (the male decoy) aren't allowed to use excessive amounts of money.

Finally, the best way to protect yourself is with and around money. Never talk money, never offer money, don't even imply money. The police could jump the gun a bit and snatch you, but they are waiting for P4P solicitation. I'll say it again...never, ever, talk money.

I agree exposing yourself is a risk. So it's always better to drive away and then do the check. If I know the sw is working then I will do the check parked. Finally always wait until drive away until you discuss the price.

[QUOTE=Stoner]
Finally, the best way to protect yourself is with and around money. Never talk money, never offer money, don't even imply money. The police could jump the gun a bit and snatch you, but they are waiting for P4P solicitation. I'll say it again...never, ever, talk money.[/QUOTE]

I don't understand what you are saying... you have to talk money at some point though, so at what point do you do so?

[QUOTE=Hizark21]I agree exposing yourself is a risk. So it's always better to drive away and then do the check. If I know the sw is working then I will do the check parked. Finally always wait until drive away until you discuss the price.[/QUOTE]

What do you mean "if I know the sw is working"....and why would that lead you to do the check parked rather than while you are driving?

[QUOTE=Stoner]Thats THE most important question. The answer is, yes, in some jurisdictions they can and have. In some jurisdictions, male decoys have gone so far as to completion. Never read about this with a female decoy.

Truth be told, the LE check is a myth, a misnomer. That myth will get you in jail.

[/QUOTE]I agree with you stoner. 100%

However, I do the check anyway, minus the exposure part. In court it is always your word against theirs. Once you get that far, you are a goner. So I try every trick that I can not to end up in court. Your instincts are your best weapon. If a girl is not willing to get in the car - I drive off. If she hesitates when asked to lift her bra and give up a free feel - I say, my mistake I thought you were somebody else, please get out. I always drive away from the initial pick-up spot before starting my conversation. Talk about money only after you are sure your have done everything possible to determine that she is not LE. Try and let her bring up the subject of sex and money. Ask her, "How do I know you are not a cop, can you prove to me some how that you are not? " Do not pass on any money until she has preformed a act in good faith. Check the area out first, for LE staked out around the corners. Check for regular SW traffic (LE will normally chase away the regulars before operating a sting with female decoys). And my first rule of thumb is: If it looks to good to be true, it probably is not true.

There is no 100% fool proof way of determining an decoy. Short of letting you ram your 9inch harden rod up her ass, a decoy can do or say anything she is willing to do to get the bust. After all it's still you word against hers in court.

If your gut feeling is that something seems odd, or not right, pass on her. It is better to miss your dream date with your dream girl, then to end up in front of a judge. Always follow Obiwans' advice, "Use the force Luke. "

CookyJar

[QUOTE=Peter Johnson]I don't understand what you are saying... you have to talk money at some point though, so at what point do you do so?[/QUOTE]

What is there not to understand? You don't talk money...not until you know who you are dealing with and you are clearly safe and away. But even then, even with escorts, I avoid discussions of the sort. I'd go the non-verbal route, more often than not. Verbal can be recorded, actively or passively. Non-verbal can't, unless it was videotaped and a mindreader is present.

There are risks, and there are some dumb chicks who talk money before they ever get in a car. I just shake my head and pull off. Even the good looking ones. Its just not worth the hassle.

But thats just my methods. I am sure, over the years, I've avoided several stings. I'm sure, over the years, I've missed out on many treats. But in the end, my record stays clean, and I've had more than my fairshare overall. So I am quite content.

[QUOTE=Stoner]What is there not to understand? You don't talk money...not until you know who you are dealing with and you are clearly safe and away. But even then, even with escorts, I avoid discussions of the sort. I'd go the non-verbal route, more often than not. Verbal can be recorded, actively or passively. Non-verbal can't, unless it was videotaped and a mindreader is present.[/QUOTE]

Well, now you've answered my question...you do talk money, but only after you are driving away and have done the LE check.

I'm not sure how one would arrive at a mutually agreeable price through completely non-verbal means, so I assume you just try not to say too much and wait until the right time to discuss the price.

Anyway, that's a good bit of advice about just driving off if some chick is discussing price before getting in the car. That sounds like a higher probability that it would be LE.

[QUOTE=Ed Norton]Yes, Peter, we are proud of our women here in Philadelphia and of our chronicler Cookyjar.

But Peter, you need to help us out here. [b]Eight of the ten[/b] pictures our chronicler showed us were of this girl's ass cheeks and asshole. You know, the asshole, or rectum, from which people take a shit. As you know, those holes smell pretty bad and in fact are the body part that most people use to insult other people. In other words, as the photos well show, they're a disgusting place that people wipe daily but don't really need to look at for sexual purposes.

Peter, in your post you showed your appreciation of the face and titties of this woman, which are natural sexual attractants. So your opinion of the asshole pictures will be valuable to other readers here:

• Do you think that showing off a woman's ass and shithole helps men find women for sex?
• Do you agree that a person posting a picture of an asshole is in no way attracted to assholes in general, for example those of his own sex?

Please answer YES to both questions. Otherwise we could be in danger violating forum principles, and we would lose a widely acclaimed contributer to our forum here in the City of, um, Brotherly Love.[/QUOTE]CJ may have posted some unappealing picutres here, but THAT is not one of them. That girl looks pretty good, from ALL angles, including from the back. Are you implying that looking at a woman's ass means that a man has some kind of latent homosexual issues? If so, most of us on this forum must be gay. Yeah, she could be trimmed up a little, but generally, she is a fairly good looking woman. I like women, I like all three holes, and everything else about them. Maybe those who have some kind of fears or anxiety in this area are the ones with, um, issues.

I remember talking to a guy years ago, who was telling me that women's vaginas were, in a word, ugly. That they did not look appealing. I did not argue with the guy at the time but I was thinking to myself---- well, maybe that is your opinion. they are not ugly to me.

I like the look of pussies, and women's assholes, and faces. and breasts, and hands, and feet, and hair, and ears, well, you get the point. Did I say assholes?