Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

Damn! I like this one too. What can I say? There is something about pendulous titties hanging in front of me that is a big turn-on!

Personally I think a cock in the mouth whether it is your or mine adds to the beauty and sensuality of the ladies.

Keep up the good work SuperE.

Thanks to Street we added Jennifer (standing in her jeans) to the current line-up of Brooke (reddish hair),"Christina Ricci" Nicole (she should be pretty obvious) and Kendra (the blonde).

Street and Rook: did I miss any?

Does anyone else have any further nominations for 2010 to date?

This will definitely be a category for my SW of the Year contest for 2010. Other categories will be announced, as I expect to have a full slate of "candidates." (And you thought the election season was over. LOL) :)

Unaccustomed as I am to issuing praise in this thread, I must compliment Supereloquent on the great montage reproduced below. It shows clear and attractive views of the four "low-ball" SWs, and will make it most helpful to identify them on the street, where they will likely be in a similar pose and attire.

We love many of the other photos too, in moderation, with one exception that I have pretty well beaten the horse on. Time to feed the old nag some oats.

I saw Santa at the mall yesterday. Maybe we rush the season too much these days, and maybe the retail stores need an extra shot in the arm in this recession (was THAT a good analogy to K mongering or WHAT?) But, that, and contemplating low-ballers as a definite category for the contest, got me thinking about the possible structure of my Miss SW of the Year Contest for 2010. Rather than arbitrarily setting down some guidelines, I thought I would begin by incorporating your feedback to my initial design thoughts. You will all likely have different ideas. I can't promise that they all can be accommodated. My decision will be final. However, I do desire your input if you have any sincere thoughts on the matter.

First, my thoughts as to groups and categories. You will see that they are somewhat tongue-in-cheek, more risque copies of the Miss America Contest. They are the following:

[b]Specialty Groups:[/b]

Low-Ballers
Spinners
Miss Congeniality

[b]The "Swimsuit" Categories:[/b]

Face
Tits
Ass
Pussy
Overall Body

[b]The "Talent" Categories:[/b]

BJ
Fucking
Overall

[b]Overall Miss SW of the Year 2010[/b]

I am keeping the contest categories open until feedback regarding them is closed at midnight, Wednesday, November 24th. After that, voting will be open for the contest. To give you flexibility to include SWs with postings after the opening of the contest, you can change your mind right up until the end of the contest at midnight, December 31st. You are not obligated to vote for any particular category or categories. If all you want to do is vote for the best tits or the best overall SW, that is up to you. Votes in any category will help me to make final decisions on the overall winner in case of a very close vote or tie. Winning in any group or category does not preclude that a SW could not be the overall winner (for example, the best spinner could also be the overall winner). YOUR criteria apply in any selections. If you are an ass man and you think that takes precedence in your considerations for the overall winner, then so be it. Since it is unlikely that voters have experienced the performances of any or all of the SWs, reliance upon reports of their performance is both necessary and acceptable.

All of the SWs that I have reported on with pics during 2010 in the Philly and Camden areas are automatically nominated for the contest. Other SWs with pics posted in Philly and Camden during 2010 may be nominated, subject to my approval. This obviously excludes certain considerations for reasons of Administrative regulation. Don't shoot the messenger on this one.

I look forward to your feedback and to having a fun contest from Thanksgiving through year end.

[QUOTE=Member #1759;1088400]Personally I think a cock in the mouth whether it is your or mine adds to the beauty and sensuality of the ladies.[/QUOTE]That commercial on TV is funny in which an appraiser is examining a 'bird in the hand" and telling the owner it is definitely worth "two in the bush."

Some on here hate cock-pics and some love them. Some hate the posting of many pics and some say the more the merrier.

I am neither looking for popularity or to piss anyone off (well, one exception would be the whiners: to post the pics they complain about in even greater volume IS deliberate, just so the whiners realize how effective complaining about it REALLY is). I do what I do because I decide to do it. I have tried to make it less tedious for the viewers here by posting pics in batches of 10, and showing them in a large collage format so they can see what they look like before opening the pic icons. That has been very well received if one looks at the number of pic views as a measure of its success, compared to my previous approach of batching the pics in groups of 20-60, or more. I have also revised my pic postings to include a wider variety of types and angles of pics within each grouping of 10 that I post. This has also been very well received judging by the pic views. I made both of these adjustments after some members here had well-reasoned discussions with me about it. I am certainly not above adjusting my behavior to accommodate intelligent suggestions.

[QUOTE=Member #1759]Keep up the good work SuperE.[/QUOTE]Thank you for your support.

[QUOTE= Street Steve]It is good for us to post those SW's that are merely acceptable, and maybe a little under that. It takes some guts. Guys need to know it is ok to pick up a SW that is NOT a Gem- that on some days a plain jane may be the girl for you. Truthfully I always felt sorry for those Guys that can only get off with a Gem. They are missing out. A plain jane can be fun, and have her own kind of heat.[/QUOTE]A GEM to some mongers is a SW who looks good. Looking good is desirable, but I would prefer an average looking girl with a great attitude to a great looking girl with an average attitude. Sex to me is a two-person chemistry that is beyond the mere visual. It is still ideal to have a girl who has good hygiene, an excellent attitude, great performance AND good looks, but I would prefer them in that relative order, given a choice.

[QUOTE=Member #1759; 1088400]Personally I think a cock in the mouth whether it is your or mine adds to the beauty and sensuality of the ladies.

Keep up the good work SuperE. [/QUOTE]I guess cock-pic kibitzers will just never "get it." The more they piss and moan, the more of my cock they are going to see in the mouths of SWs. You appreciate this genre, Member #1759, so you will be the beneficiary of their bitching. Here is a collage of my earliest cock-sucking pics. I literally have THOUSANDS of them, both previously published and not previously published, more than enough to post 10 LARGE pic attachments a DAY here and never run out, not to mention the fact that my ongoing cock-pic taking could keep up that pace INDEFINITELY. I am sure the cock-pic lovers would absolutely love it if the cock-pic haters kept on making an issue of it.

Sorry, Bigtime Monger: others do not possess your sincere rationality on this subject. They need to be taken to the "Woodshed." :)

[QUOTE= Street Steve]SuperE add Jennifer to 10.00 Lowball Lineup. Note this 10.00 for indoor girl. She will do full service for 10.00 with pictures![/QUOTE]IMHO Street is the reigning King of low-balling on the stroll. I am merely his designated pic chronicler. This is his domain. I merely operate in his shadow and serve at his pleasure. My ego is not invested in this arena, and I respect his particular documented expertise in this on the stroll. Rook would be a solid second alternate.

I recently submitted a collage of SWs in the low-ball category. Lest there be any confusion among the mathematically challenged in reference to this category in my SW of the Year Contest, I offer the following re-clarification of exactly what I have previously stated that a low-ball SW is on the K, based on Street's original criteria: it is any date you have for 10 or less, with some leeway given for a few bonus loosies or a drink, etc. I defer to Street for any appropriate future adjustments to this definition, but "low-ball" refers to an absolute and not a relative target. Regardless what a girl "usually" gets (or says she gets, which is one of the great SW lies), a low-ball SW is one with a documented date at the target low-ball price of 10 (or below, with acceptable leeway), and a published pic.

I hope that clears the air on this matter. It is pretty simple and straight-forward, and doesn't require further muddying of the water. I may have promulgated this initial ruling as far as my contest is concerned, but Street is the final authority and arbiter of any disputes as to what SW is or isn't a "low-baller" in my contest, and in any further admissions to my official Low-Ballers Hall of Fame. If someone else wants to have his own set of definitions, proclaim himself the King of this domain, and reinvent low-ball math, then go for it. :)

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1088681]I guess cock-pic kibitzers will just never "get it." The more they piss and moan, the more of my cock they are going to see in the mouths of SWs. You appreciate this genre, Member #1759, so you will be the beneficiary of their bitching. Here is a collage of my earliest cock-sucking pics. I literally have THOUSANDS of them, both previously published and not previously published, more than enough to post 10 LARGE pic attachments a DAY here and never run out, not to mention the fact that my ongoing cock-pic taking could keep up that pace INDEFINITELY. I am sure the cock-pic lovers would absolutely love it if the cock-pic haters kept on making an issue of it.

Sorry, Bigtime Monger: others do not possess your sincere rationality on this subject. They need to be taken to the "Woodshed.". [/QUOTE]SE:

These shots are surpassed only by the money shots. I vote for an endless supply of both. Keep it and us up!

[QUOTE=Dripper; 1088707]SE:

These shots are surpassed only by the money shots. I vote for an endless supply of both. Keep it and us up! [/QUOTE]Ask and you shall receive; complain and you shall receive; just MENTION cock-sucking pics and you shall receive. Is that clear enough for you cock-pic haters?

Keep up with the pictures! They make my day! Rocket Dork Chicago

[QUOTE=Rocket Dork;1088884]Keep up with the pictures! They make my day! Rocket Dork Chicago[/QUOTE]Another Clint Eastwood fan. I love it!

The cock-pic whiners' complaints are to your benefit. I already made this very clear: the more they bi*tch and moan, over-exaggerate and throw rocks on this subject, the more cock-sucking pics they (and you for collateral enjoyment) will get. A different version of the first cock-pic reprise I published as a collage is attached below. To follow are some close-ups of the first of this series of cock-sucking collages that I presented.

I have DOZENS of EACH of these individual pics to show close-up. And, do the math; I have dated over 150 SWs in the past two years, most of whom I have taken 20-30, and often a LOT more cock sucking pics each. Plus, I have dated many of these SWs multiple times. I haven't counted all my cock sucking pics, but let's just say, technically, that there are oodles, LOL

So, those who are clueless about cock pics had best either shut the fuck up or tune to another channel, because there is a lot more where this came from. Rocket Dork would be only happy to have his day made, so in case you didn't comprehend my last statement about this,"Go ahead, make my day."

Here is a MILF-suck from early on in my pic taking publishing adventures. You will see that I hadn't yet perfected a great way to reduce the glare from close-up flash photography at that point, but I finally figured it out.

"Sleepyhead Carol" didn't open her eyes during our entire date, but when she got actually into sucking mode she was AWESOME!

Another MILF with sucking ability. One of the things I found very arousing about Deb was her high-pitched voice and willingness and ability to talk FILTHY DIRTY!

A sweet, cute, young BBW with a mouth like a HOOVER!

There are several reasons I would strongly recommend not dating this SW (read the reports in my index), but she could suck you dry when she felt like it.

Sweet, pretty, fuckable young Kitty. With a great sucking technique, [url]Yeeeeeehawwwww[/url]!

A young spinner who could DT. YEAH!

Great FS experience!

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1089033]Great FS experience![/QUOTE]I would say she was the best experience I had yet in Philly, Next would be Stacy from Old York Road.

The most lopsided college score in American football history was a game played on October 7,1916, between the Georgia Tech Engineers and the Cumberland College Bulldogs. Georgia Tech was victorious 222–0. The coach for Georgia Tech for that game was the legendary John Heisman, for whom the trophy is named for the annual outstanding college football player.

There seem to be several theories as to why the score was run up like that, but the most basic and simple answer is that Georgia Tech had the power and motivation to do it.

The cock-sucking pic haters can't seem to shut the fuck up, so they are about to get my entire collection dumped on them. The score will not be 222 to 0. No, it will be far worse, maybe as terrible as 5000 to whatever. Cock- sucking pic fans will cheer and the cock-sucking pic clueless will just have to suffer the drubbing, and / or look away in defeat.

So, have your say cock-pic haters, falsely accuse me and call me names, tell me how cock-sucking pics don't belong here, how you hate to see my dick in a pic in a SW's mouth, how "small" my cock is (ROFLMFAO), how my cock spoils the view of a SW's face... WHATEVER! All this will just make me want to further run up the score. I can run a very high-powered offense. I am capable of making it 10,000 to one, if you like. Higher than that? Sure, you bet. There is no mercy; there is no second or third string to give you a rest.

You can all just quietly go away; just leave the field and vacate the stadium. But my bet is that there will always be a few of you who don't "get it," and just can't resist thinking that you have a viable defense. I have an almost infinite capacity to run up the score on you. If that's what you want, I most surely will oblige.

[blue]Greetings Everyone,

I recently cleaned up this thread by deleting a number of off-topic and otherwise worthless posts by [B][U]Grosse Pointe[/U][/B] aka [B][U]Dark Tucson[/U][/B] aka [B][U]Your Mother[/U][/B] aka [B][U]Jermaine [/U][/B]aka [B][U]Flanders[/U][/B], as well as a number responses made by other forum members to these deleted posts.

In addition, [B][U]Grosse Pointe[/U][/B] aka [B][U]Dark Tucson[/U][/B] aka [B][U]Your Mother[/U][/B] aka [B][U]Jermaine [/U][/B]aka [B][U]Flanders[/U][/B] have been erased and banned from the forum, and all IP addresses used by him have been recorded in my "Troublemaker's Database" for identification of future aliases.

I'm fucking sick and tired of the one lone asshole who continues to surreptitiously infest the forum for the sole purpose of relentlessly attacking both CookyJar and Supereloquent in pursuit of his own personal agenda, and so I have a new, easy to administer criteria for banning members in this thread: It's real simple: Criticize CookyJar and/or Supereloquent and you will be banned immediately.

Thanks,

Jackson[/blue]

I see that Bigtime Monger thinks that complaining about cock-pics is in accordance with anti-spamming rules. I recommend that you read what constitutes "spamming:"

Spam is the use of electronic messaging systems to send unsolicited bulk ADVERTISING messages.

Just because someone posts a lot of pics doesn't make it spam. Just because you don't care for the pics that someone posts doesn't make it spam either. By those measures we could eliminate every major pic poster on this Board. If you want to complain about something, complain about REAL spam: all those pics that are constantly re-posted here from CL or BP and all those same, old, repeat pics that are regularly re-posted from advertising escorts like Irishlass39, Dixie Haynes, etc, or all those commercial pics that seem to constantly show up from the Honolulu Forum.

If my cock pics are "spam" and objectionable, then what about the dozens and dozens and dozens of pics posted by certain parties when the girl is just fucking ugly or shows multiple shots of her asshole or whatever? What about when the poster can't even remember her fucking name? : a lot of good that does in positively identifying her. What about the hundreds of street shots which are long-range and out of focus and without names or usefulness in actually identifying a SW? What about people who post dozens of useless "joke" pics? Faceless pics? Series of basically the same angle and subject stills from videos? Are you going to censor every single pic on here just because you don't like it, or it isn't useful? Then you may as well not allow pic posting at all.

I was going to reply, Street, but I knew you deserved the first shot, and could well defend yourself.

[QUOTE= Street Steve]This is going to be fun.[/QUOTE]I was thinking the very same thing.

[QUOTE= Gareth]It's bad enough that I troll in bad neighborhoods looking for women[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE= Street Steve]Sorry it is not my fault that women in good neighborhoods don't want you. I would not be a bit surprised if women in bad neighborhoods don't want you. Blame your Parents; I know I do.[/QUOTE]War whooping here, Street! [url]Yeeeeehawwww[/url]!

[QUOTE= Gareth]women driven by fate to sell themselves[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE= Street Steve]Oh sure, they only stuck that needle in their arm at gunpoint. It is such a sad story. Before they were kidnapped by Sex Traffickers, they were pursuing a career in early childhood education.[/QUOTE]Yeah, that "fate" thing really tugged at my heartstrings. LOL.

[QUOTE= Gareth]God help me[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE= Street Steve]Oh you need help alright, and I hope you get it soon.[/QUOTE]Street and I are starting a prayer group for SWs and mongers which will meet every Sunday evening. Want to join? :)

Time to get back on track after getting rid of the serial antagonists:

Niki clothed, topless, sucking my cock

Collage of the latest posted set of Niki's pics.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1089187]I was going to reply, Street, but I knew you deserved the first shot, and could well defend yourself [/QUOTE][QUOTE=Street Steve;1089149]This is going to be fun[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1089187]I was thinking the very same thing. [/QUOTE]It is life on the Pro Tour Pal. You know it.

Street

My favorite from the last set of 10 pics posted.

Well said and well done Jackson. A big thanks too.

[QUOTE=Admin; 1089133][blue]Greetings Everyone,

I recently cleaned up this thread by deleting a number of off-topic and otherwise worthless posts by [B][U]Grosse Pointe[/U][/B] Aka [B][U]Dark Tucson[/U][/B] Aka [B][U]Your Mother[/U][/B] Aka [B][U]Jermaine [/U][/B]aka [B][U]Flanders[/U][/B], as well as a number responses made by other forum members to these deleted posts.

In addition, [B][U]Grosse Pointe[/U][/B] Aka [B][U]Dark Tucson[/U][/B] Aka [B][U]Your Mother[/U][/B] Aka [B][U]Jermaine [/U][/B]aka [B][U]Flanders[/U][/B] Have been erased and banned from the forum, and all IP addresses used by him have been recorded in my "Troublemaker's Database" for identification of future aliases.

I'm fucking sick and tired of the one lone asshole who continues to surreptitiously infest the forum for the sole purpose of relentlessly attacking both CookyJar and Supereloquent in pursuit of his own personal agenda, and so I have a new, easy to administer criteria for banning members in this thread: It's real simple: Criticize CookyJar and / or Supereloquent and you will be banned immediately.

Thanks,

Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1088282]Damn! I like this one too. What can I say? There is something about pendulous titties hanging in front of me that is a big turn-on![/QUOTE]Great pic! I love tits of all sizes, but "Pendulous titties" are a favorite of mine as well! I love it when the girl rides me and her tits flop about in all directions, slapping me in the face even. That is the kind of abuse a girl can give me all day long, LOL!

[QUOTE=Fbtom]Great pic! I love tits of all sizes, but "Pendulous titties" are a favorite of mine as well! I love it when the girl rides me and her tits flop about in all directions, slapping me in the face even. That is the kind of abuse a girl can give me all day long, LOL![/QUOTE]

I never thought of myself as a man enamored with a particular body part (well, maybe except for asses, I DO love a well formed ass), LOL, but I like many different types of titties: big, small, perky. Most work for me, except saggy. I can't say that I enjoy flopping tits slapping me in the face, but watching pendulous titties as a girl sucks you off, or bouncing all around in the CG position IS something to be savored.

[QUOTE=Runner8;1089253]Well said and well done Jackson. A big thanks too.[/QUOTE]Some people didn't get the memo. Bigtime Monger, a multiple-time critic and one-time praiser of both me and my pics, has now taken it upon himself not only to object to my cock-pics, but to direct others in a step-by-step instruction-manual complaint campaign against my pics as "spam."

In my "222 to 0" post I was making a simple point: complain about cock-sucking pics and you will get a lot more of them. This was precisely the same attitude that once persisted in college football. Today, there is a more congenial atmosphere of sportsmanship. Firebrands with big mouths once fueled the desire to run roughshod over weaker teams. If a team had the power, the big-mouths for the opposition created the motivation. I think that would happen today, too. You sometimes see a big-mouth on TV before a game being a reason his team gets buried on the field in the subsequent game. The few, egregious, false accusation-throwing, name-calling complainers (who apparently were the same person) are now gone and banned, and have given me no reason to "run up the score." However, now Bigtime Monger has elected to take the fight underground, and others continue to mouth-off on the issue. IMHO there are FAR worse pic situations to "complain" about on here than cock-sucking pics. This complaining, to me, seems far more about personal agendas with me. Otherwise, why wouldn't the complainers be specifically directing their remarks to others who post these same types of pics?

At least I clearly identify the SWs in my reports. I give you a name, provide a detailed report of the encounter and a number of pics. I even provide a standardized rating system, and an index to find my reports and pics, by stroll and by year, and alphabetically by SW name. Whether I post "too many" pics seems to be a matter for individual interpretation. Some think one pic for ID is plenty. Others profess that they can't get enough. But, I would contend my reports and pics are a lot better than much of what is posted on this website.

There are many pics posted here that give you relatively little, if any, information regarding the stated purpose of this Forum: to find women for sex. To complain about situations where "too much" information is provided seems counter-productive. If you want to attack something, attack the advertising-escort spam, the commercial-pic spam, tiny pic dimensions, street recon shots with no ID or reporting value, the overload of joke pics and any number of other pics and reports which are relatively useless in finding a woman for sex.

This is simple: if you can be a good sport then I can be a good sport. If you want to provoke me into running up the score, I can do that too. I prefer to be a good sport. I have changed my habit of posting 20 or more cock-sucking pics at a time. I try to mix the types and variety of my pics now in sets of 10. If I am going to post a set of 10 cock-sucking pics, I have at least attempted to make them of different SWs and not the same one over and over. I am not totally insensitive to what seems to be more popular and accepted, which one can somewhat glean from the number of pic views in the gallery.

Let's both be good sports.

[QUOTE=Socalcasualguy; 1089651]Even though I'm a newbie on this board I thought I'd post my opinion:

I agree.

As the Great Rodney King once said:" Can't we all just get along?". [/QUOTE]There is a wonderful short story called "A Mild Attack of Locusts," that is often used in anthologies as an example of the way a short story should be written. The title is obvious to most as a classic use of irony. It could describe the differing points of view on here between the attacker and the person being attacked.

The same motivation had existed here for members to lay off attacking that existed for the LA police to do so prior to the Rodney King incident. Many apparently felt a need to attack just because they could, or for whatever other reasons motivated them. Rarely could one perceive that an attacker's motives were pure and not without some personal agenda. Sometimes it takes "A Mild Attack of Locusts" for the rule makers to make it clear in no uncertain terms that there shall be no more such attacks.

Even after it has been made clear there shall be no more attacks or criticism, a member is already testing the boundaries of that by saying I am in my 60s? (I haven't decided yet if that is just funny or complete flattery). Previously he said I was 65. His understanding has become more vague, and apparently he knows more about me than I do? I looked at his past "contributions," such as they were, and it is the typical, nonsensical, tripe that provides ZERO information on how to find a girl for sex. So, it only stands to reason that his continued "contributions" would be equally useless. That seems to be a standard MO for a rock thrower, just as a standard MO for pic critics seems to include that they rarely have contributed many, if any pics. I am not saying that one needs to be a good contributor in order to have an opinion. In fact, those very people seem most likely to be the ones with big mouths. So perhaps it is a basic requirement and certainly an expectation.

I thought I made myself very clear on this subject: you stop opening up your big mouth before the game, and I won't run up the score. Apparently some people just can't let a sleeping dog lie, even when it comes to left- handing me as opposed to frontal assault. OK, no skin off my nose. At least I will try to make it interesting. The last postings of individual cock-sucking pics got some pretty good pic view numbers. So, while some of you continue to think that ongoing criticism of this will be effective, there are many more who will benefit from seeing more cock-sucking pics.

Here is a different version of the second cock-sucking pic collage I recently posted, with individual pics of every girl in the collage to follow.

Enjoy!

Always a delightful FS date.

A fun spinner; she couldn't quite DT but very enthusiastic.

Used to be a great date, but recent reports indicate spotty performance.

Terrific all-around FS