Printable View
[QUOTE=JvMan;2202832]Heard she has given up the massage job for a boyfriend to help take care of her 4 kids. I do miss her. She was special. And very nice.[/QUOTE]Missed my chance to write down her number before her post was taken down. Does anyone have Rachel's digits?
I actually saw her new website just the other day. For the life of me, I cannot find it now, but I think she's calling it "3 Doves Massage". Her and I had a falling out, so I cannot confirm her current level of service.
[QUOTE=JvMan;2202832]Heard she has given up the massage job for a boyfriend to help take care of her 4 kids. I do miss her. She was special. And very nice.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WiNiteOwl;2203171]I actually saw her new website just the other day. For the life of me, I cannot find it now, but I think she's calling it "3 Doves Massage". Her and I had a falling out, so I cannot confirm her current level of service.[/QUOTE][URL]http://3dovesmassage.blog spot.com/?m=0[/URL]
You'll have to delete the space between "blog" and "spot". Url wouldn't post properly without it.
Responded to this ad on CL: [URL]http://milwaukee.craigslist.org/crs/4648671434.html[/URL].
Actually heard back from whoever posted it. Money was never discussed. We emailed back and forth a few times. Told her I was looking for kissing, uncovered oral and covered F. S. Asked her what her preferences were. She responded with massage, threesome and oral. I asked if she swallowed or at least did cum in mouth and if she stripped naked for the massage. She responded she didn't swallow, didn't like cum in her mouth and naked would cost extra. At that point I told her sorry, we wouldn't be doing any business. At some point in the conversation, she sent a pic after I requested one. Once I was able to drop it into Google Images, I got about 50 different hits.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]341184[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=BadAzMofo;2203186][URL]http://3dovesmassage.blog spot.com/?m=0[/URL]
You'll have to delete the space between "blog" and "spot". Url wouldn't post properly without it.[/QUOTE]Hahah. She pops up on okcupid all the time for me.
I finally visited a lady who has been discussed at length on here. Was an ok time, pretty much as described in previous reviews. Big downside for me was that she is one and done from daty. But the point of this posting is that anyone on here who thinks this is some top secret site is a little off base, at least for any provider that has been to more than one rodeo. Anyhow, this lady is very sweet and we chatted for quite a while after the performance. The subject of reviews came up and I asked her if she wanted me to post a review on here. She said no because "too many creeps. " She said a posting on The other review site was ok. I don't know why she would think people don't check both sites, but the comment she made intrigued me. She said that there are a number of providers who maintain a "blacklist" of clients they won't see. Anyone ever heard of such a thing?
[QUOTE=OlderFunGuy;2210678]She said that there are a number of providers who maintain a "blacklist" of clients they won't see. Anyone ever heard of such a thing?[/QUOTE]Sure have. It's the opposite of the whitelist that you would want to be on where in you're considered someone a girl would want to see. There are forums for these ladies that we're not allowed access to. Not unless you want to pretend you're a woman that is, LOL.
Look at it as ANOTHER good reason to be a gentleman with the women you see. Wherever you are.
I know at work, all the women talk and know who the assholes are, who packs what in their shorts, who PE's etc, etc. I was talking to a lady who had all kind of details about a guy at work she had never even seen. Women talk just like men do.
IMO we should have both blacklist and whitelist forums as well, to verify women worth avoiding and to elevate those worth seeing. Wouldn't THAT be nice?
I know a few women I'd like to put on the whitelist and one or two that definitely deserve to be blacklisted.
[QUOTE=OlderFunGuy;2210678]I finally visited a lady who has been discussed at length on here. Was an ok time, pretty much as described in previous reviews. Big downside for me was that she is one and done from daty. But the point of this posting is that anyone on here who thinks this is some top secret site is a little off base, at least for any provider that has been to more than one rodeo. Anyhow, this lady is very sweet and we chatted for quite a while after the performance. The subject of reviews came up and I asked her if she wanted me to post a review on here. She said no because "too many creeps. " She said a posting on The other review site was ok. I don't know why she would think people don't check both sites, but the comment she made intrigued me. She said that there are a number of providers who maintain a "blacklist" of clients they won't see. Anyone ever heard of such a thing?[/QUOTE]Yes its very common and there are many reasons why providers will blacklist you.
Some of the reasons include:
Too rough / bad experience.
Too cheap, short change them, constantly trying to get a better price, or flat out rip them off.
Bad Hygiene.
Constantly calling or texting.
Heck they will even black list you if they get a bad vibe or feeling from you aka the creeper factor.
Its a fairly common practice.
Just curious, who was it? I have found that senior members from this site are as dependable and respectful as any people I meet elsewhere. Maybe even more so because we realize the value of high-quality ladies and treat them right. I wonder who the creeps are?
S.
[QUOTE=OlderFunGuy;2210678]I finally visited a lady who has been discussed at length on here. Was an ok time, pretty much as described in previous reviews. Big downside for me was that she is one and done from daty. But the point of this posting is that anyone on here who thinks this is some top secret site is a little off base, at least for any provider that has been to more than one rodeo. Anyhow, this lady is very sweet and we chatted for quite a while after the performance. The subject of reviews came up and I asked her if she wanted me to post a review on here. She said no because "too many creeps. " She said a posting on The other review site was ok. I don't know why she would think people don't check both sites, but the comment she made intrigued me. She said that there are a number of providers who maintain a "blacklist" of clients they won't see. Anyone ever heard of such a thing?[/QUOTE]
In the past week, I overdosed on stripclubs, escorts, & sidewalk hostesses so I decided to relax a little and give a Chinese massage a try. Saw this ad on Craigslist. Price looked good and the I was going to be in the neighborhood so decided to give Sophia a try.
Turns out the location is a rather new, large private home so you definitely need to call first for an appointment. I was met at the door by Sophia who was fairly good looking and had a nice set of DDs. But, she was dressed very conservatively (slacks and a long sleeve sweater). There is no table shower so I was glad I had showered at the gym before arriving. I didn't see anyone else in the house but I'm sure there were others behind closed doors.
The massage was very good. On the flip, she made sure little Sam was covered and throughout the remainder of the massage, she avoided touching it. When I suggested she finish the job, she said she wasn't permitted. The one hour massage lasted 80 minutes and overall I was satisfied. The girl was nice-looking, friendly and certainly didn't rush anything. Her English was limited so there wasn't much conversation. I'm sure I'll repeat.
[URL]http://milwaukee.craigslist.org/thp/4665882244.html[/URL]
Iceman.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]douchebaggery[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]