Why are you guys giving mediocre talent that can't host 600+? They will take much less. At least try opening with 200 or 300. 😆.
Printable View
Why are you guys giving mediocre talent that can't host 600+? They will take much less. At least try opening with 200 or 300. 😆.
Has anyone seen this one? Wants 400. Open to anal.
I think she might only speak Portuguese as one of the texts I got was Portuguese so I'm assuming she is translating the others.
The whole thing makes me wonder if there an handler involved. I haven't encountered that yet on seeking.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d3a91311-4fb0-4521-b807-70c73287401c[/URL]
I have encountered a few Latinas with handlers on Seeking. I am learning to weed them out though.
[QUOTE=MarkPowers;6909928]Has anyone seen this one? Wants 400. Open to anal.
I think she might only speak Portuguese as one of the texts I got was Portuguese so I'm assuming she is translating the others.
The whole thing makes me wonder if there an handler involved. I haven't encountered that yet on seeking.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d3a91311-4fb0-4521-b807-70c73287401c[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MarkPowers;6907846]Why are you guys giving mediocre talent that can't host 600+? They will take much less. At least try opening with 200 or 300. 😆.[/QUOTE]I guess some guys pay out of desperation. Personally I have never paid anyone more than 500.500 is top tier, student / professional with a great personality.
I met with an international student yesterday for a drink, mid-20's with a slender build. We hit it off immediately, had a great conversation, and I asked about her expectations. She was hesitant to name a price and eventually mentioned 500. I countered with 300, and she instantly agreed. Off we go and we were under the sheets in no time. I bet someone else would have paid her 600 or 700—she's definitely worth it. Some women aren't just focused on the money. If she likes you, money is just an added benefit to her. Genuine sugar babies prioritize safety, connection more than the ppm.
You nailed it bro!
[QUOTE=FriendlyKing;6909965]Some women aren't just focused on the money. If she likes you, money is just an added benefit to her. Genuine sugar babies prioritize safety, connection more than the ppm.[/QUOTE]
I've seen the 3rd picture on skip / ero so yes your talking to the handler. They know traditional is over.
[QUOTE=MarkPowers;6909928]Has anyone seen this one? Wants 400. Open to anal.
I think she might only speak Portuguese as one of the texts I got was Portuguese so I'm assuming she is translating the others.
The whole thing makes me wonder if there an handler involved. I haven't encountered that yet on seeking.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d3a91311-4fb0-4521-b807-70c73287401c[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EuHunter;6910353]I've seen the 3rd picture on skip / ero so yes your talking to the handler. They know traditional is over.[/QUOTE]Thanks. Bummer.
They are def pseudo brazilian agencies on seeking now for sure (a key tell if the girl is based out of Medford / Everett / Woburn); sometimes can be not even the girl in the picture. Happened to me once; she was hot at least when she arrived but it was off putting and she didn't know not 1 word of english (thank you google translate).
I got a woman who asked the following, "what are the $ expectations for when we meet, so there won't be any awkwardness. ".
I provided my lines of $300, and stated that we would get together multiple times per month.
She followed up w / the following statement:
"I normally get $500 w / other arrangements. Going lower feels like it lowers my value and self-worth. That's something I do not want to do. Can you go higher? ".
Now, obviously, we've had lots of discussions on the price trajectory here. I've been away from Seeking, stopped paying for the service for about 12 months, but, was still watching the free version of the site & reading here the past & keeping up with what's been happing. I want to get some insights from as many guys as I can on how to respond to this statement.
Overall, I do not want to contribute to the $500 fallacy. I do want to get some current insights on what others are actually agreeing too.
At the end of the day, the the chick is:
1. Medium Slim.
2. Retail Job.
3. Not a total knockout but pleasing.
4. Seems to fun & outgoing.
5. Seems for the possibility of long-term consistent.
6. Not sure how many of the arrangements she's had, but I question her amount requests, whereas, what happened to those other arrangments? And why aren't they ongoing now?
Any advice would be helpful?
[QUOTE=DreplyNow;6910967]I got a woman who asked the following, "what are the $ expectations for when we meet, so there won't be any awkwardness. ".
I provided my lines of $300, and stated that we would get together multiple times per month.
She followed up w / the following statement:
"I normally get $500 w / other arrangements. Going lower feels like it lowers my value and self-worth. That's something I do not want to do. Can you go higher? ".
Now, obviously, we've had lots of discussions on the price trajectory here. I've been away from Seeking, stopped paying for the service for about 12 months, but, was still watching the free version of the site & reading here the past & keeping up with what's been happing. I want to get some insights from as many guys as I can on how to respond to this statement.
Overall, I do not want to contribute to the $500 fallacy. I do want to get some current insights on what others are actually agreeing too.
At the end of the day, the the chick is:
1. Medium Slim.
2. Retail Job.
3. Not a total knockout but pleasing.
4. Seems to fun & outgoing.
5. Seems for the possibility of long-term consistent.
6. Not sure how many of the arrangements she's had, but I question her amount requests, whereas, what happened to those other arrangments? And why aren't they ongoing now?
Any advice would be helpful?[/QUOTE]I try to stay firm in the 3 to 4 range but do dabble in the 5 IF they are ok with GFE, BBFS, CIP and there's a mutual connection vice transactional. If I wanted transactional or cheaper rates I would seek out a escort with a menu. If conversation is lively aka flirty, about more than just sex and you genuinely like them then why not. What's better a great arrangement you see once a week, twice a month or more often because you pay for dinner or events or a cheap 200 arrangement that you see once a week where you're rushed, half assed experience or not get what you want? But that's my cup of tea and two cents.
[QUOTE=DreplyNow;6910967]I got a woman who asked the following, "what are the $ expectations for when we meet, so there won't be any awkwardness. ".
I provided my lines of $300, and stated that we would get together multiple times per month.
She followed up w / the following statement:
"I normally get $500 w / other arrangements. Going lower feels like it lowers my value and self-worth. That's something I do not want to do. Can you go higher? ".
Now, obviously, we've had lots of discussions on the price trajectory here. I've been away from Seeking, stopped paying for the service for about 12 months, but, was still watching the free version of the site & reading here the past & keeping up with what's been happing. I want to get some insights from as many guys as I can on how to respond to this statement.
Overall, I do not want to contribute to the $500 fallacy. I do want to get some current insights on what others are actually agreeing too.
At the end of the day, the the chick is:
1. Medium Slim.
2. Retail Job.
3. Not a total knockout but pleasing.
4. Seems to fun & outgoing.
5. Seems for the possibility of long-term consistent.
6. Not sure how many of the arrangements she's had, but I question her amount requests, whereas, what happened to those other arrangments? And why aren't they ongoing now?
Any advice would be helpful?[/QUOTE]At the end of the day everyone has to decide what's worth it for them. I've found 500 just feels like too much for me even if I can afford it.
If she's young and nice and pretty than I go up to 400 for the initial meet and try to get it down to 300 after that. It also depends on whether they can host or not and how close they are since that adds value for me.
For me if they won't budge off 500+ then I just say sorry, that’s out of my range. Some will bend some won't.
A report here since I saw her location to Boston yesterday LOL. Well That escalated quickly 🤣. This one is using fake photos and when we did a video call and called her out apparently she gets triple what I offered by 9+ guys day and has a husband. Not sure how that was relevant to the conversation but ok boohoo haha. She's open to BBFS and CIP for 300 though so as long as you don't piss her off enjoy haha. Oh but you'll have to get a room or. Sigh do it in the back of your car 🤦8205;9794;65039;. That should've been my sign to dip when she said we could do that there LOL.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e2b32209-c9a4-4445-9058-411daf0ef267[/URL]
[QUOTE=DreplyNow;6910967]I got a woman who asked the following, "what are the $ expectations for when we meet, so there won't be any awkwardness. ".
I provided my lines of $300, and stated that we would get together multiple times per month.
She followed up w / the following statement:
"I normally get $500 w / other arrangements. Going lower feels like it lowers my value and self-worth. That's something I do not want to do. Can you go higher? ".
Now, obviously, we've had lots of discussions on the price trajectory here. I've been away from Seeking, stopped paying for the service for about 12 months, but, was still watching the free version of the site & reading here the past & keeping up with what's been happing. I want to get some insights from as many guys as I can on how to respond to this statement.
Overall, I do not want to contribute to the $500 fallacy. I do want to get some current insights on what others are actually agreeing too.
At the end of the day, the the chick is:
1. Medium Slim.
2. Retail Job.
3. Not a total knockout but pleasing.
4. Seems to fun & outgoing.
5. Seems for the possibility of long-term consistent.
6. Not sure how many of the arrangements she's had, but I question her amount requests, whereas, what happened to those other arrangments? And why aren't they ongoing now?
Any advice would be helpful?[/QUOTE]Some great advice. Thanks for that at Emv La and at Mark Powers. Some additional points I forgot to mention, based on your responses:
For me, this is how I role with each one that I meet:
1. GFE. I treat all of them that I meat w / the expectation that it must be & expected to be a real GFE experience. I don't want the in-and-out, 1-day experince. The expectation is to focus on a short term or long-term thing.
2. Expectation is there are no time limits. I attempt to deliver an experience, all day events. Yes, I'm offering dinner, drinks, doing things (I. E. A comedy show, or indoors event, etc), I'm also hosting w / the hotel. I tell them all this upfront.
3. Yes, she's young technically. Late 20's.
4. Intimacy: I let it be known there will be a lot of it. I let it be known that where Adults up front, and there's no time like the present to have as much fun as many times as possible. But I never ask for specific like CIP, things like that. I let it be known there aims to be multiple pops, and to do as much as we can w / the time we got.
5. Hosting: I always host. Hotels. Personally, don't want to risk going their house or even my own.
Overall, at Emv La. I see what you're saying. However, I've been in the range of $200 - $300 and getting the GFE w / my overall "event experience methods". I'm trying to NOT having to jump to no $500 even to dabble. My point overall, is not to be stuck on one, but to be economical so that I can get others as well. The goal is to pull off 1 or 2 every couple of weeks. But no way at a rate of $500 per person (not to say the others will be that high -- but, if the game is going towards that. Then we're all screwed.).
At Mark. Yes, it's all about our own decision of course. Overall, I'm trying to get a better gauge of what's REALLY happening on the market. We're all talking the game & providing statements about the "increase" - but the real question is, are we giving into it, or is their a strong push back & the push back is acceptable. That's what I don't know yet, based on readying the comments in the past 6 months. Overall, I'ts all a challenge.
But based on the additional information I provided, would you say things differently now?
[QUOTE=DreplyNow;6911155]Some great advice. Thanks for that at Emv La and at Mark Powers. Some additional points I forgot to mention, based on your responses:
For me, this is how I role with each one that I meet:
1. GFE. I treat all of them that I meat w / the expectation that it must be & expected to be a real GFE experience. I don't want the in-and-out, 1-day experince. The expectation is to focus on a short term or long-term thing.
2. Expectation is there are no time limits. I attempt to deliver an experience, all day events. Yes, I'm offering dinner, drinks, doing things (I. E. A comedy show, or indoors event, etc), I'm also hosting w / the hotel. I tell them all this upfront.
3. Yes, she's young technically. Late 20's.
4. Intimacy: I let it be known there will be a lot of it. I let it be known that where Adults up front, and there's no time like the present to have as much fun as many times as possible. But I never ask for specific like CIP, things like that. I let it be known there aims to be multiple pops, and to do as much as we can w / the time we got.
5. Hosting: I always host. Hotels. Personally, don't want to risk going their house or even my own.
Overall, at Emv La. I see what you're saying. However, I've been in the range of $200 - $300 and getting the GFE w / my overall "event experience methods". I'm trying to NOT having to jump to no $500 even to dabble. My point overall, is not to be stuck on one, but to be economical so that I can get others as well. The goal is to pull off 1 or 2 every couple of weeks. But no way at a rate of $500 per person (not to say the others will be that high -- but, if the game is going towards that. Then we're all screwed.).
At Mark. Yes, it's all about our own decision of course. Overall, I'm trying to get a better gauge of what's REALLY happening on the market. We're all talking the game & providing statements about the "increase" - but the real question is, are we giving into it, or is their a strong push back & the push back is acceptable. That's what I don't know yet, based on readying the comments in the past 6 months. Overall, I'ts all a challenge.
But based on the additional information I provided, would you say things differently now?[/QUOTE]I wouldn't say a different range. I've found mid 20's girls that are pretty and we hang out then go to dinner then hang out again for 300-400. They are out there.
Issue 1: Profiles show Member is "Online", but Active: Days / Months / Weeks Ago.
Question: How can a member profile be "online" and "active" months ago at the same time?
Why this is important:
We're paying for accuracy of information. We're paying to be able to get access to profiles that are real people. We're paying to know whether or not the members profile is actually ONLINE and ACTIVE or not.
It can't be possible that a profile has not been Active for 10 months, and "online" at the same time.
If a person is "online", there's a higher chance of a response. Basically right now, the site is showing that every member profile is "online", giving a false positive, thinking that you have a high chance of getting a response from someone who receives a message, when that member profile hasn't been active for over 2 weeks, 6 months, 10 months, years even.
This needs to be address and fixed. I'm going to be reporting this to Seeking today. I recommend you all do as well and any other issues you find.