Printable View
Did a quick search and found a couple of other Victoria's previously reviewed, but not this one.
Damn, she looks familiar. Probably a stripper as well. Wondering if anyone has any info. Thanks!
[url]http://lexington.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/victorias-with-new-pix-til-midnight-come-get-23/3897374[/url]
[QUOTE=Snoot;1434854]Apparently contempt is not bondable offense. Can't get this gal out. Then again she sees a judge tomorrow hopefully she will be released tomorrow[/QUOTE]Probably in on a bench warrant for Failure To Appear, they won't bond that again until she sees a judge since she didn't appear the first time. Depending on what it was for, she will get sentenced on it tomorrow. Probably get some time.
[QUOTE=Snoot; 1435484]Looks like Joshua S. Local pimp has 3 new gals.
[url]http://lexington.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/devon-new-girl-in-town-23/4035207[/url]
And.
[url]http://lexington.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/you-know-you-want-some-morgan-im-just-1-call-away-20/4033739[/url]
And.
[url]http://lexington.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hey-there-lexington-let-me-show-you-a-good-time-shai-18/4032934[/url]
Josh is doing pretty well for himself. Huh?
Different numbers I know but all pics in the same room and one of the numbers belongs to him. Ads are linked together as well. Maybe alright don't know. Just don't like pimps.[/QUOTE]Snoot,
Thanks for the research. It is a big help for those of us not familiar with the Lexington provider network.
Yurengr (soon to be visiting from Knoxville)
So why do we as customers constantly tolerate bait and switch (pics of one girl- then another shows) last min. Price increases and the general BS we put up with? Easy answer is we are thinking with the wrong heads! Not meaning to pick on anyone in particular but lets take Marie Ashley as an example (constantly advertises as Exotic Brunette, Sexy Latina, etc, etc, etc, at859-608-1386) She uses very nice photos and will even tell you they are her AND recent. First off- I really doubt they are her and if they are they're YEARS old (She states she is 29 but I'd bet she's closer to 39- which is pretty much in line with this whole discussion). The pics are tattoo free yet she has no less than a half dozen tats. Don't get me wrong- she's not ugly BUT she's hardly what is depicted in her ads. She's not the only one guilty of this-I bet most ads are deceptive in one way or another. So why do we put up with it? From now on if what greets me at the door is not much like what was in the ad I'm just going to pass. And I bet if others did the same the BS would subside. Afterall, if you ordered a new Corvette and instead the dealer brought you a used Chevette would you drive it home?