1 photos
Can't fix the duplicate Karen | visit with SSG Yuria #2
Not directly useful to the thread but it is agency related so dropping it here anyway. I tried to fix a duplicate TER profile with Karen as I have done twice before to prevent the whole arguing about them doing it to dodge scores. I went back and forwards with TER for a few days and they weren't budging (image attached). I even agree with part of what the staff said. But the girl outright said her profile was 408197. Then the site put up a second one I told her about 408747. And whoever I got decided that isn't proof they're the same Karen, so all the Nashville reviews are on this second one. To me, even if they were somehow different, the fact that the site links both should have been proof enough of a connection.
If anyone else would like to try and report them as duplicates to see if you get a different staff member feel free but I'm not going to keep risking the debate. It was closed without a followup answer twice and like I said in my other update, visit #2 was just ok so I'm not going to risk a ban for her haha. Just know there is now proof that at least 'some' duplicate profiles out there are not allowed to be fixed.
On the other hand, I did get a second SSG Yuria visit in. It actually broke the recent stigma about second visits being subpar for me, so I was glad and the actual in session details aren't worth repeating. But she did kinda casually let me know someone was a little too rough with her earlier that day. I'm sure it is no one from here but I hope this doesn't become a regular problem because it might make good ones want to skip us. In another way, I think she was happy she was busy that day haha.
Still better for the overall site thread but
[QUOTE=Suede15;7380934]I've been getting 502 errors everytime I tried to come from my laptop. It's on my server side since it works fine on my phone. Actually had to VPN through an LA server since I tried DC and it did the same thing.[/QUOTE]
yes, but (un?)fortunately I was experiencing none of those issues on my laptop (Win 11, Firefox, a version behind) so I can only parrot the things that others have suggested. But for the sake of being more thorough, I went and finally updated to the latest version(142.0) and started the process from the beginning.
So upon entering the site, it did give me the 502 error immediately, but removing the "s" from https continued to keep the site working as before I updated.
However, for a curiosity check, then I popped on my phone (AT&T, Chrome Browser, Android) and am getting the 502 consistently. Even more amusingly, I'm using the wifi from my phone to connect on my laptop. And then I tried it on my laptop in Chrome and had the same issue.
Firefox does already have the setting for "Don’t enable HTTPS-Only Mode" so perhaps that's why. And DNS over HTTPS (Cloudfare) which is something that was set a long time ago and I don't even really recall why lol. Either of these could be the reason I am facing no troubles.
Chrome claims it is off, but removing the s from https remains consistent and it continues to add the s back. Enabling the flag for #unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure also appears to have had no effect. Ultimately, nothing fixed it here as well until I did some VPN rotations (LA was not working with my particular service after 5 retries, Japan worked, and Kansas City worked after about 3 attempts). Turning the VPN off afterwards, it continued to work until I closed and opened a new incognito window where it died again.
I never put the VPN version on my phone but went ahead for completeness, struggled a lot more trying to get a server that would let me through, but it eventually did.
So personally, I would blame the browser. It's trying to protect people from themselves with this security issue. Which for 99% of the world, that's like a good thing. But in this case, it is a pain.
Can we get some real authentic feedbacks? Other than ayaski and ssg burner account
[QUOTE=AceCreamer;7383881]I had some free time today and was torn between seeing Chu or Hana, but I ultimately chose Hana. Compared to an older service queen, I preferred younger, prettier girls.
Hana did not disappoint. Her photos were real but used Japanese studio filters. She looked pretty without makeup. Very petite and thin, her breasts appeared large on her tiny frame. She greeted me with a hug and a kiss, we settled the donation, and went for a quick shower. While waiting for the water to warm up, I stood behind her with my dick between her legs, pumping back and forth while grabbing her breasts. She eventually cleaned my dick, we dried off, and headed back to the room. We both got on the bed, I started making out with her, and then she sucked on my nipples. She went down and gave me a great BBBJ, slow and sensual, with occasional moaning and eye contact. She lubed us both up and climbed on top of me, slowly sliding my dick inside her. I was probably too big for her in that position because she moved very slowly. I suggested we switch to missionary; she grabbed a pillow to place under her, and I slowly entered her tight pussy while making out with her. She handled my dick much better in missionary, with no resistance. Her pussy felt amazing, and I had to slow down to control myself because I could have finished quickly. After slowing it down, I enjoyed a slow and sensual session for about ten minutes, eventually speeding up to finish inside her.
Afterward, we made small talk. She was on tour and planned to leave on September 3rd for other states. I definitely recommend seeing her if you can.[/QUOTE]Still waiting for real feedback for ssg from reputable member so I can make my first appt with ssg but so far I don't see any.