Printable View
[QUOTE=Nachynn;3598003]In the olden days, H or H was a useful board. Then, more and more it became harshly political, with great battles between opposite sides. From there, it descended in use, and I think was one of the reasons it finally died a slow death.
I suggest we not let that happen here. If you wish to have political debates, there are many places to do so.
For here though, can we stay on topic?[/QUOTE]Just focus on pussy and booty period.
[QUOTE=GoodTimes55;3597956]Last I checked we have nuclear power plants that us nuclear fusion and their was this Hiroshima bombing that caused a little damage.[/QUOTE]Your reply shows me 3 things.
1) you infer things that were not said then imply I said something which I did not.
2) you don't know or understand the difference between fusion and fission. You just regurgitate what "they say".
3) you never checked.
Fusion power plants are a technology in development stated time frames to be able to create sustainable reactions able to create useable energy from a fusion reactor is 2030. However the reality is they will not be used wide spread untill every last drop of oil is pumped out of the earth and sold.
[URL]https://www.sciencealert.com/the-uk-has-just-switch-on-its-tokamak-nuclear-fusion-reactor[/URL]
Nuclear fission energy has been produced since 1954. The dangers of radiation are severly over exagerated.
[URL]https://www.libertariannews.org/2012/06/27/man-eats-uranium-drinks-and-swims-in-reactor-water-ignites-plutonium-in-his-bare-hand/[/URL]
Galan Winsor got me started on the nuke scam many years ago. His credentials are not refuted.
Nuclear powerplants are able to safely produce abundent cheap energy. The reason we have nuclear power plants is not to create cheap energy, but to produce isotopes of weapons grade quality to build said nuclear weapons.
My statement was "I don't believe nuclear weapons exist either".
I try not to completely believe anything 100% at face value. In trying to determine whether or not a nuclear explosion is in fact possible I looked for video evidence of a nuclear detonation. 2056 nuclear weapons are reported to have taken place.
[URL]https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nucleartesttally[/URL]
I would think that with 2056 blasts I could find at least one video that dosen't look like it came out of a 1970's godzilla movie or are large conventional explosions. Nuclear blast footages just don't look real. Since testing went to 2016 I would think at least one would look real but video documentation doesn't exist that I can find.
Now google "ground zero hiroshima pics" reinforced concrete structures remain standing at ground zero. In Nagisake concrete buidings remained standing 800 ft from ground zero. Those blasts were 15 kt and 20 kt which should be more then sufficent to flatten any structures.
The only sources saying nukes exist comes from the government. I'm not really finding anything to support government claims. It is easier for me to believe nuclear weapons were a 19 trillon (which is by chance about what our national deficit is) dollar scam pulled on the American public to keep the masses afraid, controlled and poor
What about the radiation of hiroshima nagisake chernyble? Isin't the fallout and radiation supposed to last for hundreds if not thousands of years leaving the areas uninhabitable? But the cities of Hiroshima and Nagisake remain and were rebuilt. the areas around Chernoble the USSR actually brought more people in. wheres the massive cancer and mutations? there are only claims of more thyroid cancer which can be manipulated.
Why are nukes not used? India and Pakistan have had a high historic animosity yet no nukes? Since the partition of British India in 1947 and creation of modern states of India and Pakistan, the two South Asian countries have been involved in four wars, including one undeclared war, and many border skirmishes and military stand-offs. Whats the chance of North Korea setting off a nuke if attacked by the US?(North Korea Iran and Cuba don't have central banks so they are on the hit list as the next US debt states to need central bank loans) Il Jung Sung doesn't seem like a man to hesitate in a deploying a nuke if he is attacked. I guess time will tell.
I don't believe 100% that nukes don't exist, I have also read theories stating nukes can only be detonated at certain places and certain times based on gravitational effects, ley lines and magnetic influences (read this years ago and can't recall the author) what I want to impart is that we aren't being told the truth on many fronts. The truth neds to be sought after not just assumed because of conventional wisdom and what "they say" because they lie.
In response to other comment.
Nachynn no I can't stop sorry.
JohneDrama you picked a good handle for yourself but insults and opinions are very diffrent things I'm sorry If I made you cry.
[QUOTE=ThotSlap;3600611]Your reply shows me 3 things.
1) you infer things that were not said then imply I said something which I did not.
2) you don't know or understand the difference between fusion and fission. You just regurgitate what "they say".
3) you never checked.
Fusion power plants are a technology in development stated time frames to be able to create sustainable reactions able to create useable energy from a fusion reactor is 2030. However the reality is they will not be used wide spread untill every last drop of oil is pumped out of the earth and sold.
[URL]https://www.sciencealert.com/the-uk-has-just-switch-on-its-tokamak-nuclear-fusion-reactor[/URL]
Nuclear fission energy has been produced since 1954. The dangers of radiation are severly over exagerated.
[URL]https://www.libertariannews.org/2012/06/27/man-eats-uranium-drinks-and-swims-in-reactor-water-ignites-plutonium-in-his-bare-hand/[/URL]
Galan Winsor got me started on the nuke scam many years ago. His credentials are not refuted.
Nuclear powerplants are able to safely produce abundent cheap energy. The reason we have nuclear power plants is not to create cheap energy, but to produce isotopes of weapons grade quality to build said nuclear weapons.
My statement was "I don't believe nuclear weapons exist either".
I try not to completely believe anything 100% at face value. In trying to determine whether or not a nuclear explosion is in fact possible I looked for video evidence of a nuclear detonation. 2056 nuclear weapons are reported to have taken place.
[URL]https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nucleartesttally[/URL]
I would think that with 2056 blasts I could find at least one video that dosen't look like it came out of a 1970's godzilla movie or are large conventional explosions. Nuclear blast footages just don't look real. Since testing went to 2016 I would think at least one would look real but video documentation doesn't exist that I can find.
Now google "ground zero hiroshima pics" reinforced concrete structures remain standing at ground zero. In Nagisake concrete buidings remained standing 800 ft from ground zero. Those blasts were 15 kt and 20 kt which should be more then sufficent to flatten any structures.
The only sources saying nukes exist comes from the government. I'm not really finding anything to support government claims. It is easier for me to believe nuclear weapons were a 19 trillon (which is by chance about what our national deficit is) dollar scam pulled on the American public to keep the masses afraid, controlled and poor
What about the radiation of hiroshima nagisake chernyble? Isin't the fallout and radiation supposed to last for hundreds if not thousands of years leaving the areas uninhabitable? But the cities of Hiroshima and Nagisake remain and were rebuilt. the areas around Chernoble the USSR actually brought more people in. wheres the massive cancer and mutations? there are only claims of more thyroid cancer which can be manipulated.
Why are nukes not used? India and Pakistan have had a high historic animosity yet no nukes? Since the partition of British India in 1947 and creation of modern states of India and Pakistan, the two South Asian countries have been involved in four wars, including one undeclared war, and many border skirmishes and military stand-offs. Whats the chance of North Korea setting off a nuke if attacked by the US?(North Korea Iran and Cuba don't have central banks so they are on the hit list as the next US debt states to need central bank loans) Il Jung Sung doesn't seem like a man to hesitate in a deploying a nuke if he is attacked. I guess time will tell.
I don't believe 100% that nukes don't exist, I have also read theories stating nukes can only be detonated at certain places and certain times based on gravitational effects, ley lines and magnetic influences (read this years ago and can't recall the author) what I want to impart is that we aren't being told the truth on many fronts. The truth neds to be sought after not just assumed because of conventional wisdom and what "they say" because they lie.
In response to other comment.
Nachynn no I can't stop sorry.
JohneDrama you picked a good handle for yourself but insults and opinions are very diffrent things I'm sorry If I made you cry.[/QUOTE]I do admit your correct on some points not going to debate fission bomb and fusion reaction (thermonuclear bomb) before I get everyone pissed at me. I do believe you basic ideas how government uses the information to control and get what they want. And I love this site with good pussy information so I best leave it at that.
[QUOTE=ThotSlap;3600611]Your reply shows me 3 things.[/QUOTE]I kinda believe Kendall Snow's p*ssy may be nuclear powered.
1) It generates an intense amount of heat.
2) There's an awful lot of liquid in and around it to contain that heat.
3) It takes a while to clean up Ground Zero after an 'explosion'.
Cheers Gentlemen!
HS.
[QUOTE=HuntingStreets;3600653]I kinda believe Kendall Snow's p*ssy may be nuclear powered.
1) It generates an intense amount of heat.
2) There's an awful lot of liquid in and around it to contain that heat.
3) It takes a while to clean up Ground Zero after an 'explosion'.
Cheers Gentlemen!
HS.[/QUOTE]LOL I am thinking I got to go get me some of that shit.
[QUOTE=HuntingStreets;3600653]I kinda believe Kendall Snow's p*ssy may be nuclear powered.
1) It generates an intense amount of heat.
2) There's an awful lot of liquid in and around it to contain that heat.
3) It takes a while to clean up Ground Zero after an 'explosion'.
Cheers Gentlemen!
HS.[/QUOTE]I can attest to all these being true. It's historic and worthy to be noted.
[QUOTE=Nachynn;3598003]In the olden days, H or H was a useful board. Then, more and more it became harshly political, with great battles between opposite sides. From there, it descended in use, and I think was one of the reasons it finally died a slow death.
I suggest we not let that happen here. If you wish to have political debates, there are many places to do so.
For here though, can we stay on topic?[/QUOTE]THANK YOU. I don't post hardly at all, but I can really do without having to read third-hand Limbaugh crap.
Ok, so this is a little silly guys. Almost every review I have seen has no accompanying link to an add, or other form of identification. You all are aware there are dozens of candys, myas, Sarah's, etc? Let us not take the lazy way out guys. It takes very little effort to put a link in. Thank you guys for reading this.
I was having withdrawals last night and was refreshing the page every half hour or so. Hoping the forums were back up.
[QUOTE=BigMilwaukee;3621366]Ok, so this is a little silly guys. Almost every review I have seen has no accompanying link to an add, or other form of identification. You all are aware there are dozens of candys, myas, Sarah's, etc? Let us not take the lazy way out guys. It takes very little effort to put a link in. Thank you guys for reading this.[/QUOTE]I agree with this! And a then when you ask for link or I'd some member always chews you out "go back to post #Blah. Should have checked you idiot".
And said post is like 13 pages old _.
[QUOTE=BigMilwaukee;3621366]Ok, so this is a little silly guys. Almost every review I have seen has no accompanying link to an add, or other form of identification. You all are aware there are dozens of candys, myas, Sarah's, etc? Let us not take the lazy way out guys. It takes very little effort to put a link in. Thank you guys for reading this.[/QUOTE]Yeah I get what you mean. A lot of girls either have the same name or change their names and it's hard to know who exactly is being talked about unless you are consistently following the thread or something. Also makes it much either to get their contact info. To be honest, it'd be nice if we could post numbers, but it typically blocks it out I think.
Special tx to you morons who keep telling providers about this site. I was getting cozy with one and proceeded to ask her if she liked any kink and she snapped "you should know, don't you read USA sexguide?" Talk about a mood killer.
Trying to look up things and checking all my sources, I have noticed as of late all of the ads linked by "the other site" to ************ URLs are all redirecting to TER search.
I tried a clean browser and found the same thing happening just trying to hit their home page.
[QUOTE=Miltown;3623593]Special tx to you morons who keep telling providers about this site. I was getting cozy with one and proceeded to ask her if she liked any kink and she snapped "you should know, don't you read USA sexguide?" Talk about a mood killer.[/QUOTE]Yeah because no providers know how to use the internet and find this site on their own.
[QUOTE=Mkejoe;3624314]Yeah because no providers know how to use the internet and find this site on their own.[/QUOTE]You miss the point. What exactly does that have to do with it? Then let them find this site on their own. We don't need mongers telling providers what others are saying about them on this site.