Printable View
[QUOTE=BigBibble;5974310]Is 937.303. 1979. The add was suspect and so were the fast answers / low quote.[/QUOTE]Thanks brother! Yea in the sting ads they will take any offer. Thats why you have these dumbasses get arrested and offer 20 bucks LOL. But they end up being smarter then the guys offering $200, because every red cent gets seized and a motion for destruction of evidence gets filed so I suppose better to lose 20 then 200 LMAO.
C92.
[QUOTE=Chunks92;5970698]Nah, hes just a guy, like myself, who gets his news from the docket sheets instead of the mainstream news. Following the docket sheets whenever a high ranking official is arrested is a good practice, you can see what's truly going on in our state's fucked up court system. For example, a prosecutor was arrested and he got heinous disgusting charges reduced in court with no jail time, yet a guy caught in a hooker sting got 60 days for misdemeanors. Its fucked up beyond belief and I implore everyone to start researching stuff you see in the news on court websites.
C92.[/QUOTE]Seems like you made the opposite point you were going for. Cops, prosecutors, electeds, all get away with stuff and people blindly allow it to happen.
[QUOTE=ThirdManAlive;5974466]Seems like you made the opposite point you were going for. Cops, prosecutors, electeds, all get away with stuff and people blindly allow it to happen.[/QUOTE]The point here is the facts of the case. Which don't seem to matter to some. Reading a misleading article that omits important information thankfully is not admissible evidence in a court of law. The facts of the case strongly indicate self defense. The truth came out during the trial, and the truth definitely wasn't what most people wanted to hear.
Sure, Mitchell may be guilty of other crimes. But that has nothing to do with this murder trial. The truth about that stuff will come out later and future trials. How does Mitchell have the money to cover all these legal cases? How many houses does (did?) he own? He's probably had to sell them all by now.
[QUOTE=RayPugh;5975237]The point here is the facts of the case. Which don't seem to matter to some. Reading a misleading article that omits important information thankfully is not admissible evidence in a court of law. The facts of the case strongly indicate self defense. The truth came out during the trial, and the truth definitely wasn't what most people wanted to hear.
Sure, Mitchell may be guilty of other crimes. But that has nothing to do with this murder trial. The truth about that stuff will come out later and future trials. How does Mitchell have the money to cover all these legal cases? How many houses does (did?) he own? He's probably had to sell them all by now.[/QUOTE]Can you point me in the direction of what you read that led you to this conclusion. I disagree, but maybe you read something I failed to find.
Thanks.
[QUOTE=LiveMonger;5976634]Can you point me in the direction of what you read that led you to this conclusion. I disagree, but maybe you read something I failed to find.
Thanks.[/QUOTE][URL]www.fccourts.org[/URL]
[QUOTE=RayPugh;5975237]The point here is the facts of the case. Which don't seem to matter to some. Reading a misleading article that omits important information thankfully is not admissible evidence in a court of law. The facts of the case strongly indicate self defense. The truth came out during the trial, and the truth definitely wasn't what most people wanted to hear.
Sure, Mitchell may be guilty of other crimes. But that has nothing to do with this murder trial. The truth about that stuff will come out later and future trials. How does Mitchell have the money to cover all these legal cases? How many houses does (did?) he own? He's probably had to sell them all by now.[/QUOTE]Good looking out brother, its amazing how much people don't know because it is hidden from us unless we go looking for it. The docket sheets tell all! Far as what he said he is right people allow to get away with it, but that's partially because people don't research just how fucked up the system is in the first place.
[QUOTE=Chunks92;5974330]Thanks brother! Yea in the sting ads they will take any offer. Thats why you have these dumbasses get arrested and offer 20 bucks LOL. But they end up being smarter then the guys offering $200, because every red cent gets seized and a motion for destruction of evidence gets filed so I suppose better to lose 20 then 200 LMAO.
C92.[/QUOTE][URL]https://columbus.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/storm-the-new-girl-in-town/569263406434[/URL]
[QUOTE=BigBibble;5980029][URL]https://columbus.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/storm-the-new-girl-in-town/569263406434[/URL][/QUOTE]Fairly sure that is a scam ad not a sting ad, though Columbus could have downloaded her pictures I suppose is plausible. Its been posted all around the state, here's one from Akron. No Akron good guy stings have occurred since 4/24/21.
[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/storm-the-new-girl-in-town/47041162[/URL]
[QUOTE=BigBibble;5980029][URL]https://columbus.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/storm-the-new-girl-in-town/569263406434[/URL][/QUOTE]What's with you guys lately? What about this ad would indicate that its a cop? And don't give me vague answers. You guys are getting pretty bizarre here.
The only possible red flag in this ad would be the location. Non-specific locations that could work in an any city are either scammers, or the person posting the ad doesn't know what they are doing. Examples of possible locations scammers use include: incall, outcall, your place place or mine, downtown, airport, north, south, east, west, hotel. A real person uses specific locations. For example / Worthington or 161 and 71, or Hollywood Casino. Places specific to the city in which they are posting.
I just texted the ad. The person texting back is not American. So this ad is a scammer, but not a cop.
[QUOTE=RayPugh;5980181]What's with you guys lately? What about this ad would indicate that its a cop? And don't give me vague answers. You guys are getting pretty bizarre here.
The only possible red flag in this ad would be the location. Non-specific locations that could work in an any city are either scammers, or the person posting the ad doesn't know what they are doing. Examples of possible locations scammers use include: incall, outcall, your place place or mine, downtown, airport, north, south, east, west, hotel. A real person uses specific locations. For example / Worthington or 161 and 71, or Hollywood Casino. Places specific to the city in which they are posting.
I just texted the ad. The person texting back is not American. So this ad is a scammer, but not a cop.[/QUOTE]They think you're a cop LOL.
[QUOTE=RayPugh;5980181]What's with you guys lately? What about this ad would indicate that its a cop? And don't give me vague answers. You guys are getting pretty bizarre here.
The only possible red flag in this ad would be the location. Non-specific locations that could work in an any city are either scammers, or the person posting the ad doesn't know what they are doing. Examples of possible locations scammers use include: incall, outcall, your place place or mine, downtown, airport, north, south, east, west, hotel. A real person uses specific locations. For example / Worthington or 161 and 71, or Hollywood Casino. Places specific to the city in which they are posting.
I just texted the ad. The person texting back is not American. So this ad is a scammer, but not a cop.[/QUOTE]Correct, scam not sting. the sting ads are painfully obvious the women in them look like mannequins. Thats how stupid these high ranking officials like councilmen and drug task force chiefs are that show up, not only do they not make sure the escort is real, they show up for an obviously fake person. I'm sure if they applied even less effort into it then they already do and cropped Fabio's face onto a big boobed mannequin and took a picture of it in front of the courtesy inn in Akron (shittiest motel in the state), theyd still have a huge turn out.
[URL]https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/fairfield-county/12-charged-in-fairfield-county-prostitution-sting/?fbclid=IwAR0rSX1yDKhj_dWAjuEhXbKDYWnakjSoQ-ueW0XTN8q2DAqHs3gLGrxuYlg[/URL]
[QUOTE=LiveMonger;5987339][URL]https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/fairfield-county/12-charged-in-fairfield-county-prostitution-sting/?fbclid=IwAR0rSX1yDKhj_dWAjuEhXbKDYWnakjSoQ-ueW0XTN8q2DAqHs3gLGrxuYlg[/URL][/QUOTE]Looks like FCSO suppressed the ads from leaking to sumosear. Was unable to find out where it stemmed from. Haven't researched fairfield county yet, will have to explore their court site and check the arraignments.
[QUOTE=Chunks92;5987703]Looks like FCSO suppressed the ads from leaking to sumosear. Was unable to find out where it stemmed from. Haven't researched fairfield county yet, will have to explore their court site and check the arraignments.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=401211045366788&set=a.242311071256787[/URL]
[QUOTE=Chunks92;5987703]Looks like FCSO suppressed the ads from leaking to sumosear. Was unable to find out where it stemmed from. Haven't researched fairfield county yet, will have to explore their court site and check the arraignments.[/QUOTE]Arraignments now viewable on fairfield municipal case search. May I also say, I greatly respect when they only charge with the prostitution charge and not the bullshit "criminal tools" charge. looks like a pretty typical turnout, bunch of local noobs and of course always a guy from out of state. not too many fared well in the nov 2021 sting in this county that caught 23 guys. we will see what happens.