The "bad" CP shows up again
[QUOTE=Coconut Poke]Silly me, Mythbuster. I should have checked your profile before ragging on you. It turns out you just joined the USG this month, so you're a [b]newbie[/b]! Sorry.
So let me be gentler in my explanation. None of your 61 posts, for example the one above, are reports on streetwalker activity, traits, or location. They are simply commentary on and questions about other people's writing. They don't add to the purpose of this thread, which is to provide information about for men who are looking for sex with female streetwalkers in Philadelphia.[/QUOTE]
I can't complain about your bashing of Mythbuster. Of course, I have him on ignore so the only sight of him I see is when someone like you responds to one of his posts. You are rapidly becoming a candidate for the same fate. Whatever small contributions you make to this forum are vastly outweighed by your constant and intentional picking of fights.
You are one to be accusing others of not adding to "information" in the Streetwalker Reports thread and simply making commentary about other people's writing. That seems to be your main purpose in life.
[QUOTE=Coconut Poke]We have had occasion in the past to honor those who, like you, enjoy talking a lot. We have awarded them their own thread. A big benefit of that is that the frequent and often lengthy responses to their talking, photo montages, contests, and general sex topics can take place apart from the reports in this thread. Thus we don't have to wade through a lot of stuff here that is off-topic or excessive in its presentation.[/QUOTE]
You seem to often read through and comment on the very threads you condemn. Why don't you "wade through" the SW Reports and SW Photos Threads as your [b]sole[/b] basis for information? Could the reason be that 70% of the new reports and pics of SWs on the K (90 plus % of the pics by volume) are contributed by me and most of the rest are contributed by CJ and practically ALL of the pics and reports from Camden are contributed by CJ? If you don't want this "excessive information" then don't fucking read it and/or comment on it! As you freely admitted, the information is in separate threads and very easy for you to simply ignore. But that really isn't your motivation, is it? A blind man could see you a mile off as a big green monster of envy and jealousy, just itching to make trouble.
[QUOTE=Coconut Poke]So, Mythbuster, I have two suggestions for you:
• Get thee to the threads of SE and CJ where you can talk to your heart's content without bothering those who want to scroll through concise and informative streetwalker reports here. You'll notice that the topic you're commenting above has been moved appropriately to the CJ thread.
• Don't come back here to post until you have made a trip to one of the Philadelphia strolls and are willing to report on your experience with streetwalker(s) you saw or picked up.[/QUOTE]
It's so befitting to have a self-appointed editor who desires "concise" SW Reports and Photos. It's also so admirable to see that the self-appointed editor takes his own advice so well. You will be so proud of me Editor-in-Chief CoconutPUKE, that I moved my reply to my own thread. Don't bother responding or you will reveal to all that you actually peruse the prose in my abysmally excessive thread, which you have made clear you avoid in favor of the tightly edited and policed (by you) reports in your threads of choice.
Re: Nicole, "She's my neighbor"
[QUOTE=Pkgman]Nice find,[/QUOTE]OMG Super! That's the Nicole/Nichole I recently picked up and reported on. I am assuming "Nicole" is the right spelling because you usually get that right? She sure does look and act like the girl next door. Great pix! They will remind me of my date with her. You are one lucky SOB to get her digits. She said she didn't have a phone yet when I had her.